Quality of life in teaching at the higher level: evaluation of professors in the Production Engineering field in Brazil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Qualidade de Vida |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.utfpr.edu.br/rbqv/article/view/13689 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVE: To analyze the quality of life (QOL) of all Brazilian professors who works in graduate course in Production Engineering field of 2013 to 2015.METHODS: For that, WHOQOL-bref instrument was applied in the Google Drive platform with 130 teachers enrolled in graduate programs of Production Engineering.RESULTS: The results showed higher QOL deficiency in the Recreation and Leisure (53.08), Positive feelings (57.88) and Sleep and Rest (59.42) facets. The points of greatest satisfaction were about Mobility (83.85), Self-esteem (81.73) and Home Environment (80.58). Nonetheless, the Psychological (70.48) and Physical (70.27) domains were the best scores. On the other hand, the Environment (66.18) and Social Relationship (66.28) had the worst scores. It is concluded that the teaching career justifies some positive and negative aspects of the researched population QOL.CONCLUSIONS: It was found that males scored higher than females, while professors with researcher grants had higher QOL scores compared with who did not hold researcher grant. Furthermore, it was possible to identify that individuals with 16 years or more of service time presented the lowest scores in four of seven items and that individuals with service time between eight to 15 years presented the highest scores in six of seven items evaluated in this study. |
id |
UTFPR-9_4dca7d554af506987b0b5bc0caf5c7fa |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.utfpr:article/13689 |
network_acronym_str |
UTFPR-9 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Qualidade de Vida |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Quality of life in teaching at the higher level: evaluation of professors in the Production Engineering field in BrazilQualidade de vida de professores do ensino superior: avaliação de professores da área de Engenharia de Produção no BrasilSaúde; Educação FísicaEngenharia de produção; Ensino superior; Avaliação da qualidade de vida.Higher education; Evaluation of quality of life; Production engineering.OBJECTIVE: To analyze the quality of life (QOL) of all Brazilian professors who works in graduate course in Production Engineering field of 2013 to 2015.METHODS: For that, WHOQOL-bref instrument was applied in the Google Drive platform with 130 teachers enrolled in graduate programs of Production Engineering.RESULTS: The results showed higher QOL deficiency in the Recreation and Leisure (53.08), Positive feelings (57.88) and Sleep and Rest (59.42) facets. The points of greatest satisfaction were about Mobility (83.85), Self-esteem (81.73) and Home Environment (80.58). Nonetheless, the Psychological (70.48) and Physical (70.27) domains were the best scores. On the other hand, the Environment (66.18) and Social Relationship (66.28) had the worst scores. It is concluded that the teaching career justifies some positive and negative aspects of the researched population QOL.CONCLUSIONS: It was found that males scored higher than females, while professors with researcher grants had higher QOL scores compared with who did not hold researcher grant. Furthermore, it was possible to identify that individuals with 16 years or more of service time presented the lowest scores in four of seven items and that individuals with service time between eight to 15 years presented the highest scores in six of seven items evaluated in this study.OBJETIVO: Analisar a produção científica dos docentes que atuam em programas de pós-graduação na área de Engenharia de Produção no Brasil de 2013 a 2015. MÉTODOS: Para tal, o instrumento WHOQOL-bref foi aplicado através da plataforma Google Drive em 130 professores que atuam in programas de pós-graduação de Engenharia de Produção.RESULTADOS: Os resultados mostraram maior deficiência de Qualidade de Vida nas facetas Recreação e Lazer (53,08), Sentimentos Positivos (57,88) e Sono e Repouso (29,42). Os pontos de maior satisfação foram quanto a Mobilidade (83,85), Autoestima (81,73) e Ambiente do lar (80,58). Além disso, os domínios Psicológico (70,48) e Físico (70,27) foram os melhores escores. Por outro lado, Ambiente (66,18) e Relações Sociais (66,28) apresentaram as piores pontuações. Conclui-se que a carreira docente justifica alguns aspectos positivos e negativos da Qualidade de Vida da população pesquisada.CONCLUSÕES: Verificou-se que os homens pontuaram mais alto que as mulheres, enquanto os professores com bolsa de pesquisa tiveram pontuações mais altas de qualidade de vida em comparação com os que não tinham bolsa de pesquisa. Além disso, foi possível identificar que indivíduos com 16 anos ou mais de tempo de serviço apresentaram os menores escores em quatro dos sete itens e que indivíduos com tempo de serviço entre oito a 15 anos apresentaram os maiores escores em seis dos sete itens avaliados neste estudo.Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR)Pinto, Guilherme Moreira CaetanoPedroso, BrunoMoraes, JessycaPicinin, Claudia Tania2021-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.utfpr.edu.br/rbqv/article/view/1368910.3895/rbqv.v13n0.13689Revista Brasileira de Qualidade de Vida; v. 13 (2021)2175-085810.3895/rbqv.v1n0reponame:Revista Brasileira de Qualidade de Vidainstname:Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR)instacron:UTFPRenghttps://periodicos.utfpr.edu.br/rbqv/article/view/13689/pdfDireitos autorais 2022 CC-BYhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-05-01T10:37:42Zoai:periodicos.utfpr:article/13689Revistahttps://periodicos.utfpr.edu.br/rbqvPUBhttp://periodicos.utfpr.edu.br/rbqv/oai||rbqv-pg@utfpr.edu.br2175-08582175-0858opendoar:2024-05-01T10:37:42Revista Brasileira de Qualidade de Vida - Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Quality of life in teaching at the higher level: evaluation of professors in the Production Engineering field in Brazil Qualidade de vida de professores do ensino superior: avaliação de professores da área de Engenharia de Produção no Brasil |
title |
Quality of life in teaching at the higher level: evaluation of professors in the Production Engineering field in Brazil |
spellingShingle |
Quality of life in teaching at the higher level: evaluation of professors in the Production Engineering field in Brazil Pinto, Guilherme Moreira Caetano Saúde; Educação Física Engenharia de produção; Ensino superior; Avaliação da qualidade de vida. Higher education; Evaluation of quality of life; Production engineering. |
title_short |
Quality of life in teaching at the higher level: evaluation of professors in the Production Engineering field in Brazil |
title_full |
Quality of life in teaching at the higher level: evaluation of professors in the Production Engineering field in Brazil |
title_fullStr |
Quality of life in teaching at the higher level: evaluation of professors in the Production Engineering field in Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Quality of life in teaching at the higher level: evaluation of professors in the Production Engineering field in Brazil |
title_sort |
Quality of life in teaching at the higher level: evaluation of professors in the Production Engineering field in Brazil |
author |
Pinto, Guilherme Moreira Caetano |
author_facet |
Pinto, Guilherme Moreira Caetano Pedroso, Bruno Moraes, Jessyca Picinin, Claudia Tania |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pedroso, Bruno Moraes, Jessyca Picinin, Claudia Tania |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pinto, Guilherme Moreira Caetano Pedroso, Bruno Moraes, Jessyca Picinin, Claudia Tania |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Saúde; Educação Física Engenharia de produção; Ensino superior; Avaliação da qualidade de vida. Higher education; Evaluation of quality of life; Production engineering. |
topic |
Saúde; Educação Física Engenharia de produção; Ensino superior; Avaliação da qualidade de vida. Higher education; Evaluation of quality of life; Production engineering. |
description |
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the quality of life (QOL) of all Brazilian professors who works in graduate course in Production Engineering field of 2013 to 2015.METHODS: For that, WHOQOL-bref instrument was applied in the Google Drive platform with 130 teachers enrolled in graduate programs of Production Engineering.RESULTS: The results showed higher QOL deficiency in the Recreation and Leisure (53.08), Positive feelings (57.88) and Sleep and Rest (59.42) facets. The points of greatest satisfaction were about Mobility (83.85), Self-esteem (81.73) and Home Environment (80.58). Nonetheless, the Psychological (70.48) and Physical (70.27) domains were the best scores. On the other hand, the Environment (66.18) and Social Relationship (66.28) had the worst scores. It is concluded that the teaching career justifies some positive and negative aspects of the researched population QOL.CONCLUSIONS: It was found that males scored higher than females, while professors with researcher grants had higher QOL scores compared with who did not hold researcher grant. Furthermore, it was possible to identify that individuals with 16 years or more of service time presented the lowest scores in four of seven items and that individuals with service time between eight to 15 years presented the highest scores in six of seven items evaluated in this study. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-12-31 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.utfpr.edu.br/rbqv/article/view/13689 10.3895/rbqv.v13n0.13689 |
url |
https://periodicos.utfpr.edu.br/rbqv/article/view/13689 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.3895/rbqv.v13n0.13689 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.utfpr.edu.br/rbqv/article/view/13689/pdf |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2022 CC-BY http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2022 CC-BY http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Qualidade de Vida; v. 13 (2021) 2175-0858 10.3895/rbqv.v1n0 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Qualidade de Vida instname:Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR) instacron:UTFPR |
instname_str |
Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR) |
instacron_str |
UTFPR |
institution |
UTFPR |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Qualidade de Vida |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Qualidade de Vida |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Qualidade de Vida - Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rbqv-pg@utfpr.edu.br |
_version_ |
1809282493478600704 |