Categorias metacognitivas como subsídio à prática pedagógica
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Educação e Pesquisa |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/28333 |
Resumo: | The aim of this paper is to present the metacognitive categories present in the way each child plans, oversees, and evaluates his or her school tasks, and relates them to pedagogical practice. This work reflects an empirical concern with metacognition, and the data derived from it have been analyzed in the light of the works of John Flavell (1981, 1999), Juan Mayor, Aurora Suengas and Javier Marques (1995) and Evelise Portilho (2003, 2009). The research had a qualitative approach and consisted of the analysis of the responses of 396 children in 1st grade of elementary education at a municipal school in the state of Parana. The instrument was a semi-structured interview with ten metacognitive questions relating to control strategy. The results indicated that children in the literacy process generally use metacognitive strategies and plan their tasks, i.e., they set the goals and means, either partially (breaking the job), or in an automated way (ordering the task). They also oversee themselves, detect errors and / or deviations by means of external reference (in speech, action, correction or order of the other), and justify or not their actions. They evaluate their results and focus on the facilities and difficulties in identifying words or letters. Because students do not arrive at school ready to learn in exactly the same way, learning metacognitive strategies requires teachers not only to provide appropriate tasks, but also and mainly to adopt strategic actions in relation to their work so that students learn from such actions. |
id |
USP-11_983b6e984d454a74fe3dce260343fb50 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/28333 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-11 |
network_name_str |
Educação e Pesquisa |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Categorias metacognitivas como subsídio à prática pedagógica Metacognitive categories as a support of pedagogical practices MetacogniçãoEstratégiasAprendizagemCategorizaçãoPrática pedagógicaMetacognitionStrategiesLearningCategorizationPedagogical practice The aim of this paper is to present the metacognitive categories present in the way each child plans, oversees, and evaluates his or her school tasks, and relates them to pedagogical practice. This work reflects an empirical concern with metacognition, and the data derived from it have been analyzed in the light of the works of John Flavell (1981, 1999), Juan Mayor, Aurora Suengas and Javier Marques (1995) and Evelise Portilho (2003, 2009). The research had a qualitative approach and consisted of the analysis of the responses of 396 children in 1st grade of elementary education at a municipal school in the state of Parana. The instrument was a semi-structured interview with ten metacognitive questions relating to control strategy. The results indicated that children in the literacy process generally use metacognitive strategies and plan their tasks, i.e., they set the goals and means, either partially (breaking the job), or in an automated way (ordering the task). They also oversee themselves, detect errors and / or deviations by means of external reference (in speech, action, correction or order of the other), and justify or not their actions. They evaluate their results and focus on the facilities and difficulties in identifying words or letters. Because students do not arrive at school ready to learn in exactly the same way, learning metacognitive strategies requires teachers not only to provide appropriate tasks, but also and mainly to adopt strategic actions in relation to their work so that students learn from such actions. O objetivo deste artigo é apresentar as categorias metacognitivas presentes na maneira de cada criança planejar, supervisionar e avaliar suas tarefas escolares, bem como relacioná-las à prática pedagógica. O trabalho reflete uma preocupação empírica com a metacognição, e os dados dela derivados são analisados à luz, principalmente, dos trabalhos de John Flavell (1981, 1999), Juan Mayor, Aurora Suengas e Javier Marques (1995) e Evelise Portilho (2003, 2009). A pesquisa de abordagem qualitativa consistiu na análise das respostas de 396 crianças da 1ª série do ensino fundamental de uma rede municipal de ensino do Estado do Paraná. O instrumento utilizado foi uma entrevista semiestruturada com as crianças, contendo dez perguntas metacognitivas referentes à estratégia de controle. Os resultados indicaram que as crianças em processo de alfabetização geralmente utilizam estratégias metacognitivas e planejam suas tarefas, ou seja, fixam as metas e os meios, ora de forma parcial (fragmentando a tarefa realizada), ora de forma automatizada (ordenando a tarefa). Elas também se supervisionam, detectam os erros e/ou desvios cometidos, por meio de referencial externo (na fala, ação, correção ou ordem do outro), e justificam, ou não, suas ações. Elas avaliam seus resultados e focam as facilidades e dificuldades na identificação de palavras ou letras. A aprendizagem das estratégias metacognitivas solicita que o professor não apenas disponha de tarefas adequadas, mas, principalmente, adote atitudes estratégicas em relação a seu trabalho para que os alunos aprendam com elas, pois eles não chegam às escolas preparados para aprender exatamente da mesma maneira. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Educação2012-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/2833310.1590/S1517-97022011005000009Educação e Pesquisa; v. 38 n. 1 (2012); 181-196Educação e Pesquisa; Vol. 38 No. 1 (2012); 181-196Educação e Pesquisa; Vol. 38 Núm. 1 (2012); 181-1961678-46341517-9702reponame:Educação e Pesquisainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/28333/30191Copyright (c) 2017 Educação e Pesquisainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPortilho, Evelise Maria LabatutDreher, Simone A. Souza2014-10-24T15:50:18Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/28333Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/indexPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/oai||revedu@usp.br1678-46341517-9702opendoar:2014-10-24T15:50:18Educação e Pesquisa - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Categorias metacognitivas como subsídio à prática pedagógica Metacognitive categories as a support of pedagogical practices |
title |
Categorias metacognitivas como subsídio à prática pedagógica |
spellingShingle |
Categorias metacognitivas como subsídio à prática pedagógica Portilho, Evelise Maria Labatut Metacognição Estratégias Aprendizagem Categorização Prática pedagógica Metacognition Strategies Learning Categorization Pedagogical practice |
title_short |
Categorias metacognitivas como subsídio à prática pedagógica |
title_full |
Categorias metacognitivas como subsídio à prática pedagógica |
title_fullStr |
Categorias metacognitivas como subsídio à prática pedagógica |
title_full_unstemmed |
Categorias metacognitivas como subsídio à prática pedagógica |
title_sort |
Categorias metacognitivas como subsídio à prática pedagógica |
author |
Portilho, Evelise Maria Labatut |
author_facet |
Portilho, Evelise Maria Labatut Dreher, Simone A. Souza |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Dreher, Simone A. Souza |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Portilho, Evelise Maria Labatut Dreher, Simone A. Souza |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Metacognição Estratégias Aprendizagem Categorização Prática pedagógica Metacognition Strategies Learning Categorization Pedagogical practice |
topic |
Metacognição Estratégias Aprendizagem Categorização Prática pedagógica Metacognition Strategies Learning Categorization Pedagogical practice |
description |
The aim of this paper is to present the metacognitive categories present in the way each child plans, oversees, and evaluates his or her school tasks, and relates them to pedagogical practice. This work reflects an empirical concern with metacognition, and the data derived from it have been analyzed in the light of the works of John Flavell (1981, 1999), Juan Mayor, Aurora Suengas and Javier Marques (1995) and Evelise Portilho (2003, 2009). The research had a qualitative approach and consisted of the analysis of the responses of 396 children in 1st grade of elementary education at a municipal school in the state of Parana. The instrument was a semi-structured interview with ten metacognitive questions relating to control strategy. The results indicated that children in the literacy process generally use metacognitive strategies and plan their tasks, i.e., they set the goals and means, either partially (breaking the job), or in an automated way (ordering the task). They also oversee themselves, detect errors and / or deviations by means of external reference (in speech, action, correction or order of the other), and justify or not their actions. They evaluate their results and focus on the facilities and difficulties in identifying words or letters. Because students do not arrive at school ready to learn in exactly the same way, learning metacognitive strategies requires teachers not only to provide appropriate tasks, but also and mainly to adopt strategic actions in relation to their work so that students learn from such actions. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-03-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/28333 10.1590/S1517-97022011005000009 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/28333 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/S1517-97022011005000009 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/28333/30191 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Educação e Pesquisa info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Educação e Pesquisa |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Educação |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Educação |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Educação e Pesquisa; v. 38 n. 1 (2012); 181-196 Educação e Pesquisa; Vol. 38 No. 1 (2012); 181-196 Educação e Pesquisa; Vol. 38 Núm. 1 (2012); 181-196 1678-4634 1517-9702 reponame:Educação e Pesquisa instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Educação e Pesquisa |
collection |
Educação e Pesquisa |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Educação e Pesquisa - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revedu@usp.br |
_version_ |
1787713808782852096 |