The studies of Walton, Hackman and Oldham, Huse and Cummings, Lippitt, Westley, Werther and Davis, Nadler and Lawler classics?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pilatti, Luís Eduardo
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Picinin, Claudia Tania, Helmann, Caroline Lievore, Santos, Celso Bilynkievycz dos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Qualidade de Vida
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.utfpr.edu.br/rbqv/article/view/14698
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: To discuss the classic status attributed to studies by Walton, Hackman and Oldham, Huse and Cummings, Lippitt, Westley, Werther and Davis and Nadler and Lawler in the Brazilian academic environment.METHODS: This research note is characterized as an academic essay. The essay allows for the discussion of the theme and the exposition of the authors' ideas and points of view supported by referential research.RESULTS: Despite the real recognition of its value, the Walton study is not a “classic” in the sense given by the scientific literature to the term. The scope of studies by Hackman and Oldham, Huse and Cummings, Lippitt, Westley, Werther and Davis and Nadler and Lawler present indicators that are much lower than those of Walton.CONCLUSIONS: The classic status attributed in the Brazilian academic world to a set of works that address quality of life at work, developed in the United States in the 1970s and 1980s, is wrong.
id UTFPR-9_65e203a24dbe670732c462ad531efe46
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.utfpr:article/14698
network_acronym_str UTFPR-9
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Qualidade de Vida
repository_id_str
spelling The studies of Walton, Hackman and Oldham, Huse and Cummings, Lippitt, Westley, Werther and Davis, Nadler and Lawler classics?Os estudos de Walton, Hackman e Oldham, Huse e Cummings, Lippitt, Westley, Werther e Davis, Nadler e Lawler são clássicos?6.02.01.05-3 Administração de Recursos HumanosQualidade de vida no trabalho; Clássico; Richard I. Walton.Quality of life at work; Classic; Richard I. Walton.OBJECTIVE: To discuss the classic status attributed to studies by Walton, Hackman and Oldham, Huse and Cummings, Lippitt, Westley, Werther and Davis and Nadler and Lawler in the Brazilian academic environment.METHODS: This research note is characterized as an academic essay. The essay allows for the discussion of the theme and the exposition of the authors' ideas and points of view supported by referential research.RESULTS: Despite the real recognition of its value, the Walton study is not a “classic” in the sense given by the scientific literature to the term. The scope of studies by Hackman and Oldham, Huse and Cummings, Lippitt, Westley, Werther and Davis and Nadler and Lawler present indicators that are much lower than those of Walton.CONCLUSIONS: The classic status attributed in the Brazilian academic world to a set of works that address quality of life at work, developed in the United States in the 1970s and 1980s, is wrong.OBJETIVO: Discutir a condição de clássico atribuída para os estudos de Walton, Hackman e Oldham, Huse e Cummings, Lippitt, Westley, Werther e Davis e Nadler e Lawler no meio acadêmico brasileiro.MÉTODOS: A presente nota de pesquisa caracteriza-se como um ensaio acadêmico. O ensaio permite a discussão do tema e a exposição das ideias e dos pontos de vista dos autores sustentado em pesquisa referencial.RESULTADOS: Apesar do reconhecimento real do seu valor, o estudo de Walton não é um clássico no sentido conferido pela literatura científica ao termo. O alcance dos estudos de Hackman e Oldham, Huse e Cummings, Lippitt, Westley, Werther e Davis e Nadler e Lawler apresentam indicadores bastante inferiores aos de Walton.CONCLUSÕES: A condição de clássico atribuída no meio acadêmico brasileiro para um conjunto de trabalhos que tematizam a qualidade de vida no trabalho, desenvolvidos nos Estados Unidos das décadas de 1970 e 1980, é equivocada.Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR)Pilatti, Luís EduardoPicinin, Claudia TaniaHelmann, Caroline LievoreSantos, Celso Bilynkievycz dos2021-09-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.utfpr.edu.br/rbqv/article/view/1469810.3895/rbqv.v13n0.14698Revista Brasileira de Qualidade de Vida; v. 13 (2021)2175-085810.3895/rbqv.v1n0reponame:Revista Brasileira de Qualidade de Vidainstname:Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR)instacron:UTFPRporhttps://periodicos.utfpr.edu.br/rbqv/article/view/14698/pdfDireitos autorais 2021 CC-BYhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-05-01T10:37:42Zoai:periodicos.utfpr:article/14698Revistahttps://periodicos.utfpr.edu.br/rbqvPUBhttp://periodicos.utfpr.edu.br/rbqv/oai||rbqv-pg@utfpr.edu.br2175-08582175-0858opendoar:2024-05-01T10:37:42Revista Brasileira de Qualidade de Vida - Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The studies of Walton, Hackman and Oldham, Huse and Cummings, Lippitt, Westley, Werther and Davis, Nadler and Lawler classics?
Os estudos de Walton, Hackman e Oldham, Huse e Cummings, Lippitt, Westley, Werther e Davis, Nadler e Lawler são clássicos?
title The studies of Walton, Hackman and Oldham, Huse and Cummings, Lippitt, Westley, Werther and Davis, Nadler and Lawler classics?
spellingShingle The studies of Walton, Hackman and Oldham, Huse and Cummings, Lippitt, Westley, Werther and Davis, Nadler and Lawler classics?
Pilatti, Luís Eduardo
6.02.01.05-3 Administração de Recursos Humanos
Qualidade de vida no trabalho; Clássico; Richard I. Walton.
Quality of life at work; Classic; Richard I. Walton.
title_short The studies of Walton, Hackman and Oldham, Huse and Cummings, Lippitt, Westley, Werther and Davis, Nadler and Lawler classics?
title_full The studies of Walton, Hackman and Oldham, Huse and Cummings, Lippitt, Westley, Werther and Davis, Nadler and Lawler classics?
title_fullStr The studies of Walton, Hackman and Oldham, Huse and Cummings, Lippitt, Westley, Werther and Davis, Nadler and Lawler classics?
title_full_unstemmed The studies of Walton, Hackman and Oldham, Huse and Cummings, Lippitt, Westley, Werther and Davis, Nadler and Lawler classics?
title_sort The studies of Walton, Hackman and Oldham, Huse and Cummings, Lippitt, Westley, Werther and Davis, Nadler and Lawler classics?
author Pilatti, Luís Eduardo
author_facet Pilatti, Luís Eduardo
Picinin, Claudia Tania
Helmann, Caroline Lievore
Santos, Celso Bilynkievycz dos
author_role author
author2 Picinin, Claudia Tania
Helmann, Caroline Lievore
Santos, Celso Bilynkievycz dos
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pilatti, Luís Eduardo
Picinin, Claudia Tania
Helmann, Caroline Lievore
Santos, Celso Bilynkievycz dos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv 6.02.01.05-3 Administração de Recursos Humanos
Qualidade de vida no trabalho; Clássico; Richard I. Walton.
Quality of life at work; Classic; Richard I. Walton.
topic 6.02.01.05-3 Administração de Recursos Humanos
Qualidade de vida no trabalho; Clássico; Richard I. Walton.
Quality of life at work; Classic; Richard I. Walton.
description OBJECTIVE: To discuss the classic status attributed to studies by Walton, Hackman and Oldham, Huse and Cummings, Lippitt, Westley, Werther and Davis and Nadler and Lawler in the Brazilian academic environment.METHODS: This research note is characterized as an academic essay. The essay allows for the discussion of the theme and the exposition of the authors' ideas and points of view supported by referential research.RESULTS: Despite the real recognition of its value, the Walton study is not a “classic” in the sense given by the scientific literature to the term. The scope of studies by Hackman and Oldham, Huse and Cummings, Lippitt, Westley, Werther and Davis and Nadler and Lawler present indicators that are much lower than those of Walton.CONCLUSIONS: The classic status attributed in the Brazilian academic world to a set of works that address quality of life at work, developed in the United States in the 1970s and 1980s, is wrong.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-09-29
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.utfpr.edu.br/rbqv/article/view/14698
10.3895/rbqv.v13n0.14698
url https://periodicos.utfpr.edu.br/rbqv/article/view/14698
identifier_str_mv 10.3895/rbqv.v13n0.14698
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.utfpr.edu.br/rbqv/article/view/14698/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2021 CC-BY
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2021 CC-BY
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Qualidade de Vida; v. 13 (2021)
2175-0858
10.3895/rbqv.v1n0
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Qualidade de Vida
instname:Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR)
instacron:UTFPR
instname_str Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR)
instacron_str UTFPR
institution UTFPR
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Qualidade de Vida
collection Revista Brasileira de Qualidade de Vida
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Qualidade de Vida - Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rbqv-pg@utfpr.edu.br
_version_ 1809282494160175104