The hegemonic power of science in the scientific popularization discourse

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Motta-Roth, Désirée
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: dos Santos Lovato, Cristina
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Calidoscópio (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/cld.2011.93.09
Resumo: Science popularization in contemporary French media mobilizes enunciative positions (public, industry or government) in a public debate about science (Beacco et al., 2002). However, previous analyses of science popularization news texts in English and Portuguese (Motta-Rothand Lovato, 2009; Lovato, 2010; Marcuzzo, 2011) demonstrate an almost exclusive insertion of science-related social actors’ voices. This preponderance suggests that these voices are used as an authority resource with an effect of monologism, which in turn produces a “monologue intertext”centered around science (Moirand, 2003, p. 179): strictly speaking, thereis no interaction between equipolent consciousnesses or equivalent voices (Bakhtin, 2008, p. 4-5). Based on Critical Discourse Analysis (Fairclough,2003) and the Appraisal System (Martin, White, 2005), in this paper we analyzethe extent to which this effect can be verified in a corpus of 30 science popularization news texts recently published in two Brazilian publications, Ciência Hoje and Galileu. The results indicate the predominance of the linguistic exponents of dialogic expansion. The constant use of modalization, citation and report shows that journalists construct the topic of these texts as an open question, inviting alternative points of view. On the other hand, we observe that the perspectives about the popularized scientific discovery are practically restricted to the scientific sphere, which in fact restricts the dialogical space in these news texts, reinstating the hegemonic power of science discourse in the discourse of scientific popularization.Key words: dialogism and intertextuality, critical discourse analysis,appraisal system, science popularization news.
id Unisinos-3_0ae945a32c9263500920bfb1cd6a7384
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.revistas.unisinos.br:article/1720
network_acronym_str Unisinos-3
network_name_str Calidoscópio (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The hegemonic power of science in the scientific popularization discourseO poder hegemônico da ciência no discurso de popularização científicaScience popularization in contemporary French media mobilizes enunciative positions (public, industry or government) in a public debate about science (Beacco et al., 2002). However, previous analyses of science popularization news texts in English and Portuguese (Motta-Rothand Lovato, 2009; Lovato, 2010; Marcuzzo, 2011) demonstrate an almost exclusive insertion of science-related social actors’ voices. This preponderance suggests that these voices are used as an authority resource with an effect of monologism, which in turn produces a “monologue intertext”centered around science (Moirand, 2003, p. 179): strictly speaking, thereis no interaction between equipolent consciousnesses or equivalent voices (Bakhtin, 2008, p. 4-5). Based on Critical Discourse Analysis (Fairclough,2003) and the Appraisal System (Martin, White, 2005), in this paper we analyzethe extent to which this effect can be verified in a corpus of 30 science popularization news texts recently published in two Brazilian publications, Ciência Hoje and Galileu. The results indicate the predominance of the linguistic exponents of dialogic expansion. The constant use of modalization, citation and report shows that journalists construct the topic of these texts as an open question, inviting alternative points of view. On the other hand, we observe that the perspectives about the popularized scientific discovery are practically restricted to the scientific sphere, which in fact restricts the dialogical space in these news texts, reinstating the hegemonic power of science discourse in the discourse of scientific popularization.Key words: dialogism and intertextuality, critical discourse analysis,appraisal system, science popularization news.A popularização da ciência na mídia francesa contemporânea mobiliza posições enunciativas (público, indústria ou governo) em um debate público sobre a ciência (Beacco et al., 2002). Entretanto, análises prévias de notícias de popularização da ciência em inglês e em português (Motta-Roth e Lovato, 2009; Lovato, 2010; Marcuzzo, 2011) evidenciam uma inserção quase exclusiva da voz de atores sociais ligados à ciência. Essa preponderância indica que essas vozes são utilizadas como um recurso de autoridade com efeito de monologismo o que, por sua vez, produz um “intertexto monologal” centrado na ciência (Moirand, 2003, p. 179): a rigor, não há uma interação entre consciências equipolentes ou vozes plenivalentes (Bakhtin, 2008, p. 4-5). Com base na Análise Crítica do Discurso (Fairclough, 2003) e no Sistema de Avaliatividade (Martin e White, 2005), neste trabalho, analisamos em que medida esse efeito se verifica em um corpus de 30 notícias de popularização da ciência recentes, publicadas nas revistas Ciência Hoje e Galileu. Os resultados indicam a predominância dos expoentes linguísticos da expansão dialógica. O uso constante demodalização, citação e relato mostra que os jornalistas constroem o tópico desses textos como uma questão aberta, convidando posicionamento salternativos. Por outro, observamos que as perspectivas sobre a descoberta científica popularizada são praticamente restritas à esfera científica, o que, de fato, restringe o espaço dialógico, reafirmando o poder hegemônico do discurso da ciência no discurso de popularização científica.Palavras-chave: dialogismo e intertextualidade, análise crítica do discurso,sistema de avaliatividade, notícias de popularização da ciência.Unisinos2011-11-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/cld.2011.93.09Calidoscópio; Vol. 9 No. 3 (2011): September/December; 251-268Calidoscópio; v. 9 n. 3 (2011): Setembro/Dezembro; 251-2682177-6202reponame:Calidoscópio (Online)instname:Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)instacron:Unisinosporhttps://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/cld.2011.93.09/559Motta-Roth, Désiréedos Santos Lovato, Cristinainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2011-12-22T17:28:34Zoai:ojs2.revistas.unisinos.br:article/1720Revistahttps://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopioPUBhttps://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/oaicmira@unisinos.br || cmira@unisinos.br2177-62022177-6202opendoar:2011-12-22T17:28:34Calidoscópio (Online) - Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The hegemonic power of science in the scientific popularization discourse
O poder hegemônico da ciência no discurso de popularização científica
title The hegemonic power of science in the scientific popularization discourse
spellingShingle The hegemonic power of science in the scientific popularization discourse
Motta-Roth, Désirée
title_short The hegemonic power of science in the scientific popularization discourse
title_full The hegemonic power of science in the scientific popularization discourse
title_fullStr The hegemonic power of science in the scientific popularization discourse
title_full_unstemmed The hegemonic power of science in the scientific popularization discourse
title_sort The hegemonic power of science in the scientific popularization discourse
author Motta-Roth, Désirée
author_facet Motta-Roth, Désirée
dos Santos Lovato, Cristina
author_role author
author2 dos Santos Lovato, Cristina
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Motta-Roth, Désirée
dos Santos Lovato, Cristina
description Science popularization in contemporary French media mobilizes enunciative positions (public, industry or government) in a public debate about science (Beacco et al., 2002). However, previous analyses of science popularization news texts in English and Portuguese (Motta-Rothand Lovato, 2009; Lovato, 2010; Marcuzzo, 2011) demonstrate an almost exclusive insertion of science-related social actors’ voices. This preponderance suggests that these voices are used as an authority resource with an effect of monologism, which in turn produces a “monologue intertext”centered around science (Moirand, 2003, p. 179): strictly speaking, thereis no interaction between equipolent consciousnesses or equivalent voices (Bakhtin, 2008, p. 4-5). Based on Critical Discourse Analysis (Fairclough,2003) and the Appraisal System (Martin, White, 2005), in this paper we analyzethe extent to which this effect can be verified in a corpus of 30 science popularization news texts recently published in two Brazilian publications, Ciência Hoje and Galileu. The results indicate the predominance of the linguistic exponents of dialogic expansion. The constant use of modalization, citation and report shows that journalists construct the topic of these texts as an open question, inviting alternative points of view. On the other hand, we observe that the perspectives about the popularized scientific discovery are practically restricted to the scientific sphere, which in fact restricts the dialogical space in these news texts, reinstating the hegemonic power of science discourse in the discourse of scientific popularization.Key words: dialogism and intertextuality, critical discourse analysis,appraisal system, science popularization news.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-11-23
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/cld.2011.93.09
url https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/cld.2011.93.09
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/cld.2011.93.09/559
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Unisinos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Unisinos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Calidoscópio; Vol. 9 No. 3 (2011): September/December; 251-268
Calidoscópio; v. 9 n. 3 (2011): Setembro/Dezembro; 251-268
2177-6202
reponame:Calidoscópio (Online)
instname:Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)
instacron:Unisinos
instname_str Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)
instacron_str Unisinos
institution Unisinos
reponame_str Calidoscópio (Online)
collection Calidoscópio (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Calidoscópio (Online) - Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cmira@unisinos.br || cmira@unisinos.br
_version_ 1792203885111148544