Comparison of the biocompatibility of different root canal irrigants

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gomes-Filho, João Eduardo
Data de Publicação: 2008
Outros Autores: Aurélio, Kamila Guilherme, Costa, Mariana Machado Teixeira de Moraes, Bernabé, Pedro Felício Estrada
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Journal of applied oral science (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3554
Resumo: The purpose of this study was to compare the reaction of rat subcutaneous connective tissue to 0.9% sterile saline, 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), 5.25% NaOCl and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate solution or gel. Six circles were demarcated on the dorsal skin of 24 male Wistar rats, leaving 2 cm between each circle. Using a syringe, 0.1 mL of each root canal irrigant was injected subcutaneously into 5 circles. In the 6th circle, the needle of an empty syringe was introduced into the skin, but no irrigant was injected (control group). Evaluations were undertaken at 2 h, 48 h, 14 days and 30 days post-procedure. Tissue samples were excised, embedded in paraffin blocks and 3-µm-thick sections were obtained and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The areas of inflammatory reaction were evaluated and analyzed statistically by ANOVA and Tukey's test. The control group showed few or no inflammatory reaction areas in the subcutaneous tissue. 0.9% saline solution, 2.0% chlorhexidine solution and 2.5% NaOCl showed a good biocompatibility, as very mild inflammatory reaction was detected at 14 days and tissue repair occurred at 30 days. 5.25% NaOCl was the most toxic irrigant, as the number of inflammatory cells remained elevated at 14 and 30 days. The group treated with 2.0% chlorhexidine gluconate gel presented a moderate inflammatory response at 14 days, which decreased at 30 days, being considered similar to that of the control group, 0.9% saline solution, 2.0% chlorhexidine solution and 2.5% NaOCl at this experimental period.
id USP-17_8e509994fcd79ae8a582faea1aaada6b
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/3554
network_acronym_str USP-17
network_name_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of the biocompatibility of different root canal irrigants Root canal irrigantsSodium hypochloriteChlorhexidineBiocompatibility The purpose of this study was to compare the reaction of rat subcutaneous connective tissue to 0.9% sterile saline, 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), 5.25% NaOCl and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate solution or gel. Six circles were demarcated on the dorsal skin of 24 male Wistar rats, leaving 2 cm between each circle. Using a syringe, 0.1 mL of each root canal irrigant was injected subcutaneously into 5 circles. In the 6th circle, the needle of an empty syringe was introduced into the skin, but no irrigant was injected (control group). Evaluations were undertaken at 2 h, 48 h, 14 days and 30 days post-procedure. Tissue samples were excised, embedded in paraffin blocks and 3-µm-thick sections were obtained and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The areas of inflammatory reaction were evaluated and analyzed statistically by ANOVA and Tukey's test. The control group showed few or no inflammatory reaction areas in the subcutaneous tissue. 0.9% saline solution, 2.0% chlorhexidine solution and 2.5% NaOCl showed a good biocompatibility, as very mild inflammatory reaction was detected at 14 days and tissue repair occurred at 30 days. 5.25% NaOCl was the most toxic irrigant, as the number of inflammatory cells remained elevated at 14 and 30 days. The group treated with 2.0% chlorhexidine gluconate gel presented a moderate inflammatory response at 14 days, which decreased at 30 days, being considered similar to that of the control group, 0.9% saline solution, 2.0% chlorhexidine solution and 2.5% NaOCl at this experimental period. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru2008-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/355410.1590/S1678-77572008000200011Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 16 No. 2 (2008); 137-144 Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 16 Núm. 2 (2008); 137-144 Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 16 n. 2 (2008); 137-144 1678-77651678-7757reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3554/4244Copyright (c) 2008 Journal of Applied Oral Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGomes-Filho, João EduardoAurélio, Kamila GuilhermeCosta, Mariana Machado Teixeira de MoraesBernabé, Pedro Felício Estrada2012-04-27T12:00:29Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/3554Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jaosPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/oai||jaos@usp.br1678-77651678-7757opendoar:2012-04-27T12:00:29Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of the biocompatibility of different root canal irrigants
title Comparison of the biocompatibility of different root canal irrigants
spellingShingle Comparison of the biocompatibility of different root canal irrigants
Gomes-Filho, João Eduardo
Root canal irrigants
Sodium hypochlorite
Chlorhexidine
Biocompatibility
title_short Comparison of the biocompatibility of different root canal irrigants
title_full Comparison of the biocompatibility of different root canal irrigants
title_fullStr Comparison of the biocompatibility of different root canal irrigants
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the biocompatibility of different root canal irrigants
title_sort Comparison of the biocompatibility of different root canal irrigants
author Gomes-Filho, João Eduardo
author_facet Gomes-Filho, João Eduardo
Aurélio, Kamila Guilherme
Costa, Mariana Machado Teixeira de Moraes
Bernabé, Pedro Felício Estrada
author_role author
author2 Aurélio, Kamila Guilherme
Costa, Mariana Machado Teixeira de Moraes
Bernabé, Pedro Felício Estrada
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gomes-Filho, João Eduardo
Aurélio, Kamila Guilherme
Costa, Mariana Machado Teixeira de Moraes
Bernabé, Pedro Felício Estrada
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Root canal irrigants
Sodium hypochlorite
Chlorhexidine
Biocompatibility
topic Root canal irrigants
Sodium hypochlorite
Chlorhexidine
Biocompatibility
description The purpose of this study was to compare the reaction of rat subcutaneous connective tissue to 0.9% sterile saline, 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), 5.25% NaOCl and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate solution or gel. Six circles were demarcated on the dorsal skin of 24 male Wistar rats, leaving 2 cm between each circle. Using a syringe, 0.1 mL of each root canal irrigant was injected subcutaneously into 5 circles. In the 6th circle, the needle of an empty syringe was introduced into the skin, but no irrigant was injected (control group). Evaluations were undertaken at 2 h, 48 h, 14 days and 30 days post-procedure. Tissue samples were excised, embedded in paraffin blocks and 3-µm-thick sections were obtained and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The areas of inflammatory reaction were evaluated and analyzed statistically by ANOVA and Tukey's test. The control group showed few or no inflammatory reaction areas in the subcutaneous tissue. 0.9% saline solution, 2.0% chlorhexidine solution and 2.5% NaOCl showed a good biocompatibility, as very mild inflammatory reaction was detected at 14 days and tissue repair occurred at 30 days. 5.25% NaOCl was the most toxic irrigant, as the number of inflammatory cells remained elevated at 14 and 30 days. The group treated with 2.0% chlorhexidine gluconate gel presented a moderate inflammatory response at 14 days, which decreased at 30 days, being considered similar to that of the control group, 0.9% saline solution, 2.0% chlorhexidine solution and 2.5% NaOCl at this experimental period.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3554
10.1590/S1678-77572008000200011
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3554
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S1678-77572008000200011
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3554/4244
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2008 Journal of Applied Oral Science
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2008 Journal of Applied Oral Science
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 16 No. 2 (2008); 137-144
Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 16 Núm. 2 (2008); 137-144
Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 16 n. 2 (2008); 137-144
1678-7765
1678-7757
reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
collection Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jaos@usp.br
_version_ 1800221673921708032