E-LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: A FEATURE-BASED COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/jistem/article/view/186062 |
Resumo: | One of the main important resources for higher education is a Learning Management System (LMS), which has shown an enhancement of students’ progress with high quality learning outcomes worldwide. Many e-learning tools exist, each one has its own weaknesses and strongest points to the online learning process. This number increases continuously, and the existing tools are being updated, redeveloped, and upgraded. The aim of this study is to present a comprehensive comparative analysis between existing e-learning management systems. Unlike other relevant studies that have narrow scope either in terms of the number of tools or the number of comparative features, this work considers top twenty, highly recommended tools, both open source and commercial. Furthermore, more than twenty evaluation features were used carefully to fulfil students’ and instructors’ current needs. The results of this study have shown that Moodle outperforms the others and it is considered as the best free open source tool for educational purposes. It supports more than 100 different languages and provides its services to more than tens of millions of customers worldwide. Besides to Moodle, Chamilo, TotaraLearn, Open edX and Sakai have more built-in features that provide services to educational institutions. Also, this study showed that Docebo, SkyPrep, ProProfs, SAP Litmos, Moodle, TotaraLearn, Open edX and Opigno systems have more built-in security mechanisms such as antispam, antivirus, IP Blocker, data protection and complex password enforcement. Most considered systems have gamification features except Schoology, ATutor, Sakai, and Ilias, and most commercial systems can offer 24/7 customer care services, except Edmodo and Telnet, whereas open source tools offer this service on specific time slots except Opigno, Ilias, TotaraLearn, Chamilo, and Canvas where the service is offered 24/7. |
id |
USP-33_1bb735bc4f982ae1672c0ea4a7795b3c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/186062 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-33 |
network_name_str |
Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
E-LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: A FEATURE-BASED COMPARATIVE ANALYSISE-LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: A FEATURE-BASED COMPARATIVE ANALYSISLearning Management System (LMS)E-learningOpen SourceCommercialMoodleEvaluationLearning Management System (LMS)E-learningOpen SourceCommercialMoodleEvaluationOne of the main important resources for higher education is a Learning Management System (LMS), which has shown an enhancement of students’ progress with high quality learning outcomes worldwide. Many e-learning tools exist, each one has its own weaknesses and strongest points to the online learning process. This number increases continuously, and the existing tools are being updated, redeveloped, and upgraded. The aim of this study is to present a comprehensive comparative analysis between existing e-learning management systems. Unlike other relevant studies that have narrow scope either in terms of the number of tools or the number of comparative features, this work considers top twenty, highly recommended tools, both open source and commercial. Furthermore, more than twenty evaluation features were used carefully to fulfil students’ and instructors’ current needs. The results of this study have shown that Moodle outperforms the others and it is considered as the best free open source tool for educational purposes. It supports more than 100 different languages and provides its services to more than tens of millions of customers worldwide. Besides to Moodle, Chamilo, TotaraLearn, Open edX and Sakai have more built-in features that provide services to educational institutions. Also, this study showed that Docebo, SkyPrep, ProProfs, SAP Litmos, Moodle, TotaraLearn, Open edX and Opigno systems have more built-in security mechanisms such as antispam, antivirus, IP Blocker, data protection and complex password enforcement. Most considered systems have gamification features except Schoology, ATutor, Sakai, and Ilias, and most commercial systems can offer 24/7 customer care services, except Edmodo and Telnet, whereas open source tools offer this service on specific time slots except Opigno, Ilias, TotaraLearn, Chamilo, and Canvas where the service is offered 24/7. One of the main important resources for higher education is a Learning Management System (LMS), which has shown an enhancement of students’ progress with high quality learning outcomes worldwide. Many e-learning tools exist, each one has its own weaknesses and strongest points to the online learning process. This number increases continuously, and the existing tools are being updated, redeveloped, and upgraded. The aim of this study is to present a comprehensive comparative analysis between existing e-learning management systems. Unlike other relevant studies that have narrow scope either in terms of the number of tools or the number of comparative features, this work considers top twenty, highly recommended tools, both open source and commercial. Furthermore, more than twenty evaluation features were used carefully to fulfil students’ and instructors’ current needs. The results of this study have shown that Moodle outperforms the others and it is considered as the best free open source tool for educational purposes. It supports more than 100 different languages and provides its services to more than tens of millions of customers worldwide. Besides to Moodle, Chamilo, TotaraLearn, Open edX and Sakai have more built-in features that provide services to educational institutions. Also, this study showed that Docebo, SkyPrep, ProProfs, SAP Litmos, Moodle, TotaraLearn, Open edX and Opigno systems have more built-in security mechanisms such as antispam, antivirus, IP Blocker, data protection and complex password enforcement. Most considered systems have gamification features except Schoology, ATutor, Sakai, and Ilias, and most commercial systems can offer 24/7 customer care services, except Edmodo and Telnet, whereas open source tools offer this service on specific time slots except Opigno, Ilias, TotaraLearn, Chamilo, and Canvas where the service is offered 24/7. TECSI - FEA - Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração, Contabilidade e Atuária2022-08-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jistem/article/view/18606210.4301/S1807-1775202118003Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management; v. 18 (2021); e202118003Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management; Vol. 18 (2021); e202118003Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management; Vol. 18 (2021); e2021180031807-1775reponame:Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jistem/article/view/186062/171791Copyright (c) 2021 JISTEM - Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management (Online)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSalah, SaeedThabet, MahmoudSalah, SaeedThabet, Mahmoud2022-08-10T14:50:12Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/186062Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=1807-1775&lng=pt&nrm=isoPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||jistem@usp.br1807-17751807-1775opendoar:2022-08-10T14:50:12Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
E-LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: A FEATURE-BASED COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS E-LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: A FEATURE-BASED COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS |
title |
E-LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: A FEATURE-BASED COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS |
spellingShingle |
E-LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: A FEATURE-BASED COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS Salah, Saeed Learning Management System (LMS) E-learning Open Source Commercial Moodle Evaluation Learning Management System (LMS) E-learning Open Source Commercial Moodle Evaluation |
title_short |
E-LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: A FEATURE-BASED COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS |
title_full |
E-LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: A FEATURE-BASED COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS |
title_fullStr |
E-LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: A FEATURE-BASED COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS |
title_full_unstemmed |
E-LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: A FEATURE-BASED COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS |
title_sort |
E-LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: A FEATURE-BASED COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS |
author |
Salah, Saeed |
author_facet |
Salah, Saeed Thabet, Mahmoud |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Thabet, Mahmoud |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Salah, Saeed Thabet, Mahmoud Salah, Saeed Thabet, Mahmoud |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Learning Management System (LMS) E-learning Open Source Commercial Moodle Evaluation Learning Management System (LMS) E-learning Open Source Commercial Moodle Evaluation |
topic |
Learning Management System (LMS) E-learning Open Source Commercial Moodle Evaluation Learning Management System (LMS) E-learning Open Source Commercial Moodle Evaluation |
description |
One of the main important resources for higher education is a Learning Management System (LMS), which has shown an enhancement of students’ progress with high quality learning outcomes worldwide. Many e-learning tools exist, each one has its own weaknesses and strongest points to the online learning process. This number increases continuously, and the existing tools are being updated, redeveloped, and upgraded. The aim of this study is to present a comprehensive comparative analysis between existing e-learning management systems. Unlike other relevant studies that have narrow scope either in terms of the number of tools or the number of comparative features, this work considers top twenty, highly recommended tools, both open source and commercial. Furthermore, more than twenty evaluation features were used carefully to fulfil students’ and instructors’ current needs. The results of this study have shown that Moodle outperforms the others and it is considered as the best free open source tool for educational purposes. It supports more than 100 different languages and provides its services to more than tens of millions of customers worldwide. Besides to Moodle, Chamilo, TotaraLearn, Open edX and Sakai have more built-in features that provide services to educational institutions. Also, this study showed that Docebo, SkyPrep, ProProfs, SAP Litmos, Moodle, TotaraLearn, Open edX and Opigno systems have more built-in security mechanisms such as antispam, antivirus, IP Blocker, data protection and complex password enforcement. Most considered systems have gamification features except Schoology, ATutor, Sakai, and Ilias, and most commercial systems can offer 24/7 customer care services, except Edmodo and Telnet, whereas open source tools offer this service on specific time slots except Opigno, Ilias, TotaraLearn, Chamilo, and Canvas where the service is offered 24/7. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-08-10 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/jistem/article/view/186062 10.4301/S1807-1775202118003 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/jistem/article/view/186062 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.4301/S1807-1775202118003 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/jistem/article/view/186062/171791 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 JISTEM - Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management (Online) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 JISTEM - Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management (Online) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
TECSI - FEA - Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração, Contabilidade e Atuária |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
TECSI - FEA - Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração, Contabilidade e Atuária |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management; v. 18 (2021); e202118003 Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management; Vol. 18 (2021); e202118003 Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management; Vol. 18 (2021); e202118003 1807-1775 reponame:Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management (Online) instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management (Online) |
collection |
Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||jistem@usp.br |
_version_ |
1809284037263491072 |