The different forms of interaction and its status in a science of language: Considerations and questions
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | fra |
Título da fonte: | Calidoscópio (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/474 |
Resumo: | This article is the written version of a conference lecture that proposed a survey of the studies on “language and interaction.” The first part proposes a brief commentary on the developement of the current Chomsky’s position, which now understands language as a communicative phenomenon, as well as the development of the interpretations of Saussure’s work which highlight the importance the scholar gave to the interactions between the levels of discourse and languages. The second part presents a critical summary of three approaches explicitly centered around verbal interactions: initially, the sciences of texts/discourse, which have their foundations on the work by Voloshinov, author who is central to the current conception of dialogism; the different approaches of interactional linguistics, inspired on Ethnomethodology and centered on the situated oral productions; approaches that analyze the effects of the e-learning devices, which constitute a type of natural laboratory for the study of the interactive phenomena. The main analysis refers to the contributions of the interactional linguistics and distinguishes the studies related to the structure itself of verbal interactions, the studies centered on the verbal productions in work situations and those centered on the verbal productions in the devices for the analysis of practices. The conclusion highlights the importance of the interactional epistemology, as it proposes to distinguish five levels: (a) the interactions between the and the gnosiological dimensions of language; (b) the interactions between general praxeology and language praxeology; (c) the constitutive interactions of the signs; (d) the concrete dialogical interactions; (e) the interactions between the structure of the verbal interactions and the different properties of the context.Key words: Dialogism, Discourse, e-learning, Interaction, Language, Praxeology, Sign. |
id |
Unisinos-3_072e513c4cbcf2162c9f23f788b89ce7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs2.revistas.unisinos.br:article/474 |
network_acronym_str |
Unisinos-3 |
network_name_str |
Calidoscópio (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The different forms of interaction and its status in a science of language: Considerations and questionsLes différentes formes d’interaction et leur statut dans une science du langage: Réflexions et questionsThis article is the written version of a conference lecture that proposed a survey of the studies on “language and interaction.” The first part proposes a brief commentary on the developement of the current Chomsky’s position, which now understands language as a communicative phenomenon, as well as the development of the interpretations of Saussure’s work which highlight the importance the scholar gave to the interactions between the levels of discourse and languages. The second part presents a critical summary of three approaches explicitly centered around verbal interactions: initially, the sciences of texts/discourse, which have their foundations on the work by Voloshinov, author who is central to the current conception of dialogism; the different approaches of interactional linguistics, inspired on Ethnomethodology and centered on the situated oral productions; approaches that analyze the effects of the e-learning devices, which constitute a type of natural laboratory for the study of the interactive phenomena. The main analysis refers to the contributions of the interactional linguistics and distinguishes the studies related to the structure itself of verbal interactions, the studies centered on the verbal productions in work situations and those centered on the verbal productions in the devices for the analysis of practices. The conclusion highlights the importance of the interactional epistemology, as it proposes to distinguish five levels: (a) the interactions between the and the gnosiological dimensions of language; (b) the interactions between general praxeology and language praxeology; (c) the constitutive interactions of the signs; (d) the concrete dialogical interactions; (e) the interactions between the structure of the verbal interactions and the different properties of the context.Key words: Dialogism, Discourse, e-learning, Interaction, Language, Praxeology, Sign.Cet article constitue la version écrite d’une conférence proposant un bilan des études récentes sur le thème “Langage et interaction”. La première partie propose un bref commentaire de l’évolution actuelle de la position de Chomsky, qui saisit désormais le langage comme phénomène communicatif, ainsi que de l’évolution des interprétations de l’oeuvre de Saussure, qui mettent en évidence l’importance que ce dernier accordait aux interactions entre les niveaux des discours et des langues. La deuxième partie présente un bilan critique de trois courants explicitement centrés sur les interactions verbales: - les sciences des textes/discours d’abord, qui ont leurs sources dans l’oeuvre de Voloshinov, auteur qui est à l’origine de la conception contemporaine du dialogisme; - les divers courants de linguistique interactionnelle, inspirés de l’ethnométhodologie et centrés sur les productions orales situées; - les courants analysant les effets des dispositifs de e-learning, qui constituent une sorte de laboratoire naturel pour l’étude des phénomènes interactifs. L’analyse principale concerne les apports de la linguistique interactionnelle, et elle conduit à distinguer les travaux portant sur la structure même des interactions verbales, ceux centrés sur les productions verbales en situation de travail, et ceux centrés sur les productions verbales dans les dispositifs d’analyse des pratiques. La conclusion souligne la pertinence de l’épistémologie interactionniste, puis propose de distinguer cinq niveaux: (a) les interactions entre dimensionspraxéologique et gnoséologique du langage; (b) les interactions entre la praxéologie générale et la praxéologie langagière; (c) les interactions constitutives des signes; (d) les interactions dialogales concrètes; (e) les interactions entre la structure des productions verbales et diverses propriétés du contexte.Mots-clefs: dialogisme, discours, e-learning, interaction, langue, praxéologie, signe.Unisinos2010-08-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/474Calidoscópio; Vol. 8 No. 2 (2010): May/August; 154-164Calidoscópio; v. 8 n. 2 (2010): Maio/Agosto; 154-1642177-6202reponame:Calidoscópio (Online)instname:Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)instacron:Unisinosfrahttps://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/474/71Bronckart, Jean-Paulinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2012-03-16T16:14:17Zoai:ojs2.revistas.unisinos.br:article/474Revistahttps://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopioPUBhttps://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/oaicmira@unisinos.br || cmira@unisinos.br2177-62022177-6202opendoar:2012-03-16T16:14:17Calidoscópio (Online) - Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The different forms of interaction and its status in a science of language: Considerations and questions Les différentes formes d’interaction et leur statut dans une science du langage: Réflexions et questions |
title |
The different forms of interaction and its status in a science of language: Considerations and questions |
spellingShingle |
The different forms of interaction and its status in a science of language: Considerations and questions Bronckart, Jean-Paul |
title_short |
The different forms of interaction and its status in a science of language: Considerations and questions |
title_full |
The different forms of interaction and its status in a science of language: Considerations and questions |
title_fullStr |
The different forms of interaction and its status in a science of language: Considerations and questions |
title_full_unstemmed |
The different forms of interaction and its status in a science of language: Considerations and questions |
title_sort |
The different forms of interaction and its status in a science of language: Considerations and questions |
author |
Bronckart, Jean-Paul |
author_facet |
Bronckart, Jean-Paul |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bronckart, Jean-Paul |
description |
This article is the written version of a conference lecture that proposed a survey of the studies on “language and interaction.” The first part proposes a brief commentary on the developement of the current Chomsky’s position, which now understands language as a communicative phenomenon, as well as the development of the interpretations of Saussure’s work which highlight the importance the scholar gave to the interactions between the levels of discourse and languages. The second part presents a critical summary of three approaches explicitly centered around verbal interactions: initially, the sciences of texts/discourse, which have their foundations on the work by Voloshinov, author who is central to the current conception of dialogism; the different approaches of interactional linguistics, inspired on Ethnomethodology and centered on the situated oral productions; approaches that analyze the effects of the e-learning devices, which constitute a type of natural laboratory for the study of the interactive phenomena. The main analysis refers to the contributions of the interactional linguistics and distinguishes the studies related to the structure itself of verbal interactions, the studies centered on the verbal productions in work situations and those centered on the verbal productions in the devices for the analysis of practices. The conclusion highlights the importance of the interactional epistemology, as it proposes to distinguish five levels: (a) the interactions between the and the gnosiological dimensions of language; (b) the interactions between general praxeology and language praxeology; (c) the constitutive interactions of the signs; (d) the concrete dialogical interactions; (e) the interactions between the structure of the verbal interactions and the different properties of the context.Key words: Dialogism, Discourse, e-learning, Interaction, Language, Praxeology, Sign. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-08-27 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/474 |
url |
https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/474 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
fra |
language |
fra |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/474/71 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Unisinos |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Unisinos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Calidoscópio; Vol. 8 No. 2 (2010): May/August; 154-164 Calidoscópio; v. 8 n. 2 (2010): Maio/Agosto; 154-164 2177-6202 reponame:Calidoscópio (Online) instname:Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS) instacron:Unisinos |
instname_str |
Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS) |
instacron_str |
Unisinos |
institution |
Unisinos |
reponame_str |
Calidoscópio (Online) |
collection |
Calidoscópio (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Calidoscópio (Online) - Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cmira@unisinos.br || cmira@unisinos.br |
_version_ |
1792203884659212288 |