Application of in dubio pro societate in penal execution: analysis of the decisions of the São Paulo’s State Court of Justice on progressive sentencing
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Segurança Pública (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revista.forumseguranca.org.br/index.php/rbsp/article/view/1385 |
Resumo: | This article aims to address the issue of application of in dubio pro societate in penal execution. Deeming as start point the study of the positioning of legal doctrine, the research focuses on understanding the judicial reasoning in decisions of progressive sentencing, investigating the use of in dubio pro societate. By setting this purpose, 96 appeals were analyzed, all of which judged by São Paulo’s State Court of Justice in December 2019. Given the absence of a constitutional framework for its application, discussions tackled the concept of public security and contradictions with the resocialization planning adopted by penal execution legislation. Thus, mounting evidence remain in relation to its application being based upon extralegal criteria, which justify the state of doubt regarding the merit for progressive sentencing, promoting decisions for the maintenance of a person deprived of liberty in the most rigorous regime or requiring her to undergo criminological assessment. |
id |
FBSP_da6b690b0fecedfe92cf2535f6db65d2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revista.forumseguranca.org.br:article/1385 |
network_acronym_str |
FBSP |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Segurança Pública (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Application of in dubio pro societate in penal execution: analysis of the decisions of the São Paulo’s State Court of Justice on progressive sentencingAplicação do in dubio pro societate na execução penal: análise das decisões do Tribunal de Justiça de São Paulo sobre progressão de regimePenal executionIn dubio pro societateProgression of penalty compliance regimeSão Paulo’s State Court of JusticeExecução penalIn dubio pro societateProgressão de regimeTribunal de Justiça de São PauloThis article aims to address the issue of application of in dubio pro societate in penal execution. Deeming as start point the study of the positioning of legal doctrine, the research focuses on understanding the judicial reasoning in decisions of progressive sentencing, investigating the use of in dubio pro societate. By setting this purpose, 96 appeals were analyzed, all of which judged by São Paulo’s State Court of Justice in December 2019. Given the absence of a constitutional framework for its application, discussions tackled the concept of public security and contradictions with the resocialization planning adopted by penal execution legislation. Thus, mounting evidence remain in relation to its application being based upon extralegal criteria, which justify the state of doubt regarding the merit for progressive sentencing, promoting decisions for the maintenance of a person deprived of liberty in the most rigorous regime or requiring her to undergo criminological assessment. O presente artigo discute a questão da aplicação do in dubio pro societate na execução penal. Partindo dos posicionamentos da doutrina no processo penal e na execução penal, a pesquisa tem como foco a fundamentação judicial em decisões de progressão de regime, buscando investigar como se dá a utilização do in dubio pro societate. Para tanto, são analisados 96 agravos em execução penal julgados pelo Tribunal de Justiça de São Paulo em dezembro de 2019. Diante da ausência de amparo constitucional para a sua aplicação, discute-se o conceito de segurança pública que ele concentra e as contradições com o “plano ressocializador” adotado pela Lei de Execução Penal. Evidencia-se que a sua aplicação na execução penal se sustenta a partir de critérios extralegais que fundamentam o estado da dúvida quanto ao merecimento para a progressão, ocasionando decisões de manutenção da pessoa em privação de liberdade no regime mais rigoroso ou exigência de exame criminológico.Fórum Brasileiro de Segurança Pública2022-09-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmltext/xmlhttps://revista.forumseguranca.org.br/index.php/rbsp/article/view/138510.31060/rbsp.2022.v16.n3.1385Revista Brasileira de Segurança Pública; v. 16 n. 3 (2022): Revista Brasileira de Segurança Pública 31Revista Brasileira de Segurança Pública; Vol. 16 No. 3 (2022): Revista Brasileira de Segurança Pública 312595-02581981-1659reponame:Revista Brasileira de Segurança Pública (Online)instname:Fórum Brasileiro de Segurança Pública (FBSP)instacron:FBSP-1porhttps://revista.forumseguranca.org.br/index.php/rbsp/article/view/1385/596https://revista.forumseguranca.org.br/index.php/rbsp/article/view/1385/618https://revista.forumseguranca.org.br/index.php/rbsp/article/view/1385/619Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Brasileira de Segurança Públicahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessZambom, Mariana Morais2022-10-10T12:39:06Zoai:ojs.revista.forumseguranca.org.br:article/1385Revistahttps://revista.forumseguranca.org.br/index.php/rbsp/indexONGhttps://revista.forumseguranca.org.br/index.php/rbsp/oairevista@forumseguranca.org.br || suporte+rbsp@openjournalsolutions.com.br2595-02581981-1659opendoar:2022-10-10T12:39:06Revista Brasileira de Segurança Pública (Online) - Fórum Brasileiro de Segurança Pública (FBSP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Application of in dubio pro societate in penal execution: analysis of the decisions of the São Paulo’s State Court of Justice on progressive sentencing Aplicação do in dubio pro societate na execução penal: análise das decisões do Tribunal de Justiça de São Paulo sobre progressão de regime |
title |
Application of in dubio pro societate in penal execution: analysis of the decisions of the São Paulo’s State Court of Justice on progressive sentencing |
spellingShingle |
Application of in dubio pro societate in penal execution: analysis of the decisions of the São Paulo’s State Court of Justice on progressive sentencing Zambom, Mariana Morais Penal execution In dubio pro societate Progression of penalty compliance regime São Paulo’s State Court of Justice Execução penal In dubio pro societate Progressão de regime Tribunal de Justiça de São Paulo |
title_short |
Application of in dubio pro societate in penal execution: analysis of the decisions of the São Paulo’s State Court of Justice on progressive sentencing |
title_full |
Application of in dubio pro societate in penal execution: analysis of the decisions of the São Paulo’s State Court of Justice on progressive sentencing |
title_fullStr |
Application of in dubio pro societate in penal execution: analysis of the decisions of the São Paulo’s State Court of Justice on progressive sentencing |
title_full_unstemmed |
Application of in dubio pro societate in penal execution: analysis of the decisions of the São Paulo’s State Court of Justice on progressive sentencing |
title_sort |
Application of in dubio pro societate in penal execution: analysis of the decisions of the São Paulo’s State Court of Justice on progressive sentencing |
author |
Zambom, Mariana Morais |
author_facet |
Zambom, Mariana Morais |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Zambom, Mariana Morais |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Penal execution In dubio pro societate Progression of penalty compliance regime São Paulo’s State Court of Justice Execução penal In dubio pro societate Progressão de regime Tribunal de Justiça de São Paulo |
topic |
Penal execution In dubio pro societate Progression of penalty compliance regime São Paulo’s State Court of Justice Execução penal In dubio pro societate Progressão de regime Tribunal de Justiça de São Paulo |
description |
This article aims to address the issue of application of in dubio pro societate in penal execution. Deeming as start point the study of the positioning of legal doctrine, the research focuses on understanding the judicial reasoning in decisions of progressive sentencing, investigating the use of in dubio pro societate. By setting this purpose, 96 appeals were analyzed, all of which judged by São Paulo’s State Court of Justice in December 2019. Given the absence of a constitutional framework for its application, discussions tackled the concept of public security and contradictions with the resocialization planning adopted by penal execution legislation. Thus, mounting evidence remain in relation to its application being based upon extralegal criteria, which justify the state of doubt regarding the merit for progressive sentencing, promoting decisions for the maintenance of a person deprived of liberty in the most rigorous regime or requiring her to undergo criminological assessment. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-09-26 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.forumseguranca.org.br/index.php/rbsp/article/view/1385 10.31060/rbsp.2022.v16.n3.1385 |
url |
https://revista.forumseguranca.org.br/index.php/rbsp/article/view/1385 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.31060/rbsp.2022.v16.n3.1385 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.forumseguranca.org.br/index.php/rbsp/article/view/1385/596 https://revista.forumseguranca.org.br/index.php/rbsp/article/view/1385/618 https://revista.forumseguranca.org.br/index.php/rbsp/article/view/1385/619 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Brasileira de Segurança Pública https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Brasileira de Segurança Pública https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html text/xml |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fórum Brasileiro de Segurança Pública |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fórum Brasileiro de Segurança Pública |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Segurança Pública; v. 16 n. 3 (2022): Revista Brasileira de Segurança Pública 31 Revista Brasileira de Segurança Pública; Vol. 16 No. 3 (2022): Revista Brasileira de Segurança Pública 31 2595-0258 1981-1659 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Segurança Pública (Online) instname:Fórum Brasileiro de Segurança Pública (FBSP) instacron:FBSP-1 |
instname_str |
Fórum Brasileiro de Segurança Pública (FBSP) |
instacron_str |
FBSP-1 |
institution |
FBSP-1 |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Segurança Pública (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Segurança Pública (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Segurança Pública (Online) - Fórum Brasileiro de Segurança Pública (FBSP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista@forumseguranca.org.br || suporte+rbsp@openjournalsolutions.com.br |
_version_ |
1754913694672748544 |