From building to territory: the urban industrial heritage in the trajectory of the Condephaat (1968-2018)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rufinoni, Manoela Rossinetti
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: arq.urb
Texto Completo: https://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/26
Resumo: The breadth of the concept of industrial heritage, ratified by the Nizhny Tagil Charter (2003) and the Dublin Principles (2011), highlights the urban and territorial dimension of the testimonies of industrialization as one of the main challenges to be faced by preservation actions. By analyzing a selection of administrative legal processes of the CONDEPHAAT (Council of Defense of the Historical, Archaeological, Artistic and Tourist Heritage of the State of São Paulo, an organ created in 1968), we identified, since the mid-1970s, a gradual perception of this urban dimension in studies focused on the preservation of industrial heritage, despite the difficulties related to the limits of the instrument called “tombamento”, originally intended for the protection of buildings considered in isolation. From the analysis of some administrative legal process of preservation of São Paulo industrial heritage, this article intends to underscore the presence and breadth of mentions to the urban and territorial issue along the CONDEPHAAT trajectory, highlighting the ways of understanding the urban relations inherent to this heritage in each historical period and the possibilities for deepening this debate today.
id USJT_143f5aec1e97c1f4d470ccc733144d15
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/26
network_acronym_str USJT
network_name_str arq.urb
repository_id_str
spelling From building to territory: the urban industrial heritage in the trajectory of the Condephaat (1968-2018)Do edifício ao território: o patrimônio urbano industrial na trajetória do CONDEPHAAT (1968-2018)Patrimônio UrbanoPolíticas de PreservaçãoSão Paulo (Estado)Industrial heritageultural heritage preservation policiesSão Paulo (State)The breadth of the concept of industrial heritage, ratified by the Nizhny Tagil Charter (2003) and the Dublin Principles (2011), highlights the urban and territorial dimension of the testimonies of industrialization as one of the main challenges to be faced by preservation actions. By analyzing a selection of administrative legal processes of the CONDEPHAAT (Council of Defense of the Historical, Archaeological, Artistic and Tourist Heritage of the State of São Paulo, an organ created in 1968), we identified, since the mid-1970s, a gradual perception of this urban dimension in studies focused on the preservation of industrial heritage, despite the difficulties related to the limits of the instrument called “tombamento”, originally intended for the protection of buildings considered in isolation. From the analysis of some administrative legal process of preservation of São Paulo industrial heritage, this article intends to underscore the presence and breadth of mentions to the urban and territorial issue along the CONDEPHAAT trajectory, highlighting the ways of understanding the urban relations inherent to this heritage in each historical period and the possibilities for deepening this debate today.A amplitude do conceito de patrimônio industrial, ratificada pela Carta de Nizhny Tagil (2003) e pelos Princípios de Dublin (2011), evidencia a dimensão urbana e territorial dos testemunhos da industrialização como um dos principais desafios a serem enfrentados pelas ações de preservação. Ao analisar uma seleção de processos de tombamento do CONDEPHAAT (Conselho de Defesa do Patrimônio Histórico, Arqueológico, Artístico e Turístico do Estado de São Paulo, órgão criado em 1968), identificamos, desde meados da década de 1970, uma paulatina percepção dessa dimensão urbana nos estudos voltados à preservação do patrimônio industrial, não obstante as dificuldades relacionadas aos limites do instrumento de tombamento, pensado originalmente para a tutela de edifícios considerados isoladamente. A partir da análise de uma seleção de processos de tombamento de bens industriais paulistas, este artigo pretende destacar a presença e a amplitude das menções à questão urbana e territorial ao longo da trajetória do CONDEPHAAT, evidenciando as formas de entendimento das relações urbanas inerentes ao patrimônio industrial em cada período histórico e as possibilidades de aprofundamento desse debate na atualidade.Universidade São Judas Tadeu – Programa de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Arquitetura e Urbanismo2019-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/2610.37916/arq.urb.vi26.26arq.urb; No. 26 (2019): set. - dez.; 44-60arq.urb; Núm. 26 (2019): set. - dez.; 44-60arq.urb; n. 26 (2019): set. - dez.; 44-601984-5766reponame:arq.urbinstname:Universidade São Judas Tadeuinstacron:USJTporenghttps://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/26/19https://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/26/255Rufinoni, Manoela Rossinetti info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-03-26T19:30:40Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/26Revistahttps://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurbhttps://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/oairevista.arq.urb@saojudas.br||1984-57661984-5766opendoar:2021-03-26T19:30:40arq.urb - Universidade São Judas Tadeufalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv From building to territory: the urban industrial heritage in the trajectory of the Condephaat (1968-2018)
Do edifício ao território: o patrimônio urbano industrial na trajetória do CONDEPHAAT (1968-2018)
title From building to territory: the urban industrial heritage in the trajectory of the Condephaat (1968-2018)
spellingShingle From building to territory: the urban industrial heritage in the trajectory of the Condephaat (1968-2018)
Rufinoni, Manoela Rossinetti
Patrimônio Urbano
Políticas de Preservação
São Paulo (Estado)
Industrial heritage
ultural heritage preservation policies
São Paulo (State)
title_short From building to territory: the urban industrial heritage in the trajectory of the Condephaat (1968-2018)
title_full From building to territory: the urban industrial heritage in the trajectory of the Condephaat (1968-2018)
title_fullStr From building to territory: the urban industrial heritage in the trajectory of the Condephaat (1968-2018)
title_full_unstemmed From building to territory: the urban industrial heritage in the trajectory of the Condephaat (1968-2018)
title_sort From building to territory: the urban industrial heritage in the trajectory of the Condephaat (1968-2018)
author Rufinoni, Manoela Rossinetti
author_facet Rufinoni, Manoela Rossinetti
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rufinoni, Manoela Rossinetti
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Patrimônio Urbano
Políticas de Preservação
São Paulo (Estado)
Industrial heritage
ultural heritage preservation policies
São Paulo (State)
topic Patrimônio Urbano
Políticas de Preservação
São Paulo (Estado)
Industrial heritage
ultural heritage preservation policies
São Paulo (State)
description The breadth of the concept of industrial heritage, ratified by the Nizhny Tagil Charter (2003) and the Dublin Principles (2011), highlights the urban and territorial dimension of the testimonies of industrialization as one of the main challenges to be faced by preservation actions. By analyzing a selection of administrative legal processes of the CONDEPHAAT (Council of Defense of the Historical, Archaeological, Artistic and Tourist Heritage of the State of São Paulo, an organ created in 1968), we identified, since the mid-1970s, a gradual perception of this urban dimension in studies focused on the preservation of industrial heritage, despite the difficulties related to the limits of the instrument called “tombamento”, originally intended for the protection of buildings considered in isolation. From the analysis of some administrative legal process of preservation of São Paulo industrial heritage, this article intends to underscore the presence and breadth of mentions to the urban and territorial issue along the CONDEPHAAT trajectory, highlighting the ways of understanding the urban relations inherent to this heritage in each historical period and the possibilities for deepening this debate today.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/26
10.37916/arq.urb.vi26.26
url https://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/26
identifier_str_mv 10.37916/arq.urb.vi26.26
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/26/19
https://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/26/255
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade São Judas Tadeu – Programa de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Arquitetura e Urbanismo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade São Judas Tadeu – Programa de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Arquitetura e Urbanismo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv arq.urb; No. 26 (2019): set. - dez.; 44-60
arq.urb; Núm. 26 (2019): set. - dez.; 44-60
arq.urb; n. 26 (2019): set. - dez.; 44-60
1984-5766
reponame:arq.urb
instname:Universidade São Judas Tadeu
instacron:USJT
instname_str Universidade São Judas Tadeu
instacron_str USJT
institution USJT
reponame_str arq.urb
collection arq.urb
repository.name.fl_str_mv arq.urb - Universidade São Judas Tadeu
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista.arq.urb@saojudas.br||
_version_ 1797067629166329856