Reduction of postsurgical adhesions in a rat model: a comparative study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2009 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Clinics |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/17982 |
Resumo: | BACKGROUND: Adhesion formation after peritoneal surgery is a major cause of postoperative bowel obstruction, infertility, and chronic pelvic pain. In this study, we compared the possible individual effects of phosphatidylcholine (PC), Seprafilm® II, and tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) and the combined effects of phosphatidylcholine and t-PA on postoperative adhesion formation in a rat surgical model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 50 Wistar male rats underwent median laparotomy and standardized abrasion of the visceral and parietal peritoneum. phosphatidylcholine, Seprafilm II, and t-PA alone and phosphatidylcholine and t-PA in combination were applied intraperitoneally at the end of the surgical procedure. Seven days after surgery, a relaparotomy was performed for adhesion grading and histopathological examination. RESULTS: A comparison of adhesion stages demonstrated a significant difference between the control group and the study groups (p |
id |
USP-19_0a32393bbb25927914682c7a7c71d378 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/17982 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-19 |
network_name_str |
Clinics |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Reduction of postsurgical adhesions in a rat model: a comparative study Intraabdominal adhesionPhosphatidylcholineTissue plasminogen activatorSeprafilm BACKGROUND: Adhesion formation after peritoneal surgery is a major cause of postoperative bowel obstruction, infertility, and chronic pelvic pain. In this study, we compared the possible individual effects of phosphatidylcholine (PC), Seprafilm® II, and tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) and the combined effects of phosphatidylcholine and t-PA on postoperative adhesion formation in a rat surgical model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 50 Wistar male rats underwent median laparotomy and standardized abrasion of the visceral and parietal peritoneum. phosphatidylcholine, Seprafilm II, and t-PA alone and phosphatidylcholine and t-PA in combination were applied intraperitoneally at the end of the surgical procedure. Seven days after surgery, a relaparotomy was performed for adhesion grading and histopathological examination. RESULTS: A comparison of adhesion stages demonstrated a significant difference between the control group and the study groups (pHospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2009-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/1798210.1590/S1807-59322009000200012Clinics; Vol. 64 No. 2 (2009); 143-148 Clinics; v. 64 n. 2 (2009); 143-148 Clinics; Vol. 64 Núm. 2 (2009); 143-148 1980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/17982/20047Irkorucu, OktayFerahköşe, ZaferMemiş, LeylaEkinci, ÖzgürAkın, Muratinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2012-05-22T18:49:44Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/17982Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2012-05-22T18:49:44Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Reduction of postsurgical adhesions in a rat model: a comparative study |
title |
Reduction of postsurgical adhesions in a rat model: a comparative study |
spellingShingle |
Reduction of postsurgical adhesions in a rat model: a comparative study Irkorucu, Oktay Intraabdominal adhesion Phosphatidylcholine Tissue plasminogen activator Seprafilm |
title_short |
Reduction of postsurgical adhesions in a rat model: a comparative study |
title_full |
Reduction of postsurgical adhesions in a rat model: a comparative study |
title_fullStr |
Reduction of postsurgical adhesions in a rat model: a comparative study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reduction of postsurgical adhesions in a rat model: a comparative study |
title_sort |
Reduction of postsurgical adhesions in a rat model: a comparative study |
author |
Irkorucu, Oktay |
author_facet |
Irkorucu, Oktay Ferahköşe, Zafer Memiş, Leyla Ekinci, Özgür Akın, Murat |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ferahköşe, Zafer Memiş, Leyla Ekinci, Özgür Akın, Murat |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Irkorucu, Oktay Ferahköşe, Zafer Memiş, Leyla Ekinci, Özgür Akın, Murat |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Intraabdominal adhesion Phosphatidylcholine Tissue plasminogen activator Seprafilm |
topic |
Intraabdominal adhesion Phosphatidylcholine Tissue plasminogen activator Seprafilm |
description |
BACKGROUND: Adhesion formation after peritoneal surgery is a major cause of postoperative bowel obstruction, infertility, and chronic pelvic pain. In this study, we compared the possible individual effects of phosphatidylcholine (PC), Seprafilm® II, and tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) and the combined effects of phosphatidylcholine and t-PA on postoperative adhesion formation in a rat surgical model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 50 Wistar male rats underwent median laparotomy and standardized abrasion of the visceral and parietal peritoneum. phosphatidylcholine, Seprafilm II, and t-PA alone and phosphatidylcholine and t-PA in combination were applied intraperitoneally at the end of the surgical procedure. Seven days after surgery, a relaparotomy was performed for adhesion grading and histopathological examination. RESULTS: A comparison of adhesion stages demonstrated a significant difference between the control group and the study groups (p |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2009-02-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/17982 10.1590/S1807-59322009000200012 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/17982 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/S1807-59322009000200012 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/17982/20047 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Clinics; Vol. 64 No. 2 (2009); 143-148 Clinics; v. 64 n. 2 (2009); 143-148 Clinics; Vol. 64 Núm. 2 (2009); 143-148 1980-5322 1807-5932 reponame:Clinics instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Clinics |
collection |
Clinics |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br |
_version_ |
1800222754412167168 |