Management methods and soil cover plants for the cultivation of tutored tomato

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Valmorbida, Janice
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Wamser, Anderson Fernando, Santin, Bruna Luisa, Ender, Marcos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Agropecuária Catarinense (Online)
Texto Completo: https://publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br/rac/article/view/753
Resumo: The objective of this work was to evaluate the influence of management methods and winter soil cover crops on the tutored tomato yield. The treatments consisted of a combination of two planting methods (conventional and no-tillage) and four winter soil coverings (fallow, oats, turnip and oats + turnip). The nitrogen content (N), the C/N ratio, the dry mass and the N accumulation in the aerial part of the cover plants were evaluated, as well as the tomato yield, in the 2009/10 and 2011/12 harvests. At the end of the harvest, the mechanical resistance to soil penetration was determined using an impact penetrometer. The species of cover plants and the methods of soil preparation did not affect the production of dry mass and total N of the cover plants, with a higher N content for the oat + turnip consortium than for oats, with reduction of C/N ratio, only in 2011/12. Higher commercial tomato yield was observed in conventional planting (79.2 x 65.3t ha-1) in the 2009/10 harvest, in which the no-tillage system presented greater soil resistance to the penetrometer test. In the 2011/12 harvest, the commercial yield was higher in no-till (102.8 x 97.3t ha-1). The coverings of soil with oats and turnip, in intercropped or single cultivation, as well as the winter fallow, did not affect the commercial tomato yield in any of the studied years.
id EPAGRI_ce3c8fc52a7e48a60e68c40c744bab8e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br:article/753
network_acronym_str EPAGRI
network_name_str Agropecuária Catarinense (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Management methods and soil cover plants for the cultivation of tutored tomatoMétodos de manejo e plantas de cobertura do solo para o cultivo do tomateiro tutoradoSolanum lycopersicum L.Avena strigosa Schreb.Raphanus sativus L.no-tillageconventional tillage.Solanum lycopersicum L.Avena strigosa Schreb.Raphanus sativus L.plantio diretoplantio convencionalThe objective of this work was to evaluate the influence of management methods and winter soil cover crops on the tutored tomato yield. The treatments consisted of a combination of two planting methods (conventional and no-tillage) and four winter soil coverings (fallow, oats, turnip and oats + turnip). The nitrogen content (N), the C/N ratio, the dry mass and the N accumulation in the aerial part of the cover plants were evaluated, as well as the tomato yield, in the 2009/10 and 2011/12 harvests. At the end of the harvest, the mechanical resistance to soil penetration was determined using an impact penetrometer. The species of cover plants and the methods of soil preparation did not affect the production of dry mass and total N of the cover plants, with a higher N content for the oat + turnip consortium than for oats, with reduction of C/N ratio, only in 2011/12. Higher commercial tomato yield was observed in conventional planting (79.2 x 65.3t ha-1) in the 2009/10 harvest, in which the no-tillage system presented greater soil resistance to the penetrometer test. In the 2011/12 harvest, the commercial yield was higher in no-till (102.8 x 97.3t ha-1). The coverings of soil with oats and turnip, in intercropped or single cultivation, as well as the winter fallow, did not affect the commercial tomato yield in any of the studied years.O objetivo desse trabalho foi avaliar a influência de métodos de manejo e culturas de cobertura do solo de inverno na produtividade de tomateiro tutorado. Os tratamentos consistiram na combinação de dois métodos de plantio de tomate (convencional e direto) e quatro coberturas de solo de inverno (pousio, aveia, nabo e aveia+nabo). Avaliou-se o teor de nitrogênio (N), a relação C/N, a massa seca e o acúmulo de N na parte aérea de plantas de cobertura de solo, bem como a produtividade do tomate, nas safras 2009/10 e 2011/12. Ao final da safra foi determinada a resistência mecânica à penetração do solo usando um penetrômetro de impacto.  As espécies de cobertura do solo e os métodos de preparo para a semeadura não afetaram a produção de massa seca e N total das plantas de cobertura, sendo que apenas na safra 2011/12 o consórcio aveia+nabo apresentou maior teor de N do que a aveia, com redução da relação C/N. Maior produtividade comercial de tomate foi observada no plantio convencional (79,2 x 65,3 ton ha-1) na safra 2009/10, na qual o sistema de plantio direto apresentou maior resistência do solo ao teste do penetrômetro. Na safra 2011/12 a produtividade comercial foi maior no plantio direto (102,8 x 97,3 ton ha-1). As coberturas de solo com aveia e nabo, em cultivo consorciado ou solteiro, bem como o pousio invernal, não afetaram a produtividade comercial de tomate em nenhuma das safras estudadas. Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina - Epagri2020-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br/rac/article/view/75310.52945/rac.v33i2.753Agropecuária Catarinense Journal; Vol. 33 No. 2 (2020); 76-81Agropecuária Catarinense; v. 33 n. 2 (2020); 76-812525-60760103-0779reponame:Agropecuária Catarinense (Online)instname:Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina (Epagri)instacron:EPAGRIporhttps://publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br/rac/article/view/753/942Copyright (c) 2020 Autoreshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessValmorbida, JaniceWamser, Anderson FernandoSantin, Bruna LuisaEnder, Marcos2020-11-13T01:15:35Zoai:ojs.publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br:article/753Revistahttps://publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br/RAC/indexPUBhttps://publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br/index.php/RAC/oaieditoriarac@epagri.sc.gov.br || lamperuch@epagri.sc.gov.br2525-60760103-0779opendoar:2020-11-13T01:15:35Agropecuária Catarinense (Online) - Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina (Epagri)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Management methods and soil cover plants for the cultivation of tutored tomato
Métodos de manejo e plantas de cobertura do solo para o cultivo do tomateiro tutorado
title Management methods and soil cover plants for the cultivation of tutored tomato
spellingShingle Management methods and soil cover plants for the cultivation of tutored tomato
Valmorbida, Janice
Solanum lycopersicum L.
Avena strigosa Schreb.
Raphanus sativus L.
no-tillage
conventional tillage.
Solanum lycopersicum L.
Avena strigosa Schreb.
Raphanus sativus L.
plantio direto
plantio convencional
title_short Management methods and soil cover plants for the cultivation of tutored tomato
title_full Management methods and soil cover plants for the cultivation of tutored tomato
title_fullStr Management methods and soil cover plants for the cultivation of tutored tomato
title_full_unstemmed Management methods and soil cover plants for the cultivation of tutored tomato
title_sort Management methods and soil cover plants for the cultivation of tutored tomato
author Valmorbida, Janice
author_facet Valmorbida, Janice
Wamser, Anderson Fernando
Santin, Bruna Luisa
Ender, Marcos
author_role author
author2 Wamser, Anderson Fernando
Santin, Bruna Luisa
Ender, Marcos
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Valmorbida, Janice
Wamser, Anderson Fernando
Santin, Bruna Luisa
Ender, Marcos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Solanum lycopersicum L.
Avena strigosa Schreb.
Raphanus sativus L.
no-tillage
conventional tillage.
Solanum lycopersicum L.
Avena strigosa Schreb.
Raphanus sativus L.
plantio direto
plantio convencional
topic Solanum lycopersicum L.
Avena strigosa Schreb.
Raphanus sativus L.
no-tillage
conventional tillage.
Solanum lycopersicum L.
Avena strigosa Schreb.
Raphanus sativus L.
plantio direto
plantio convencional
description The objective of this work was to evaluate the influence of management methods and winter soil cover crops on the tutored tomato yield. The treatments consisted of a combination of two planting methods (conventional and no-tillage) and four winter soil coverings (fallow, oats, turnip and oats + turnip). The nitrogen content (N), the C/N ratio, the dry mass and the N accumulation in the aerial part of the cover plants were evaluated, as well as the tomato yield, in the 2009/10 and 2011/12 harvests. At the end of the harvest, the mechanical resistance to soil penetration was determined using an impact penetrometer. The species of cover plants and the methods of soil preparation did not affect the production of dry mass and total N of the cover plants, with a higher N content for the oat + turnip consortium than for oats, with reduction of C/N ratio, only in 2011/12. Higher commercial tomato yield was observed in conventional planting (79.2 x 65.3t ha-1) in the 2009/10 harvest, in which the no-tillage system presented greater soil resistance to the penetrometer test. In the 2011/12 harvest, the commercial yield was higher in no-till (102.8 x 97.3t ha-1). The coverings of soil with oats and turnip, in intercropped or single cultivation, as well as the winter fallow, did not affect the commercial tomato yield in any of the studied years.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br/rac/article/view/753
10.52945/rac.v33i2.753
url https://publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br/rac/article/view/753
identifier_str_mv 10.52945/rac.v33i2.753
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br/rac/article/view/753/942
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Autores
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Autores
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina - Epagri
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina - Epagri
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Agropecuária Catarinense Journal; Vol. 33 No. 2 (2020); 76-81
Agropecuária Catarinense; v. 33 n. 2 (2020); 76-81
2525-6076
0103-0779
reponame:Agropecuária Catarinense (Online)
instname:Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina (Epagri)
instacron:EPAGRI
instname_str Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina (Epagri)
instacron_str EPAGRI
institution EPAGRI
reponame_str Agropecuária Catarinense (Online)
collection Agropecuária Catarinense (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Agropecuária Catarinense (Online) - Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina (Epagri)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv editoriarac@epagri.sc.gov.br || lamperuch@epagri.sc.gov.br
_version_ 1754917259853168640