RETHINKING SECTORAL TYPOLOGIES: A CLASSIFICATION OF ACTIVITY ACCORDING TO KNOWLEDGE AND TECHNOLOGICAL INTENSITY
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Administração e Inovação |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/108038 |
Resumo: | This article aims to integrate and adapt two classifications of economic activity from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development(OECD) and the Statistical Office of the European Commission (Eurostat) into a Brazilian context and contemporary studies of economicdevelopment. The classification that emerges, called the “Classification of economic activity according to technology and knowledge intensity”,results in (i) valuing the criteria that deals with the present and future factors of competitiveness, such as technology and knowledge, science andinnovation, and transversability and dissemination of information; (ii) overcoming the old dichotomy between manufacturing and services with anew but flexible and gradual classification, ranging from more high-tech and knowledge-intensive activities to low-tech, less knowledge-intensiveactivities. |
id |
USP-40_06d8e919025a2017305cd3a95e9975b2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/108038 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-40 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Administração e Inovação |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
RETHINKING SECTORAL TYPOLOGIES: A CLASSIFICATION OF ACTIVITY ACCORDING TO KNOWLEDGE AND TECHNOLOGICAL INTENSITYClassification of economic activityTechnologyKnowledgeCompetitivenessThis article aims to integrate and adapt two classifications of economic activity from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development(OECD) and the Statistical Office of the European Commission (Eurostat) into a Brazilian context and contemporary studies of economicdevelopment. The classification that emerges, called the “Classification of economic activity according to technology and knowledge intensity”,results in (i) valuing the criteria that deals with the present and future factors of competitiveness, such as technology and knowledge, science andinnovation, and transversability and dissemination of information; (ii) overcoming the old dichotomy between manufacturing and services with anew but flexible and gradual classification, ranging from more high-tech and knowledge-intensive activities to low-tech, less knowledge-intensiveactivities.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade2017-06-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/108038INMR - Innovation & Management Review; v. 13 n. 4 (2016); 232-2412515-8961reponame:Revista de Administração e Inovaçãoinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/108038/129471Abdal, AlexandreTorres-Freire, CarlosCalil, Victorinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-08-08T13:16:19Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/108038Revistahttp://www.viannajr.edu.br/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/raiPUBhttp://www.revistas.usp.br/viaatlantica/oairevistarai@usp.br||tatianepgt@revistarai.org1809-20391809-2039opendoar:2018-08-08T13:16:19Revista de Administração e Inovação - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
RETHINKING SECTORAL TYPOLOGIES: A CLASSIFICATION OF ACTIVITY ACCORDING TO KNOWLEDGE AND TECHNOLOGICAL INTENSITY |
title |
RETHINKING SECTORAL TYPOLOGIES: A CLASSIFICATION OF ACTIVITY ACCORDING TO KNOWLEDGE AND TECHNOLOGICAL INTENSITY |
spellingShingle |
RETHINKING SECTORAL TYPOLOGIES: A CLASSIFICATION OF ACTIVITY ACCORDING TO KNOWLEDGE AND TECHNOLOGICAL INTENSITY Abdal, Alexandre Classification of economic activity Technology Knowledge Competitiveness |
title_short |
RETHINKING SECTORAL TYPOLOGIES: A CLASSIFICATION OF ACTIVITY ACCORDING TO KNOWLEDGE AND TECHNOLOGICAL INTENSITY |
title_full |
RETHINKING SECTORAL TYPOLOGIES: A CLASSIFICATION OF ACTIVITY ACCORDING TO KNOWLEDGE AND TECHNOLOGICAL INTENSITY |
title_fullStr |
RETHINKING SECTORAL TYPOLOGIES: A CLASSIFICATION OF ACTIVITY ACCORDING TO KNOWLEDGE AND TECHNOLOGICAL INTENSITY |
title_full_unstemmed |
RETHINKING SECTORAL TYPOLOGIES: A CLASSIFICATION OF ACTIVITY ACCORDING TO KNOWLEDGE AND TECHNOLOGICAL INTENSITY |
title_sort |
RETHINKING SECTORAL TYPOLOGIES: A CLASSIFICATION OF ACTIVITY ACCORDING TO KNOWLEDGE AND TECHNOLOGICAL INTENSITY |
author |
Abdal, Alexandre |
author_facet |
Abdal, Alexandre Torres-Freire, Carlos Calil, Victor |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Torres-Freire, Carlos Calil, Victor |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Abdal, Alexandre Torres-Freire, Carlos Calil, Victor |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Classification of economic activity Technology Knowledge Competitiveness |
topic |
Classification of economic activity Technology Knowledge Competitiveness |
description |
This article aims to integrate and adapt two classifications of economic activity from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development(OECD) and the Statistical Office of the European Commission (Eurostat) into a Brazilian context and contemporary studies of economicdevelopment. The classification that emerges, called the “Classification of economic activity according to technology and knowledge intensity”,results in (i) valuing the criteria that deals with the present and future factors of competitiveness, such as technology and knowledge, science andinnovation, and transversability and dissemination of information; (ii) overcoming the old dichotomy between manufacturing and services with anew but flexible and gradual classification, ranging from more high-tech and knowledge-intensive activities to low-tech, less knowledge-intensiveactivities. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-06-06 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/108038 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/108038 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/108038/129471 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
INMR - Innovation & Management Review; v. 13 n. 4 (2016); 232-241 2515-8961 reponame:Revista de Administração e Inovação instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Revista de Administração e Inovação |
collection |
Revista de Administração e Inovação |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Administração e Inovação - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistarai@usp.br||tatianepgt@revistarai.org |
_version_ |
1800221936702193664 |