The invention of the Émile as conjecture: methodological choice of Rousseau's writing

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Boto, Carlota
Data de Publicação: 2010
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Educação e Pesquisa
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/28227
Resumo: The present work aims at a reflection on Rousseau's pedagogical thinking. To such end, the analysis is centered on the reading of his Émile: or treatise on education published in 1762. The article seeks to contrast the Émile with the analyses of commentators, so as to proceed to a literature review on the subject. The hypothesis put forward here is that the Émile is more than just a book about education. Rousseau emphasizes in his text his concern with establishing a characterization of the child's "being". In this sense he was trying to find in childhood in general vestiges of the man in a state of Nature. In so doing, he establishes a periodization of life and of learning. Denouncing the neglect displayed by his epoch with regard to the child, and critical of the educational model propagated by the religious schools of that time, Rousseau describes the condition of the child, whilst inventing an imaginary boy that was supposed to be educated according to Nature's criteria. Émile's education can be understood as a libel against the harshness of the treatment dispensed to real children - both inside their families and at school. According to the philosopher people were incapable of "seeing" the child. Therefore, the writing of the Émile does not intend to establish pedagogical prescriptions, since Rousseau has the boy educated away from society. The objective here is a different one: the author wanted to identify in the child his essence. The figure of Émile is, thus, a method to operate the thought.
id USP-11_f698c766feb0b90a2ea22be25c35fa90
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/28227
network_acronym_str USP-11
network_name_str Educação e Pesquisa
repository_id_str
spelling The invention of the Émile as conjecture: methodological choice of Rousseau's writing A invenção do Emílio como conjectura: opção metodológica da escrita de Rousseau EducaçãoEmílioRousseauFilosofia da educaçãoIluminismoEducationÉmileRousseauPhilosophy of educationEnlightenment The present work aims at a reflection on Rousseau's pedagogical thinking. To such end, the analysis is centered on the reading of his Émile: or treatise on education published in 1762. The article seeks to contrast the Émile with the analyses of commentators, so as to proceed to a literature review on the subject. The hypothesis put forward here is that the Émile is more than just a book about education. Rousseau emphasizes in his text his concern with establishing a characterization of the child's "being". In this sense he was trying to find in childhood in general vestiges of the man in a state of Nature. In so doing, he establishes a periodization of life and of learning. Denouncing the neglect displayed by his epoch with regard to the child, and critical of the educational model propagated by the religious schools of that time, Rousseau describes the condition of the child, whilst inventing an imaginary boy that was supposed to be educated according to Nature's criteria. Émile's education can be understood as a libel against the harshness of the treatment dispensed to real children - both inside their families and at school. According to the philosopher people were incapable of "seeing" the child. Therefore, the writing of the Émile does not intend to establish pedagogical prescriptions, since Rousseau has the boy educated away from society. The objective here is a different one: the author wanted to identify in the child his essence. The figure of Émile is, thus, a method to operate the thought. O presente trabalho tem por propósito refletir sobre o pensamento pedagógico de Rousseau. Para isso, a análise centra-se na leitura da obra Emílio ou da educação publicada em 1762. O texto procura cotejar a leitura do Emílio com a análise de comentadores, de modo a proceder à revisão bibliográfica sobre o tema. A hipótese aqui defendida é a de que Emílio não é apenas um livro sobre educação. Rousseau enfatiza, no texto, sua preocupação quanto ao estabelecimento da caracterização do "ser" da criança. Nesse sentido, ele queria procurar, na infância de maneira geral, vestígios do homem em estado de natureza. Ao fazer isso, estabelece uma periodização da vida e do aprendizado. Denunciando o descaso de sua época relativamente à figura da criança, crítico do modelo educacional veiculado pelos colégios religiosos de seu tempo, Rousseau descreve a condição da criança, ao mesmo tempo em que inventa um menino imaginário, que deveria ser educado de acordo com os critérios da natureza. A educação do menino Emílio pode ser compreendida como um libelo contra o severo tratamento oferecido às crianças de verdade - tanto nas famílias quanto nos colégios. Segundo o filósofo, não se era capaz de "ver" a criança. Sendo assim, a escrita Emílio não tem a finalidade de estabelecer prescrições pedagógicas, pois Rousseau cria o menino apartado da sociedade. O objetivo ali era outro: o autor pretendia identificar na criança sua essência. A figura do Emílio era, assim, um método para operar o pensamento. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Educação2010-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/2822710.1590/S1517-97022010000100002Educação e Pesquisa; v. 36 n. 1 (2010); 207-225Educação e Pesquisa; Vol. 36 No. 1 (2010); 207-225Educação e Pesquisa; Vol. 36 Núm. 1 (2010); 207-2251678-46341517-9702reponame:Educação e Pesquisainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/28227/30057https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/28227/30058Copyright (c) 2017 Educação e Pesquisainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBoto, Carlota2014-10-24T15:47:33Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/28227Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/indexPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/oai||revedu@usp.br1678-46341517-9702opendoar:2014-10-24T15:47:33Educação e Pesquisa - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The invention of the Émile as conjecture: methodological choice of Rousseau's writing
A invenção do Emílio como conjectura: opção metodológica da escrita de Rousseau
title The invention of the Émile as conjecture: methodological choice of Rousseau's writing
spellingShingle The invention of the Émile as conjecture: methodological choice of Rousseau's writing
Boto, Carlota
Educação
Emílio
Rousseau
Filosofia da educação
Iluminismo
Education
Émile
Rousseau
Philosophy of education
Enlightenment
title_short The invention of the Émile as conjecture: methodological choice of Rousseau's writing
title_full The invention of the Émile as conjecture: methodological choice of Rousseau's writing
title_fullStr The invention of the Émile as conjecture: methodological choice of Rousseau's writing
title_full_unstemmed The invention of the Émile as conjecture: methodological choice of Rousseau's writing
title_sort The invention of the Émile as conjecture: methodological choice of Rousseau's writing
author Boto, Carlota
author_facet Boto, Carlota
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Boto, Carlota
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Educação
Emílio
Rousseau
Filosofia da educação
Iluminismo
Education
Émile
Rousseau
Philosophy of education
Enlightenment
topic Educação
Emílio
Rousseau
Filosofia da educação
Iluminismo
Education
Émile
Rousseau
Philosophy of education
Enlightenment
description The present work aims at a reflection on Rousseau's pedagogical thinking. To such end, the analysis is centered on the reading of his Émile: or treatise on education published in 1762. The article seeks to contrast the Émile with the analyses of commentators, so as to proceed to a literature review on the subject. The hypothesis put forward here is that the Émile is more than just a book about education. Rousseau emphasizes in his text his concern with establishing a characterization of the child's "being". In this sense he was trying to find in childhood in general vestiges of the man in a state of Nature. In so doing, he establishes a periodization of life and of learning. Denouncing the neglect displayed by his epoch with regard to the child, and critical of the educational model propagated by the religious schools of that time, Rousseau describes the condition of the child, whilst inventing an imaginary boy that was supposed to be educated according to Nature's criteria. Émile's education can be understood as a libel against the harshness of the treatment dispensed to real children - both inside their families and at school. According to the philosopher people were incapable of "seeing" the child. Therefore, the writing of the Émile does not intend to establish pedagogical prescriptions, since Rousseau has the boy educated away from society. The objective here is a different one: the author wanted to identify in the child his essence. The figure of Émile is, thus, a method to operate the thought.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/28227
10.1590/S1517-97022010000100002
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/28227
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S1517-97022010000100002
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/28227/30057
https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/28227/30058
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Educação e Pesquisa
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Educação e Pesquisa
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Educação
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Educação
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Educação e Pesquisa; v. 36 n. 1 (2010); 207-225
Educação e Pesquisa; Vol. 36 No. 1 (2010); 207-225
Educação e Pesquisa; Vol. 36 Núm. 1 (2010); 207-225
1678-4634
1517-9702
reponame:Educação e Pesquisa
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Educação e Pesquisa
collection Educação e Pesquisa
repository.name.fl_str_mv Educação e Pesquisa - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revedu@usp.br
_version_ 1787713808273244160