“Problems of Dostoiévsky's Work” in the Mirror of the Sovietic and Foreign Criticism
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista da ANPOLL (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistadaanpoll.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/1331 |
Resumo: | This article aims to examine the reception of PDW ((Problems of Dostoiévsky’s work, 1929) in the sovietic and foreign criticism in the 1920s and 1930s based on the concepts of apperceptive background of responsive understanding and valorative horizon. For this purpose, it was collected reviews and mentions to PDW in Russian libraries and bookstores, that were translated and analysed in the article. The results of the research indicated: the dominant view in the sovietic criticism was to “unmask” the idealistc filosophy under a sociological appearence; the stylistic analysis were in general well appreciated: Bakhtin is considerated a philosopher of the culture and of the dialogue: the thesis about the poliphony of the Dostoyevsky’s novels is the most controversial aspect in the reception of PDW; it was indicated the ocurrence of a formal research in the Dostoyevsky’s formal procedures, with incursions in the champ of sociological elucidation. |
id |
ANPOLL-2_7c90d44c0f75e786bb53ae3e221bf750 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistadaanpoll.emnuvens.com.br:article/1331 |
network_acronym_str |
ANPOLL-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista da ANPOLL (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
“Problems of Dostoiévsky's Work” in the Mirror of the Sovietic and Foreign CriticismProblemas da obra de Dostoiévski: no espelho da crítica soviética e estrangeiraProblems of Dostoyevsky’s WorkReceptionReviewTranslationProblemas da Obra de DostoiévskiRecepçãoResenhasTraduçãoThis article aims to examine the reception of PDW ((Problems of Dostoiévsky’s work, 1929) in the sovietic and foreign criticism in the 1920s and 1930s based on the concepts of apperceptive background of responsive understanding and valorative horizon. For this purpose, it was collected reviews and mentions to PDW in Russian libraries and bookstores, that were translated and analysed in the article. The results of the research indicated: the dominant view in the sovietic criticism was to “unmask” the idealistc filosophy under a sociological appearence; the stylistic analysis were in general well appreciated: Bakhtin is considerated a philosopher of the culture and of the dialogue: the thesis about the poliphony of the Dostoyevsky’s novels is the most controversial aspect in the reception of PDW; it was indicated the ocurrence of a formal research in the Dostoyevsky’s formal procedures, with incursions in the champ of sociological elucidation.Este artigo objetiva examinar a recepção de POD (1929) na crítica soviética e estrangeira dos anos 1920 e 1930, à luz dos conceitos de fundo aperceptível do destinatário do discurso e horizonte valorativo. Para isso, foram reunidas resenhas e menções a POD, localizadas em bibliotecas e livrarias russas, que foram aqui traduzidas e analisadas. Os resultados da pesquisa apontaram: o tom dominante da crítica soviética foi «desmascarar» a filosofia idealista sob uma roupagem sociológica; as análises estilísticas foram no geral muito bem avaliadas;a tese sobre a polifonia dos romances de Dostoiévski é o ponto mais polêmico na recepção de POD; apontou-se a ocorrência de uma pesquisa formal dos procedimentos de criação de Dostoiévski, com incursões no campo da elucidação sociológica.ANPOLL2019-12-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistadaanpoll.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/133110.18309/anp.v1i51.1331Revista da Anpoll; Vol. 1 No. 50 (2019): Estudos Literários; 176-196Revista da Anpoll; v. 1 n. 50 (2019): Estudos Literários; 176-1961982-78301414-7564reponame:Revista da ANPOLL (Online)instname:Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Letras e Lingüística (ANPOLL)instacron:ANPOLLporhttps://revistadaanpoll.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/1331/1065Copyright (c) 2019 Sheila Vieira de Camargo Grilloinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVieira de Camargo Grillo, Sheila2019-12-30T18:30:38Zoai:ojs.revistadaanpoll.emnuvens.com.br:article/1331Revistahttps://revistadaanpoll.emnuvens.com.br/revista/indexONGhttps://revistadaanpoll.emnuvens.com.br/revista/oairevistadaanpoll@gmail.com1982-78301414-7564opendoar:2023-01-13T09:48:49.788852Revista da ANPOLL (Online) - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Letras e Lingüística (ANPOLL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
“Problems of Dostoiévsky's Work” in the Mirror of the Sovietic and Foreign Criticism Problemas da obra de Dostoiévski: no espelho da crítica soviética e estrangeira |
title |
“Problems of Dostoiévsky's Work” in the Mirror of the Sovietic and Foreign Criticism |
spellingShingle |
“Problems of Dostoiévsky's Work” in the Mirror of the Sovietic and Foreign Criticism Vieira de Camargo Grillo, Sheila Problems of Dostoyevsky’s Work Reception Review Translation Problemas da Obra de Dostoiévski Recepção Resenhas Tradução |
title_short |
“Problems of Dostoiévsky's Work” in the Mirror of the Sovietic and Foreign Criticism |
title_full |
“Problems of Dostoiévsky's Work” in the Mirror of the Sovietic and Foreign Criticism |
title_fullStr |
“Problems of Dostoiévsky's Work” in the Mirror of the Sovietic and Foreign Criticism |
title_full_unstemmed |
“Problems of Dostoiévsky's Work” in the Mirror of the Sovietic and Foreign Criticism |
title_sort |
“Problems of Dostoiévsky's Work” in the Mirror of the Sovietic and Foreign Criticism |
author |
Vieira de Camargo Grillo, Sheila |
author_facet |
Vieira de Camargo Grillo, Sheila |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Vieira de Camargo Grillo, Sheila |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Problems of Dostoyevsky’s Work Reception Review Translation Problemas da Obra de Dostoiévski Recepção Resenhas Tradução |
topic |
Problems of Dostoyevsky’s Work Reception Review Translation Problemas da Obra de Dostoiévski Recepção Resenhas Tradução |
description |
This article aims to examine the reception of PDW ((Problems of Dostoiévsky’s work, 1929) in the sovietic and foreign criticism in the 1920s and 1930s based on the concepts of apperceptive background of responsive understanding and valorative horizon. For this purpose, it was collected reviews and mentions to PDW in Russian libraries and bookstores, that were translated and analysed in the article. The results of the research indicated: the dominant view in the sovietic criticism was to “unmask” the idealistc filosophy under a sociological appearence; the stylistic analysis were in general well appreciated: Bakhtin is considerated a philosopher of the culture and of the dialogue: the thesis about the poliphony of the Dostoyevsky’s novels is the most controversial aspect in the reception of PDW; it was indicated the ocurrence of a formal research in the Dostoyevsky’s formal procedures, with incursions in the champ of sociological elucidation. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-12-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistadaanpoll.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/1331 10.18309/anp.v1i51.1331 |
url |
https://revistadaanpoll.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/1331 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.18309/anp.v1i51.1331 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistadaanpoll.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/1331/1065 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Sheila Vieira de Camargo Grillo info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Sheila Vieira de Camargo Grillo |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ANPOLL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ANPOLL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Anpoll; Vol. 1 No. 50 (2019): Estudos Literários; 176-196 Revista da Anpoll; v. 1 n. 50 (2019): Estudos Literários; 176-196 1982-7830 1414-7564 reponame:Revista da ANPOLL (Online) instname:Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Letras e Lingüística (ANPOLL) instacron:ANPOLL |
instname_str |
Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Letras e Lingüística (ANPOLL) |
instacron_str |
ANPOLL |
institution |
ANPOLL |
reponame_str |
Revista da ANPOLL (Online) |
collection |
Revista da ANPOLL (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista da ANPOLL (Online) - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Letras e Lingüística (ANPOLL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistadaanpoll@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797051180274155520 |