Multimodality in human interaction

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Goodwin, Charles
Data de Publicação: 2010
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Calidoscópio (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/468
Resumo: Human action is built by actively combining materials with intrinsically different properties into situated contextual configurations where they can mutually elaborate each other to create a whole that is both different from, and greater than, any of its constitutive parts. This has a range of consequences for the organization of language, action, knowledge and embodiment in situated interaction. Two phenomena that depend upon such distributed organization of action will be investigated here. First, Chil, a man who suffered severe damage to the left hemisphere of his brain that left him with a three word vocabulary, Yes, No and And, was nonetheless able to act as a powerful speaker in conversation. He did this by operating on the talk of others to lead them to produce the words he needed but couldn’t say himself, and also by using gesture to incorporate meaningful phenomena in this surrounding environment into the organization of his utterance. Second, the processes through which archaeologists acquire the ability to see relevant structure in the dirt they are excavating, and construct the documents, such as maps, that animate the discourse of their profession are investigated. The way in which action is built through the simultaneous use of materials with diverse properties makes it possible for experienced archaeologists to calibrate the professional vision, practice and embodied knowledge of novices, and thus to interactively construct within situated interaction the cognition, ways of seeing and embodied practices of new archaeologists. Both Chil’s ability to act as a speaker and the social organization of the embodied knowledge and perception required to act as a member of a scientific community are made possible through the way in which alternatively placed social actors contribute with different kinds of materials to a common course of action.Key words: multimodality, aphasia, professional vision, gesture, pointing, talk-in-interaction.
id Unisinos-3_d95896a2e01fee9eb391200b21e854d8
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.revistas.unisinos.br:article/468
network_acronym_str Unisinos-3
network_name_str Calidoscópio (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Multimodality in human interactionMultimodalidade na interação humanaHuman action is built by actively combining materials with intrinsically different properties into situated contextual configurations where they can mutually elaborate each other to create a whole that is both different from, and greater than, any of its constitutive parts. This has a range of consequences for the organization of language, action, knowledge and embodiment in situated interaction. Two phenomena that depend upon such distributed organization of action will be investigated here. First, Chil, a man who suffered severe damage to the left hemisphere of his brain that left him with a three word vocabulary, Yes, No and And, was nonetheless able to act as a powerful speaker in conversation. He did this by operating on the talk of others to lead them to produce the words he needed but couldn’t say himself, and also by using gesture to incorporate meaningful phenomena in this surrounding environment into the organization of his utterance. Second, the processes through which archaeologists acquire the ability to see relevant structure in the dirt they are excavating, and construct the documents, such as maps, that animate the discourse of their profession are investigated. The way in which action is built through the simultaneous use of materials with diverse properties makes it possible for experienced archaeologists to calibrate the professional vision, practice and embodied knowledge of novices, and thus to interactively construct within situated interaction the cognition, ways of seeing and embodied practices of new archaeologists. Both Chil’s ability to act as a speaker and the social organization of the embodied knowledge and perception required to act as a member of a scientific community are made possible through the way in which alternatively placed social actors contribute with different kinds of materials to a common course of action.Key words: multimodality, aphasia, professional vision, gesture, pointing, talk-in-interaction.A interação humana é constituída pela combinação ativa de materiais com propriedades intrinsecamente diversas, em configurações contextuais situadas, onde eles podem mutuamente elaborar um ao outro para criar um todo que é diferente e maior que suas partes constituintes. Isso gera uma série de consequências na organização da linguagem, ação, conhecimento e corporificação em interações situadas. Dois fenônomenos que dependem dessa organização distribuída da ação serão investigados aqui. Primeiro, Chil, um homem que sofreu um grave comprometimento no hemisfério esquerdo de seu cérebro que o deixou com um vocabulário de três itens: Sim, Não e E, mas que se revela capaz de agir como um poderoso falante em interações. Chil consegue isso ao operar na fala dos outros, de forma a fazê-los produzir as palavras de que ele precisa, mas que não poderia ele próprio produzir, e também ao usar gestos na organização de seus enunciados a fim de incorporar fenômenos significativos do ambiente que os cerca. Segundo, são investigados os processos pelos quais arqueólogos adquirem a habilidade de enxergar estruturas relevantes no solo que estão escavando e de construir documentos, tais como mapas, que fomentam o discurso de sua profissão. A maneira com que a ação é construída por meio do uso simultâneo de materiais com propriedades diversas faz com que seja possível que arqueólogos experientes calibrem a visão, a prática e o conhecimento corporificado de profissionais ainda em formação e assim construam, na própria interação situada, a cognição, as formas de ver e as práticas corporificadas dos jovens arqueólogos. Tanto a habilidade de Chil, de agir como um falante, quanto a organização social do conhecimento corporificado e a percepção necessárias para agir-se como um membro de uma comunidade científica são possíveis pela forma com que atores sociais alternativamente situados contribuem com diferentes tipos de materiais para um curso de ação comum.Palavras-chave: multimodalidade, afasia, visão profissional, gestos, apontação, fala-em-interação.Unisinos2010-08-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/468Calidoscópio; Vol. 8 No. 2 (2010): May/August; 85-98Calidoscópio; v. 8 n. 2 (2010): Maio/Agosto; 85-982177-6202reponame:Calidoscópio (Online)instname:Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)instacron:Unisinosenghttps://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/468/64Goodwin, Charlesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2012-03-16T15:44:13Zoai:ojs2.revistas.unisinos.br:article/468Revistahttps://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopioPUBhttps://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/oaicmira@unisinos.br || cmira@unisinos.br2177-62022177-6202opendoar:2012-03-16T15:44:13Calidoscópio (Online) - Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Multimodality in human interaction
Multimodalidade na interação humana
title Multimodality in human interaction
spellingShingle Multimodality in human interaction
Goodwin, Charles
title_short Multimodality in human interaction
title_full Multimodality in human interaction
title_fullStr Multimodality in human interaction
title_full_unstemmed Multimodality in human interaction
title_sort Multimodality in human interaction
author Goodwin, Charles
author_facet Goodwin, Charles
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Goodwin, Charles
description Human action is built by actively combining materials with intrinsically different properties into situated contextual configurations where they can mutually elaborate each other to create a whole that is both different from, and greater than, any of its constitutive parts. This has a range of consequences for the organization of language, action, knowledge and embodiment in situated interaction. Two phenomena that depend upon such distributed organization of action will be investigated here. First, Chil, a man who suffered severe damage to the left hemisphere of his brain that left him with a three word vocabulary, Yes, No and And, was nonetheless able to act as a powerful speaker in conversation. He did this by operating on the talk of others to lead them to produce the words he needed but couldn’t say himself, and also by using gesture to incorporate meaningful phenomena in this surrounding environment into the organization of his utterance. Second, the processes through which archaeologists acquire the ability to see relevant structure in the dirt they are excavating, and construct the documents, such as maps, that animate the discourse of their profession are investigated. The way in which action is built through the simultaneous use of materials with diverse properties makes it possible for experienced archaeologists to calibrate the professional vision, practice and embodied knowledge of novices, and thus to interactively construct within situated interaction the cognition, ways of seeing and embodied practices of new archaeologists. Both Chil’s ability to act as a speaker and the social organization of the embodied knowledge and perception required to act as a member of a scientific community are made possible through the way in which alternatively placed social actors contribute with different kinds of materials to a common course of action.Key words: multimodality, aphasia, professional vision, gesture, pointing, talk-in-interaction.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-08-27
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/468
url https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/468
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/468/64
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Unisinos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Unisinos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Calidoscópio; Vol. 8 No. 2 (2010): May/August; 85-98
Calidoscópio; v. 8 n. 2 (2010): Maio/Agosto; 85-98
2177-6202
reponame:Calidoscópio (Online)
instname:Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)
instacron:Unisinos
instname_str Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)
instacron_str Unisinos
institution Unisinos
reponame_str Calidoscópio (Online)
collection Calidoscópio (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Calidoscópio (Online) - Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cmira@unisinos.br || cmira@unisinos.br
_version_ 1792203884647677952