Socioeconomic differences between self- and interviewer-classification of color/race

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bastos, João Luiz
Data de Publicação: 2008
Outros Autores: Peres, Marco Aurélio, Peres, Karen Glazer, Dumith, Samuel Carvalho, Gigante, Denise Petrucci
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Revista de Saúde Pública
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/32416
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: To assess (1) the consistency between self-classified and interviewer-classified color/race according to socioeconomic and demographic variables and (2) the magnitude of the ethnic-racial inequalities of income and socioeconomic status using self-classified and interviewer-classified color/race. METHODS: A cross-sectional population-based study was carried out among individuals of both sexes aged >;20 years (N=3,353), living in the urban area of a city in Southern Brazil, in 2005. A two-stage sampling scheme was adopted and data collection was performed at participants' homes. Face-to-face interviews were conducted using standardized precoded questionnaires. The consistency between self-classified and interviewer-classified color/race was checked by means of concordance proportions and kappa statistics. Ethnic-racial inequalities of income and socioeconomic status were estimated using linear and ordinal logistic regression models, adjusting for sex, age and schooling. RESULTS: The response rate was 93.5%. Despite the high reproducibility observed between self-classified and interviewer-classified color/race, a tendency towards whitening was seen among the interviewees. Self-classified brown (pardo) and black individuals were 1.4 and 1.5 times more likely to be classified as whites than as blacks and browns (pardos), respectively. Socioeconomically deprived strata presented higher kappa values. Ethnic-racial inequalities of income and socioeconomic status were found, and these were slightly greater using interviewer-classified color/race. CONCLUSIONS: Racial classification presents a tendency towards the whitening of participants by interviewers. Browns (pardos) and blacks were socioeconomically disadvantaged in comparison with whites.
id USP-23_097d89010a770f2ac2b2ef233a19cbb1
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/32416
network_acronym_str USP-23
network_name_str Revista de Saúde Pública
repository_id_str
spelling Socioeconomic differences between self- and interviewer-classification of color/race Diferenças socioeconômicas entre autoclassificação e heteroclassificação de cor/raça Raça e SaúdeFatores SocioeconômicosIniqüidade SocialEstudos TransversaisEthnic Group and HealthSocioeconomic FactorsSocial InequityCross-Sectional Studies OBJECTIVE: To assess (1) the consistency between self-classified and interviewer-classified color/race according to socioeconomic and demographic variables and (2) the magnitude of the ethnic-racial inequalities of income and socioeconomic status using self-classified and interviewer-classified color/race. METHODS: A cross-sectional population-based study was carried out among individuals of both sexes aged >;20 years (N=3,353), living in the urban area of a city in Southern Brazil, in 2005. A two-stage sampling scheme was adopted and data collection was performed at participants' homes. Face-to-face interviews were conducted using standardized precoded questionnaires. The consistency between self-classified and interviewer-classified color/race was checked by means of concordance proportions and kappa statistics. Ethnic-racial inequalities of income and socioeconomic status were estimated using linear and ordinal logistic regression models, adjusting for sex, age and schooling. RESULTS: The response rate was 93.5%. Despite the high reproducibility observed between self-classified and interviewer-classified color/race, a tendency towards whitening was seen among the interviewees. Self-classified brown (pardo) and black individuals were 1.4 and 1.5 times more likely to be classified as whites than as blacks and browns (pardos), respectively. Socioeconomically deprived strata presented higher kappa values. Ethnic-racial inequalities of income and socioeconomic status were found, and these were slightly greater using interviewer-classified color/race. CONCLUSIONS: Racial classification presents a tendency towards the whitening of participants by interviewers. Browns (pardos) and blacks were socioeconomically disadvantaged in comparison with whites. OBJETIVO: Avaliar (1) a consistência entre cor/raça autoclassificada e determinada por entrevistador segundo variáveis socioeconômicas e demográficas e (2) a magnitude das desigualdades étnico-raciais de renda e condição socioeconômica utilizando cor/raça autoclassificada e heteroclassificada. MÉTODOS: Estudo transversal de base populacional com indivíduos >;20 anos (N=3.353), de ambos os sexos, conduzido na zona urbana de Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, em 2005. O processo de amostragem ocorreu em dois estágios e a coleta de dados foi domiciliar. Foram utilizados questionários padronizados e pré-codificados, aplicados sob a forma de entrevistas face-a-face. A consistência entre cor/raça autoclassificada e determinada pelo entrevistador foi verificada por meio da proporção de concordância e estatística kappa. Desigualdades étnico-raciais de renda e condição socioeconômica foram estimadas com os modelos de regressão linear e logística ordinal, ajustando-se para sexo, idade e escolaridade. RESULTADOS: A taxa de resposta foi de 93,5%. Apesar da alta reprodutibilidade observada para cor/raça, verificou-se tendência de branqueamento dos entrevistados. Autoclassificados pardos e pretos tiveram 1,4 e 1,5 vezes mais chance de serem classificados como brancos do que como pretos e pardos, respectivamente. Os valores de kappa foram mais altos nos grupos socialmente desfavorecidos. Evidenciaram-se desigualdades étnico-raciais de renda e condição socioeconômica, as quais foram ligeiramente maiores com cor/raça determinada por entrevistador. CONCLUSÕES: A classificação racial apresenta tendência ao branqueamento dos participantes por parte do entrevistador. Pardos e pretos encontraram-se em desvantagem socioeconômica quando comparados aos brancos. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública2008-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/3241610.1590/S0034-89102008005000005Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 42 No. 2 (2008); 324-334 Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 42 Núm. 2 (2008); 324-334 Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 42 n. 2 (2008); 324-334 1518-87870034-8910reponame:Revista de Saúde Públicainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/32416/34640https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/32416/34641Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Públicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBastos, João LuizPeres, Marco AurélioPeres, Karen GlazerDumith, Samuel CarvalhoGigante, Denise Petrucci2012-07-09T01:14:34Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/32416Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/indexONGhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/oairevsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br1518-87870034-8910opendoar:2012-07-09T01:14:34Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Socioeconomic differences between self- and interviewer-classification of color/race
Diferenças socioeconômicas entre autoclassificação e heteroclassificação de cor/raça
title Socioeconomic differences between self- and interviewer-classification of color/race
spellingShingle Socioeconomic differences between self- and interviewer-classification of color/race
Bastos, João Luiz
Raça e Saúde
Fatores Socioeconômicos
Iniqüidade Social
Estudos Transversais
Ethnic Group and Health
Socioeconomic Factors
Social Inequity
Cross-Sectional Studies
title_short Socioeconomic differences between self- and interviewer-classification of color/race
title_full Socioeconomic differences between self- and interviewer-classification of color/race
title_fullStr Socioeconomic differences between self- and interviewer-classification of color/race
title_full_unstemmed Socioeconomic differences between self- and interviewer-classification of color/race
title_sort Socioeconomic differences between self- and interviewer-classification of color/race
author Bastos, João Luiz
author_facet Bastos, João Luiz
Peres, Marco Aurélio
Peres, Karen Glazer
Dumith, Samuel Carvalho
Gigante, Denise Petrucci
author_role author
author2 Peres, Marco Aurélio
Peres, Karen Glazer
Dumith, Samuel Carvalho
Gigante, Denise Petrucci
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bastos, João Luiz
Peres, Marco Aurélio
Peres, Karen Glazer
Dumith, Samuel Carvalho
Gigante, Denise Petrucci
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Raça e Saúde
Fatores Socioeconômicos
Iniqüidade Social
Estudos Transversais
Ethnic Group and Health
Socioeconomic Factors
Social Inequity
Cross-Sectional Studies
topic Raça e Saúde
Fatores Socioeconômicos
Iniqüidade Social
Estudos Transversais
Ethnic Group and Health
Socioeconomic Factors
Social Inequity
Cross-Sectional Studies
description OBJECTIVE: To assess (1) the consistency between self-classified and interviewer-classified color/race according to socioeconomic and demographic variables and (2) the magnitude of the ethnic-racial inequalities of income and socioeconomic status using self-classified and interviewer-classified color/race. METHODS: A cross-sectional population-based study was carried out among individuals of both sexes aged >;20 years (N=3,353), living in the urban area of a city in Southern Brazil, in 2005. A two-stage sampling scheme was adopted and data collection was performed at participants' homes. Face-to-face interviews were conducted using standardized precoded questionnaires. The consistency between self-classified and interviewer-classified color/race was checked by means of concordance proportions and kappa statistics. Ethnic-racial inequalities of income and socioeconomic status were estimated using linear and ordinal logistic regression models, adjusting for sex, age and schooling. RESULTS: The response rate was 93.5%. Despite the high reproducibility observed between self-classified and interviewer-classified color/race, a tendency towards whitening was seen among the interviewees. Self-classified brown (pardo) and black individuals were 1.4 and 1.5 times more likely to be classified as whites than as blacks and browns (pardos), respectively. Socioeconomically deprived strata presented higher kappa values. Ethnic-racial inequalities of income and socioeconomic status were found, and these were slightly greater using interviewer-classified color/race. CONCLUSIONS: Racial classification presents a tendency towards the whitening of participants by interviewers. Browns (pardos) and blacks were socioeconomically disadvantaged in comparison with whites.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/32416
10.1590/S0034-89102008005000005
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/32416
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S0034-89102008005000005
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/32416/34640
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/32416/34641
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Pública
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Pública
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 42 No. 2 (2008); 324-334
Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 42 Núm. 2 (2008); 324-334
Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 42 n. 2 (2008); 324-334
1518-8787
0034-8910
reponame:Revista de Saúde Pública
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Revista de Saúde Pública
collection Revista de Saúde Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br
_version_ 1787713227871748096