The use of medical reports in lawsuits for the supply of medicines

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Alves, Deny Eduardo Pereira
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Direito Sanitário (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/rdisan/article/view/176911
Resumo: The article discussed the requirements of medical reports and prescriptions resulting from the judgement of Special Appeal nº 1.657.156/RJ, in which the High Court of Justice established the compulsory adoption measures that all Brazilian judges must follow to decide on the supply of drugs that are not listed in the official Brazilian Unified Health System. This is a bibliographic and documentary research, with a qualitative and exploratory approach, based on the electronic document availability of the judgement trough the High Court of Justice portal. This research followed a critical approach, and entailed searches in various bibliographic sources, including: Google Scholar, Virtual Health Library, Scientific Electronic Library Online and the Brazilian Digital Library of Dissertations and Theses of the Brazilian Institute of Information in Science and Technology. Finally, we proceeded to the analysis of the findings, and, with a theoretical and empirical basis, we sought to understand and justify the requirements related to the medical report used in the lawsuits. This had the purpose of contributing to both the management of the health policy and the legal processes themselves, and the popularization of the requirements. It is concluded that these requirements will conduct to having medical reports with more information, doctors aware of important actions, and prioritization of clinical protocols, therapeutic guidelines and medications included in the official lists of Brazilian Unified Health System.
id USP-4_ca47fdf52a3e4d81c31e7fd80c829b4e
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/176911
network_acronym_str USP-4
network_name_str Revista de Direito Sanitário (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The use of medical reports in lawsuits for the supply of medicinesLaudo médico e a sua utilização em ações judiciais de fornecimento de medicamentosAssistência FarmacêuticaDemandas JudiciaisLaudo MédicoRecurso Especial n. 1.657.156Superior Tribunal de JustiçaPharmaceutical CareJudicial RequirementsMedical ReportSpecial AppealHigh Court of JusticeThe article discussed the requirements of medical reports and prescriptions resulting from the judgement of Special Appeal nº 1.657.156/RJ, in which the High Court of Justice established the compulsory adoption measures that all Brazilian judges must follow to decide on the supply of drugs that are not listed in the official Brazilian Unified Health System. This is a bibliographic and documentary research, with a qualitative and exploratory approach, based on the electronic document availability of the judgement trough the High Court of Justice portal. This research followed a critical approach, and entailed searches in various bibliographic sources, including: Google Scholar, Virtual Health Library, Scientific Electronic Library Online and the Brazilian Digital Library of Dissertations and Theses of the Brazilian Institute of Information in Science and Technology. Finally, we proceeded to the analysis of the findings, and, with a theoretical and empirical basis, we sought to understand and justify the requirements related to the medical report used in the lawsuits. This had the purpose of contributing to both the management of the health policy and the legal processes themselves, and the popularization of the requirements. It is concluded that these requirements will conduct to having medical reports with more information, doctors aware of important actions, and prioritization of clinical protocols, therapeutic guidelines and medications included in the official lists of Brazilian Unified Health System.O artigo discutiu os requisitos ínsitos do laudo médico e receituário decorrentes do julgamento do Recurso Especial n. 1.657.156/RJ, no qual o Superior Tribunal de Justiça fixou as bases de observância obrigatória por todos os juízes brasileiros para determinação de fornecimento de fármacos não constantes das listas oficiais do Sistema Único de Saúde. Foi feita pesquisa bibliográfica e documental, com abordagem qualitativa e exploratória, a partir do acórdão disponibilizado pelo portal do Superior Tribunal de Justiça; seguiu-se, então, para consultas às demais fontes bibliográficas, dentre as quais Google Scholar, Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde, Scientific Electronic Library Online e Biblioteca Digital Brasileira de Teses e Dissertações do Instituto Brasileiro de Informação em Ciência e Tecnologia. Por fim, passou-se à análise dos achados e, com embasamento teórico e empírico, buscou-se compreender e justificar as exigências relativas a laudo médico utilizado em ações judiciais, em uma tentativa de contribuir para a gestão da política sanitária e dos próprios processos judiciais, bem como para a popularização do precedente. Concluiu-se que o precedente do Superior Tribunal de Justiça levara à exigência de laudos médicos com mais informações, demandando nova atuação dos médicos, e à expectativa de priorização dos protocolos clínicos, das diretrizes terapêuticas e dos medicamentos constantes das listas oficiais do Sistema Único de Saúde.Universidade de São Paulo. Núcleo de Pesquisa em Direito Sanitário. Centro de Estudos e Pesquisas de Direito Sanitário2022-09-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresPeer-reviewed articleapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rdisan/article/view/17691110.11606/issn.2316-9044.rdisan.2022.176911Revista de Direito Sanitário; v. 22 n. 2 (2022); e0001Journal of Health Law; Vol. 22 No. 2 (2022); e0001Revista de Direito Sanitário; Vol. 22 Núm. 2 (2022); e00012316-9044reponame:Revista de Direito Sanitário (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rdisan/article/view/176911/186227Copyright (c) 2022 Revista de Direito Sanitáriohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlves, Deny Eduardo Pereira2023-02-01T15:51:01Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/176911Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rdisanPUBhttp://www.revistas.usp.br/rdisan/oaisdallari@usp.br||revdisan@usp.br2316-90441516-4179opendoar:2023-02-01T15:51:01Revista de Direito Sanitário (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The use of medical reports in lawsuits for the supply of medicines
Laudo médico e a sua utilização em ações judiciais de fornecimento de medicamentos
title The use of medical reports in lawsuits for the supply of medicines
spellingShingle The use of medical reports in lawsuits for the supply of medicines
Alves, Deny Eduardo Pereira
Assistência Farmacêutica
Demandas Judiciais
Laudo Médico
Recurso Especial n. 1.657.156
Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Pharmaceutical Care
Judicial Requirements
Medical Report
Special Appeal
High Court of Justice
title_short The use of medical reports in lawsuits for the supply of medicines
title_full The use of medical reports in lawsuits for the supply of medicines
title_fullStr The use of medical reports in lawsuits for the supply of medicines
title_full_unstemmed The use of medical reports in lawsuits for the supply of medicines
title_sort The use of medical reports in lawsuits for the supply of medicines
author Alves, Deny Eduardo Pereira
author_facet Alves, Deny Eduardo Pereira
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Alves, Deny Eduardo Pereira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Assistência Farmacêutica
Demandas Judiciais
Laudo Médico
Recurso Especial n. 1.657.156
Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Pharmaceutical Care
Judicial Requirements
Medical Report
Special Appeal
High Court of Justice
topic Assistência Farmacêutica
Demandas Judiciais
Laudo Médico
Recurso Especial n. 1.657.156
Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Pharmaceutical Care
Judicial Requirements
Medical Report
Special Appeal
High Court of Justice
description The article discussed the requirements of medical reports and prescriptions resulting from the judgement of Special Appeal nº 1.657.156/RJ, in which the High Court of Justice established the compulsory adoption measures that all Brazilian judges must follow to decide on the supply of drugs that are not listed in the official Brazilian Unified Health System. This is a bibliographic and documentary research, with a qualitative and exploratory approach, based on the electronic document availability of the judgement trough the High Court of Justice portal. This research followed a critical approach, and entailed searches in various bibliographic sources, including: Google Scholar, Virtual Health Library, Scientific Electronic Library Online and the Brazilian Digital Library of Dissertations and Theses of the Brazilian Institute of Information in Science and Technology. Finally, we proceeded to the analysis of the findings, and, with a theoretical and empirical basis, we sought to understand and justify the requirements related to the medical report used in the lawsuits. This had the purpose of contributing to both the management of the health policy and the legal processes themselves, and the popularization of the requirements. It is concluded that these requirements will conduct to having medical reports with more information, doctors aware of important actions, and prioritization of clinical protocols, therapeutic guidelines and medications included in the official lists of Brazilian Unified Health System.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-09-12
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado pelos pares
Peer-reviewed article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rdisan/article/view/176911
10.11606/issn.2316-9044.rdisan.2022.176911
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/rdisan/article/view/176911
identifier_str_mv 10.11606/issn.2316-9044.rdisan.2022.176911
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rdisan/article/view/176911/186227
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista de Direito Sanitário
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista de Direito Sanitário
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Núcleo de Pesquisa em Direito Sanitário. Centro de Estudos e Pesquisas de Direito Sanitário
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Núcleo de Pesquisa em Direito Sanitário. Centro de Estudos e Pesquisas de Direito Sanitário
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Direito Sanitário; v. 22 n. 2 (2022); e0001
Journal of Health Law; Vol. 22 No. 2 (2022); e0001
Revista de Direito Sanitário; Vol. 22 Núm. 2 (2022); e0001
2316-9044
reponame:Revista de Direito Sanitário (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Revista de Direito Sanitário (Online)
collection Revista de Direito Sanitário (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Direito Sanitário (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv sdallari@usp.br||revdisan@usp.br
_version_ 1787713914522304512

Registros relacionados