The (re)formulation practice as an argumentative strategy in conflict situation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Vieira, Amitza Torres
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Gago, Paulo Cortes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Calidoscópio (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/cld.2016.142.14
Resumo: The article analyzes actual data of talk-in-interaction in a conflict situation and proposes to combine the formulation practice in ethnomethodological Conversation Analysis to the interactional perspective of argument. In a pilot qualitative case study, we follow the trajectory of an argumentative process of a combined sale in a conciliation hearing at PROCON. We specifically show how the (re)formulations are connected to the (re)introduction of positions and supports. We argue that both complement each other because, as the argument is a basic function of language and central in the legal world, the formulation is also an important practice because it is present in all contexts. We defend interaction as a privileged locus of human experience.Keywords: formulation practice, argumentative strategy, interaction in conflict situation.
id Unisinos-3_20cc24555bc2dcfc0cda3487306f5cdc
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.revistas.unisinos.br:article/11243
network_acronym_str Unisinos-3
network_name_str Calidoscópio (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The (re)formulation practice as an argumentative strategy in conflict situationA prática de (re)formulação como estratégia argumentativa em situação de conflitoThe article analyzes actual data of talk-in-interaction in a conflict situation and proposes to combine the formulation practice in ethnomethodological Conversation Analysis to the interactional perspective of argument. In a pilot qualitative case study, we follow the trajectory of an argumentative process of a combined sale in a conciliation hearing at PROCON. We specifically show how the (re)formulations are connected to the (re)introduction of positions and supports. We argue that both complement each other because, as the argument is a basic function of language and central in the legal world, the formulation is also an important practice because it is present in all contexts. We defend interaction as a privileged locus of human experience.Keywords: formulation practice, argumentative strategy, interaction in conflict situation.O artigo analisa dados reais de fala-em-interação em situação de conflito e propõe conjugar a prática de formulação em Análise da Conversa Etnometodológica à perspectiva interacional de argumentação. Em um estudo de caso, piloto, qualitativo, acompanhamos a trajetória do processo argumentativo de um caso de venda casada em uma audiência de conciliação no PROCON. Mostramos, especificamente, como as (re)formulações estão ligadas à (re)introdução de posições e de sustentações. Argumentamos que ambas complementam-se, pois, assim como a argumentação é uma função básica da linguagem e central no universo jurídico, a formulação é prática igualmente relevante, pois é presente em todos os contextos. Defendemos a interação como lócus privilegiado da experiência humana.Palavras-chave: prática de formulação, estratégia argumentativa, interação em situação de conflito.Unisinos2016-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/cld.2016.142.14Calidoscópio; Vol. 14 No. 2 (2016): May/August; 317-331Calidoscópio; v. 14 n. 2 (2016): Maio/Agosto; 317-3312177-6202reponame:Calidoscópio (Online)instname:Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)instacron:Unisinosporhttps://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/cld.2016.142.14/5569Vieira, Amitza TorresGago, Paulo Cortesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2016-11-01T19:02:03Zoai:ojs2.revistas.unisinos.br:article/11243Revistahttps://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopioPUBhttps://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/oaicmira@unisinos.br || cmira@unisinos.br2177-62022177-6202opendoar:2016-11-01T19:02:03Calidoscópio (Online) - Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The (re)formulation practice as an argumentative strategy in conflict situation
A prática de (re)formulação como estratégia argumentativa em situação de conflito
title The (re)formulation practice as an argumentative strategy in conflict situation
spellingShingle The (re)formulation practice as an argumentative strategy in conflict situation
Vieira, Amitza Torres
title_short The (re)formulation practice as an argumentative strategy in conflict situation
title_full The (re)formulation practice as an argumentative strategy in conflict situation
title_fullStr The (re)formulation practice as an argumentative strategy in conflict situation
title_full_unstemmed The (re)formulation practice as an argumentative strategy in conflict situation
title_sort The (re)formulation practice as an argumentative strategy in conflict situation
author Vieira, Amitza Torres
author_facet Vieira, Amitza Torres
Gago, Paulo Cortes
author_role author
author2 Gago, Paulo Cortes
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Vieira, Amitza Torres
Gago, Paulo Cortes
description The article analyzes actual data of talk-in-interaction in a conflict situation and proposes to combine the formulation practice in ethnomethodological Conversation Analysis to the interactional perspective of argument. In a pilot qualitative case study, we follow the trajectory of an argumentative process of a combined sale in a conciliation hearing at PROCON. We specifically show how the (re)formulations are connected to the (re)introduction of positions and supports. We argue that both complement each other because, as the argument is a basic function of language and central in the legal world, the formulation is also an important practice because it is present in all contexts. We defend interaction as a privileged locus of human experience.Keywords: formulation practice, argumentative strategy, interaction in conflict situation.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/cld.2016.142.14
url https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/cld.2016.142.14
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/cld.2016.142.14/5569
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Unisinos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Unisinos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Calidoscópio; Vol. 14 No. 2 (2016): May/August; 317-331
Calidoscópio; v. 14 n. 2 (2016): Maio/Agosto; 317-331
2177-6202
reponame:Calidoscópio (Online)
instname:Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)
instacron:Unisinos
instname_str Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)
instacron_str Unisinos
institution Unisinos
reponame_str Calidoscópio (Online)
collection Calidoscópio (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Calidoscópio (Online) - Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cmira@unisinos.br || cmira@unisinos.br
_version_ 1792203886704984064

Registros relacionados