From building to territory: the urban industrial heritage in the trajectory of the Condephaat (1968-2018)
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | arq.urb |
Texto Completo: | https://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/26 |
Resumo: | The breadth of the concept of industrial heritage, ratified by the Nizhny Tagil Charter (2003) and the Dublin Principles (2011), highlights the urban and territorial dimension of the testimonies of industrialization as one of the main challenges to be faced by preservation actions. By analyzing a selection of administrative legal processes of the CONDEPHAAT (Council of Defense of the Historical, Archaeological, Artistic and Tourist Heritage of the State of São Paulo, an organ created in 1968), we identified, since the mid-1970s, a gradual perception of this urban dimension in studies focused on the preservation of industrial heritage, despite the difficulties related to the limits of the instrument called “tombamento”, originally intended for the protection of buildings considered in isolation. From the analysis of some administrative legal process of preservation of São Paulo industrial heritage, this article intends to underscore the presence and breadth of mentions to the urban and territorial issue along the CONDEPHAAT trajectory, highlighting the ways of understanding the urban relations inherent to this heritage in each historical period and the possibilities for deepening this debate today. |
id |
USJT_143f5aec1e97c1f4d470ccc733144d15 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/26 |
network_acronym_str |
USJT |
network_name_str |
arq.urb |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
From building to territory: the urban industrial heritage in the trajectory of the Condephaat (1968-2018)Do edifício ao território: o patrimônio urbano industrial na trajetória do CONDEPHAAT (1968-2018)Patrimônio UrbanoPolíticas de PreservaçãoSão Paulo (Estado)Industrial heritageultural heritage preservation policiesSão Paulo (State)The breadth of the concept of industrial heritage, ratified by the Nizhny Tagil Charter (2003) and the Dublin Principles (2011), highlights the urban and territorial dimension of the testimonies of industrialization as one of the main challenges to be faced by preservation actions. By analyzing a selection of administrative legal processes of the CONDEPHAAT (Council of Defense of the Historical, Archaeological, Artistic and Tourist Heritage of the State of São Paulo, an organ created in 1968), we identified, since the mid-1970s, a gradual perception of this urban dimension in studies focused on the preservation of industrial heritage, despite the difficulties related to the limits of the instrument called “tombamento”, originally intended for the protection of buildings considered in isolation. From the analysis of some administrative legal process of preservation of São Paulo industrial heritage, this article intends to underscore the presence and breadth of mentions to the urban and territorial issue along the CONDEPHAAT trajectory, highlighting the ways of understanding the urban relations inherent to this heritage in each historical period and the possibilities for deepening this debate today.A amplitude do conceito de patrimônio industrial, ratificada pela Carta de Nizhny Tagil (2003) e pelos Princípios de Dublin (2011), evidencia a dimensão urbana e territorial dos testemunhos da industrialização como um dos principais desafios a serem enfrentados pelas ações de preservação. Ao analisar uma seleção de processos de tombamento do CONDEPHAAT (Conselho de Defesa do Patrimônio Histórico, Arqueológico, Artístico e Turístico do Estado de São Paulo, órgão criado em 1968), identificamos, desde meados da década de 1970, uma paulatina percepção dessa dimensão urbana nos estudos voltados à preservação do patrimônio industrial, não obstante as dificuldades relacionadas aos limites do instrumento de tombamento, pensado originalmente para a tutela de edifícios considerados isoladamente. A partir da análise de uma seleção de processos de tombamento de bens industriais paulistas, este artigo pretende destacar a presença e a amplitude das menções à questão urbana e territorial ao longo da trajetória do CONDEPHAAT, evidenciando as formas de entendimento das relações urbanas inerentes ao patrimônio industrial em cada período histórico e as possibilidades de aprofundamento desse debate na atualidade.Universidade São Judas Tadeu – Programa de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Arquitetura e Urbanismo2019-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/2610.37916/arq.urb.vi26.26arq.urb; No. 26 (2019): set. - dez.; 44-60arq.urb; Núm. 26 (2019): set. - dez.; 44-60arq.urb; n. 26 (2019): set. - dez.; 44-601984-5766reponame:arq.urbinstname:Universidade São Judas Tadeuinstacron:USJTporenghttps://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/26/19https://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/26/255Rufinoni, Manoela Rossinetti info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-03-26T19:30:40Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/26Revistahttps://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurbPRIhttps://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/oairevista.arq.urb@saojudas.br||1984-57661984-5766opendoar:2021-03-26T19:30:40arq.urb - Universidade São Judas Tadeufalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
From building to territory: the urban industrial heritage in the trajectory of the Condephaat (1968-2018) Do edifício ao território: o patrimônio urbano industrial na trajetória do CONDEPHAAT (1968-2018) |
title |
From building to territory: the urban industrial heritage in the trajectory of the Condephaat (1968-2018) |
spellingShingle |
From building to territory: the urban industrial heritage in the trajectory of the Condephaat (1968-2018) Rufinoni, Manoela Rossinetti Patrimônio Urbano Políticas de Preservação São Paulo (Estado) Industrial heritage ultural heritage preservation policies São Paulo (State) |
title_short |
From building to territory: the urban industrial heritage in the trajectory of the Condephaat (1968-2018) |
title_full |
From building to territory: the urban industrial heritage in the trajectory of the Condephaat (1968-2018) |
title_fullStr |
From building to territory: the urban industrial heritage in the trajectory of the Condephaat (1968-2018) |
title_full_unstemmed |
From building to territory: the urban industrial heritage in the trajectory of the Condephaat (1968-2018) |
title_sort |
From building to territory: the urban industrial heritage in the trajectory of the Condephaat (1968-2018) |
author |
Rufinoni, Manoela Rossinetti |
author_facet |
Rufinoni, Manoela Rossinetti |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rufinoni, Manoela Rossinetti |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Patrimônio Urbano Políticas de Preservação São Paulo (Estado) Industrial heritage ultural heritage preservation policies São Paulo (State) |
topic |
Patrimônio Urbano Políticas de Preservação São Paulo (Estado) Industrial heritage ultural heritage preservation policies São Paulo (State) |
description |
The breadth of the concept of industrial heritage, ratified by the Nizhny Tagil Charter (2003) and the Dublin Principles (2011), highlights the urban and territorial dimension of the testimonies of industrialization as one of the main challenges to be faced by preservation actions. By analyzing a selection of administrative legal processes of the CONDEPHAAT (Council of Defense of the Historical, Archaeological, Artistic and Tourist Heritage of the State of São Paulo, an organ created in 1968), we identified, since the mid-1970s, a gradual perception of this urban dimension in studies focused on the preservation of industrial heritage, despite the difficulties related to the limits of the instrument called “tombamento”, originally intended for the protection of buildings considered in isolation. From the analysis of some administrative legal process of preservation of São Paulo industrial heritage, this article intends to underscore the presence and breadth of mentions to the urban and territorial issue along the CONDEPHAAT trajectory, highlighting the ways of understanding the urban relations inherent to this heritage in each historical period and the possibilities for deepening this debate today. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-09-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/26 10.37916/arq.urb.vi26.26 |
url |
https://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/26 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.37916/arq.urb.vi26.26 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/26/19 https://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/26/255 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade São Judas Tadeu – Programa de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Arquitetura e Urbanismo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade São Judas Tadeu – Programa de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Arquitetura e Urbanismo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
arq.urb; No. 26 (2019): set. - dez.; 44-60 arq.urb; Núm. 26 (2019): set. - dez.; 44-60 arq.urb; n. 26 (2019): set. - dez.; 44-60 1984-5766 reponame:arq.urb instname:Universidade São Judas Tadeu instacron:USJT |
instname_str |
Universidade São Judas Tadeu |
instacron_str |
USJT |
institution |
USJT |
reponame_str |
arq.urb |
collection |
arq.urb |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
arq.urb - Universidade São Judas Tadeu |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista.arq.urb@saojudas.br|| |
_version_ |
1809730427229831168 |