Relación entre la coordinación motora y la función ejecutiva en adultos y ancianos
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Fisioterapia e Pesquisa |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/201734 |
Resumo: | Brazilian older adults present a relatively lowschooling level when compared with other populations.In clinical practice, defining if more subtle alterationsobserved in executive function (EF) and motor coordinationtests in older adults are due to an initial neurologicalcondition or low schooling level is difficult. This study aimedto evaluate the possible differences in motor coordinationand EF between adults and older adults with high andlow schooling level as well as the possible correlationsbetween motor coordination and EF in this sample. A totalof 75 healthy individuals (aged from 30 to 89 years) wereevaluated. EF was assessed by the trail making test (TMT)whereas motor coordination was assessed by the upper limbdiadochokinetic test, which is the rapid alternation betweensupination and pronation of the forearms (right, left, bothperforming in-phase movements, and both performinganti-phase movements). Analysis of variance showedthat age and schooling level possibly influenced EF andmotor coordination. Possible relationships between EF anddiadochokinesis were calculated by Pearson’s correlation.Older adults with low schooling level were significantlyslower on the TMT part B (cognitive and motor) and deltaTMT (cognitive). All groups were slower performing theanti-phase movement, especially those with low schoolinglevel. Results showed only weak correlations between EFand motor coordination. Age and schooling level influencedexecutive function and motor coordination. However, the EF and motor coordination tests presented no correlation whenthese two factors were statistically corrected |
id |
USP-9_8ece80c0258ee9cf5c76f36fe9bd3d64 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/201734 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-9 |
network_name_str |
Fisioterapia e Pesquisa |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Relación entre la coordinación motora y la función ejecutiva en adultos y ancianosRelationship between motor coordination and executive function in adults and older adultsRelação entre a coordenação motora e a função executiva em adultos e idososDesempenho PsicomotorEscolaridadCogniciónAncianoPsychomotor Performance Schooling LevelCognitionOlder AdultExecutive FunctionDesempenho PsicomotorEscolaridadeCogniçãoIdoso Função ExecutivaBrazilian older adults present a relatively lowschooling level when compared with other populations.In clinical practice, defining if more subtle alterationsobserved in executive function (EF) and motor coordinationtests in older adults are due to an initial neurologicalcondition or low schooling level is difficult. This study aimedto evaluate the possible differences in motor coordinationand EF between adults and older adults with high andlow schooling level as well as the possible correlationsbetween motor coordination and EF in this sample. A totalof 75 healthy individuals (aged from 30 to 89 years) wereevaluated. EF was assessed by the trail making test (TMT)whereas motor coordination was assessed by the upper limbdiadochokinetic test, which is the rapid alternation betweensupination and pronation of the forearms (right, left, bothperforming in-phase movements, and both performinganti-phase movements). Analysis of variance showedthat age and schooling level possibly influenced EF andmotor coordination. Possible relationships between EF anddiadochokinesis were calculated by Pearson’s correlation.Older adults with low schooling level were significantlyslower on the TMT part B (cognitive and motor) and deltaTMT (cognitive). All groups were slower performing theanti-phase movement, especially those with low schoolinglevel. Results showed only weak correlations between EFand motor coordination. Age and schooling level influencedexecutive function and motor coordination. However, the EF and motor coordination tests presented no correlation whenthese two factors were statistically correctedA população idosa brasileira possuiescolaridade relativamente baixa, quando comparadaa outras populações. Na prática clínica, torna-se difícildecidir se alterações mais sutis, observadas nos testesde função executiva (FE) e coordenação motora deidosos, devem-se a um quadro neurológico inicial ou àbaixa escolaridade. O objetivo do trabalho foi investigar:(1) possíveis diferenças na coordenação motora e FEde adultos e idosos com escolaridade alta e baixa;e (2) possíveis correlações entre coordenação motora e FEnessa amostra. Foram avaliados 75 indivíduos saudáveis,com idade entre 30 e 89 anos. A FE foi avaliada por meio dotrail making test (TMT) e a coordenação motora foi avaliadacom o teste de diadococinesia dos membros superiores,que consiste na alternância rápida entre supinação epronação do antebraço (direito, esquerdo, de ambosos antebraços em fase, e ambos em antifase). A análisede variância investigou possíveis influências da idadee da escolaridade na FE e coordenação motora. O testede correlação de Pearson investigou possíveis relaçõesentre FE e diadococinesia. Idosos com escolaridadebaixa foram significativamente mais lentos na parte B(cognitivo-motora) e no delta (cognitiva) do TMT. Todos osgrupos foram mais lentos na condição antifase, sobretudoos idosos com escolaridade baixa. Encontramos apenascorrelações fracas entre FE e coordenação motora. A idadee a escolaridade influenciaram na FE e na coordenaçãomotora; porém, os testes de FE e coordenação motoranão apresentaram correlação quando esses dois fatoresforam corrigidos estatisticamente.La población anciana brasileña tiene un bajo niveleducativo en comparación con otras poblaciones. En la prácticaclínica es difícil decidir si las alteraciones más sutiles, observadas enpruebas de función ejecutiva (FE) y coordinación motora en ancianos,son provenientes de una condición neurológica inicial o de un bajonivel educativo. El objetivo de este estudio fue examinar: (1) posiblesdiferencias en la coordinación motora y la FE de adultos y ancianoscon altos y bajos niveles educativos; y (2) posibles correlacionesentre coordinación motora y FE en esta muestra. Se evaluaron a75 individuos sanos, con edades entre 30 y 89 años. Para la FEse aplicó la Prueba de creación de senderos (TMT en inglés), y lacoordinación motora se evaluó con la prueba de diadococinesiade miembros superiores, que consiste en una alternancia rápidaentre supinación y pronación del antebrazo (derecho, izquierdo,ambos antebrazos en fase y ambos en antifase). El análisis devarianza analizó las posibles influencias de la edad y la educaciónen la FE y la coordinación motora. La prueba de correlación dePearson evaluó las posibles relaciones entre FE y diadococinesia.Los ancianos con bajo nivel educativo fueron significativamentemás lentos en la parte B (cognitivo-motora) y delta (cognitiva) dela TMT. Todos los grupos fueron más lentos en la condición antifase,especialmente los ancianos con bajo nivel educativo. Se encontróúnicamente correlaciones débiles entre FE y coordinación motora.La edad y el nivel educativo influyeron en la FE y la coordinaciónmotora; sin embargo, las pruebas de FE y de coordinación motora nomostraron correlación cuando estos dos factores fueron corregidosestadísticamenteUniversidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina2022-08-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/20173410.1590/1809-2950/21027729022022PTFisioterapia e Pesquisa; Vol. 29 No. 2 (2022); 203-209Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; Vol. 29 Núm. 2 (2022); 203-209Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; v. 29 n. 2 (2022); 203-2092316-91171809-2950reponame:Fisioterapia e Pesquisainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/201734/185805https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/201734/185806Copyright (c) 2022 Maria Luiza Triolo Ribeiro, Daniela Melo de Almeida, Mariana Callil Vooshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRibeiro, Maria Luiza Triolo Almeida, Daniela Melo de Voos, Mariana Callil 2023-05-26T12:28:48Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/201734Revistahttp://www.revistas.usp.br/fpuspPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/oai||revfisio@usp.br2316-91171809-2950opendoar:2023-05-26T12:28:48Fisioterapia e Pesquisa - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Relación entre la coordinación motora y la función ejecutiva en adultos y ancianos Relationship between motor coordination and executive function in adults and older adults Relação entre a coordenação motora e a função executiva em adultos e idosos |
title |
Relación entre la coordinación motora y la función ejecutiva en adultos y ancianos |
spellingShingle |
Relación entre la coordinación motora y la función ejecutiva en adultos y ancianos Ribeiro, Maria Luiza Triolo Desempenho Psicomotor Escolaridad Cognición Anciano Psychomotor Performance Schooling Level Cognition Older Adult Executive Function Desempenho Psicomotor Escolaridade Cognição Idoso Função Executiva |
title_short |
Relación entre la coordinación motora y la función ejecutiva en adultos y ancianos |
title_full |
Relación entre la coordinación motora y la función ejecutiva en adultos y ancianos |
title_fullStr |
Relación entre la coordinación motora y la función ejecutiva en adultos y ancianos |
title_full_unstemmed |
Relación entre la coordinación motora y la función ejecutiva en adultos y ancianos |
title_sort |
Relación entre la coordinación motora y la función ejecutiva en adultos y ancianos |
author |
Ribeiro, Maria Luiza Triolo |
author_facet |
Ribeiro, Maria Luiza Triolo Almeida, Daniela Melo de Voos, Mariana Callil |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Almeida, Daniela Melo de Voos, Mariana Callil |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ribeiro, Maria Luiza Triolo Almeida, Daniela Melo de Voos, Mariana Callil |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Desempenho Psicomotor Escolaridad Cognición Anciano Psychomotor Performance Schooling Level Cognition Older Adult Executive Function Desempenho Psicomotor Escolaridade Cognição Idoso Função Executiva |
topic |
Desempenho Psicomotor Escolaridad Cognición Anciano Psychomotor Performance Schooling Level Cognition Older Adult Executive Function Desempenho Psicomotor Escolaridade Cognição Idoso Função Executiva |
description |
Brazilian older adults present a relatively lowschooling level when compared with other populations.In clinical practice, defining if more subtle alterationsobserved in executive function (EF) and motor coordinationtests in older adults are due to an initial neurologicalcondition or low schooling level is difficult. This study aimedto evaluate the possible differences in motor coordinationand EF between adults and older adults with high andlow schooling level as well as the possible correlationsbetween motor coordination and EF in this sample. A totalof 75 healthy individuals (aged from 30 to 89 years) wereevaluated. EF was assessed by the trail making test (TMT)whereas motor coordination was assessed by the upper limbdiadochokinetic test, which is the rapid alternation betweensupination and pronation of the forearms (right, left, bothperforming in-phase movements, and both performinganti-phase movements). Analysis of variance showedthat age and schooling level possibly influenced EF andmotor coordination. Possible relationships between EF anddiadochokinesis were calculated by Pearson’s correlation.Older adults with low schooling level were significantlyslower on the TMT part B (cognitive and motor) and deltaTMT (cognitive). All groups were slower performing theanti-phase movement, especially those with low schoolinglevel. Results showed only weak correlations between EFand motor coordination. Age and schooling level influencedexecutive function and motor coordination. However, the EF and motor coordination tests presented no correlation whenthese two factors were statistically corrected |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-08-08 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/201734 10.1590/1809-2950/21027729022022PT |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/201734 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/1809-2950/21027729022022PT |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/201734/185805 https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/201734/185806 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Maria Luiza Triolo Ribeiro, Daniela Melo de Almeida, Mariana Callil Voos https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Maria Luiza Triolo Ribeiro, Daniela Melo de Almeida, Mariana Callil Voos https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; Vol. 29 No. 2 (2022); 203-209 Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; Vol. 29 Núm. 2 (2022); 203-209 Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; v. 29 n. 2 (2022); 203-209 2316-9117 1809-2950 reponame:Fisioterapia e Pesquisa instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Fisioterapia e Pesquisa |
collection |
Fisioterapia e Pesquisa |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Fisioterapia e Pesquisa - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revfisio@usp.br |
_version_ |
1787713740854001664 |