The Motivation of Judicial Decisions as Guarantee of a Due Process: Analysis of Innovations Brought By the New Civil Procedure Code Against the Need for a Quick Decision Pronouncement

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Dias, Luciano Souto
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Oliveira, Natane Franciella de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Cidadania e Acesso à Justiça
Texto Completo: http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/acessoajustica/article/view/366
Resumo: This research aims to discuss the constitutional principle of the reasoning of judicial decisions in the Brazilian civil procedure law. It aims to show its real importance in the rule of law, in order to build a just decision, participatory, democratic, without subjectivism and arbitrariness on the part of judges. Search also analyze the innovations brought by the New Procedure Code (Law 13.105/2015) regarding the matter, since the Code ensures highlight the issue, specifically bringing the cases in which the decision will be regarded as unfounded. Elaborated through the dialetics and historical-comparative methods, the text highlights the evolution of the legislative thought as to the reasoning of judicial decisions, highlighting the main innovations resulting in the 2015 Code of Civil Procedure.
id CONPEDI-23_41be06e7bd9d025bffc991af666dee93
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/366
network_acronym_str CONPEDI-23
network_name_str Revista Cidadania e Acesso à Justiça
repository_id_str
spelling The Motivation of Judicial Decisions as Guarantee of a Due Process: Analysis of Innovations Brought By the New Civil Procedure Code Against the Need for a Quick Decision PronouncementA Fundamentação das Decisões Judicias como Garantia de um Processo Justo: Análise Das Inovações Trazidas Pelo Novo Código de Processo Civil Face à Necessidade de um Rápido Pronunciamento DecisórioReasons for decisions;Jurisdictional tutelage;New civil procedure code;Standardized decisions;ContradictoryFundamentação das decisões;Tutela jurisdicional;Novo código de processo civil;Decisões padronizadas;ContraditórioThis research aims to discuss the constitutional principle of the reasoning of judicial decisions in the Brazilian civil procedure law. It aims to show its real importance in the rule of law, in order to build a just decision, participatory, democratic, without subjectivism and arbitrariness on the part of judges. Search also analyze the innovations brought by the New Procedure Code (Law 13.105/2015) regarding the matter, since the Code ensures highlight the issue, specifically bringing the cases in which the decision will be regarded as unfounded. Elaborated through the dialetics and historical-comparative methods, the text highlights the evolution of the legislative thought as to the reasoning of judicial decisions, highlighting the main innovations resulting in the 2015 Code of Civil Procedure.A presente pesquisa tem como objetivo discorrer sobre o princípio constitucional da fundamentação das decisões judiciais na legislação processual civil brasileira. Visa mostrar a sua real importância no Estado de Direito, a fim de se construir uma decisão justa, participada, democrática, sem subjetivismos e arbítrios por parte dos magistrados. Busca ainda, analisar as inovações trazidas pelo Novo Código de Processo (Lei 13.105/2015) no que concerne à matéria, uma vez que o Código garante destaque ao tema, trazendo especificamente as hipóteses em que a decisão será considerada como não fundamentada. Elaborado através do método dialético e do histórico-comparativo, o texto destaca a evolução do pensamento legislativo quanto à fundamentação das decisões, destacando as principais inovações advindas do Código de Processo Civil de 2015.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDIDias, Luciano SoutoOliveira, Natane Franciella de2016-10-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo Avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/acessoajustica/article/view/36610.26668/IndexLawJournals/2526-026X/2016.v2i1.366Revista Cidadania e Acesso à Justiça; v. 2, n. 1 (2016): JANEIRO/JUNHO2526-026X2526-026Xreponame:Revista Cidadania e Acesso à Justiçainstname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/acessoajustica/article/view/366/369Direitos autorais 2016 Luciano Souto Dias, Natane Franciella de Oliveirahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-09-11T14:54:44Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/366Revistahttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/acessoajustica/oai2526-026X2526-026Xopendoar:2020-09-11T14:54:44Revista Cidadania e Acesso à Justiça - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Motivation of Judicial Decisions as Guarantee of a Due Process: Analysis of Innovations Brought By the New Civil Procedure Code Against the Need for a Quick Decision Pronouncement
A Fundamentação das Decisões Judicias como Garantia de um Processo Justo: Análise Das Inovações Trazidas Pelo Novo Código de Processo Civil Face à Necessidade de um Rápido Pronunciamento Decisório
title The Motivation of Judicial Decisions as Guarantee of a Due Process: Analysis of Innovations Brought By the New Civil Procedure Code Against the Need for a Quick Decision Pronouncement
spellingShingle The Motivation of Judicial Decisions as Guarantee of a Due Process: Analysis of Innovations Brought By the New Civil Procedure Code Against the Need for a Quick Decision Pronouncement
Dias, Luciano Souto
Reasons for decisions;Jurisdictional tutelage;New civil procedure code;Standardized decisions;Contradictory
Fundamentação das decisões;Tutela jurisdicional;Novo código de processo civil;Decisões padronizadas;Contraditório
title_short The Motivation of Judicial Decisions as Guarantee of a Due Process: Analysis of Innovations Brought By the New Civil Procedure Code Against the Need for a Quick Decision Pronouncement
title_full The Motivation of Judicial Decisions as Guarantee of a Due Process: Analysis of Innovations Brought By the New Civil Procedure Code Against the Need for a Quick Decision Pronouncement
title_fullStr The Motivation of Judicial Decisions as Guarantee of a Due Process: Analysis of Innovations Brought By the New Civil Procedure Code Against the Need for a Quick Decision Pronouncement
title_full_unstemmed The Motivation of Judicial Decisions as Guarantee of a Due Process: Analysis of Innovations Brought By the New Civil Procedure Code Against the Need for a Quick Decision Pronouncement
title_sort The Motivation of Judicial Decisions as Guarantee of a Due Process: Analysis of Innovations Brought By the New Civil Procedure Code Against the Need for a Quick Decision Pronouncement
author Dias, Luciano Souto
author_facet Dias, Luciano Souto
Oliveira, Natane Franciella de
author_role author
author2 Oliveira, Natane Franciella de
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Dias, Luciano Souto
Oliveira, Natane Franciella de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Reasons for decisions;Jurisdictional tutelage;New civil procedure code;Standardized decisions;Contradictory
Fundamentação das decisões;Tutela jurisdicional;Novo código de processo civil;Decisões padronizadas;Contraditório
topic Reasons for decisions;Jurisdictional tutelage;New civil procedure code;Standardized decisions;Contradictory
Fundamentação das decisões;Tutela jurisdicional;Novo código de processo civil;Decisões padronizadas;Contraditório
description This research aims to discuss the constitutional principle of the reasoning of judicial decisions in the Brazilian civil procedure law. It aims to show its real importance in the rule of law, in order to build a just decision, participatory, democratic, without subjectivism and arbitrariness on the part of judges. Search also analyze the innovations brought by the New Procedure Code (Law 13.105/2015) regarding the matter, since the Code ensures highlight the issue, specifically bringing the cases in which the decision will be regarded as unfounded. Elaborated through the dialetics and historical-comparative methods, the text highlights the evolution of the legislative thought as to the reasoning of judicial decisions, highlighting the main innovations resulting in the 2015 Code of Civil Procedure.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-10-11
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo Avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/acessoajustica/article/view/366
10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2526-026X/2016.v2i1.366
url http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/acessoajustica/article/view/366
identifier_str_mv 10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2526-026X/2016.v2i1.366
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/acessoajustica/article/view/366/369
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Luciano Souto Dias, Natane Franciella de Oliveira
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Luciano Souto Dias, Natane Franciella de Oliveira
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Cidadania e Acesso à Justiça; v. 2, n. 1 (2016): JANEIRO/JUNHO
2526-026X
2526-026X
reponame:Revista Cidadania e Acesso à Justiça
instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron:CONPEDI
instname_str Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron_str CONPEDI
institution CONPEDI
reponame_str Revista Cidadania e Acesso à Justiça
collection Revista Cidadania e Acesso à Justiça
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Cidadania e Acesso à Justiça - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808858161962024960

Registros relacionados