What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for insomnia?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | São Paulo medical journal (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802018000600579 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Insomnia is a frequent complaint that generates more than five million visits to doctors per year in the United States. This study summarizes all Cochrane systematic reviews (SRs) that evaluated interventions to treat insomnia. DESIGN AND SETTING: Review of SRs, conducted in the Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP). METHODS: A sensitive search was carried out in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews to identify Cochrane SRs that assessed the effects of any type of intervention for people with insomnia. The results, main characteristics of the SRs and the certainty of the evidence obtained from them were synthesized and discussed. RESULTS: Seven SRs were included. They addressed the benefits and harm of acupuncture (n = 1), behavioral interventions (n = 1), music (n = 1), pharmacotherapy (n = 2), phototherapy (n = 1) and physical exercise (n = 1). The certainty of the evidence ranged from moderate to very low. CONCLUSION: Acupuncture, music, physical exercise, paroxetine, doxepin, trimipramine and trazodone seem to present some benefit for patients with insomnia. However, the uncertainty around these results means that no robust and definitive recommendations for clinical practice can be made until the benefits and harms from each intervention for patients with insomnia have been confirmed through further studies. |
id |
APM-1_f644ec99117f0aef1429ad9887f4e28b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1516-31802018000600579 |
network_acronym_str |
APM-1 |
network_name_str |
São Paulo medical journal (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for insomnia?Review [publication type]. Evidence-based medicine. Evidence-based practice. Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders. Comparative Effectiveness ResearchABSTRACT CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Insomnia is a frequent complaint that generates more than five million visits to doctors per year in the United States. This study summarizes all Cochrane systematic reviews (SRs) that evaluated interventions to treat insomnia. DESIGN AND SETTING: Review of SRs, conducted in the Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP). METHODS: A sensitive search was carried out in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews to identify Cochrane SRs that assessed the effects of any type of intervention for people with insomnia. The results, main characteristics of the SRs and the certainty of the evidence obtained from them were synthesized and discussed. RESULTS: Seven SRs were included. They addressed the benefits and harm of acupuncture (n = 1), behavioral interventions (n = 1), music (n = 1), pharmacotherapy (n = 2), phototherapy (n = 1) and physical exercise (n = 1). The certainty of the evidence ranged from moderate to very low. CONCLUSION: Acupuncture, music, physical exercise, paroxetine, doxepin, trimipramine and trazodone seem to present some benefit for patients with insomnia. However, the uncertainty around these results means that no robust and definitive recommendations for clinical practice can be made until the benefits and harms from each intervention for patients with insomnia have been confirmed through further studies.Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM2018-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802018000600579Sao Paulo Medical Journal v.136 n.6 2018reponame:São Paulo medical journal (Online)instname:Associação Paulista de Medicinainstacron:APM10.1590/1516-3180.2018.0380311018info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMelo,Florence de LuccaMendoza,Juan Fulgencio WelkoLatorraca,Carolina de Oliveira CruzPacheco,Rafael LeiteMartimbianco,Ana Luiza CabreraPachito,Daniela ViannaRiera,Racheleng2019-03-13T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-31802018000600579Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/spmjhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevistas@apm.org.br1806-94601516-3180opendoar:2019-03-13T00:00São Paulo medical journal (Online) - Associação Paulista de Medicinafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for insomnia? |
title |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for insomnia? |
spellingShingle |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for insomnia? Melo,Florence de Lucca Review [publication type]. Evidence-based medicine. Evidence-based practice. Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders. Comparative Effectiveness Research |
title_short |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for insomnia? |
title_full |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for insomnia? |
title_fullStr |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for insomnia? |
title_full_unstemmed |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for insomnia? |
title_sort |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for insomnia? |
author |
Melo,Florence de Lucca |
author_facet |
Melo,Florence de Lucca Mendoza,Juan Fulgencio Welko Latorraca,Carolina de Oliveira Cruz Pacheco,Rafael Leite Martimbianco,Ana Luiza Cabrera Pachito,Daniela Vianna Riera,Rachel |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Mendoza,Juan Fulgencio Welko Latorraca,Carolina de Oliveira Cruz Pacheco,Rafael Leite Martimbianco,Ana Luiza Cabrera Pachito,Daniela Vianna Riera,Rachel |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Melo,Florence de Lucca Mendoza,Juan Fulgencio Welko Latorraca,Carolina de Oliveira Cruz Pacheco,Rafael Leite Martimbianco,Ana Luiza Cabrera Pachito,Daniela Vianna Riera,Rachel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Review [publication type]. Evidence-based medicine. Evidence-based practice. Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders. Comparative Effectiveness Research |
topic |
Review [publication type]. Evidence-based medicine. Evidence-based practice. Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders. Comparative Effectiveness Research |
description |
ABSTRACT CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Insomnia is a frequent complaint that generates more than five million visits to doctors per year in the United States. This study summarizes all Cochrane systematic reviews (SRs) that evaluated interventions to treat insomnia. DESIGN AND SETTING: Review of SRs, conducted in the Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP). METHODS: A sensitive search was carried out in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews to identify Cochrane SRs that assessed the effects of any type of intervention for people with insomnia. The results, main characteristics of the SRs and the certainty of the evidence obtained from them were synthesized and discussed. RESULTS: Seven SRs were included. They addressed the benefits and harm of acupuncture (n = 1), behavioral interventions (n = 1), music (n = 1), pharmacotherapy (n = 2), phototherapy (n = 1) and physical exercise (n = 1). The certainty of the evidence ranged from moderate to very low. CONCLUSION: Acupuncture, music, physical exercise, paroxetine, doxepin, trimipramine and trazodone seem to present some benefit for patients with insomnia. However, the uncertainty around these results means that no robust and definitive recommendations for clinical practice can be made until the benefits and harms from each intervention for patients with insomnia have been confirmed through further studies. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802018000600579 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802018000600579 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1516-3180.2018.0380311018 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Sao Paulo Medical Journal v.136 n.6 2018 reponame:São Paulo medical journal (Online) instname:Associação Paulista de Medicina instacron:APM |
instname_str |
Associação Paulista de Medicina |
instacron_str |
APM |
institution |
APM |
reponame_str |
São Paulo medical journal (Online) |
collection |
São Paulo medical journal (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
São Paulo medical journal (Online) - Associação Paulista de Medicina |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistas@apm.org.br |
_version_ |
1754209266246352896 |