Positivism and Constitutional Post- positivism : A Debate on Breast Theory of Fundamental Rights

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Castro, Matheus Felipe de
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Sanches, Samyra Hay dêe Dal Farra Naspolini
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Conpedi Law Review
Texto Completo: https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3420
Resumo: This article, based on the theoretical framework of the philosophy of praxis, is to discuss the strained relations between power and justice in the enforcement of fundamental rights, making a comparison between the theoretical concepts of Hans Kelsen and Robert Alexy. In this sense, are compared the thoughts of these two authors, emphasizing the central role that power has the legal conception of the first as opposed to the theory of justice that animates the legal conceptions of the second. We discuss how this tension that appears in the theoretical confrontation of the two authors is actually a moment of real, but constitutes a dialectical interaction which must be observed and deciphered in the concrete application of the law. It concludes with the search of separation from what is real from what is in this ideological debate, seeking to deepen the debate on fundamental rights as the core of modern structural theory of law.
id CONPEDI-4_118e7f3949828b127ac3c8b35e4b671d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/3420
network_acronym_str CONPEDI-4
network_name_str Conpedi Law Review
repository_id_str
spelling Positivism and Constitutional Post- positivism : A Debate on Breast Theory of Fundamental RightsPositivismo e Pós-Positivismo Constitucional: Um Debate no Seio da Teoria dos Direitos FundamentaisFundamental Rights; Power; Justice; Philosophy of Praxis; Interpretation; Application of Law.Direitos Fundamentais; Poder; Justiça; Filosofia da Práxis; Interpretação; Aplicação do Direito.This article, based on the theoretical framework of the philosophy of praxis, is to discuss the strained relations between power and justice in the enforcement of fundamental rights, making a comparison between the theoretical concepts of Hans Kelsen and Robert Alexy. In this sense, are compared the thoughts of these two authors, emphasizing the central role that power has the legal conception of the first as opposed to the theory of justice that animates the legal conceptions of the second. We discuss how this tension that appears in the theoretical confrontation of the two authors is actually a moment of real, but constitutes a dialectical interaction which must be observed and deciphered in the concrete application of the law. It concludes with the search of separation from what is real from what is in this ideological debate, seeking to deepen the debate on fundamental rights as the core of modern structural theory of law.O presente artigo, partindo do referencial teórico da filosofia da práxis, busca discutir as relações tensas entre o poder e a justiça na efetivação dos direitos fundamentais, realizando um confronto entre as concepções teóricas de Hans Kelsen e Robert Alexy. Nesse sentido, são comparados os pensamentos desses dois autores, ressaltando o papel central que o poder possui na concepção jurídica do primeiro, em contraponto com a teoria da justiça que anima as concepções jurídicas do segundo. Discute-se como essa tensão que aparece no confronto teórico dos dois autores na verdade é um momento inafastável do real, constituindo antes uma convivência dialética que precisa ser observada e decifrada na concretude da aplicação do direito. Conclui-se com a busca da separação daquilo que é real daquilo que é ideológico nesse debate, buscando aprofundar o debate em torno dos direitos fundamentais como núcleo estruturante da moderna teoria do direito.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDICastro, Matheus Felipe deSanches, Samyra Hay dêe Dal Farra Naspolini2023-12-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo Avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/342010.26668/2448-3931_conpedilawreview/2015.v1i4.3420Conpedi Law Review; v. 1, n. 4 (2015): Direito Constitucional, Direitos Humanos; 134-1512448-39312448-3931reponame:Conpedi Law Reviewinstname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3420/2936Direitos autorais 2016 Matheus Felipe de Castro, Samyra Hay dêe Dal Farra Naspolini Sancheshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-12-15T19:25:12Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/3420Revistahttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireviewONGhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/oaipublicacao@conpedi.org.br||indexlawjournals@gmail.com2448-39312448-3931opendoar:2023-12-15T19:25:12Conpedi Law Review - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Positivism and Constitutional Post- positivism : A Debate on Breast Theory of Fundamental Rights
Positivismo e Pós-Positivismo Constitucional: Um Debate no Seio da Teoria dos Direitos Fundamentais
title Positivism and Constitutional Post- positivism : A Debate on Breast Theory of Fundamental Rights
spellingShingle Positivism and Constitutional Post- positivism : A Debate on Breast Theory of Fundamental Rights
Castro, Matheus Felipe de
Fundamental Rights; Power; Justice; Philosophy of Praxis; Interpretation; Application of Law.
Direitos Fundamentais; Poder; Justiça; Filosofia da Práxis; Interpretação; Aplicação do Direito.
title_short Positivism and Constitutional Post- positivism : A Debate on Breast Theory of Fundamental Rights
title_full Positivism and Constitutional Post- positivism : A Debate on Breast Theory of Fundamental Rights
title_fullStr Positivism and Constitutional Post- positivism : A Debate on Breast Theory of Fundamental Rights
title_full_unstemmed Positivism and Constitutional Post- positivism : A Debate on Breast Theory of Fundamental Rights
title_sort Positivism and Constitutional Post- positivism : A Debate on Breast Theory of Fundamental Rights
author Castro, Matheus Felipe de
author_facet Castro, Matheus Felipe de
Sanches, Samyra Hay dêe Dal Farra Naspolini
author_role author
author2 Sanches, Samyra Hay dêe Dal Farra Naspolini
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Castro, Matheus Felipe de
Sanches, Samyra Hay dêe Dal Farra Naspolini
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Fundamental Rights; Power; Justice; Philosophy of Praxis; Interpretation; Application of Law.
Direitos Fundamentais; Poder; Justiça; Filosofia da Práxis; Interpretação; Aplicação do Direito.
topic Fundamental Rights; Power; Justice; Philosophy of Praxis; Interpretation; Application of Law.
Direitos Fundamentais; Poder; Justiça; Filosofia da Práxis; Interpretação; Aplicação do Direito.
description This article, based on the theoretical framework of the philosophy of praxis, is to discuss the strained relations between power and justice in the enforcement of fundamental rights, making a comparison between the theoretical concepts of Hans Kelsen and Robert Alexy. In this sense, are compared the thoughts of these two authors, emphasizing the central role that power has the legal conception of the first as opposed to the theory of justice that animates the legal conceptions of the second. We discuss how this tension that appears in the theoretical confrontation of the two authors is actually a moment of real, but constitutes a dialectical interaction which must be observed and deciphered in the concrete application of the law. It concludes with the search of separation from what is real from what is in this ideological debate, seeking to deepen the debate on fundamental rights as the core of modern structural theory of law.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-12-15
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo Avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3420
10.26668/2448-3931_conpedilawreview/2015.v1i4.3420
url https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3420
identifier_str_mv 10.26668/2448-3931_conpedilawreview/2015.v1i4.3420
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3420/2936
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Matheus Felipe de Castro, Samyra Hay dêe Dal Farra Naspolini Sanches
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Matheus Felipe de Castro, Samyra Hay dêe Dal Farra Naspolini Sanches
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Conpedi Law Review; v. 1, n. 4 (2015): Direito Constitucional, Direitos Humanos; 134-151
2448-3931
2448-3931
reponame:Conpedi Law Review
instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron:CONPEDI
instname_str Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron_str CONPEDI
institution CONPEDI
reponame_str Conpedi Law Review
collection Conpedi Law Review
repository.name.fl_str_mv Conpedi Law Review - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv publicacao@conpedi.org.br||indexlawjournals@gmail.com
_version_ 1798319596848021504

Registros relacionados