Bayesian sequential procedure to estimate the viability of seeds Coffea arabica L. in tetrazolium test

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Brighenti,Carla Regina Guimarães
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Cirillo,Marcelo Ângelo, Costa,André Luís Alves, Rosa,Sttela Dellyzete Veiga Franco da, Guimarães,Renato Mendes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Scientia Agrícola (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-90162019001300198
Resumo: ABSTRACT: Tetrazolium tests use conventional sampling techniques in which a sample has a fixed size. These tests may be improved by sequential sampling, which does not work with fixed-size samples. When data obtained from an experiment are analyzed sequentially the analysis can be terminated when a particular decision has been made, and thus, there is no need to pre-establish the number of seeds to assess. Bayesian statistics can also help, if we have sufficient knowledge about coffee production in the area to construct a prior distribution. Therefore, we used the Bayesian sequential approach to estimate the percentage of viable coffee seeds submitted to tetrazolium testing, and we incorporated priors with information from other analyses of crops from previous years. We used the Beta prior distribution and, using data obtained from sample lots of Coffea arabica, determined its hyperparameters with a histogram and O’Hagan's methods. To estimate the lowest risk, we computed the Bayes risks, which provided us with a basis for deciding whether or not we should continue the sampling process. The results confirm that the Bayesian sequential estimation can indeed be used for the tetrazolium test: the average percentage of viability obtained with the conventional frequentist method was 88 %, whereas that obtained with the Bayesian method with both priors was 89 %. However, the Bayesian method required, on average, only 89 samples to reach this value while the traditional estimation method needed as many as 200 samples.
id USP-18_325cae7f5c0e39b348540fa9fc3d416d
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0103-90162019001300198
network_acronym_str USP-18
network_name_str Scientia Agrícola (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Bayesian sequential procedure to estimate the viability of seeds Coffea arabica L. in tetrazolium testBeta distributionseed analysissamplingcoffeeprior distributionABSTRACT: Tetrazolium tests use conventional sampling techniques in which a sample has a fixed size. These tests may be improved by sequential sampling, which does not work with fixed-size samples. When data obtained from an experiment are analyzed sequentially the analysis can be terminated when a particular decision has been made, and thus, there is no need to pre-establish the number of seeds to assess. Bayesian statistics can also help, if we have sufficient knowledge about coffee production in the area to construct a prior distribution. Therefore, we used the Bayesian sequential approach to estimate the percentage of viable coffee seeds submitted to tetrazolium testing, and we incorporated priors with information from other analyses of crops from previous years. We used the Beta prior distribution and, using data obtained from sample lots of Coffea arabica, determined its hyperparameters with a histogram and O’Hagan's methods. To estimate the lowest risk, we computed the Bayes risks, which provided us with a basis for deciding whether or not we should continue the sampling process. The results confirm that the Bayesian sequential estimation can indeed be used for the tetrazolium test: the average percentage of viability obtained with the conventional frequentist method was 88 %, whereas that obtained with the Bayesian method with both priors was 89 %. However, the Bayesian method required, on average, only 89 samples to reach this value while the traditional estimation method needed as many as 200 samples.Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz"2019-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-90162019001300198Scientia Agricola v.76 n.3 2019reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USP10.1590/1678-992x-2017-0123info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBrighenti,Carla Regina GuimarãesCirillo,Marcelo ÂngeloCosta,André Luís AlvesRosa,Sttela Dellyzete Veiga Franco daGuimarães,Renato Mendeseng2019-02-28T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-90162019001300198Revistahttp://revistas.usp.br/sa/indexPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpscientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br1678-992X0103-9016opendoar:2019-02-28T00:00Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Bayesian sequential procedure to estimate the viability of seeds Coffea arabica L. in tetrazolium test
title Bayesian sequential procedure to estimate the viability of seeds Coffea arabica L. in tetrazolium test
spellingShingle Bayesian sequential procedure to estimate the viability of seeds Coffea arabica L. in tetrazolium test
Brighenti,Carla Regina Guimarães
Beta distribution
seed analysis
sampling
coffee
prior distribution
title_short Bayesian sequential procedure to estimate the viability of seeds Coffea arabica L. in tetrazolium test
title_full Bayesian sequential procedure to estimate the viability of seeds Coffea arabica L. in tetrazolium test
title_fullStr Bayesian sequential procedure to estimate the viability of seeds Coffea arabica L. in tetrazolium test
title_full_unstemmed Bayesian sequential procedure to estimate the viability of seeds Coffea arabica L. in tetrazolium test
title_sort Bayesian sequential procedure to estimate the viability of seeds Coffea arabica L. in tetrazolium test
author Brighenti,Carla Regina Guimarães
author_facet Brighenti,Carla Regina Guimarães
Cirillo,Marcelo Ângelo
Costa,André Luís Alves
Rosa,Sttela Dellyzete Veiga Franco da
Guimarães,Renato Mendes
author_role author
author2 Cirillo,Marcelo Ângelo
Costa,André Luís Alves
Rosa,Sttela Dellyzete Veiga Franco da
Guimarães,Renato Mendes
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Brighenti,Carla Regina Guimarães
Cirillo,Marcelo Ângelo
Costa,André Luís Alves
Rosa,Sttela Dellyzete Veiga Franco da
Guimarães,Renato Mendes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Beta distribution
seed analysis
sampling
coffee
prior distribution
topic Beta distribution
seed analysis
sampling
coffee
prior distribution
description ABSTRACT: Tetrazolium tests use conventional sampling techniques in which a sample has a fixed size. These tests may be improved by sequential sampling, which does not work with fixed-size samples. When data obtained from an experiment are analyzed sequentially the analysis can be terminated when a particular decision has been made, and thus, there is no need to pre-establish the number of seeds to assess. Bayesian statistics can also help, if we have sufficient knowledge about coffee production in the area to construct a prior distribution. Therefore, we used the Bayesian sequential approach to estimate the percentage of viable coffee seeds submitted to tetrazolium testing, and we incorporated priors with information from other analyses of crops from previous years. We used the Beta prior distribution and, using data obtained from sample lots of Coffea arabica, determined its hyperparameters with a histogram and O’Hagan's methods. To estimate the lowest risk, we computed the Bayes risks, which provided us with a basis for deciding whether or not we should continue the sampling process. The results confirm that the Bayesian sequential estimation can indeed be used for the tetrazolium test: the average percentage of viability obtained with the conventional frequentist method was 88 %, whereas that obtained with the Bayesian method with both priors was 89 %. However, the Bayesian method required, on average, only 89 samples to reach this value while the traditional estimation method needed as many as 200 samples.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-05-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-90162019001300198
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-90162019001300198
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1678-992x-2017-0123
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz"
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz"
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Agricola v.76 n.3 2019
reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Scientia Agrícola (Online)
collection Scientia Agrícola (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br
_version_ 1748936464822960128