What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for insomnia?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Melo,Florence de Lucca
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Mendoza,Juan Fulgencio Welko, Latorraca,Carolina de Oliveira Cruz, Pacheco,Rafael Leite, Martimbianco,Ana Luiza Cabrera, Pachito,Daniela Vianna, Riera,Rachel
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: São Paulo medical journal (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802018000600579
Resumo: ABSTRACT CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Insomnia is a frequent complaint that generates more than five million visits to doctors per year in the United States. This study summarizes all Cochrane systematic reviews (SRs) that evaluated interventions to treat insomnia. DESIGN AND SETTING: Review of SRs, conducted in the Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP). METHODS: A sensitive search was carried out in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews to identify Cochrane SRs that assessed the effects of any type of intervention for people with insomnia. The results, main characteristics of the SRs and the certainty of the evidence obtained from them were synthesized and discussed. RESULTS: Seven SRs were included. They addressed the benefits and harm of acupuncture (n = 1), behavioral interventions (n = 1), music (n = 1), pharmacotherapy (n = 2), phototherapy (n = 1) and physical exercise (n = 1). The certainty of the evidence ranged from moderate to very low. CONCLUSION: Acupuncture, music, physical exercise, paroxetine, doxepin, trimipramine and trazodone seem to present some benefit for patients with insomnia. However, the uncertainty around these results means that no robust and definitive recommendations for clinical practice can be made until the benefits and harms from each intervention for patients with insomnia have been confirmed through further studies.
id APM-1_f644ec99117f0aef1429ad9887f4e28b
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-31802018000600579
network_acronym_str APM-1
network_name_str São Paulo medical journal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for insomnia?Review [publication type]. Evidence-based medicine. Evidence-based practice. Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders. Comparative Effectiveness ResearchABSTRACT CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Insomnia is a frequent complaint that generates more than five million visits to doctors per year in the United States. This study summarizes all Cochrane systematic reviews (SRs) that evaluated interventions to treat insomnia. DESIGN AND SETTING: Review of SRs, conducted in the Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP). METHODS: A sensitive search was carried out in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews to identify Cochrane SRs that assessed the effects of any type of intervention for people with insomnia. The results, main characteristics of the SRs and the certainty of the evidence obtained from them were synthesized and discussed. RESULTS: Seven SRs were included. They addressed the benefits and harm of acupuncture (n = 1), behavioral interventions (n = 1), music (n = 1), pharmacotherapy (n = 2), phototherapy (n = 1) and physical exercise (n = 1). The certainty of the evidence ranged from moderate to very low. CONCLUSION: Acupuncture, music, physical exercise, paroxetine, doxepin, trimipramine and trazodone seem to present some benefit for patients with insomnia. However, the uncertainty around these results means that no robust and definitive recommendations for clinical practice can be made until the benefits and harms from each intervention for patients with insomnia have been confirmed through further studies.Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM2018-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802018000600579Sao Paulo Medical Journal v.136 n.6 2018reponame:São Paulo medical journal (Online)instname:Associação Paulista de Medicinainstacron:APM10.1590/1516-3180.2018.0380311018info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMelo,Florence de LuccaMendoza,Juan Fulgencio WelkoLatorraca,Carolina de Oliveira CruzPacheco,Rafael LeiteMartimbianco,Ana Luiza CabreraPachito,Daniela ViannaRiera,Racheleng2019-03-13T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-31802018000600579Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/spmjhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevistas@apm.org.br1806-94601516-3180opendoar:2019-03-13T00:00São Paulo medical journal (Online) - Associação Paulista de Medicinafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for insomnia?
title What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for insomnia?
spellingShingle What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for insomnia?
Melo,Florence de Lucca
Review [publication type]. Evidence-based medicine. Evidence-based practice. Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders. Comparative Effectiveness Research
title_short What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for insomnia?
title_full What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for insomnia?
title_fullStr What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for insomnia?
title_full_unstemmed What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for insomnia?
title_sort What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for insomnia?
author Melo,Florence de Lucca
author_facet Melo,Florence de Lucca
Mendoza,Juan Fulgencio Welko
Latorraca,Carolina de Oliveira Cruz
Pacheco,Rafael Leite
Martimbianco,Ana Luiza Cabrera
Pachito,Daniela Vianna
Riera,Rachel
author_role author
author2 Mendoza,Juan Fulgencio Welko
Latorraca,Carolina de Oliveira Cruz
Pacheco,Rafael Leite
Martimbianco,Ana Luiza Cabrera
Pachito,Daniela Vianna
Riera,Rachel
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Melo,Florence de Lucca
Mendoza,Juan Fulgencio Welko
Latorraca,Carolina de Oliveira Cruz
Pacheco,Rafael Leite
Martimbianco,Ana Luiza Cabrera
Pachito,Daniela Vianna
Riera,Rachel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Review [publication type]. Evidence-based medicine. Evidence-based practice. Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders. Comparative Effectiveness Research
topic Review [publication type]. Evidence-based medicine. Evidence-based practice. Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders. Comparative Effectiveness Research
description ABSTRACT CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Insomnia is a frequent complaint that generates more than five million visits to doctors per year in the United States. This study summarizes all Cochrane systematic reviews (SRs) that evaluated interventions to treat insomnia. DESIGN AND SETTING: Review of SRs, conducted in the Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP). METHODS: A sensitive search was carried out in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews to identify Cochrane SRs that assessed the effects of any type of intervention for people with insomnia. The results, main characteristics of the SRs and the certainty of the evidence obtained from them were synthesized and discussed. RESULTS: Seven SRs were included. They addressed the benefits and harm of acupuncture (n = 1), behavioral interventions (n = 1), music (n = 1), pharmacotherapy (n = 2), phototherapy (n = 1) and physical exercise (n = 1). The certainty of the evidence ranged from moderate to very low. CONCLUSION: Acupuncture, music, physical exercise, paroxetine, doxepin, trimipramine and trazodone seem to present some benefit for patients with insomnia. However, the uncertainty around these results means that no robust and definitive recommendations for clinical practice can be made until the benefits and harms from each intervention for patients with insomnia have been confirmed through further studies.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802018000600579
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802018000600579
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1516-3180.2018.0380311018
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Sao Paulo Medical Journal v.136 n.6 2018
reponame:São Paulo medical journal (Online)
instname:Associação Paulista de Medicina
instacron:APM
instname_str Associação Paulista de Medicina
instacron_str APM
institution APM
reponame_str São Paulo medical journal (Online)
collection São Paulo medical journal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv São Paulo medical journal (Online) - Associação Paulista de Medicina
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistas@apm.org.br
_version_ 1754209266246352896