Relación entre la coordinación motora y la función ejecutiva en adultos y ancianos

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ribeiro, Maria Luiza Triolo
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Almeida, Daniela Melo de, Voos, Mariana Callil
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Fisioterapia e Pesquisa
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/201734
Resumo: Brazilian older adults present a relatively lowschooling level when compared with other populations.In clinical practice, defining if more subtle alterationsobserved in executive function (EF) and motor coordinationtests in older adults are due to an initial neurologicalcondition or low schooling level is difficult. This study aimedto evaluate the possible differences in motor coordinationand EF between adults and older adults with high andlow schooling level as well as the possible correlationsbetween motor coordination and EF in this sample. A totalof 75 healthy individuals (aged from 30 to 89 years) wereevaluated. EF was assessed by the trail making test (TMT)whereas motor coordination was assessed by the upper limbdiadochokinetic test, which is the rapid alternation betweensupination and pronation of the forearms (right, left, bothperforming in-phase movements, and both performinganti-phase movements). Analysis of variance showedthat age and schooling level possibly influenced EF andmotor coordination. Possible relationships between EF anddiadochokinesis were calculated by Pearson’s correlation.Older adults with low schooling level were significantlyslower on the TMT part B (cognitive and motor) and deltaTMT (cognitive). All groups were slower performing theanti-phase movement, especially those with low schoolinglevel. Results showed only weak correlations between EFand motor coordination. Age and schooling level influencedexecutive function and motor coordination. However, the EF and motor coordination tests presented no correlation whenthese two factors were statistically corrected
id USP-9_8ece80c0258ee9cf5c76f36fe9bd3d64
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/201734
network_acronym_str USP-9
network_name_str Fisioterapia e Pesquisa
repository_id_str
spelling Relación entre la coordinación motora y la función ejecutiva en adultos y ancianosRelationship between motor coordination and executive function in adults and older adultsRelação entre a coordenação motora e a função executiva em adultos e idososDesempenho PsicomotorEscolaridadCogniciónAncianoPsychomotor Performance Schooling LevelCognitionOlder AdultExecutive FunctionDesempenho PsicomotorEscolaridadeCogniçãoIdoso Função ExecutivaBrazilian older adults present a relatively lowschooling level when compared with other populations.In clinical practice, defining if more subtle alterationsobserved in executive function (EF) and motor coordinationtests in older adults are due to an initial neurologicalcondition or low schooling level is difficult. This study aimedto evaluate the possible differences in motor coordinationand EF between adults and older adults with high andlow schooling level as well as the possible correlationsbetween motor coordination and EF in this sample. A totalof 75 healthy individuals (aged from 30 to 89 years) wereevaluated. EF was assessed by the trail making test (TMT)whereas motor coordination was assessed by the upper limbdiadochokinetic test, which is the rapid alternation betweensupination and pronation of the forearms (right, left, bothperforming in-phase movements, and both performinganti-phase movements). Analysis of variance showedthat age and schooling level possibly influenced EF andmotor coordination. Possible relationships between EF anddiadochokinesis were calculated by Pearson’s correlation.Older adults with low schooling level were significantlyslower on the TMT part B (cognitive and motor) and deltaTMT (cognitive). All groups were slower performing theanti-phase movement, especially those with low schoolinglevel. Results showed only weak correlations between EFand motor coordination. Age and schooling level influencedexecutive function and motor coordination. However, the EF and motor coordination tests presented no correlation whenthese two factors were statistically correctedA população idosa brasileira possuiescolaridade relativamente baixa, quando comparadaa outras populações. Na prática clínica, torna-se difícildecidir se alterações mais sutis, observadas nos testesde função executiva (FE) e coordenação motora deidosos, devem-se a um quadro neurológico inicial ou àbaixa escolaridade. O objetivo do trabalho foi investigar:(1) possíveis diferenças na coordenação motora e FEde adultos e idosos com escolaridade alta e baixa;e (2) possíveis correlações entre coordenação motora e FEnessa amostra. Foram avaliados 75 indivíduos saudáveis,com idade entre 30 e 89 anos. A FE foi avaliada por meio dotrail making test (TMT) e a coordenação motora foi avaliadacom o teste de diadococinesia dos membros superiores,que consiste na alternância rápida entre supinação epronação do antebraço (direito, esquerdo, de ambosos antebraços em fase, e ambos em antifase). A análisede variância investigou possíveis influências da idadee da escolaridade na FE e coordenação motora. O testede correlação de Pearson investigou possíveis relaçõesentre FE e diadococinesia. Idosos com escolaridadebaixa foram significativamente mais lentos na parte B(cognitivo-motora) e no delta (cognitiva) do TMT. Todos osgrupos foram mais lentos na condição antifase, sobretudoos idosos com escolaridade baixa. Encontramos apenascorrelações fracas entre FE e coordenação motora. A idadee a escolaridade influenciaram na FE e na coordenaçãomotora; porém, os testes de FE e coordenação motoranão apresentaram correlação quando esses dois fatoresforam corrigidos estatisticamente.La población anciana brasileña tiene un bajo niveleducativo en comparación con otras poblaciones. En la prácticaclínica es difícil decidir si las alteraciones más sutiles, observadas enpruebas de función ejecutiva (FE) y coordinación motora en ancianos,son provenientes de una condición neurológica inicial o de un bajonivel educativo. El objetivo de este estudio fue examinar: (1) posiblesdiferencias en la coordinación motora y la FE de adultos y ancianoscon altos y bajos niveles educativos; y (2) posibles correlacionesentre coordinación motora y FE en esta muestra. Se evaluaron a75 individuos sanos, con edades entre 30 y 89 años. Para la FEse aplicó la Prueba de creación de senderos (TMT en inglés), y lacoordinación motora se evaluó con la prueba de diadococinesiade miembros superiores, que consiste en una alternancia rápidaentre supinación y pronación del antebrazo (derecho, izquierdo,ambos antebrazos en fase y ambos en antifase). El análisis devarianza analizó las posibles influencias de la edad y la educaciónen la FE y la coordinación motora. La prueba de correlación dePearson evaluó las posibles relaciones entre FE y diadococinesia.Los ancianos con bajo nivel educativo fueron significativamentemás lentos en la parte B (cognitivo-motora) y delta (cognitiva) dela TMT. Todos los grupos fueron más lentos en la condición antifase,especialmente los ancianos con bajo nivel educativo. Se encontróúnicamente correlaciones débiles entre FE y coordinación motora.La edad y el nivel educativo influyeron en la FE y la coordinaciónmotora; sin embargo, las pruebas de FE y de coordinación motora nomostraron correlación cuando estos dos factores fueron corregidosestadísticamenteUniversidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina2022-08-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/20173410.1590/1809-2950/21027729022022PTFisioterapia e Pesquisa; Vol. 29 No. 2 (2022); 203-209Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; Vol. 29 Núm. 2 (2022); 203-209Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; v. 29 n. 2 (2022); 203-2092316-91171809-2950reponame:Fisioterapia e Pesquisainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/201734/185805https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/201734/185806Copyright (c) 2022 Maria Luiza Triolo Ribeiro, Daniela Melo de Almeida, Mariana Callil Vooshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRibeiro, Maria Luiza Triolo Almeida, Daniela Melo de Voos, Mariana Callil 2023-05-26T12:28:48Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/201734Revistahttp://www.revistas.usp.br/fpuspPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/oai||revfisio@usp.br2316-91171809-2950opendoar:2023-05-26T12:28:48Fisioterapia e Pesquisa - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Relación entre la coordinación motora y la función ejecutiva en adultos y ancianos
Relationship between motor coordination and executive function in adults and older adults
Relação entre a coordenação motora e a função executiva em adultos e idosos
title Relación entre la coordinación motora y la función ejecutiva en adultos y ancianos
spellingShingle Relación entre la coordinación motora y la función ejecutiva en adultos y ancianos
Ribeiro, Maria Luiza Triolo
Desempenho Psicomotor
Escolaridad
Cognición
Anciano
Psychomotor Performance
Schooling Level
Cognition
Older Adult
Executive Function
Desempenho Psicomotor
Escolaridade
Cognição
Idoso
Função Executiva
title_short Relación entre la coordinación motora y la función ejecutiva en adultos y ancianos
title_full Relación entre la coordinación motora y la función ejecutiva en adultos y ancianos
title_fullStr Relación entre la coordinación motora y la función ejecutiva en adultos y ancianos
title_full_unstemmed Relación entre la coordinación motora y la función ejecutiva en adultos y ancianos
title_sort Relación entre la coordinación motora y la función ejecutiva en adultos y ancianos
author Ribeiro, Maria Luiza Triolo
author_facet Ribeiro, Maria Luiza Triolo
Almeida, Daniela Melo de
Voos, Mariana Callil
author_role author
author2 Almeida, Daniela Melo de
Voos, Mariana Callil
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ribeiro, Maria Luiza Triolo
Almeida, Daniela Melo de
Voos, Mariana Callil
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Desempenho Psicomotor
Escolaridad
Cognición
Anciano
Psychomotor Performance
Schooling Level
Cognition
Older Adult
Executive Function
Desempenho Psicomotor
Escolaridade
Cognição
Idoso
Função Executiva
topic Desempenho Psicomotor
Escolaridad
Cognición
Anciano
Psychomotor Performance
Schooling Level
Cognition
Older Adult
Executive Function
Desempenho Psicomotor
Escolaridade
Cognição
Idoso
Função Executiva
description Brazilian older adults present a relatively lowschooling level when compared with other populations.In clinical practice, defining if more subtle alterationsobserved in executive function (EF) and motor coordinationtests in older adults are due to an initial neurologicalcondition or low schooling level is difficult. This study aimedto evaluate the possible differences in motor coordinationand EF between adults and older adults with high andlow schooling level as well as the possible correlationsbetween motor coordination and EF in this sample. A totalof 75 healthy individuals (aged from 30 to 89 years) wereevaluated. EF was assessed by the trail making test (TMT)whereas motor coordination was assessed by the upper limbdiadochokinetic test, which is the rapid alternation betweensupination and pronation of the forearms (right, left, bothperforming in-phase movements, and both performinganti-phase movements). Analysis of variance showedthat age and schooling level possibly influenced EF andmotor coordination. Possible relationships between EF anddiadochokinesis were calculated by Pearson’s correlation.Older adults with low schooling level were significantlyslower on the TMT part B (cognitive and motor) and deltaTMT (cognitive). All groups were slower performing theanti-phase movement, especially those with low schoolinglevel. Results showed only weak correlations between EFand motor coordination. Age and schooling level influencedexecutive function and motor coordination. However, the EF and motor coordination tests presented no correlation whenthese two factors were statistically corrected
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-08-08
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/201734
10.1590/1809-2950/21027729022022PT
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/201734
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1809-2950/21027729022022PT
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/201734/185805
https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/201734/185806
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Maria Luiza Triolo Ribeiro, Daniela Melo de Almeida, Mariana Callil Voos
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Maria Luiza Triolo Ribeiro, Daniela Melo de Almeida, Mariana Callil Voos
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; Vol. 29 No. 2 (2022); 203-209
Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; Vol. 29 Núm. 2 (2022); 203-209
Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; v. 29 n. 2 (2022); 203-209
2316-9117
1809-2950
reponame:Fisioterapia e Pesquisa
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Fisioterapia e Pesquisa
collection Fisioterapia e Pesquisa
repository.name.fl_str_mv Fisioterapia e Pesquisa - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revfisio@usp.br
_version_ 1787713740854001664

Registros relacionados