Implementation of Group Interpersonal Psychotherapy in primary care
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Saúde Pública |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/197261 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVE To show the implementation process of IPT-G in primary care, including facilitating and obstructing factors, implementation strategies, and training and supervision of primary care professionals. METHODS Quantitative (cross-sectional and longitudinal) analysis of pre and post-knowledge tests; qualitative analyses of the training courses; patient recruitment; conduction of IPT-G sessions; supervision of IPT-G therapists; application of a semi-structured questionnaire to assess, investigate, and develop strategies against the identified barriers. RESULTS About 120 clinicians answered the pre-test; 84 completed the post-test. Pre- and post-test scores of IPT-G knowledge were significantly different. Twenty initially trained clinicians completed additional supervision in IPT-G. Qualitative analysis identified twelve barriers and six facilitators to IPT-G implementation in individual, organizational, and systemic contexts. CONCLUSIONS Implementation of IPT-G in primary care is a complex process with several steps. In the first step, health professionals were successfully trained in IPT-G. However, subsequent steps were more complex. Therefore, careful planning of IPT-G implementation is essential to maximize the success of this innovation. |
id |
USP-23_612c72eb3e3e89f74e95dfbaa1247609 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/197261 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-23 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Saúde Pública |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Implementation of Group Interpersonal Psychotherapy in primary careHealth PersonnelPsychologyPrimary Health CareGroup Interpersonal PsychotherapyCommunication BarriersHealth Plan ImplementationOBJECTIVE To show the implementation process of IPT-G in primary care, including facilitating and obstructing factors, implementation strategies, and training and supervision of primary care professionals. METHODS Quantitative (cross-sectional and longitudinal) analysis of pre and post-knowledge tests; qualitative analyses of the training courses; patient recruitment; conduction of IPT-G sessions; supervision of IPT-G therapists; application of a semi-structured questionnaire to assess, investigate, and develop strategies against the identified barriers. RESULTS About 120 clinicians answered the pre-test; 84 completed the post-test. Pre- and post-test scores of IPT-G knowledge were significantly different. Twenty initially trained clinicians completed additional supervision in IPT-G. Qualitative analysis identified twelve barriers and six facilitators to IPT-G implementation in individual, organizational, and systemic contexts. CONCLUSIONS Implementation of IPT-G in primary care is a complex process with several steps. In the first step, health professionals were successfully trained in IPT-G. However, subsequent steps were more complex. Therefore, careful planning of IPT-G implementation is essential to maximize the success of this innovation.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública2022-04-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/xmlapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/19726110.11606/s1518-8787.2022056003731Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 56 (2022); 23Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 56 (2022); 23Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 56 (2022); 231518-87870034-8910reponame:Revista de Saúde Públicainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/197261/181608https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/197261/181610Copyright (c) 2022 Maria Isabel Perez Mattos, Bruno Paz Mosqueiro, Scott Stuart, Giovanni Salum, Rosana de Lima Duzzo, Laura Wolf de Souza, Ariane Chini, Marcelo Pio de Almeida Fleckhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMattos, Maria Isabel PerezMosqueiro, Bruno PazStuart, Scott Salum, GiovanniDuzzo, Rosana de Lima Souza, Laura Wolf deChini, ArianeFleck, Marcelo Pio de Almeida 2022-05-03T19:54:42Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/197261Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/indexONGhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/oairevsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br1518-87870034-8910opendoar:2022-05-03T19:54:42Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Implementation of Group Interpersonal Psychotherapy in primary care |
title |
Implementation of Group Interpersonal Psychotherapy in primary care |
spellingShingle |
Implementation of Group Interpersonal Psychotherapy in primary care Mattos, Maria Isabel Perez Health Personnel Psychology Primary Health Care Group Interpersonal Psychotherapy Communication Barriers Health Plan Implementation |
title_short |
Implementation of Group Interpersonal Psychotherapy in primary care |
title_full |
Implementation of Group Interpersonal Psychotherapy in primary care |
title_fullStr |
Implementation of Group Interpersonal Psychotherapy in primary care |
title_full_unstemmed |
Implementation of Group Interpersonal Psychotherapy in primary care |
title_sort |
Implementation of Group Interpersonal Psychotherapy in primary care |
author |
Mattos, Maria Isabel Perez |
author_facet |
Mattos, Maria Isabel Perez Mosqueiro, Bruno Paz Stuart, Scott Salum, Giovanni Duzzo, Rosana de Lima Souza, Laura Wolf de Chini, Ariane Fleck, Marcelo Pio de Almeida |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Mosqueiro, Bruno Paz Stuart, Scott Salum, Giovanni Duzzo, Rosana de Lima Souza, Laura Wolf de Chini, Ariane Fleck, Marcelo Pio de Almeida |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Mattos, Maria Isabel Perez Mosqueiro, Bruno Paz Stuart, Scott Salum, Giovanni Duzzo, Rosana de Lima Souza, Laura Wolf de Chini, Ariane Fleck, Marcelo Pio de Almeida |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Health Personnel Psychology Primary Health Care Group Interpersonal Psychotherapy Communication Barriers Health Plan Implementation |
topic |
Health Personnel Psychology Primary Health Care Group Interpersonal Psychotherapy Communication Barriers Health Plan Implementation |
description |
OBJECTIVE To show the implementation process of IPT-G in primary care, including facilitating and obstructing factors, implementation strategies, and training and supervision of primary care professionals. METHODS Quantitative (cross-sectional and longitudinal) analysis of pre and post-knowledge tests; qualitative analyses of the training courses; patient recruitment; conduction of IPT-G sessions; supervision of IPT-G therapists; application of a semi-structured questionnaire to assess, investigate, and develop strategies against the identified barriers. RESULTS About 120 clinicians answered the pre-test; 84 completed the post-test. Pre- and post-test scores of IPT-G knowledge were significantly different. Twenty initially trained clinicians completed additional supervision in IPT-G. Qualitative analysis identified twelve barriers and six facilitators to IPT-G implementation in individual, organizational, and systemic contexts. CONCLUSIONS Implementation of IPT-G in primary care is a complex process with several steps. In the first step, health professionals were successfully trained in IPT-G. However, subsequent steps were more complex. Therefore, careful planning of IPT-G implementation is essential to maximize the success of this innovation. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-04-22 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/197261 10.11606/s1518-8787.2022056003731 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/197261 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.11606/s1518-8787.2022056003731 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/197261/181608 https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/197261/181610 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/xml application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 56 (2022); 23 Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 56 (2022); 23 Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 56 (2022); 23 1518-8787 0034-8910 reponame:Revista de Saúde Pública instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Revista de Saúde Pública |
collection |
Revista de Saúde Pública |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br |
_version_ |
1800221802682646528 |