The hegemonic power of science in the scientific popularization discourse
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Calidoscópio (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/cld.2011.93.09 |
Resumo: | Science popularization in contemporary French media mobilizes enunciative positions (public, industry or government) in a public debate about science (Beacco et al., 2002). However, previous analyses of science popularization news texts in English and Portuguese (Motta-Rothand Lovato, 2009; Lovato, 2010; Marcuzzo, 2011) demonstrate an almost exclusive insertion of science-related social actors’ voices. This preponderance suggests that these voices are used as an authority resource with an effect of monologism, which in turn produces a “monologue intertext”centered around science (Moirand, 2003, p. 179): strictly speaking, thereis no interaction between equipolent consciousnesses or equivalent voices (Bakhtin, 2008, p. 4-5). Based on Critical Discourse Analysis (Fairclough,2003) and the Appraisal System (Martin, White, 2005), in this paper we analyzethe extent to which this effect can be verified in a corpus of 30 science popularization news texts recently published in two Brazilian publications, Ciência Hoje and Galileu. The results indicate the predominance of the linguistic exponents of dialogic expansion. The constant use of modalization, citation and report shows that journalists construct the topic of these texts as an open question, inviting alternative points of view. On the other hand, we observe that the perspectives about the popularized scientific discovery are practically restricted to the scientific sphere, which in fact restricts the dialogical space in these news texts, reinstating the hegemonic power of science discourse in the discourse of scientific popularization.Key words: dialogism and intertextuality, critical discourse analysis,appraisal system, science popularization news. |
id |
Unisinos-3_0ae945a32c9263500920bfb1cd6a7384 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs2.revistas.unisinos.br:article/1720 |
network_acronym_str |
Unisinos-3 |
network_name_str |
Calidoscópio (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The hegemonic power of science in the scientific popularization discourseO poder hegemônico da ciência no discurso de popularização científicaScience popularization in contemporary French media mobilizes enunciative positions (public, industry or government) in a public debate about science (Beacco et al., 2002). However, previous analyses of science popularization news texts in English and Portuguese (Motta-Rothand Lovato, 2009; Lovato, 2010; Marcuzzo, 2011) demonstrate an almost exclusive insertion of science-related social actors’ voices. This preponderance suggests that these voices are used as an authority resource with an effect of monologism, which in turn produces a “monologue intertext”centered around science (Moirand, 2003, p. 179): strictly speaking, thereis no interaction between equipolent consciousnesses or equivalent voices (Bakhtin, 2008, p. 4-5). Based on Critical Discourse Analysis (Fairclough,2003) and the Appraisal System (Martin, White, 2005), in this paper we analyzethe extent to which this effect can be verified in a corpus of 30 science popularization news texts recently published in two Brazilian publications, Ciência Hoje and Galileu. The results indicate the predominance of the linguistic exponents of dialogic expansion. The constant use of modalization, citation and report shows that journalists construct the topic of these texts as an open question, inviting alternative points of view. On the other hand, we observe that the perspectives about the popularized scientific discovery are practically restricted to the scientific sphere, which in fact restricts the dialogical space in these news texts, reinstating the hegemonic power of science discourse in the discourse of scientific popularization.Key words: dialogism and intertextuality, critical discourse analysis,appraisal system, science popularization news.A popularização da ciência na mídia francesa contemporânea mobiliza posições enunciativas (público, indústria ou governo) em um debate público sobre a ciência (Beacco et al., 2002). Entretanto, análises prévias de notícias de popularização da ciência em inglês e em português (Motta-Roth e Lovato, 2009; Lovato, 2010; Marcuzzo, 2011) evidenciam uma inserção quase exclusiva da voz de atores sociais ligados à ciência. Essa preponderância indica que essas vozes são utilizadas como um recurso de autoridade com efeito de monologismo o que, por sua vez, produz um “intertexto monologal” centrado na ciência (Moirand, 2003, p. 179): a rigor, não há uma interação entre consciências equipolentes ou vozes plenivalentes (Bakhtin, 2008, p. 4-5). Com base na Análise Crítica do Discurso (Fairclough, 2003) e no Sistema de Avaliatividade (Martin e White, 2005), neste trabalho, analisamos em que medida esse efeito se verifica em um corpus de 30 notícias de popularização da ciência recentes, publicadas nas revistas Ciência Hoje e Galileu. Os resultados indicam a predominância dos expoentes linguísticos da expansão dialógica. O uso constante demodalização, citação e relato mostra que os jornalistas constroem o tópico desses textos como uma questão aberta, convidando posicionamento salternativos. Por outro, observamos que as perspectivas sobre a descoberta científica popularizada são praticamente restritas à esfera científica, o que, de fato, restringe o espaço dialógico, reafirmando o poder hegemônico do discurso da ciência no discurso de popularização científica.Palavras-chave: dialogismo e intertextualidade, análise crítica do discurso,sistema de avaliatividade, notícias de popularização da ciência.Unisinos2011-11-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/cld.2011.93.09Calidoscópio; Vol. 9 No. 3 (2011): September/December; 251-268Calidoscópio; v. 9 n. 3 (2011): Setembro/Dezembro; 251-2682177-6202reponame:Calidoscópio (Online)instname:Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)instacron:Unisinosporhttps://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/cld.2011.93.09/559Motta-Roth, Désiréedos Santos Lovato, Cristinainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2011-12-22T17:28:34Zoai:ojs2.revistas.unisinos.br:article/1720Revistahttps://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopioPUBhttps://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/oaicmira@unisinos.br || cmira@unisinos.br2177-62022177-6202opendoar:2011-12-22T17:28:34Calidoscópio (Online) - Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The hegemonic power of science in the scientific popularization discourse O poder hegemônico da ciência no discurso de popularização científica |
title |
The hegemonic power of science in the scientific popularization discourse |
spellingShingle |
The hegemonic power of science in the scientific popularization discourse Motta-Roth, Désirée |
title_short |
The hegemonic power of science in the scientific popularization discourse |
title_full |
The hegemonic power of science in the scientific popularization discourse |
title_fullStr |
The hegemonic power of science in the scientific popularization discourse |
title_full_unstemmed |
The hegemonic power of science in the scientific popularization discourse |
title_sort |
The hegemonic power of science in the scientific popularization discourse |
author |
Motta-Roth, Désirée |
author_facet |
Motta-Roth, Désirée dos Santos Lovato, Cristina |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
dos Santos Lovato, Cristina |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Motta-Roth, Désirée dos Santos Lovato, Cristina |
description |
Science popularization in contemporary French media mobilizes enunciative positions (public, industry or government) in a public debate about science (Beacco et al., 2002). However, previous analyses of science popularization news texts in English and Portuguese (Motta-Rothand Lovato, 2009; Lovato, 2010; Marcuzzo, 2011) demonstrate an almost exclusive insertion of science-related social actors’ voices. This preponderance suggests that these voices are used as an authority resource with an effect of monologism, which in turn produces a “monologue intertext”centered around science (Moirand, 2003, p. 179): strictly speaking, thereis no interaction between equipolent consciousnesses or equivalent voices (Bakhtin, 2008, p. 4-5). Based on Critical Discourse Analysis (Fairclough,2003) and the Appraisal System (Martin, White, 2005), in this paper we analyzethe extent to which this effect can be verified in a corpus of 30 science popularization news texts recently published in two Brazilian publications, Ciência Hoje and Galileu. The results indicate the predominance of the linguistic exponents of dialogic expansion. The constant use of modalization, citation and report shows that journalists construct the topic of these texts as an open question, inviting alternative points of view. On the other hand, we observe that the perspectives about the popularized scientific discovery are practically restricted to the scientific sphere, which in fact restricts the dialogical space in these news texts, reinstating the hegemonic power of science discourse in the discourse of scientific popularization.Key words: dialogism and intertextuality, critical discourse analysis,appraisal system, science popularization news. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-11-23 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/cld.2011.93.09 |
url |
https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/cld.2011.93.09 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/cld.2011.93.09/559 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Unisinos |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Unisinos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Calidoscópio; Vol. 9 No. 3 (2011): September/December; 251-268 Calidoscópio; v. 9 n. 3 (2011): Setembro/Dezembro; 251-268 2177-6202 reponame:Calidoscópio (Online) instname:Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS) instacron:Unisinos |
instname_str |
Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS) |
instacron_str |
Unisinos |
institution |
Unisinos |
reponame_str |
Calidoscópio (Online) |
collection |
Calidoscópio (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Calidoscópio (Online) - Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cmira@unisinos.br || cmira@unisinos.br |
_version_ |
1792203885111148544 |