Evaluation of Professional Master's Program: construction and analysis of indicators in the face of multidimensionality
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Título da fonte: | Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/297 |
Resumo: | One of the main topics of discussion concerning professional master’s programs (PMP) in Brazil is about how to evaluate them. This research sought to scrutinize possible impact indicators of professional PMP from a multidimensional perspective based on Sander (1995). To achieve this goal an investigation was conducted using the Delphi technique in three rounds with the participation of PMP Directors, CAPES Committees’ Chairs, and researchers who have published academic papers on the subject. Data analysis of the information gathered permitted to achieve a list of 21 indicators, which were examined vis-à-vis Sander’s four dimensions (efficiency, efficacy, effectiveness and relevance). Efficacy is the core dimension for mostly indicators. |
id |
CESGRANRIO_b2d0df7468dd092a9b450765582c91f2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.localhost:article/297 |
network_acronym_str |
CESGRANRIO |
network_name_str |
Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Evaluation of Professional Master's Program: construction and analysis of indicators in the face of multidimensionalityEvaluacion de masteres Profesionales: Construccion y Analisis de Indicadores bajo la perspectiva de la MultidimensionalidadAvaliação de Mestrados Profissionais: Construção e Analise de Indicadores à Luz da MultidimensionalidadeEvaluacion; Impacto; Masteres ProfesionalesEvaluation; Impact; Master´s degreeavaliação; impacto; mestrados profissionaisOne of the main topics of discussion concerning professional master’s programs (PMP) in Brazil is about how to evaluate them. This research sought to scrutinize possible impact indicators of professional PMP from a multidimensional perspective based on Sander (1995). To achieve this goal an investigation was conducted using the Delphi technique in three rounds with the participation of PMP Directors, CAPES Committees’ Chairs, and researchers who have published academic papers on the subject. Data analysis of the information gathered permitted to achieve a list of 21 indicators, which were examined vis-à-vis Sander’s four dimensions (efficiency, efficacy, effectiveness and relevance). Efficacy is the core dimension for mostly indicators.Uno de los principales temas de discusion sobre cursos de master profesional (MP) en Brasil se refiere a la manera de evaluarlos. Este trabajo busco analizar los posibles indicadores de impacto de cursos de MP bajo una perspectiva multidimensional, basada en Sander (1995). Para lograr este objetivo se llevo a cabo una investigación utilizando la tecnica Delphi en tres rondas con la participacion de Coordinadores de MP, Coordinadores de Areas de *CAPES e investigadores con artículos academicos publicados sobre el tema. El analisis de las informaciónes recogidas permitio obtener una lista de 21 indicadores, que se estudiaron según las cuatro dimensiones de Sander (eficiencia, eficácia, efectividad y pertinencia). Eficacia es la dimension principal de la mayoria de los indicadores.Um dos principais topicos de discussao acerca dos cursos de mestrado profissional (MP) no Brasil diz respeito à forma de avalia-los. Esta pesquisa buscou analisar possiveis indicadores de impacto de cursos de MP a partir de uma perspectiva multidimensional, baseada em Sander (1995). Para atingir esse objetivo foi realizada uma investigação utilizando a tecnica Delphi em tres rodadas com a participação de Coordenadores de MP, Coordenadores de Area da CAPES e pesquisadores com artigos academicos publicados sobre o tema. A analise das informações coletadas permitiu a obtencao de uma lista de 21 indicadores, que foram examinados à luz das quatro dimensoes de Sander (eficiencia, eficácia, efetividade e relevância). Eficacia e a principal dimensao da maioria dos indicadores.Fundação CesgranrioPaixao, Roberto BrazileiroBruni, Adriano LealBecker, Joao LuizTenorio, Robinson Moreira2014-04-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttps://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/297Ensaio: Avaliação e Políticas Públicas em Educação; v. 22, n. 83 (2014): Revista Ensaio - Abr./Jun.; 505-5321809-44650104-4036reponame:Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online)instname:Fundação Cesgranrioinstacron:CESGRANRIO-2pt; es; enDireitos autorais 2016 Revista Ensaio: Avaliação e Politicas Públicas em Educaçãohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-02-09T14:54:34Zoai:ojs.localhost:article/297Revistahttps://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaioONGhttps://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/oaiensaio@cesgranrio.org.br||fatimacunha@cesgranrio.org.br||alan@cesgranrio.org.br1809-44650104-4036opendoar:2021-02-09T14:54:34Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online) - Fundação Cesgranriofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of Professional Master's Program: construction and analysis of indicators in the face of multidimensionality Evaluacion de masteres Profesionales: Construccion y Analisis de Indicadores bajo la perspectiva de la Multidimensionalidad Avaliação de Mestrados Profissionais: Construção e Analise de Indicadores à Luz da Multidimensionalidade |
title |
Evaluation of Professional Master's Program: construction and analysis of indicators in the face of multidimensionality |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of Professional Master's Program: construction and analysis of indicators in the face of multidimensionality Paixao, Roberto Brazileiro Evaluacion; Impacto; Masteres Profesionales Evaluation; Impact; Master´s degree avaliação; impacto; mestrados profissionais |
title_short |
Evaluation of Professional Master's Program: construction and analysis of indicators in the face of multidimensionality |
title_full |
Evaluation of Professional Master's Program: construction and analysis of indicators in the face of multidimensionality |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of Professional Master's Program: construction and analysis of indicators in the face of multidimensionality |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of Professional Master's Program: construction and analysis of indicators in the face of multidimensionality |
title_sort |
Evaluation of Professional Master's Program: construction and analysis of indicators in the face of multidimensionality |
author |
Paixao, Roberto Brazileiro |
author_facet |
Paixao, Roberto Brazileiro Bruni, Adriano Leal Becker, Joao Luiz Tenorio, Robinson Moreira |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bruni, Adriano Leal Becker, Joao Luiz Tenorio, Robinson Moreira |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Paixao, Roberto Brazileiro Bruni, Adriano Leal Becker, Joao Luiz Tenorio, Robinson Moreira |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Evaluacion; Impacto; Masteres Profesionales Evaluation; Impact; Master´s degree avaliação; impacto; mestrados profissionais |
topic |
Evaluacion; Impacto; Masteres Profesionales Evaluation; Impact; Master´s degree avaliação; impacto; mestrados profissionais |
description |
One of the main topics of discussion concerning professional master’s programs (PMP) in Brazil is about how to evaluate them. This research sought to scrutinize possible impact indicators of professional PMP from a multidimensional perspective based on Sander (1995). To achieve this goal an investigation was conducted using the Delphi technique in three rounds with the participation of PMP Directors, CAPES Committees’ Chairs, and researchers who have published academic papers on the subject. Data analysis of the information gathered permitted to achieve a list of 21 indicators, which were examined vis-à-vis Sander’s four dimensions (efficiency, efficacy, effectiveness and relevance). Efficacy is the core dimension for mostly indicators. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-04-19 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/297 |
url |
https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/297 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
pt; es; en |
language_invalid_str_mv |
pt; es; en |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Revista Ensaio: Avaliação e Politicas Públicas em Educação http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Revista Ensaio: Avaliação e Politicas Públicas em Educação http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Cesgranrio |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Cesgranrio |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Ensaio: Avaliação e Políticas Públicas em Educação; v. 22, n. 83 (2014): Revista Ensaio - Abr./Jun.; 505-532 1809-4465 0104-4036 reponame:Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online) instname:Fundação Cesgranrio instacron:CESGRANRIO-2 |
instname_str |
Fundação Cesgranrio |
instacron_str |
CESGRANRIO-2 |
institution |
CESGRANRIO-2 |
reponame_str |
Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online) |
collection |
Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online) - Fundação Cesgranrio |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
ensaio@cesgranrio.org.br||fatimacunha@cesgranrio.org.br||alan@cesgranrio.org.br |
_version_ |
1754832032872005632 |