Measuring Presidential Dominance over Cabinets in Presidential Systems: Constitutional Design and Power Sharing

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Araújo,Victor
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Silva,Thiago, Vieira,Marcelo
Tipo de documento: Relatório
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Political Science Review
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212016000200501
Resumo: This study focuses on the degree of political dominance exercised on cabinets by the executive chief in presidential systems. According to a debate that began in the 1990s, presidential systems are characterized by a non-collegial decision-making process, led by and personified in the figure of the president, in contrast to parliamentary systems where a joint decision-making process is prevalent. The key argument of this research note is that, although the majority of presidents have the constitutional power to remove cabinet ministers, the executive decision-making process in presidential systems is not necessarily vertical or based on a non-collegial process. By building a new index, we reveal a significant variation in the executive power exerted by presidents over their cabinets. To classify the degree of political dominance of presidents over their cabinets, we analyzed the rules of cabinet decision-making processes as defined in 18 Latin American constitutions.
id ABCP-1_bf0d867011fce0b2045d5f1443493ad1
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1981-38212016000200501
network_acronym_str ABCP-1
network_name_str Brazilian Political Science Review
repository_id_str
spelling Measuring Presidential Dominance over Cabinets in Presidential Systems: Constitutional Design and Power SharingConstitutionsdecision-making processpresidential systemsexecutive powerscabinetsThis study focuses on the degree of political dominance exercised on cabinets by the executive chief in presidential systems. According to a debate that began in the 1990s, presidential systems are characterized by a non-collegial decision-making process, led by and personified in the figure of the president, in contrast to parliamentary systems where a joint decision-making process is prevalent. The key argument of this research note is that, although the majority of presidents have the constitutional power to remove cabinet ministers, the executive decision-making process in presidential systems is not necessarily vertical or based on a non-collegial process. By building a new index, we reveal a significant variation in the executive power exerted by presidents over their cabinets. To classify the degree of political dominance of presidents over their cabinets, we analyzed the rules of cabinet decision-making processes as defined in 18 Latin American constitutions.Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política2016-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/reportinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212016000200501Brazilian Political Science Review v.10 n.2 2016reponame:Brazilian Political Science Reviewinstname:Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)instacron:ABCP10.1590/1981-38212016000200007info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAraújo,VictorSilva,ThiagoVieira,Marceloeng2016-08-05T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1981-38212016000200501Revistahttps://brazilianpoliticalsciencereview.org/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbpsr@brazilianpoliticalsciencareview.org||bpsr@bpsr.org.br1981-38211981-3821opendoar:2016-08-05T00:00Brazilian Political Science Review - Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Measuring Presidential Dominance over Cabinets in Presidential Systems: Constitutional Design and Power Sharing
title Measuring Presidential Dominance over Cabinets in Presidential Systems: Constitutional Design and Power Sharing
spellingShingle Measuring Presidential Dominance over Cabinets in Presidential Systems: Constitutional Design and Power Sharing
Araújo,Victor
Constitutions
decision-making process
presidential systems
executive powers
cabinets
title_short Measuring Presidential Dominance over Cabinets in Presidential Systems: Constitutional Design and Power Sharing
title_full Measuring Presidential Dominance over Cabinets in Presidential Systems: Constitutional Design and Power Sharing
title_fullStr Measuring Presidential Dominance over Cabinets in Presidential Systems: Constitutional Design and Power Sharing
title_full_unstemmed Measuring Presidential Dominance over Cabinets in Presidential Systems: Constitutional Design and Power Sharing
title_sort Measuring Presidential Dominance over Cabinets in Presidential Systems: Constitutional Design and Power Sharing
author Araújo,Victor
author_facet Araújo,Victor
Silva,Thiago
Vieira,Marcelo
author_role author
author2 Silva,Thiago
Vieira,Marcelo
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Araújo,Victor
Silva,Thiago
Vieira,Marcelo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Constitutions
decision-making process
presidential systems
executive powers
cabinets
topic Constitutions
decision-making process
presidential systems
executive powers
cabinets
description This study focuses on the degree of political dominance exercised on cabinets by the executive chief in presidential systems. According to a debate that began in the 1990s, presidential systems are characterized by a non-collegial decision-making process, led by and personified in the figure of the president, in contrast to parliamentary systems where a joint decision-making process is prevalent. The key argument of this research note is that, although the majority of presidents have the constitutional power to remove cabinet ministers, the executive decision-making process in presidential systems is not necessarily vertical or based on a non-collegial process. By building a new index, we reveal a significant variation in the executive power exerted by presidents over their cabinets. To classify the degree of political dominance of presidents over their cabinets, we analyzed the rules of cabinet decision-making processes as defined in 18 Latin American constitutions.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/report
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format report
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212016000200501
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212016000200501
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1981-38212016000200007
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Political Science Review v.10 n.2 2016
reponame:Brazilian Political Science Review
instname:Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)
instacron:ABCP
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)
instacron_str ABCP
institution ABCP
reponame_str Brazilian Political Science Review
collection Brazilian Political Science Review
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Political Science Review - Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bpsr@brazilianpoliticalsciencareview.org||bpsr@bpsr.org.br
_version_ 1754302907928281088