From governance to choreography: coordination of innovation ecosystems

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santos, Diego Alex Gazaro dos
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Zen, Aurora, Bittencourt, Bruno Anicet
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista de Administração e Inovação
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/195919
Resumo: Purpose – Innovation ecosystems can emerge and grow organically, but the process can also be managed through conscious intervention. Therefore, this study observes different motivations and expectations for each group of actors. The lack of alignment between actors could have a negative influence on the development of innovation ecosystems. This study aims to analyze the coordination strategies of the actors throughout the life cycle of innovation ecosystems. Design/methodology/approach – This study develops and proposes a model for coordinating innovation ecosystems based on the theoretical backgrounds of the ecosystem life cycle and ecosystem coordination. Findings – This study argues that each stage of an innovation ecosystem’s life cycle – inception, launching, growth and maturity – demands different coordination strategies. Initially, networks are simpler and thus the coordination issues are less difficult. However, as the ecosystem evolves and the complexity of the networks increases, a more sophisticated strategy, such as orchestration or choreography, is needed. Research limitations/implications – This is a theoretical study that recommends further research to test this model. Practical implications – The understanding of coordination and stages of the life cycle of an innovation ecosystem can guide actors in the design of strategies for developing of ecosystems. Social implications – The proposed framework could support strategies to engage civil society in actions to develop innovation ecosystems. Originality/value – This study presents a framework to understand the coordination strategies better, considering the stages of an innovation ecosystem’s life cycle.
id USP-40_5262cbd619f7dbf8f3163c5e6edd80fd
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/195919
network_acronym_str USP-40
network_name_str Revista de Administração e Inovação
repository_id_str
spelling From governance to choreography: coordination of innovation ecosystemsInnovation ecosystemEcosystem coordinationEcosystem life cyclePurpose – Innovation ecosystems can emerge and grow organically, but the process can also be managed through conscious intervention. Therefore, this study observes different motivations and expectations for each group of actors. The lack of alignment between actors could have a negative influence on the development of innovation ecosystems. This study aims to analyze the coordination strategies of the actors throughout the life cycle of innovation ecosystems. Design/methodology/approach – This study develops and proposes a model for coordinating innovation ecosystems based on the theoretical backgrounds of the ecosystem life cycle and ecosystem coordination. Findings – This study argues that each stage of an innovation ecosystem’s life cycle – inception, launching, growth and maturity – demands different coordination strategies. Initially, networks are simpler and thus the coordination issues are less difficult. However, as the ecosystem evolves and the complexity of the networks increases, a more sophisticated strategy, such as orchestration or choreography, is needed. Research limitations/implications – This is a theoretical study that recommends further research to test this model. Practical implications – The understanding of coordination and stages of the life cycle of an innovation ecosystem can guide actors in the design of strategies for developing of ecosystems. Social implications – The proposed framework could support strategies to engage civil society in actions to develop innovation ecosystems. Originality/value – This study presents a framework to understand the coordination strategies better, considering the stages of an innovation ecosystem’s life cycle.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade2022-03-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/19591910.1108/INMR-08-2020-0117INMR - Innovation & Management Review; v. 19 n. 1 (2022); 26-382515-8961reponame:Revista de Administração e Inovaçãoinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/195919/180727https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos, Diego Alex Gazaro dos Zen, Aurora Bittencourt, Bruno Anicet2022-03-24T00:57:04Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/195919Revistahttp://www.viannajr.edu.br/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/raiPUBhttp://www.revistas.usp.br/viaatlantica/oairevistarai@usp.br||tatianepgt@revistarai.org1809-20391809-2039opendoar:2022-03-24T00:57:04Revista de Administração e Inovação - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv From governance to choreography: coordination of innovation ecosystems
title From governance to choreography: coordination of innovation ecosystems
spellingShingle From governance to choreography: coordination of innovation ecosystems
Santos, Diego Alex Gazaro dos
Innovation ecosystem
Ecosystem coordination
Ecosystem life cycle
title_short From governance to choreography: coordination of innovation ecosystems
title_full From governance to choreography: coordination of innovation ecosystems
title_fullStr From governance to choreography: coordination of innovation ecosystems
title_full_unstemmed From governance to choreography: coordination of innovation ecosystems
title_sort From governance to choreography: coordination of innovation ecosystems
author Santos, Diego Alex Gazaro dos
author_facet Santos, Diego Alex Gazaro dos
Zen, Aurora
Bittencourt, Bruno Anicet
author_role author
author2 Zen, Aurora
Bittencourt, Bruno Anicet
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos, Diego Alex Gazaro dos
Zen, Aurora
Bittencourt, Bruno Anicet
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Innovation ecosystem
Ecosystem coordination
Ecosystem life cycle
topic Innovation ecosystem
Ecosystem coordination
Ecosystem life cycle
description Purpose – Innovation ecosystems can emerge and grow organically, but the process can also be managed through conscious intervention. Therefore, this study observes different motivations and expectations for each group of actors. The lack of alignment between actors could have a negative influence on the development of innovation ecosystems. This study aims to analyze the coordination strategies of the actors throughout the life cycle of innovation ecosystems. Design/methodology/approach – This study develops and proposes a model for coordinating innovation ecosystems based on the theoretical backgrounds of the ecosystem life cycle and ecosystem coordination. Findings – This study argues that each stage of an innovation ecosystem’s life cycle – inception, launching, growth and maturity – demands different coordination strategies. Initially, networks are simpler and thus the coordination issues are less difficult. However, as the ecosystem evolves and the complexity of the networks increases, a more sophisticated strategy, such as orchestration or choreography, is needed. Research limitations/implications – This is a theoretical study that recommends further research to test this model. Practical implications – The understanding of coordination and stages of the life cycle of an innovation ecosystem can guide actors in the design of strategies for developing of ecosystems. Social implications – The proposed framework could support strategies to engage civil society in actions to develop innovation ecosystems. Originality/value – This study presents a framework to understand the coordination strategies better, considering the stages of an innovation ecosystem’s life cycle.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-03-23
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/195919
10.1108/INMR-08-2020-0117
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/195919
identifier_str_mv 10.1108/INMR-08-2020-0117
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/195919/180727
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv INMR - Innovation & Management Review; v. 19 n. 1 (2022); 26-38
2515-8961
reponame:Revista de Administração e Inovação
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Revista de Administração e Inovação
collection Revista de Administração e Inovação
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Administração e Inovação - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistarai@usp.br||tatianepgt@revistarai.org
_version_ 1800221937790615552