Assisted reproductive technology: prevalence and associated factors in Southern Brazil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Saúde Pública |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/154097 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of successful assisted reproductive technology and to identify the associated factors. METHODS: This population-based birth cohort study was carried out with 4,333 pregnant women expected to deliver in 2015 in the urban area of Pelotas, Southern Brazil. Use of an assisted reproductive technology procedure, type of assisted reproductive technology [in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection or artificial insemination], number of embryos transferred, success of embryo transfer, number of attempts, and reported reasons for seeking assisted reproductive technology were the main outcomes measured. Use of an assisted reproductive technology procedure was analyzed according to sociodemographic, nutritional, reproductive history, and behavioral characteristics. Unadjusted and adjusted analyses were performed by logistic regression. RESULTS: Among the 4,275 newborns enrolled in the Pelotas 2015 Birth Cohort Study, 18 births (0.4%) were conceived by assisted reproductive technology. Most cases of assisted reproductive technology were by in vitro fertilization (70.6%). All cycles were performed in private clinics under direct out-of-pocket payment. Even after controlling for confounders, maternal age > 35 years, nulliparity and high family monthly income were strongly associated with assisted reproductive technology. CONCLUSIONS: The use of assisted reproductive technology services was reported by only a few women in the Pelotas 2015 Birth Cohort Study. Our study highlights sociodemographic factors associated to assisted reproductive technology procedures. To better understand the patterns and barriers in overall use of assisted reproductive technology services over time, national-level trend studies in assisted reproductive technology treatments and outcomes, as well as studies exploring the characteristics of women who have sought this kind of treatment are needed in low-middle income countries. |
id |
USP-23_0b840fcfa7ee25b5a58af29ba5953fc1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/154097 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-23 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Saúde Pública |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Assisted reproductive technology: prevalence and associated factors in Southern BrazilReproductive Techniques, AssistedFertilization in VitroEmbryo TransferInsemination, ArtificialRisk FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsLow-Middle Income CountriesOBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of successful assisted reproductive technology and to identify the associated factors. METHODS: This population-based birth cohort study was carried out with 4,333 pregnant women expected to deliver in 2015 in the urban area of Pelotas, Southern Brazil. Use of an assisted reproductive technology procedure, type of assisted reproductive technology [in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection or artificial insemination], number of embryos transferred, success of embryo transfer, number of attempts, and reported reasons for seeking assisted reproductive technology were the main outcomes measured. Use of an assisted reproductive technology procedure was analyzed according to sociodemographic, nutritional, reproductive history, and behavioral characteristics. Unadjusted and adjusted analyses were performed by logistic regression. RESULTS: Among the 4,275 newborns enrolled in the Pelotas 2015 Birth Cohort Study, 18 births (0.4%) were conceived by assisted reproductive technology. Most cases of assisted reproductive technology were by in vitro fertilization (70.6%). All cycles were performed in private clinics under direct out-of-pocket payment. Even after controlling for confounders, maternal age > 35 years, nulliparity and high family monthly income were strongly associated with assisted reproductive technology. CONCLUSIONS: The use of assisted reproductive technology services was reported by only a few women in the Pelotas 2015 Birth Cohort Study. Our study highlights sociodemographic factors associated to assisted reproductive technology procedures. To better understand the patterns and barriers in overall use of assisted reproductive technology services over time, national-level trend studies in assisted reproductive technology treatments and outcomes, as well as studies exploring the characteristics of women who have sought this kind of treatment are needed in low-middle income countries.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública2019-01-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/xmlhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/15409710.11606/S1518-8787.2019053000737Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 53 (2019); 13Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 53 (2019); 13Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 53 (2019); 131518-87870034-8910reponame:Revista de Saúde Públicainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/154097/150346https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/154097/150347Copyright (c) 2019 Revista de Saúde Públicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Shana Ginar daBertoldi, Andréa DâmasoSilveira, Mariângela Freitas daDomingues, Marlos RodriguesEvenson, Kelly RSantos, Iná Silva dos2019-03-29T14:01:52Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/154097Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/indexONGhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/oairevsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br1518-87870034-8910opendoar:2019-03-29T14:01:52Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Assisted reproductive technology: prevalence and associated factors in Southern Brazil |
title |
Assisted reproductive technology: prevalence and associated factors in Southern Brazil |
spellingShingle |
Assisted reproductive technology: prevalence and associated factors in Southern Brazil Silva, Shana Ginar da Reproductive Techniques, Assisted Fertilization in Vitro Embryo Transfer Insemination, Artificial Risk Factors Socioeconomic Factors Low-Middle Income Countries |
title_short |
Assisted reproductive technology: prevalence and associated factors in Southern Brazil |
title_full |
Assisted reproductive technology: prevalence and associated factors in Southern Brazil |
title_fullStr |
Assisted reproductive technology: prevalence and associated factors in Southern Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Assisted reproductive technology: prevalence and associated factors in Southern Brazil |
title_sort |
Assisted reproductive technology: prevalence and associated factors in Southern Brazil |
author |
Silva, Shana Ginar da |
author_facet |
Silva, Shana Ginar da Bertoldi, Andréa Dâmaso Silveira, Mariângela Freitas da Domingues, Marlos Rodrigues Evenson, Kelly R Santos, Iná Silva dos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bertoldi, Andréa Dâmaso Silveira, Mariângela Freitas da Domingues, Marlos Rodrigues Evenson, Kelly R Santos, Iná Silva dos |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Shana Ginar da Bertoldi, Andréa Dâmaso Silveira, Mariângela Freitas da Domingues, Marlos Rodrigues Evenson, Kelly R Santos, Iná Silva dos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Reproductive Techniques, Assisted Fertilization in Vitro Embryo Transfer Insemination, Artificial Risk Factors Socioeconomic Factors Low-Middle Income Countries |
topic |
Reproductive Techniques, Assisted Fertilization in Vitro Embryo Transfer Insemination, Artificial Risk Factors Socioeconomic Factors Low-Middle Income Countries |
description |
OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of successful assisted reproductive technology and to identify the associated factors. METHODS: This population-based birth cohort study was carried out with 4,333 pregnant women expected to deliver in 2015 in the urban area of Pelotas, Southern Brazil. Use of an assisted reproductive technology procedure, type of assisted reproductive technology [in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection or artificial insemination], number of embryos transferred, success of embryo transfer, number of attempts, and reported reasons for seeking assisted reproductive technology were the main outcomes measured. Use of an assisted reproductive technology procedure was analyzed according to sociodemographic, nutritional, reproductive history, and behavioral characteristics. Unadjusted and adjusted analyses were performed by logistic regression. RESULTS: Among the 4,275 newborns enrolled in the Pelotas 2015 Birth Cohort Study, 18 births (0.4%) were conceived by assisted reproductive technology. Most cases of assisted reproductive technology were by in vitro fertilization (70.6%). All cycles were performed in private clinics under direct out-of-pocket payment. Even after controlling for confounders, maternal age > 35 years, nulliparity and high family monthly income were strongly associated with assisted reproductive technology. CONCLUSIONS: The use of assisted reproductive technology services was reported by only a few women in the Pelotas 2015 Birth Cohort Study. Our study highlights sociodemographic factors associated to assisted reproductive technology procedures. To better understand the patterns and barriers in overall use of assisted reproductive technology services over time, national-level trend studies in assisted reproductive technology treatments and outcomes, as well as studies exploring the characteristics of women who have sought this kind of treatment are needed in low-middle income countries. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-01-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/154097 10.11606/S1518-8787.2019053000737 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/154097 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.11606/S1518-8787.2019053000737 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/154097/150346 https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/154097/150347 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista de Saúde Pública info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista de Saúde Pública |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/xml |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 53 (2019); 13 Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 53 (2019); 13 Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 53 (2019); 13 1518-8787 0034-8910 reponame:Revista de Saúde Pública instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Revista de Saúde Pública |
collection |
Revista de Saúde Pública |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br |
_version_ |
1800221800018214912 |