To Fight Against the Defensive Jurisprudence with the New Civil Procedure Code: Yes, We Can! Or Can We?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gava, Rafael Ambrósio
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Moraes, Janaina Gomes Garcia De
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Processo, Jurisdição e Efetividade da Justiça
Texto Completo: http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistaprocessojurisdicao/article/view/237
Resumo: In order to reduce their workloads, Brazilian Courts have been landing many precedents that lead to unwarranted restrictions to the right to appeal, thereby belittling the fundamental constitutional right to access to justice. Despite the existence of studies on this "defensive jurisprudence", there are still few who analyze it in the light of the new Civil Procedure Code (Law 13.105/2015), which is about to enter into force. This article aims to evaluate the suitability of the new CPC to remedy this adjudicative problem or at least minimize it. We demonstrated, based on literature and through a deductive argumentative reasoning, that the new procedural law contains a number of specific and general legal clauses which may be used as instruments able to curb the adjudicate "defensiveness. Nonetheless, the achievement of this goal will depend largely on how this legal clauses are to be interpreted and applied.
id CONPEDI-13_ae22e8d601949dc6b5ac6df24aa69ac5
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/237
network_acronym_str CONPEDI-13
network_name_str Revista de Processo, Jurisdição e Efetividade da Justiça
repository_id_str
spelling To Fight Against the Defensive Jurisprudence with the New Civil Procedure Code: Yes, We Can! Or Can We?Combater a Jurisprudência Defensiva com o Novo CPC: "Yes, We Can!" or Can We?New civil procedure code; Law 13105; Right to appeal; Defensive; JurisprudenceNovo CPC, Lei 13105; Direito de recorrer; Jurisprudência; DefensivaIn order to reduce their workloads, Brazilian Courts have been landing many precedents that lead to unwarranted restrictions to the right to appeal, thereby belittling the fundamental constitutional right to access to justice. Despite the existence of studies on this "defensive jurisprudence", there are still few who analyze it in the light of the new Civil Procedure Code (Law 13.105/2015), which is about to enter into force. This article aims to evaluate the suitability of the new CPC to remedy this adjudicative problem or at least minimize it. We demonstrated, based on literature and through a deductive argumentative reasoning, that the new procedural law contains a number of specific and general legal clauses which may be used as instruments able to curb the adjudicate "defensiveness. Nonetheless, the achievement of this goal will depend largely on how this legal clauses are to be interpreted and applied.Com o fim utilitarista de reduzir suas cargas de trabalho, os tribunais brasileiros têm cunhado vários entendimentos jurisprudenciais que acarretam restrições ilegítimas ao direito de recorrer, amesquinhando com isso o direito constitucional fundamental de acesso à justiça. Em que pese a existência de estudos a respeito dessa jurisprudência defensiva, ainda há poucos que a analisam à luz do novo Código de Processo Civil (Lei 13.105/2015), o qual está prestes a entrar em vigor. A proposta deste artigo é avaliar a aptidão do novo CPC para sanar esse vício judicante ou, ao menos, dificultar a sua ocorrência. Demonstrou-se, com base em pesquisa bibliográfica e mediante uma problematização dedutivo-argumentativa, que a nova lei processual contém uma série de previsões casuísticas e cláusulas gerais que podem ser usadas como instrumentos hábeis a refrear a defensividade jurisprudencial. Nada obstante, a concretização dos efeitos visados com a instituição desses enunciados legais dependerá, em grande parte, da maneira como eles serão interpretados e aplicados pelos operadores do direito.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDIGava, Rafael AmbrósioMoraes, Janaina Gomes Garcia De2016-10-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo Avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistaprocessojurisdicao/article/view/23710.26668/IndexLawJournals/2015.v1i1.237Revista de Processo, Jurisdição e Efetividade da Justiça; v. 1, n. 1 (2015): JANEIRO/DEZEMBRO; 188-2152525-98142525-9814reponame:Revista de Processo, Jurisdição e Efetividade da Justiçainstname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistaprocessojurisdicao/article/view/237/238Direitos autorais 2016 Rafael Ambrósio Gava, Janaina Gomes Garcia De Moraeshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2017-03-01T19:27:51Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/237Revistahttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistaprocessojurisdicaoONGhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistaprocessojurisdicao/oaipublicacao@conpedi.org.br||indexlawjournals@gmail.com2525-98142525-9814opendoar:2017-03-01T19:27:51Revista de Processo, Jurisdição e Efetividade da Justiça - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv To Fight Against the Defensive Jurisprudence with the New Civil Procedure Code: Yes, We Can! Or Can We?
Combater a Jurisprudência Defensiva com o Novo CPC: "Yes, We Can!" or Can We?
title To Fight Against the Defensive Jurisprudence with the New Civil Procedure Code: Yes, We Can! Or Can We?
spellingShingle To Fight Against the Defensive Jurisprudence with the New Civil Procedure Code: Yes, We Can! Or Can We?
Gava, Rafael Ambrósio
New civil procedure code; Law 13105; Right to appeal; Defensive; Jurisprudence
Novo CPC, Lei 13105; Direito de recorrer; Jurisprudência; Defensiva
title_short To Fight Against the Defensive Jurisprudence with the New Civil Procedure Code: Yes, We Can! Or Can We?
title_full To Fight Against the Defensive Jurisprudence with the New Civil Procedure Code: Yes, We Can! Or Can We?
title_fullStr To Fight Against the Defensive Jurisprudence with the New Civil Procedure Code: Yes, We Can! Or Can We?
title_full_unstemmed To Fight Against the Defensive Jurisprudence with the New Civil Procedure Code: Yes, We Can! Or Can We?
title_sort To Fight Against the Defensive Jurisprudence with the New Civil Procedure Code: Yes, We Can! Or Can We?
author Gava, Rafael Ambrósio
author_facet Gava, Rafael Ambrósio
Moraes, Janaina Gomes Garcia De
author_role author
author2 Moraes, Janaina Gomes Garcia De
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gava, Rafael Ambrósio
Moraes, Janaina Gomes Garcia De
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv New civil procedure code; Law 13105; Right to appeal; Defensive; Jurisprudence
Novo CPC, Lei 13105; Direito de recorrer; Jurisprudência; Defensiva
topic New civil procedure code; Law 13105; Right to appeal; Defensive; Jurisprudence
Novo CPC, Lei 13105; Direito de recorrer; Jurisprudência; Defensiva
description In order to reduce their workloads, Brazilian Courts have been landing many precedents that lead to unwarranted restrictions to the right to appeal, thereby belittling the fundamental constitutional right to access to justice. Despite the existence of studies on this "defensive jurisprudence", there are still few who analyze it in the light of the new Civil Procedure Code (Law 13.105/2015), which is about to enter into force. This article aims to evaluate the suitability of the new CPC to remedy this adjudicative problem or at least minimize it. We demonstrated, based on literature and through a deductive argumentative reasoning, that the new procedural law contains a number of specific and general legal clauses which may be used as instruments able to curb the adjudicate "defensiveness. Nonetheless, the achievement of this goal will depend largely on how this legal clauses are to be interpreted and applied.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-10-10
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo Avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistaprocessojurisdicao/article/view/237
10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2015.v1i1.237
url http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistaprocessojurisdicao/article/view/237
identifier_str_mv 10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2015.v1i1.237
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistaprocessojurisdicao/article/view/237/238
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Rafael Ambrósio Gava, Janaina Gomes Garcia De Moraes
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Rafael Ambrósio Gava, Janaina Gomes Garcia De Moraes
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Processo, Jurisdição e Efetividade da Justiça; v. 1, n. 1 (2015): JANEIRO/DEZEMBRO; 188-215
2525-9814
2525-9814
reponame:Revista de Processo, Jurisdição e Efetividade da Justiça
instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron:CONPEDI
instname_str Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron_str CONPEDI
institution CONPEDI
reponame_str Revista de Processo, Jurisdição e Efetividade da Justiça
collection Revista de Processo, Jurisdição e Efetividade da Justiça
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Processo, Jurisdição e Efetividade da Justiça - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv publicacao@conpedi.org.br||indexlawjournals@gmail.com
_version_ 1808858242681405440