Categorias metacognitivas como subsídio à prática pedagógica

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Portilho, Evelise Maria Labatut
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Dreher, Simone A. Souza
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Educação e Pesquisa
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/28333
Resumo: The aim of this paper is to present the metacognitive categories present in the way each child plans, oversees, and evaluates his or her school tasks, and relates them to pedagogical practice. This work reflects an empirical concern with metacognition, and the data derived from it have been analyzed in the light of the works of John Flavell (1981, 1999), Juan Mayor, Aurora Suengas and Javier Marques (1995) and Evelise Portilho (2003, 2009). The research had a qualitative approach and consisted of the analysis of the responses of 396 children in 1st grade of elementary education at a municipal school in the state of Parana. The instrument was a semi-structured interview with ten metacognitive questions relating to control strategy. The results indicated that children in the literacy process generally use metacognitive strategies and plan their tasks, i.e., they set the goals and means, either partially (breaking the job), or in an automated way (ordering the task). They also oversee themselves, detect errors and / or deviations †by means of external reference (in speech, action, correction or order of the other), and justify or not their actions. They evaluate their results and focus on the facilities and difficulties in identifying words or letters. Because students do not arrive at school ready to learn in exactly the same way, learning metacognitive strategies requires teachers not only to provide appropriate tasks, but also and mainly to adopt strategic actions in relation to their work so that students learn from such actions.
id USP-11_983b6e984d454a74fe3dce260343fb50
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/28333
network_acronym_str USP-11
network_name_str Educação e Pesquisa
repository_id_str
spelling Categorias metacognitivas como subsídio à prática pedagógica Metacognitive categories as a support of pedagogical practices MetacogniçãoEstratégiasAprendizagemCategorizaçãoPrática pedagógicaMetacognitionStrategiesLearningCategorizationPedagogical practice The aim of this paper is to present the metacognitive categories present in the way each child plans, oversees, and evaluates his or her school tasks, and relates them to pedagogical practice. This work reflects an empirical concern with metacognition, and the data derived from it have been analyzed in the light of the works of John Flavell (1981, 1999), Juan Mayor, Aurora Suengas and Javier Marques (1995) and Evelise Portilho (2003, 2009). The research had a qualitative approach and consisted of the analysis of the responses of 396 children in 1st grade of elementary education at a municipal school in the state of Parana. The instrument was a semi-structured interview with ten metacognitive questions relating to control strategy. The results indicated that children in the literacy process generally use metacognitive strategies and plan their tasks, i.e., they set the goals and means, either partially (breaking the job), or in an automated way (ordering the task). They also oversee themselves, detect errors and / or deviations †by means of external reference (in speech, action, correction or order of the other), and justify or not their actions. They evaluate their results and focus on the facilities and difficulties in identifying words or letters. Because students do not arrive at school ready to learn in exactly the same way, learning metacognitive strategies requires teachers not only to provide appropriate tasks, but also and mainly to adopt strategic actions in relation to their work so that students learn from such actions. O objetivo deste artigo é apresentar as categorias metacognitivas presentes na maneira de cada criança planejar, supervisionar e avaliar suas tarefas escolares, bem como relacioná-las à prática pedagógica. O trabalho reflete uma preocupação empírica com a metacognição, e os dados dela derivados são analisados à luz, principalmente, dos trabalhos de John Flavell (1981, 1999), Juan Mayor, Aurora Suengas e Javier Marques (1995) e Evelise Portilho (2003, 2009). A pesquisa de abordagem qualitativa consistiu na análise das respostas de 396 crianças da 1ª série do ensino fundamental de uma rede municipal de ensino do Estado do Paraná. O instrumento utilizado foi uma entrevista semiestruturada com as crianças, contendo dez perguntas metacognitivas referentes à estratégia de controle. Os resultados indicaram que as crianças em processo de alfabetização geralmente utilizam estratégias metacognitivas e planejam suas tarefas, ou seja, fixam as metas e os meios, ora de forma parcial (fragmentando a tarefa realizada), ora de forma automatizada (ordenando a tarefa). Elas também se supervisionam, detectam os erros e/ou desvios cometidos, por meio de referencial externo (na fala, ação, correção ou ordem do outro), e justificam, ou não, suas ações. Elas avaliam seus resultados e focam as facilidades e dificuldades na identificação de palavras ou letras. A aprendizagem das estratégias metacognitivas solicita que o professor não apenas disponha de tarefas adequadas, mas, principalmente, adote atitudes estratégicas em relação a seu trabalho para que os alunos aprendam com elas, pois eles não chegam às escolas preparados para aprender exatamente da mesma maneira. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Educação2012-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/2833310.1590/S1517-97022011005000009Educação e Pesquisa; v. 38 n. 1 (2012); 181-196Educação e Pesquisa; Vol. 38 No. 1 (2012); 181-196Educação e Pesquisa; Vol. 38 Núm. 1 (2012); 181-1961678-46341517-9702reponame:Educação e Pesquisainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/28333/30191Copyright (c) 2017 Educação e Pesquisainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPortilho, Evelise Maria LabatutDreher, Simone A. Souza2014-10-24T15:50:18Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/28333Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/indexPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/oai||revedu@usp.br1678-46341517-9702opendoar:2014-10-24T15:50:18Educação e Pesquisa - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Categorias metacognitivas como subsídio à prática pedagógica
Metacognitive categories as a support of pedagogical practices
title Categorias metacognitivas como subsídio à prática pedagógica
spellingShingle Categorias metacognitivas como subsídio à prática pedagógica
Portilho, Evelise Maria Labatut
Metacognição
Estratégias
Aprendizagem
Categorização
Prática pedagógica
Metacognition
Strategies
Learning
Categorization
Pedagogical practice
title_short Categorias metacognitivas como subsídio à prática pedagógica
title_full Categorias metacognitivas como subsídio à prática pedagógica
title_fullStr Categorias metacognitivas como subsídio à prática pedagógica
title_full_unstemmed Categorias metacognitivas como subsídio à prática pedagógica
title_sort Categorias metacognitivas como subsídio à prática pedagógica
author Portilho, Evelise Maria Labatut
author_facet Portilho, Evelise Maria Labatut
Dreher, Simone A. Souza
author_role author
author2 Dreher, Simone A. Souza
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Portilho, Evelise Maria Labatut
Dreher, Simone A. Souza
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Metacognição
Estratégias
Aprendizagem
Categorização
Prática pedagógica
Metacognition
Strategies
Learning
Categorization
Pedagogical practice
topic Metacognição
Estratégias
Aprendizagem
Categorização
Prática pedagógica
Metacognition
Strategies
Learning
Categorization
Pedagogical practice
description The aim of this paper is to present the metacognitive categories present in the way each child plans, oversees, and evaluates his or her school tasks, and relates them to pedagogical practice. This work reflects an empirical concern with metacognition, and the data derived from it have been analyzed in the light of the works of John Flavell (1981, 1999), Juan Mayor, Aurora Suengas and Javier Marques (1995) and Evelise Portilho (2003, 2009). The research had a qualitative approach and consisted of the analysis of the responses of 396 children in 1st grade of elementary education at a municipal school in the state of Parana. The instrument was a semi-structured interview with ten metacognitive questions relating to control strategy. The results indicated that children in the literacy process generally use metacognitive strategies and plan their tasks, i.e., they set the goals and means, either partially (breaking the job), or in an automated way (ordering the task). They also oversee themselves, detect errors and / or deviations †by means of external reference (in speech, action, correction or order of the other), and justify or not their actions. They evaluate their results and focus on the facilities and difficulties in identifying words or letters. Because students do not arrive at school ready to learn in exactly the same way, learning metacognitive strategies requires teachers not only to provide appropriate tasks, but also and mainly to adopt strategic actions in relation to their work so that students learn from such actions.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/28333
10.1590/S1517-97022011005000009
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/28333
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S1517-97022011005000009
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/28333/30191
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Educação e Pesquisa
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Educação e Pesquisa
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Educação
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Educação
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Educação e Pesquisa; v. 38 n. 1 (2012); 181-196
Educação e Pesquisa; Vol. 38 No. 1 (2012); 181-196
Educação e Pesquisa; Vol. 38 Núm. 1 (2012); 181-196
1678-4634
1517-9702
reponame:Educação e Pesquisa
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Educação e Pesquisa
collection Educação e Pesquisa
repository.name.fl_str_mv Educação e Pesquisa - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revedu@usp.br
_version_ 1787713808782852096