The (un) control of technology in the criminal system in light of modernity paradox: an analysis of the film “minority report”

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Verbicaro, Loiane Prado
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Trindade, Laiza Inez Maciel, Campos, Márcia Carvalho
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Científica Disruptiva
Texto Completo: http://revista.cers.com.br/ojs/index.php/revista/article/view/30
Resumo: The relationship between technology and mankind is complex and conflicting. On the one hand, technological advancement facilitates many aspects of life; on the other hand, in the name of a collectivist ideal, it ends up infringing individual rights. In this context of progressive advancement of technology, what was once a simple science fiction now becomes a gradual reality. Considering this interlocution between fiction and reality and also the fragility of the border between utopia and dystopia, the article, through a bibliographical research of a qualitative approach and aiming for a connection between philosophy and criminology, proposes to analyze the film "Minority Report" presenting a narrative of the paradox of modernity hence the use of an infallible surveillance system that anticipates visions of the future so that criminals are punished even before the crime materializes. From this scenario, this paper contemplates on the impact of technology on the relativization of criminal and procedural rights and its principles, as well as on the fragility of the guarantee of fundamental rights through an excessive control of the State through technology, which provides a process of  turning man into objects and things. There is a paradox in trying to maximize justice and fight crime through the misuse of technologies that end up destroying freedom, self-determination and human dignity.
id CERS-1_6479f8d328e8444a9aab2bb6dc82ff10
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.192.168.11.14:8080:article/30
network_acronym_str CERS-1
network_name_str Revista Científica Disruptiva
repository_id_str
spelling The (un) control of technology in the criminal system in light of modernity paradox: an analysis of the film “minority report”El (un) control de la tecnología em el sistema penal a la luz de la paradoja de la modernidad: un análisis de la película “minority report”O (des)controle da tecnologia no sistema criminal à luz do paradoxo da modernidade: uma análise do filme “Minority Report”TecnologiaParadoxo da modernidadeCriminologia JustiçaTechnologyModernity paradoxCriminologyJusticeTecnologíaParadoja de la modernidadCriminologíaJusticiaThe relationship between technology and mankind is complex and conflicting. On the one hand, technological advancement facilitates many aspects of life; on the other hand, in the name of a collectivist ideal, it ends up infringing individual rights. In this context of progressive advancement of technology, what was once a simple science fiction now becomes a gradual reality. Considering this interlocution between fiction and reality and also the fragility of the border between utopia and dystopia, the article, through a bibliographical research of a qualitative approach and aiming for a connection between philosophy and criminology, proposes to analyze the film "Minority Report" presenting a narrative of the paradox of modernity hence the use of an infallible surveillance system that anticipates visions of the future so that criminals are punished even before the crime materializes. From this scenario, this paper contemplates on the impact of technology on the relativization of criminal and procedural rights and its principles, as well as on the fragility of the guarantee of fundamental rights through an excessive control of the State through technology, which provides a process of  turning man into objects and things. There is a paradox in trying to maximize justice and fight crime through the misuse of technologies that end up destroying freedom, self-determination and human dignity.La relación entre tecnología y humanidad es compleja y conflictiva. Por un lado, el avance tecnológico facilita muchos aspectos de la vida; Por otro lado, en nombre de un ideal colectivista, uno termina infringiendo los derechos individuales. En este contexto de avance progresivo de la tecnología, lo que antes era una simple ciencia ficción ahora se convierte en una realidad gradual. Teniendo en cuenta este diálogo entre la ficción y la realidad y la fragilidad del límite entre la utopía y la distopía, el artículo, a través de una investigación bibliográfica cualitativa y un diálogo entre la filosofía y la criminología, propone analizar la película "Minority Report" que presenta una narrativa de la paradoja de la modernidad en el diseño del uso de un sistema de vigilancia infalible que sostiene visiones del futuro para que los delincuentes sean castigados antes de que se materialice el crimen. Desde este escenario, el artículo reflexiona sobre el impacto de la tecnología en la relativización de los derechos y principios penales y procesales, así como en la fragilidad de garantizar los derechos fundamentales mediante el control estatal excesivo de la tecnología, que proporciona un proceso. De la objetivación del hombre. Existe una paradoja al tratar de lograr la maximización de la justicia y la lucha contra el crimen a través del uso indebido de tecnologías que eventualmente aniquilan la libertad, la autodeterminación y la dignidad humana.A relação entre a tecnologia e o homem é complexa e conflitiva. Por um lado, o avanço tecnológico facilita muitos aspectos da vida; por outro, em nome de um ideal coletivista, acaba-se por infringir direitos individuais. Nesse contexto de progressivo avanço da tecnologia, o que antes era uma singela ficção científica agora converte-se em gradativa realidade. Considerando essa interlocução entre ficção e realidade e a fragilidade da fronteira entre utopia e distopia, o artigo, por intermédio de pesquisa bibliográfica de abordagem qualitativa, objetivando uma interlocução entre a filosofia e a criminologia, propõe-se a analisar o filme “Minority Report” que apresenta uma narrativa do paradoxo da modernidade ao projetar a utilização de um sistema de vigilância tido como infalível que realiza visões antecipadas do futuro para que os criminosos sejam punidos antes mesmo que o crime se materialize. A partir desse cenário, o artigo reflete sobre impacto da tecnologia na relativização de direitos e princípios penais e processuais, bem como sobre a fragilidade da garantia de direitos fundamentais por intermédio de um controle excessivo do Estado a partir da tecnologia, o que propicia um processo de objetificação e coisificação do homem. Vê-se um paradoxo ao se tentar alcançar a maximização da justiça e o combate ao crime por intermédio de um uso deturpado de tecnologias que acabam por aniquilar a liberdade, a autodeterminação e a dignidade humana. Editora Faculdade CERS2020-06-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdftext/htmlhttp://revista.cers.com.br/ojs/index.php/revista/article/view/30Revista Científica Disruptiva; Bd. 1 Nr. 2 (2019): Revista Científica Disruptiva; 116-135Revista Científica Disruptiva; Vol. 1 No. 2 (2019): Revista Científica Disruptiva; 116-135Revista Científica Disruptiva; Vol. 1 Núm. 2 (2019): Revista Científica Disruptiva; 116-135Revista Científica Disruptiva; Vol. 1 No 2 (2019): Revista Científica Disruptiva; 116-135Revista Científica Disruptiva; V. 1 N. 2 (2019): Revista Científica Disruptiva; 116-135Revista Científica Disruptiva; v. 1 n. 2 (2019): Revista Científica Disruptiva; 116-1352674-7804reponame:Revista Científica Disruptivainstname:Centro de Ensino Renato Saraiva (CERS)instacron:CERSporhttp://revista.cers.com.br/ojs/index.php/revista/article/view/30/20http://revista.cers.com.br/ojs/index.php/revista/article/view/30/87Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Científica Disruptivahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVerbicaro, Loiane PradoTrindade, Laiza Inez MacielCampos, Márcia Carvalho2021-07-08T17:33:33Zoai:ojs2.192.168.11.14:8080:article/30Revistahttp://revista.cers.com.br/ojs/index.php/revista/indexPRIhttp://revista.cers.com.br/ojs/index.php/revista/oairevista@cers.com.br2674-78042674-7804opendoar:2021-07-08T17:33:33Revista Científica Disruptiva - Centro de Ensino Renato Saraiva (CERS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The (un) control of technology in the criminal system in light of modernity paradox: an analysis of the film “minority report”
El (un) control de la tecnología em el sistema penal a la luz de la paradoja de la modernidad: un análisis de la película “minority report”
O (des)controle da tecnologia no sistema criminal à luz do paradoxo da modernidade: uma análise do filme “Minority Report”
title The (un) control of technology in the criminal system in light of modernity paradox: an analysis of the film “minority report”
spellingShingle The (un) control of technology in the criminal system in light of modernity paradox: an analysis of the film “minority report”
Verbicaro, Loiane Prado
Tecnologia
Paradoxo da modernidade
Criminologia
Justiça
Technology
Modernity paradox
Criminology
Justice
Tecnología
Paradoja de la modernidad
Criminología
Justicia
title_short The (un) control of technology in the criminal system in light of modernity paradox: an analysis of the film “minority report”
title_full The (un) control of technology in the criminal system in light of modernity paradox: an analysis of the film “minority report”
title_fullStr The (un) control of technology in the criminal system in light of modernity paradox: an analysis of the film “minority report”
title_full_unstemmed The (un) control of technology in the criminal system in light of modernity paradox: an analysis of the film “minority report”
title_sort The (un) control of technology in the criminal system in light of modernity paradox: an analysis of the film “minority report”
author Verbicaro, Loiane Prado
author_facet Verbicaro, Loiane Prado
Trindade, Laiza Inez Maciel
Campos, Márcia Carvalho
author_role author
author2 Trindade, Laiza Inez Maciel
Campos, Márcia Carvalho
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Verbicaro, Loiane Prado
Trindade, Laiza Inez Maciel
Campos, Márcia Carvalho
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Tecnologia
Paradoxo da modernidade
Criminologia
Justiça
Technology
Modernity paradox
Criminology
Justice
Tecnología
Paradoja de la modernidad
Criminología
Justicia
topic Tecnologia
Paradoxo da modernidade
Criminologia
Justiça
Technology
Modernity paradox
Criminology
Justice
Tecnología
Paradoja de la modernidad
Criminología
Justicia
description The relationship between technology and mankind is complex and conflicting. On the one hand, technological advancement facilitates many aspects of life; on the other hand, in the name of a collectivist ideal, it ends up infringing individual rights. In this context of progressive advancement of technology, what was once a simple science fiction now becomes a gradual reality. Considering this interlocution between fiction and reality and also the fragility of the border between utopia and dystopia, the article, through a bibliographical research of a qualitative approach and aiming for a connection between philosophy and criminology, proposes to analyze the film "Minority Report" presenting a narrative of the paradox of modernity hence the use of an infallible surveillance system that anticipates visions of the future so that criminals are punished even before the crime materializes. From this scenario, this paper contemplates on the impact of technology on the relativization of criminal and procedural rights and its principles, as well as on the fragility of the guarantee of fundamental rights through an excessive control of the State through technology, which provides a process of  turning man into objects and things. There is a paradox in trying to maximize justice and fight crime through the misuse of technologies that end up destroying freedom, self-determination and human dignity.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-06-05
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://revista.cers.com.br/ojs/index.php/revista/article/view/30
url http://revista.cers.com.br/ojs/index.php/revista/article/view/30
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revista.cers.com.br/ojs/index.php/revista/article/view/30/20
http://revista.cers.com.br/ojs/index.php/revista/article/view/30/87
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Científica Disruptiva
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Científica Disruptiva
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora Faculdade CERS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora Faculdade CERS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Científica Disruptiva; Bd. 1 Nr. 2 (2019): Revista Científica Disruptiva; 116-135
Revista Científica Disruptiva; Vol. 1 No. 2 (2019): Revista Científica Disruptiva; 116-135
Revista Científica Disruptiva; Vol. 1 Núm. 2 (2019): Revista Científica Disruptiva; 116-135
Revista Científica Disruptiva; Vol. 1 No 2 (2019): Revista Científica Disruptiva; 116-135
Revista Científica Disruptiva; V. 1 N. 2 (2019): Revista Científica Disruptiva; 116-135
Revista Científica Disruptiva; v. 1 n. 2 (2019): Revista Científica Disruptiva; 116-135
2674-7804
reponame:Revista Científica Disruptiva
instname:Centro de Ensino Renato Saraiva (CERS)
instacron:CERS
instname_str Centro de Ensino Renato Saraiva (CERS)
instacron_str CERS
institution CERS
reponame_str Revista Científica Disruptiva
collection Revista Científica Disruptiva
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Científica Disruptiva - Centro de Ensino Renato Saraiva (CERS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@cers.com.br
_version_ 1754929904181313536

Registros relacionados