An approach for assessing the quality of crowdsourced geographic information in the flood management domain

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Degrossi, Livia Castro
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Tese
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP
Texto Completo: https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/55/55134/tde-06012020-174847/
Resumo: Crowdsourced Geographic Information (CGI) encompasses both active/conscious and passive/ unconscious georeferenced information generated by non-experts. The use of CGI in the domain of flood management is considerably recent and has been motivated by its potential as source of geographic information in situations where authoritative data is scarce or unavailable. Given that citizens may vary greatly in knowledge and expertise, the quality of such information is a key concern when making use of CGI. Moreover, the usability of the crowdsourcing platforms is another critical point that impacts the quality of CGI, since increasing complexity of such systems can lead to the provision of erroneous or inaccurate information. Although usability aspects have been increasingly discussed among designers and developers of computerized systems, there is a lack of studies that investigate strategies for the enhancement of the usability of crowdsourcing platforms. In this perspective, the assessment of CGI quality is an important step to determine if the information fits a specific purpose. A common way of assessing the quality of CGI gathered by crowdsourcing platforms is the evaluation of each CGI item. However, in crisis situations, there is short time to scrutinize a great amount of data and, therefore, minimizing information overload is critically important. An interesting, but poorly explored, strategy is the assessment of the quality of aggregated CGI elements, instead of a single one. This doctoral thesis proposes an approach for the improvement and assessment of CGI quality in the domain of flood management. It describes a taxonomy of methods for the assessment of CGI quality in the absence of authoritative data, as well as proposes a method for evaluating the quality of CGI and a new interface for the Citizen Observatory of Floods. Results obtained in the evaluation of the main contributions reveal that the method can explain the quality of CGI and the usability of the new interface increased.
id USP_ce0afef4f26804e25f593cf12e43269d
oai_identifier_str oai:teses.usp.br:tde-06012020-174847
network_acronym_str USP
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP
repository_id_str 2721
spelling An approach for assessing the quality of crowdsourced geographic information in the flood management domainUma abordagem para a avaliação da qualidade de informações geográficas voluntárias no domínio de gestão de inundaçãoAvaliação da qualidadeCitizen observatoryCrowdsourced geographic informationFlood managementGestão de inundaçãoInformação geográfica voluntáriaObservatório cidadãoQuality assessmentCrowdsourced Geographic Information (CGI) encompasses both active/conscious and passive/ unconscious georeferenced information generated by non-experts. The use of CGI in the domain of flood management is considerably recent and has been motivated by its potential as source of geographic information in situations where authoritative data is scarce or unavailable. Given that citizens may vary greatly in knowledge and expertise, the quality of such information is a key concern when making use of CGI. Moreover, the usability of the crowdsourcing platforms is another critical point that impacts the quality of CGI, since increasing complexity of such systems can lead to the provision of erroneous or inaccurate information. Although usability aspects have been increasingly discussed among designers and developers of computerized systems, there is a lack of studies that investigate strategies for the enhancement of the usability of crowdsourcing platforms. In this perspective, the assessment of CGI quality is an important step to determine if the information fits a specific purpose. A common way of assessing the quality of CGI gathered by crowdsourcing platforms is the evaluation of each CGI item. However, in crisis situations, there is short time to scrutinize a great amount of data and, therefore, minimizing information overload is critically important. An interesting, but poorly explored, strategy is the assessment of the quality of aggregated CGI elements, instead of a single one. This doctoral thesis proposes an approach for the improvement and assessment of CGI quality in the domain of flood management. It describes a taxonomy of methods for the assessment of CGI quality in the absence of authoritative data, as well as proposes a method for evaluating the quality of CGI and a new interface for the Citizen Observatory of Floods. Results obtained in the evaluation of the main contributions reveal that the method can explain the quality of CGI and the usability of the new interface increased.Informação geográfica de crowdsourcing (do inglês, CGI) consiste numa informação geográfica fornecida por não especialistas de maneira ativa/consciente e passiva/inconsciente. O uso de CGI no domínio da gestão de inundações é consideravelmente recente e tem sido motivado pelo seu potencial como fonte de informação geográfica em situações em que dados oficiais são escassos ou indisponíveis. Contudo, a qualidade desse tipo de informação é uma preocupação fundamental quando a utilizamos, visto que os cidadãos podem ter diferentes níveis de conhecimento e experiência. A usabilidade das plataformas de crowdsourcing é um ponto importante visto que pode impactar a qualidade de CGI, uma vez que o aumento da complexidade desses sistemas pode levar o cidadão ao fornecimento de informações errôneas ou imprecisas. Embora aspectos de usabilidade sejam cada vez mais discutidos entre projetistas e desenvolvedores de sistemas computadorizados, ainda há uma escassez de estudos que investiguem estratégias para o aprimoramento da usabilidade de plataformas de crowdsourcing. A avaliação da qualidade de CGI é outro ponto importante para determinar se a informação geográfica é adequada a um propósito específico. Na literatura, a avaliação da qualidade de CGI é realizada para cada CGI individualmente. Em situações de crise, contudo, há pouco tempo para analisar uma grande quantidade de dados e, portanto, minimizar a sobrecarga de informações é extremamente importante. Uma estratégia interessante e pouco explorada é a avaliação da qualidade dos elementos CGI agregados, ao invés de um único elemento. Esta tese de doutorado propõe uma abordagem para a melhoria e avaliação da qualidade de CGI no domínio de gestão de inundações. A abordagem consiste em uma taxonomia de métodos para a avaliação da qualidade de CGI na ausência de dados oficiais, um método para avaliar a qualidade do CGI e uma interface para o Observatório Cidadão de Enchentes. Os resultados obtidos na avaliação das principais contribuições revelam que o método proposto pode explicar a qualidade de CGI e a usabilidade da nova interface melhorou.Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USPFortes, Renata Pontin de MattosPereira, João Porto de AlbuquerqueDegrossi, Livia Castro2019-08-29info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisapplication/pdfhttps://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/55/55134/tde-06012020-174847/reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USPinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPLiberar o conteúdo para acesso público.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesseng2020-01-10T20:52:01Zoai:teses.usp.br:tde-06012020-174847Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://www.teses.usp.br/PUBhttp://www.teses.usp.br/cgi-bin/mtd2br.plvirginia@if.usp.br|| atendimento@aguia.usp.br||virginia@if.usp.bropendoar:27212020-01-10T20:52:01Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv An approach for assessing the quality of crowdsourced geographic information in the flood management domain
Uma abordagem para a avaliação da qualidade de informações geográficas voluntárias no domínio de gestão de inundação
title An approach for assessing the quality of crowdsourced geographic information in the flood management domain
spellingShingle An approach for assessing the quality of crowdsourced geographic information in the flood management domain
Degrossi, Livia Castro
Avaliação da qualidade
Citizen observatory
Crowdsourced geographic information
Flood management
Gestão de inundação
Informação geográfica voluntária
Observatório cidadão
Quality assessment
title_short An approach for assessing the quality of crowdsourced geographic information in the flood management domain
title_full An approach for assessing the quality of crowdsourced geographic information in the flood management domain
title_fullStr An approach for assessing the quality of crowdsourced geographic information in the flood management domain
title_full_unstemmed An approach for assessing the quality of crowdsourced geographic information in the flood management domain
title_sort An approach for assessing the quality of crowdsourced geographic information in the flood management domain
author Degrossi, Livia Castro
author_facet Degrossi, Livia Castro
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Fortes, Renata Pontin de Mattos
Pereira, João Porto de Albuquerque
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Degrossi, Livia Castro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Avaliação da qualidade
Citizen observatory
Crowdsourced geographic information
Flood management
Gestão de inundação
Informação geográfica voluntária
Observatório cidadão
Quality assessment
topic Avaliação da qualidade
Citizen observatory
Crowdsourced geographic information
Flood management
Gestão de inundação
Informação geográfica voluntária
Observatório cidadão
Quality assessment
description Crowdsourced Geographic Information (CGI) encompasses both active/conscious and passive/ unconscious georeferenced information generated by non-experts. The use of CGI in the domain of flood management is considerably recent and has been motivated by its potential as source of geographic information in situations where authoritative data is scarce or unavailable. Given that citizens may vary greatly in knowledge and expertise, the quality of such information is a key concern when making use of CGI. Moreover, the usability of the crowdsourcing platforms is another critical point that impacts the quality of CGI, since increasing complexity of such systems can lead to the provision of erroneous or inaccurate information. Although usability aspects have been increasingly discussed among designers and developers of computerized systems, there is a lack of studies that investigate strategies for the enhancement of the usability of crowdsourcing platforms. In this perspective, the assessment of CGI quality is an important step to determine if the information fits a specific purpose. A common way of assessing the quality of CGI gathered by crowdsourcing platforms is the evaluation of each CGI item. However, in crisis situations, there is short time to scrutinize a great amount of data and, therefore, minimizing information overload is critically important. An interesting, but poorly explored, strategy is the assessment of the quality of aggregated CGI elements, instead of a single one. This doctoral thesis proposes an approach for the improvement and assessment of CGI quality in the domain of flood management. It describes a taxonomy of methods for the assessment of CGI quality in the absence of authoritative data, as well as proposes a method for evaluating the quality of CGI and a new interface for the Citizen Observatory of Floods. Results obtained in the evaluation of the main contributions reveal that the method can explain the quality of CGI and the usability of the new interface increased.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-08-29
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/55/55134/tde-06012020-174847/
url https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/55/55134/tde-06012020-174847/
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Liberar o conteúdo para acesso público.
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Liberar o conteúdo para acesso público.
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv virginia@if.usp.br|| atendimento@aguia.usp.br||virginia@if.usp.br
_version_ 1809090432383057920