To Fight Against the Defensive Jurisprudence with the New Civil Procedure Code: Yes, We Can! Or Can We?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Processo, Jurisdição e Efetividade da Justiça |
Texto Completo: | http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistaprocessojurisdicao/article/view/237 |
Resumo: | In order to reduce their workloads, Brazilian Courts have been landing many precedents that lead to unwarranted restrictions to the right to appeal, thereby belittling the fundamental constitutional right to access to justice. Despite the existence of studies on this "defensive jurisprudence", there are still few who analyze it in the light of the new Civil Procedure Code (Law 13.105/2015), which is about to enter into force. This article aims to evaluate the suitability of the new CPC to remedy this adjudicative problem or at least minimize it. We demonstrated, based on literature and through a deductive argumentative reasoning, that the new procedural law contains a number of specific and general legal clauses which may be used as instruments able to curb the adjudicate "defensiveness. Nonetheless, the achievement of this goal will depend largely on how this legal clauses are to be interpreted and applied. |
id |
CONPEDI-13_ae22e8d601949dc6b5ac6df24aa69ac5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/237 |
network_acronym_str |
CONPEDI-13 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Processo, Jurisdição e Efetividade da Justiça |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
To Fight Against the Defensive Jurisprudence with the New Civil Procedure Code: Yes, We Can! Or Can We?Combater a Jurisprudência Defensiva com o Novo CPC: "Yes, We Can!" or Can We?New civil procedure code; Law 13105; Right to appeal; Defensive; JurisprudenceNovo CPC, Lei 13105; Direito de recorrer; Jurisprudência; DefensivaIn order to reduce their workloads, Brazilian Courts have been landing many precedents that lead to unwarranted restrictions to the right to appeal, thereby belittling the fundamental constitutional right to access to justice. Despite the existence of studies on this "defensive jurisprudence", there are still few who analyze it in the light of the new Civil Procedure Code (Law 13.105/2015), which is about to enter into force. This article aims to evaluate the suitability of the new CPC to remedy this adjudicative problem or at least minimize it. We demonstrated, based on literature and through a deductive argumentative reasoning, that the new procedural law contains a number of specific and general legal clauses which may be used as instruments able to curb the adjudicate "defensiveness. Nonetheless, the achievement of this goal will depend largely on how this legal clauses are to be interpreted and applied.Com o fim utilitarista de reduzir suas cargas de trabalho, os tribunais brasileiros têm cunhado vários entendimentos jurisprudenciais que acarretam restrições ilegítimas ao direito de recorrer, amesquinhando com isso o direito constitucional fundamental de acesso à justiça. Em que pese a existência de estudos a respeito dessa jurisprudência defensiva, ainda há poucos que a analisam à luz do novo Código de Processo Civil (Lei 13.105/2015), o qual está prestes a entrar em vigor. A proposta deste artigo é avaliar a aptidão do novo CPC para sanar esse vício judicante ou, ao menos, dificultar a sua ocorrência. Demonstrou-se, com base em pesquisa bibliográfica e mediante uma problematização dedutivo-argumentativa, que a nova lei processual contém uma série de previsões casuísticas e cláusulas gerais que podem ser usadas como instrumentos hábeis a refrear a defensividade jurisprudencial. Nada obstante, a concretização dos efeitos visados com a instituição desses enunciados legais dependerá, em grande parte, da maneira como eles serão interpretados e aplicados pelos operadores do direito.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDIGava, Rafael AmbrósioMoraes, Janaina Gomes Garcia De2016-10-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo Avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistaprocessojurisdicao/article/view/23710.26668/IndexLawJournals/2015.v1i1.237Revista de Processo, Jurisdição e Efetividade da Justiça; v. 1, n. 1 (2015): JANEIRO/DEZEMBRO; 188-2152525-98142525-9814reponame:Revista de Processo, Jurisdição e Efetividade da Justiçainstname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistaprocessojurisdicao/article/view/237/238Direitos autorais 2016 Rafael Ambrósio Gava, Janaina Gomes Garcia De Moraeshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2017-03-01T19:27:51Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/237Revistahttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistaprocessojurisdicaoONGhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistaprocessojurisdicao/oaipublicacao@conpedi.org.br||indexlawjournals@gmail.com2525-98142525-9814opendoar:2017-03-01T19:27:51Revista de Processo, Jurisdição e Efetividade da Justiça - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
To Fight Against the Defensive Jurisprudence with the New Civil Procedure Code: Yes, We Can! Or Can We? Combater a Jurisprudência Defensiva com o Novo CPC: "Yes, We Can!" or Can We? |
title |
To Fight Against the Defensive Jurisprudence with the New Civil Procedure Code: Yes, We Can! Or Can We? |
spellingShingle |
To Fight Against the Defensive Jurisprudence with the New Civil Procedure Code: Yes, We Can! Or Can We? Gava, Rafael Ambrósio New civil procedure code; Law 13105; Right to appeal; Defensive; Jurisprudence Novo CPC, Lei 13105; Direito de recorrer; Jurisprudência; Defensiva |
title_short |
To Fight Against the Defensive Jurisprudence with the New Civil Procedure Code: Yes, We Can! Or Can We? |
title_full |
To Fight Against the Defensive Jurisprudence with the New Civil Procedure Code: Yes, We Can! Or Can We? |
title_fullStr |
To Fight Against the Defensive Jurisprudence with the New Civil Procedure Code: Yes, We Can! Or Can We? |
title_full_unstemmed |
To Fight Against the Defensive Jurisprudence with the New Civil Procedure Code: Yes, We Can! Or Can We? |
title_sort |
To Fight Against the Defensive Jurisprudence with the New Civil Procedure Code: Yes, We Can! Or Can We? |
author |
Gava, Rafael Ambrósio |
author_facet |
Gava, Rafael Ambrósio Moraes, Janaina Gomes Garcia De |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Moraes, Janaina Gomes Garcia De |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gava, Rafael Ambrósio Moraes, Janaina Gomes Garcia De |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
New civil procedure code; Law 13105; Right to appeal; Defensive; Jurisprudence Novo CPC, Lei 13105; Direito de recorrer; Jurisprudência; Defensiva |
topic |
New civil procedure code; Law 13105; Right to appeal; Defensive; Jurisprudence Novo CPC, Lei 13105; Direito de recorrer; Jurisprudência; Defensiva |
description |
In order to reduce their workloads, Brazilian Courts have been landing many precedents that lead to unwarranted restrictions to the right to appeal, thereby belittling the fundamental constitutional right to access to justice. Despite the existence of studies on this "defensive jurisprudence", there are still few who analyze it in the light of the new Civil Procedure Code (Law 13.105/2015), which is about to enter into force. This article aims to evaluate the suitability of the new CPC to remedy this adjudicative problem or at least minimize it. We demonstrated, based on literature and through a deductive argumentative reasoning, that the new procedural law contains a number of specific and general legal clauses which may be used as instruments able to curb the adjudicate "defensiveness. Nonetheless, the achievement of this goal will depend largely on how this legal clauses are to be interpreted and applied. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-10-10 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo Avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistaprocessojurisdicao/article/view/237 10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2015.v1i1.237 |
url |
http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistaprocessojurisdicao/article/view/237 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2015.v1i1.237 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistaprocessojurisdicao/article/view/237/238 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Rafael Ambrósio Gava, Janaina Gomes Garcia De Moraes http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Rafael Ambrósio Gava, Janaina Gomes Garcia De Moraes http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Processo, Jurisdição e Efetividade da Justiça; v. 1, n. 1 (2015): JANEIRO/DEZEMBRO; 188-215 2525-9814 2525-9814 reponame:Revista de Processo, Jurisdição e Efetividade da Justiça instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) instacron:CONPEDI |
instname_str |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
instacron_str |
CONPEDI |
institution |
CONPEDI |
reponame_str |
Revista de Processo, Jurisdição e Efetividade da Justiça |
collection |
Revista de Processo, Jurisdição e Efetividade da Justiça |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Processo, Jurisdição e Efetividade da Justiça - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
publicacao@conpedi.org.br||indexlawjournals@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1808858242681405440 |