Quality of life in teaching at the higher level: evaluation of professors in the Production Engineering field in Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pinto, Guilherme Moreira Caetano
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Pedroso, Bruno, Moraes, Jessyca, Picinin, Claudia Tania
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Qualidade de Vida
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.utfpr.edu.br/rbqv/article/view/13689
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: To analyze the quality of life (QOL) of all Brazilian professors who works in graduate course in Production Engineering field of 2013 to 2015.METHODS: For that, WHOQOL-bref instrument was applied in the Google Drive platform with 130 teachers enrolled in graduate programs of Production Engineering.RESULTS: The results showed higher QOL deficiency in the Recreation and Leisure (53.08), Positive feelings (57.88) and Sleep and Rest (59.42) facets. The points of greatest satisfaction were about Mobility (83.85), Self-esteem (81.73) and Home Environment (80.58). Nonetheless, the Psychological (70.48) and Physical (70.27) domains were the best scores. On the other hand, the Environment (66.18) and Social Relationship (66.28) had the worst scores. It is concluded that the teaching career justifies some positive and negative aspects of the researched population QOL.CONCLUSIONS: It was found that males scored higher than females, while professors with researcher grants had higher QOL scores compared with who did not hold researcher grant. Furthermore, it was possible to identify that individuals with 16 years or more of service time presented the lowest scores in four of seven items and that individuals with service time between eight to 15 years presented the highest scores in six of seven items evaluated in this study.
id UTFPR-9_4dca7d554af506987b0b5bc0caf5c7fa
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.utfpr:article/13689
network_acronym_str UTFPR-9
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Qualidade de Vida
repository_id_str
spelling Quality of life in teaching at the higher level: evaluation of professors in the Production Engineering field in BrazilQualidade de vida de professores do ensino superior: avaliação de professores da área de Engenharia de Produção no BrasilSaúde; Educação FísicaEngenharia de produção; Ensino superior; Avaliação da qualidade de vida.Higher education; Evaluation of quality of life; Production engineering.OBJECTIVE: To analyze the quality of life (QOL) of all Brazilian professors who works in graduate course in Production Engineering field of 2013 to 2015.METHODS: For that, WHOQOL-bref instrument was applied in the Google Drive platform with 130 teachers enrolled in graduate programs of Production Engineering.RESULTS: The results showed higher QOL deficiency in the Recreation and Leisure (53.08), Positive feelings (57.88) and Sleep and Rest (59.42) facets. The points of greatest satisfaction were about Mobility (83.85), Self-esteem (81.73) and Home Environment (80.58). Nonetheless, the Psychological (70.48) and Physical (70.27) domains were the best scores. On the other hand, the Environment (66.18) and Social Relationship (66.28) had the worst scores. It is concluded that the teaching career justifies some positive and negative aspects of the researched population QOL.CONCLUSIONS: It was found that males scored higher than females, while professors with researcher grants had higher QOL scores compared with who did not hold researcher grant. Furthermore, it was possible to identify that individuals with 16 years or more of service time presented the lowest scores in four of seven items and that individuals with service time between eight to 15 years presented the highest scores in six of seven items evaluated in this study.OBJETIVO: Analisar a produção científica dos docentes que atuam em programas de pós-graduação na área de Engenharia de Produção no Brasil de 2013 a 2015. MÉTODOS: Para tal, o instrumento WHOQOL-bref foi aplicado através da plataforma Google Drive em 130 professores que atuam in programas de pós-graduação de Engenharia de Produção.RESULTADOS: Os resultados mostraram maior deficiência de Qualidade de Vida nas facetas Recreação e Lazer (53,08), Sentimentos Positivos (57,88) e Sono e Repouso (29,42). Os pontos de maior satisfação foram quanto a Mobilidade (83,85), Autoestima (81,73) e Ambiente do lar (80,58). Além disso, os domínios Psicológico (70,48) e Físico (70,27) foram os melhores escores. Por outro lado, Ambiente (66,18) e Relações Sociais (66,28) apresentaram as piores pontuações. Conclui-se que a carreira docente justifica alguns aspectos positivos e negativos da Qualidade de Vida da população pesquisada.CONCLUSÕES: Verificou-se que os homens pontuaram mais alto que as mulheres, enquanto os professores com bolsa de pesquisa tiveram pontuações mais altas de qualidade de vida em comparação com os que não tinham bolsa de pesquisa. Além disso, foi possível identificar que indivíduos com 16 anos ou mais de tempo de serviço apresentaram os menores escores em quatro dos sete itens e que indivíduos com tempo de serviço entre oito a 15 anos apresentaram os maiores escores em seis dos sete itens avaliados neste estudo.Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR)Pinto, Guilherme Moreira CaetanoPedroso, BrunoMoraes, JessycaPicinin, Claudia Tania2021-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.utfpr.edu.br/rbqv/article/view/1368910.3895/rbqv.v13n0.13689Revista Brasileira de Qualidade de Vida; v. 13 (2021)2175-085810.3895/rbqv.v1n0reponame:Revista Brasileira de Qualidade de Vidainstname:Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR)instacron:UTFPRenghttps://periodicos.utfpr.edu.br/rbqv/article/view/13689/pdfDireitos autorais 2022 CC-BYhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-05-01T10:37:42Zoai:periodicos.utfpr:article/13689Revistahttps://periodicos.utfpr.edu.br/rbqvPUBhttp://periodicos.utfpr.edu.br/rbqv/oai||rbqv-pg@utfpr.edu.br2175-08582175-0858opendoar:2024-05-01T10:37:42Revista Brasileira de Qualidade de Vida - Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Quality of life in teaching at the higher level: evaluation of professors in the Production Engineering field in Brazil
Qualidade de vida de professores do ensino superior: avaliação de professores da área de Engenharia de Produção no Brasil
title Quality of life in teaching at the higher level: evaluation of professors in the Production Engineering field in Brazil
spellingShingle Quality of life in teaching at the higher level: evaluation of professors in the Production Engineering field in Brazil
Pinto, Guilherme Moreira Caetano
Saúde; Educação Física
Engenharia de produção; Ensino superior; Avaliação da qualidade de vida.
Higher education; Evaluation of quality of life; Production engineering.
title_short Quality of life in teaching at the higher level: evaluation of professors in the Production Engineering field in Brazil
title_full Quality of life in teaching at the higher level: evaluation of professors in the Production Engineering field in Brazil
title_fullStr Quality of life in teaching at the higher level: evaluation of professors in the Production Engineering field in Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Quality of life in teaching at the higher level: evaluation of professors in the Production Engineering field in Brazil
title_sort Quality of life in teaching at the higher level: evaluation of professors in the Production Engineering field in Brazil
author Pinto, Guilherme Moreira Caetano
author_facet Pinto, Guilherme Moreira Caetano
Pedroso, Bruno
Moraes, Jessyca
Picinin, Claudia Tania
author_role author
author2 Pedroso, Bruno
Moraes, Jessyca
Picinin, Claudia Tania
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pinto, Guilherme Moreira Caetano
Pedroso, Bruno
Moraes, Jessyca
Picinin, Claudia Tania
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Saúde; Educação Física
Engenharia de produção; Ensino superior; Avaliação da qualidade de vida.
Higher education; Evaluation of quality of life; Production engineering.
topic Saúde; Educação Física
Engenharia de produção; Ensino superior; Avaliação da qualidade de vida.
Higher education; Evaluation of quality of life; Production engineering.
description OBJECTIVE: To analyze the quality of life (QOL) of all Brazilian professors who works in graduate course in Production Engineering field of 2013 to 2015.METHODS: For that, WHOQOL-bref instrument was applied in the Google Drive platform with 130 teachers enrolled in graduate programs of Production Engineering.RESULTS: The results showed higher QOL deficiency in the Recreation and Leisure (53.08), Positive feelings (57.88) and Sleep and Rest (59.42) facets. The points of greatest satisfaction were about Mobility (83.85), Self-esteem (81.73) and Home Environment (80.58). Nonetheless, the Psychological (70.48) and Physical (70.27) domains were the best scores. On the other hand, the Environment (66.18) and Social Relationship (66.28) had the worst scores. It is concluded that the teaching career justifies some positive and negative aspects of the researched population QOL.CONCLUSIONS: It was found that males scored higher than females, while professors with researcher grants had higher QOL scores compared with who did not hold researcher grant. Furthermore, it was possible to identify that individuals with 16 years or more of service time presented the lowest scores in four of seven items and that individuals with service time between eight to 15 years presented the highest scores in six of seven items evaluated in this study.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-12-31
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv

dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.utfpr.edu.br/rbqv/article/view/13689
10.3895/rbqv.v13n0.13689
url https://periodicos.utfpr.edu.br/rbqv/article/view/13689
identifier_str_mv 10.3895/rbqv.v13n0.13689
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.utfpr.edu.br/rbqv/article/view/13689/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2022 CC-BY
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2022 CC-BY
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Qualidade de Vida; v. 13 (2021)
2175-0858
10.3895/rbqv.v1n0
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Qualidade de Vida
instname:Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR)
instacron:UTFPR
instname_str Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR)
instacron_str UTFPR
institution UTFPR
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Qualidade de Vida
collection Revista Brasileira de Qualidade de Vida
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Qualidade de Vida - Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rbqv-pg@utfpr.edu.br
_version_ 1809282493478600704