Does attention training differentiate ADHD subtypes?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Toledo, Márcia Maria
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Ciasca, Sylvia Maria
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Debates em Psiquiatria (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistardp.org.br/revista/article/view/980
Resumo: Objective: To compare the subtypes of ADHD proposed by the DSM-IV (1994), regarding the response to attention training. Method: Forty subjects diagnosed with ADHD made up the Study Groups, subdivided into: ADHD-D - Predominantly Inattentive Type and ADHD-C Combined Type, mean age of 9 years and 8 months, both genders, attending between 1st and 6th years of elementary education in public schools in Campinas and region, with 23 children being referred to DISAPRE/FCM-UNICAME; and 17 children selected from a Municipal School in Campinas. The Control Group consisted of 30 children with no impairment. The ADHD diagnosis was performed by the DISAPRE interdisciplinary team. The Attention Training was elaborated by the researchers according to the model proposed in the literature, consisting of auditory and visual activities, applied in 12 individual sessions with 20 subjects from the Study Group. Results: Subjects with the ADHD-D subtype had more difficulty in activities involving auditory sustained attention and visual selective attention, and problem-solving and self-monitoring strategies were better employed than by subjects diagnosed with ADHD-C. These showed delay in tasks involving visual sustained attention, auditory selective attention and auditory and visual alternating attention, showing greater impairment in response inhibition and self-control. Conclusion: Significant attentional differences were outlined for each subtype. In addition to raising the importance of using attentional training in the rehabilitation of children with ADHD.
id ABP-2_7c651ccec3697a00b10a779c5f9bf570
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/980
network_acronym_str ABP-2
network_name_str Debates em Psiquiatria (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Does attention training differentiate ADHD subtypes?¿El entrenamiento de la atención diferencia los subtipos de TDAH?Treino de atenção diferencia subtipos de TDAH?Subtipos de TDAHReabilitação CognitivaAtençãoTreino de AtençãoNeuropsicologiaTDAHsubtypes of ADHDADHDcognitive rehabilitationattentionattention trainingneuropsychologyTDAHsubtipos de TDAHrehabilitación cognitivatrastorno de atenciónneuropsicologíaatenciónObjective: To compare the subtypes of ADHD proposed by the DSM-IV (1994), regarding the response to attention training. Method: Forty subjects diagnosed with ADHD made up the Study Groups, subdivided into: ADHD-D - Predominantly Inattentive Type and ADHD-C Combined Type, mean age of 9 years and 8 months, both genders, attending between 1st and 6th years of elementary education in public schools in Campinas and region, with 23 children being referred to DISAPRE/FCM-UNICAME; and 17 children selected from a Municipal School in Campinas. The Control Group consisted of 30 children with no impairment. The ADHD diagnosis was performed by the DISAPRE interdisciplinary team. The Attention Training was elaborated by the researchers according to the model proposed in the literature, consisting of auditory and visual activities, applied in 12 individual sessions with 20 subjects from the Study Group. Results: Subjects with the ADHD-D subtype had more difficulty in activities involving auditory sustained attention and visual selective attention, and problem-solving and self-monitoring strategies were better employed than by subjects diagnosed with ADHD-C. These showed delay in tasks involving visual sustained attention, auditory selective attention and auditory and visual alternating attention, showing greater impairment in response inhibition and self-control. Conclusion: Significant attentional differences were outlined for each subtype. In addition to raising the importance of using attentional training in the rehabilitation of children with ADHD.Objetivo: Comparar los subtipos de TDAH propuestos por el DSM-IV (1994), en cuanto a la respuesta al entrenamiento de la atención. Método: Cuarenta sujetos diagnosticados con TDAH integraron los Grupos de Estudio, subdivididos en: TDAH-D - Tipo Predominantemente Inatento y TDAH-C Tipo Combinado, edad media de 9 años y 8 meses, ambos sexos, cursando entre 1° y 6° año de primaria educación en escuelas públicas de Campinas y región, con 23 niños encaminados a la DISAPRE/FCM-UNICAM; y 17 niños seleccionados de una Escuela Municipal de Campinas. El grupo de control constaba de 30 niños sin discapacidad. El diagnóstico de TDAH fue realizado por el equipo interdisciplinario DISAPRE. El Entrenamiento de la Atención fue elaborado por los investigadores según el modelo propuesto en la literatura, consistente en actividades auditivas y visuales, aplicadas en 12 sesiones individuales con 20 sujetos del Grupo de Estudio. Resultados: Los sujetos con el subtipo TDAH-D tuvieron más dificultad en actividades que involucraban atención sostenida auditiva y atención selectiva visual, y las estrategias de resolución de problemas y autocontrol fueron mejor empleadas que los sujetos diagnosticados con TDAH-C. Estos mostraron retraso en tareas de atención sostenida visual, atención selectiva auditiva y atención alternada auditiva y visual, mostrando mayor deterioro en la inhibición de la respuesta y el autocontrol. Conclusión: se describieron diferencias atencionales significativas para cada subtipo. Además de plantear la importancia de utilizar el entrenamiento atencional en la rehabilitación de niños con TDAH.Objetivo: Comparar os subtipos de TDAH propostos pelo DSM-IV (1994), quanto a resposta ao treino de atenção. Método: Quarenta sujeitos diagnosticados como TDAH compuseram os Grupos de Estudo, subdivididos em: TDAH-D -Tipo Predominantemente Desatento e TDAH-C Tipo Combinado, média etária de 9 anos e 8 meses, ambos os sexos, cursando entre 1º e 6º anos do ensino fundamental de escolas públicas de Campinas e região, sendo que 23 crianças foram encaminhadas ao DISAPRE/FCM-UNICAME; e 17 crianças selecionadas em uma Escola Municipal de Campinas. O Grupo Controle foi composto por 30 crianças sem comprometimento. O diagnóstico de TDAH foi realizado pela equipe interdisciplinar do DISAPRE. O Treino de Atenção foi elaborado pelos pesquisadores segundo modelo proposto na literatura, constando de atividades auditivas e visuais, aplicadas em 12 sessões individuais com 20 sujeitos do Grupo de Estudo. Resultados: Os sujeitos com o subtipo TDAH-D apresentaram mais dificuldade nas atividades que envolviam atenção sustentada auditiva e atenção seletiva visual, e as estratégias de solução de problemas e automonitoramento foram mais bem empregadas que pelos sujeitos diagnosticados como TDAH-C. Estes apresentaram defasagem nas tarefas que envolviam atenção sustentada visual, atenção seletiva auditiva e atenção alternada auditiva e visual, evidenciando comprometimento maior na inibição de respostas e autocontrole. Conclusão: Diferenças atencionais significativas foram delineadas para cada subtipo. Além de levantar a importância do uso de treino atencional na reabilitação de crianças com TDAH.Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria2012-02-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-ReviewedRevisado por ParesAvaliado Pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://revistardp.org.br/revista/article/view/98010.25118/2763-9037.2012.v2.980Debates in Psychiatry; Vol. 2 No. 1 (2012); 12-19Debates em Psiquiatria; Vol. 2 Núm. 1 (2012); 12-19Debates em Psiquiatria; v. 2 n. 1 (2012); 12-192763-90372236-918Xreponame:Debates em Psiquiatria (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP)instacron:ABPporhttps://revistardp.org.br/revista/article/view/980/783Copyright (c) 2012 Márcia Maria Toledo, Sylvia Maria Ciascahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessToledo, Márcia MariaCiasca, Sylvia Maria2023-09-09T17:46:31Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/980Revistahttps://revistardp.org.br/revista/oaiPUBhttps://revistardp.org.br/revista/oairdp@abp.org.br2763-90372236-918Xopendoar:2023-09-09T17:46:31Debates em Psiquiatria (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Does attention training differentiate ADHD subtypes?
¿El entrenamiento de la atención diferencia los subtipos de TDAH?
Treino de atenção diferencia subtipos de TDAH?
title Does attention training differentiate ADHD subtypes?
spellingShingle Does attention training differentiate ADHD subtypes?
Toledo, Márcia Maria
Subtipos de TDAH
Reabilitação Cognitiva
Atenção
Treino de Atenção
Neuropsicologia
TDAH
subtypes of ADHD
ADHD
cognitive rehabilitation
attention
attention training
neuropsychology
TDAH
subtipos de TDAH
rehabilitación cognitiva
trastorno de atención
neuropsicología
atención
title_short Does attention training differentiate ADHD subtypes?
title_full Does attention training differentiate ADHD subtypes?
title_fullStr Does attention training differentiate ADHD subtypes?
title_full_unstemmed Does attention training differentiate ADHD subtypes?
title_sort Does attention training differentiate ADHD subtypes?
author Toledo, Márcia Maria
author_facet Toledo, Márcia Maria
Ciasca, Sylvia Maria
author_role author
author2 Ciasca, Sylvia Maria
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Toledo, Márcia Maria
Ciasca, Sylvia Maria
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Subtipos de TDAH
Reabilitação Cognitiva
Atenção
Treino de Atenção
Neuropsicologia
TDAH
subtypes of ADHD
ADHD
cognitive rehabilitation
attention
attention training
neuropsychology
TDAH
subtipos de TDAH
rehabilitación cognitiva
trastorno de atención
neuropsicología
atención
topic Subtipos de TDAH
Reabilitação Cognitiva
Atenção
Treino de Atenção
Neuropsicologia
TDAH
subtypes of ADHD
ADHD
cognitive rehabilitation
attention
attention training
neuropsychology
TDAH
subtipos de TDAH
rehabilitación cognitiva
trastorno de atención
neuropsicología
atención
description Objective: To compare the subtypes of ADHD proposed by the DSM-IV (1994), regarding the response to attention training. Method: Forty subjects diagnosed with ADHD made up the Study Groups, subdivided into: ADHD-D - Predominantly Inattentive Type and ADHD-C Combined Type, mean age of 9 years and 8 months, both genders, attending between 1st and 6th years of elementary education in public schools in Campinas and region, with 23 children being referred to DISAPRE/FCM-UNICAME; and 17 children selected from a Municipal School in Campinas. The Control Group consisted of 30 children with no impairment. The ADHD diagnosis was performed by the DISAPRE interdisciplinary team. The Attention Training was elaborated by the researchers according to the model proposed in the literature, consisting of auditory and visual activities, applied in 12 individual sessions with 20 subjects from the Study Group. Results: Subjects with the ADHD-D subtype had more difficulty in activities involving auditory sustained attention and visual selective attention, and problem-solving and self-monitoring strategies were better employed than by subjects diagnosed with ADHD-C. These showed delay in tasks involving visual sustained attention, auditory selective attention and auditory and visual alternating attention, showing greater impairment in response inhibition and self-control. Conclusion: Significant attentional differences were outlined for each subtype. In addition to raising the importance of using attentional training in the rehabilitation of children with ADHD.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-02-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-Reviewed
Revisado por Pares
Avaliado Pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistardp.org.br/revista/article/view/980
10.25118/2763-9037.2012.v2.980
url https://revistardp.org.br/revista/article/view/980
identifier_str_mv 10.25118/2763-9037.2012.v2.980
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistardp.org.br/revista/article/view/980/783
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2012 Márcia Maria Toledo, Sylvia Maria Ciasca
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2012 Márcia Maria Toledo, Sylvia Maria Ciasca
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Debates in Psychiatry; Vol. 2 No. 1 (2012); 12-19
Debates em Psiquiatria; Vol. 2 Núm. 1 (2012); 12-19
Debates em Psiquiatria; v. 2 n. 1 (2012); 12-19
2763-9037
2236-918X
reponame:Debates em Psiquiatria (Online)
instname:Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP)
instacron:ABP
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP)
instacron_str ABP
institution ABP
reponame_str Debates em Psiquiatria (Online)
collection Debates em Psiquiatria (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Debates em Psiquiatria (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rdp@abp.org.br
_version_ 1796798366145839104