Arbitration Institute of Modernization in Contemporary Scene From the Perspective of New Brazilian Civil Procedure Code

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Dias, Feliciano Alcides
Data de Publicação: 2015
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Formas Consensuais de Solução de Conflitos
Texto Completo: http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistasolucoesconflitos/article/view/1014
Resumo: The complexity of contemporary society has led to the existence of conflicts in excessive degree of legalization, resulting from a demandista culture coupled with the inefficiency and delays in the provision of state judicial services. This traditional model of conflict resolution is the result of a mistaken reading of the constitutional guarantee of access to justice that took, long, a monopolistic feature, turning the Brazilian Judiciary in a multiport system to receive any kind of demand. However, not every conflict of interest claims the provocation of state jurisdiction, worth observing the democratic dimension of access to justice established by the new Civil Procedure Code, referring to arbitration as an appropriate means of conflict resolution in private. In this context, the new legislation reforming and updates the Law of Arbitration, the expectation is modernizing its institute of court, without state intervention.
id CONPEDI-11_aa70cae99bc429d4e5ecf1d8f991c85d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/1014
network_acronym_str CONPEDI-11
network_name_str Revista de Formas Consensuais de Solução de Conflitos
repository_id_str
spelling Arbitration Institute of Modernization in Contemporary Scene From the Perspective of New Brazilian Civil Procedure CodeA Modernização do Instituto da Arbitragem no Cenário Contemporâneo Sob A Ótica do novo Código de Processo Civil BrasileiroAccess to justice, Jurisdiction, Arbitration, New civil procedure codeAcesso à justiça, Jurisdição, Arbitragem, Novo código de processo civilThe complexity of contemporary society has led to the existence of conflicts in excessive degree of legalization, resulting from a demandista culture coupled with the inefficiency and delays in the provision of state judicial services. This traditional model of conflict resolution is the result of a mistaken reading of the constitutional guarantee of access to justice that took, long, a monopolistic feature, turning the Brazilian Judiciary in a multiport system to receive any kind of demand. However, not every conflict of interest claims the provocation of state jurisdiction, worth observing the democratic dimension of access to justice established by the new Civil Procedure Code, referring to arbitration as an appropriate means of conflict resolution in private. In this context, the new legislation reforming and updates the Law of Arbitration, the expectation is modernizing its institute of court, without state intervention.A complexidade da sociedade contemporânea tem provocado a existência de conflitos em um excessivo grau de judicialização, resultante de uma cultura demandista aliada à ineficiência e morosidade na prestação dos serviços jurisdicionais estatal. Esse modelo tradicional de resolução de conflitos é resultado de uma leitura equivocada da garantia constitucional do acesso à justiça que assumiu, por muito tempo, uma feição monopolística, transformando o Poder Judiciário brasileiro num sistema multiportas para receber toda e qualquer espécie de demanda. Todavia, nem todo conflito de interesses reclama a provocação da jurisdição estatal, valendo observar a dimensão democrática do acesso à justiça estabelecida pelo novo Código de Processo Civil, referenciando a arbitragem como meio adequado de resolução dos conflitos no âmbito privado. Nesse contexto, com a nova legislação que reforma e atualiza a Lei da Arbitragem, a expectativa é de modernização de seu instituto, de forma extrajudicial, sem a intervenção do Estado.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDIDias, Feliciano Alcides2015-12-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo Avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistasolucoesconflitos/article/view/101410.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9679/2015.v1i1.1014Revista de Formas Consensuais de Solução de Conflitos; v. 1, n. 1 (2015); 195-2192525-96792525-9679reponame:Revista de Formas Consensuais de Solução de Conflitosinstname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistasolucoesconflitos/article/view/1014/pdfDireitos autorais 2016 Feliciano Alcides Diashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-02-21T04:37:33Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/1014Revistahttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistasolucoesconflitos/indexONGhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistasolucoesconflitos/oai||indexlawjournals@gmail.com2525-96792525-9679opendoar:2018-02-21T04:37:33Revista de Formas Consensuais de Solução de Conflitos - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Arbitration Institute of Modernization in Contemporary Scene From the Perspective of New Brazilian Civil Procedure Code
A Modernização do Instituto da Arbitragem no Cenário Contemporâneo Sob A Ótica do novo Código de Processo Civil Brasileiro
title Arbitration Institute of Modernization in Contemporary Scene From the Perspective of New Brazilian Civil Procedure Code
spellingShingle Arbitration Institute of Modernization in Contemporary Scene From the Perspective of New Brazilian Civil Procedure Code
Dias, Feliciano Alcides
Access to justice, Jurisdiction, Arbitration, New civil procedure code
Acesso à justiça, Jurisdição, Arbitragem, Novo código de processo civil
title_short Arbitration Institute of Modernization in Contemporary Scene From the Perspective of New Brazilian Civil Procedure Code
title_full Arbitration Institute of Modernization in Contemporary Scene From the Perspective of New Brazilian Civil Procedure Code
title_fullStr Arbitration Institute of Modernization in Contemporary Scene From the Perspective of New Brazilian Civil Procedure Code
title_full_unstemmed Arbitration Institute of Modernization in Contemporary Scene From the Perspective of New Brazilian Civil Procedure Code
title_sort Arbitration Institute of Modernization in Contemporary Scene From the Perspective of New Brazilian Civil Procedure Code
author Dias, Feliciano Alcides
author_facet Dias, Feliciano Alcides
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Dias, Feliciano Alcides
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Access to justice, Jurisdiction, Arbitration, New civil procedure code
Acesso à justiça, Jurisdição, Arbitragem, Novo código de processo civil
topic Access to justice, Jurisdiction, Arbitration, New civil procedure code
Acesso à justiça, Jurisdição, Arbitragem, Novo código de processo civil
description The complexity of contemporary society has led to the existence of conflicts in excessive degree of legalization, resulting from a demandista culture coupled with the inefficiency and delays in the provision of state judicial services. This traditional model of conflict resolution is the result of a mistaken reading of the constitutional guarantee of access to justice that took, long, a monopolistic feature, turning the Brazilian Judiciary in a multiport system to receive any kind of demand. However, not every conflict of interest claims the provocation of state jurisdiction, worth observing the democratic dimension of access to justice established by the new Civil Procedure Code, referring to arbitration as an appropriate means of conflict resolution in private. In this context, the new legislation reforming and updates the Law of Arbitration, the expectation is modernizing its institute of court, without state intervention.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-12-06
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo Avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistasolucoesconflitos/article/view/1014
10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9679/2015.v1i1.1014
url http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistasolucoesconflitos/article/view/1014
identifier_str_mv 10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9679/2015.v1i1.1014
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistasolucoesconflitos/article/view/1014/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Feliciano Alcides Dias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Feliciano Alcides Dias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Formas Consensuais de Solução de Conflitos; v. 1, n. 1 (2015); 195-219
2525-9679
2525-9679
reponame:Revista de Formas Consensuais de Solução de Conflitos
instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron:CONPEDI
instname_str Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron_str CONPEDI
institution CONPEDI
reponame_str Revista de Formas Consensuais de Solução de Conflitos
collection Revista de Formas Consensuais de Solução de Conflitos
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Formas Consensuais de Solução de Conflitos - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||indexlawjournals@gmail.com
_version_ 1808858139061125120

Registros relacionados