Hermeneutics and Constitutional Mutation: Differences Between Constitutional Mutation (Verfassungswandlung) and Formal Amendment of the Constitutional (Verfassungsänderung)- Positioning of the Debate about Art. 52, X CF/98.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ferreira, Gabriela Vidotti
Data de Publicação: 2012
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Eletrônica da Faculdade de Direito de Franca
Texto Completo: http://www.revista.direitofranca.br/index.php/refdf/article/view/162
Resumo: The neo-constitutionalist movement is born in a breeding ground of post-World War II to ensure the fundamental rights and limit the Governor’s powers. On these grounds, Brazil issued in 1988, a guarantor and compromised Federal Constitution. In order to have the constitutional "pre-commitments" guaranteed against the social clamor, the Constitution provides “self-restraint” mechanisms, among them, the system of checks and balances. In this constitutionally established system is contained the function of Senate to give efficacy "erga omnes" to the final decisions of the Supreme Court, in the seat of diffuse control of constitutionality. The object of this study is unfolded before this scenario, and starts off with the analysis and differentiation of the institutes of formal amendment of the Constitution and constitutional mutation. To obtain the result, the Heideggerian phenomenological-hermeneutic "method" was used. Thus, this research does not develop a result with absolute truths, but rather, just another view on the topic. With the results, the impossibility of an express constitutional mutation of the item X from article 52 of the Constitution, required in the votes of some ministers in the Constitutional Complaint 4335-5/AC is verified. Keywords: Constitutional Law, Hermeneutics, Constitutional mutation, Formal amendment of the Constitution
id FDF-0_c5e8a90c4caf4387b1394cffa8631d20
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/162
network_acronym_str FDF-0
network_name_str Revista Eletrônica da Faculdade de Direito de Franca
repository_id_str
spelling Hermeneutics and Constitutional Mutation: Differences Between Constitutional Mutation (Verfassungswandlung) and Formal Amendment of the Constitutional (Verfassungsänderung)- Positioning of the Debate about Art. 52, X CF/98.HERMENÊUTICA E MUTAÇÃO CONSTITUCIONAL: diferenças entre mutação constitucional (Verfassungswandlung) e alteração formal da Constituição (Verfassungsänderung) – posicionamento do debate acerca do art. 52, X da CF/98Direito Constitucional. Hermenêutica. Mutação Constitucional. Alteração Formal da ConstituiçãoThe neo-constitutionalist movement is born in a breeding ground of post-World War II to ensure the fundamental rights and limit the Governor’s powers. On these grounds, Brazil issued in 1988, a guarantor and compromised Federal Constitution. In order to have the constitutional "pre-commitments" guaranteed against the social clamor, the Constitution provides “self-restraint” mechanisms, among them, the system of checks and balances. In this constitutionally established system is contained the function of Senate to give efficacy "erga omnes" to the final decisions of the Supreme Court, in the seat of diffuse control of constitutionality. The object of this study is unfolded before this scenario, and starts off with the analysis and differentiation of the institutes of formal amendment of the Constitution and constitutional mutation. To obtain the result, the Heideggerian phenomenological-hermeneutic "method" was used. Thus, this research does not develop a result with absolute truths, but rather, just another view on the topic. With the results, the impossibility of an express constitutional mutation of the item X from article 52 of the Constitution, required in the votes of some ministers in the Constitutional Complaint 4335-5/AC is verified. Keywords: Constitutional Law, Hermeneutics, Constitutional mutation, Formal amendment of the ConstitutionO movimento neoconstitucionalista nasce em um terreno fértil do Pós-Segunda Guerra Mundial para garantir os direitos fundamentais e limitar os poderes dos governantes. Sobre esses fundamentos, o Brasil editou, em 1988, uma Constituição Federal garantidora e compromissória. Para que os “pré-compromissos” constitucionais fossem garantidos em face aos clamores sociais, a Constituição prevê mecanismos de “auto-restrição”, dentre eles, o sistema de freios e contrapesos (Check and Balance). Nesse sistema constitucionalmente estabelecido, está contida a função do Senado em dar eficácia “erga omnes” às decisões definitivas do Supremo Tribunal Federal, em sede de controle difuso de constitucionalidade. O objeto de estudo se descortina diante desse cenário, e parte para a análise e diferenciação dos institutos da alteração formal da Constituição e da mutação constitucional. Para a obtenção do resultado, utilizou-se o “método” fenomenológico-hermenêutico de cariz heideggeriano. Dessa forma, não se desenvolve nessa pesquisa, um resultado com verdades absolutas, e sim, apenas outro olhar sobre o tema. De posse dos resultados, verifica-se a impossibilidade de haver uma expressa mutação constitucional do art.52 X da Constituição Federal, pretendida nos votos de alguns ministros na Reclamação Constitucional 4335-5/AC.Faculdade de Direito de Franca2012-03-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionavaliado por paresapplication/pdfhttp://www.revista.direitofranca.br/index.php/refdf/article/view/16210.21207/1983.4225.162Revista Eletrônica da Faculdade de Direito de Franca; v. 5 n. 1 (2012)1983-4225reponame:Revista Eletrônica da Faculdade de Direito de Francainstname:Faculdade de Direito de Franca (FDF)instacron:FDFporhttp://www.revista.direitofranca.br/index.php/refdf/article/view/162/105Ferreira, Gabriela Vidottiinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-01-10T13:52:47Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/162Revistahttps://www.revista.direitofranca.br/index.php/refdfPUBhttp://www.revista.direitofranca.br/index.php/refdf/oai||drcildo@direitofranca.br1983-42251983-4225opendoar:2023-01-10T13:52:47Revista Eletrônica da Faculdade de Direito de Franca - Faculdade de Direito de Franca (FDF)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Hermeneutics and Constitutional Mutation: Differences Between Constitutional Mutation (Verfassungswandlung) and Formal Amendment of the Constitutional (Verfassungsänderung)- Positioning of the Debate about Art. 52, X CF/98.
HERMENÊUTICA E MUTAÇÃO CONSTITUCIONAL: diferenças entre mutação constitucional (Verfassungswandlung) e alteração formal da Constituição (Verfassungsänderung) – posicionamento do debate acerca do art. 52, X da CF/98
title Hermeneutics and Constitutional Mutation: Differences Between Constitutional Mutation (Verfassungswandlung) and Formal Amendment of the Constitutional (Verfassungsänderung)- Positioning of the Debate about Art. 52, X CF/98.
spellingShingle Hermeneutics and Constitutional Mutation: Differences Between Constitutional Mutation (Verfassungswandlung) and Formal Amendment of the Constitutional (Verfassungsänderung)- Positioning of the Debate about Art. 52, X CF/98.
Ferreira, Gabriela Vidotti
Direito Constitucional. Hermenêutica. Mutação Constitucional. Alteração Formal da Constituição
title_short Hermeneutics and Constitutional Mutation: Differences Between Constitutional Mutation (Verfassungswandlung) and Formal Amendment of the Constitutional (Verfassungsänderung)- Positioning of the Debate about Art. 52, X CF/98.
title_full Hermeneutics and Constitutional Mutation: Differences Between Constitutional Mutation (Verfassungswandlung) and Formal Amendment of the Constitutional (Verfassungsänderung)- Positioning of the Debate about Art. 52, X CF/98.
title_fullStr Hermeneutics and Constitutional Mutation: Differences Between Constitutional Mutation (Verfassungswandlung) and Formal Amendment of the Constitutional (Verfassungsänderung)- Positioning of the Debate about Art. 52, X CF/98.
title_full_unstemmed Hermeneutics and Constitutional Mutation: Differences Between Constitutional Mutation (Verfassungswandlung) and Formal Amendment of the Constitutional (Verfassungsänderung)- Positioning of the Debate about Art. 52, X CF/98.
title_sort Hermeneutics and Constitutional Mutation: Differences Between Constitutional Mutation (Verfassungswandlung) and Formal Amendment of the Constitutional (Verfassungsänderung)- Positioning of the Debate about Art. 52, X CF/98.
author Ferreira, Gabriela Vidotti
author_facet Ferreira, Gabriela Vidotti
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ferreira, Gabriela Vidotti
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Direito Constitucional. Hermenêutica. Mutação Constitucional. Alteração Formal da Constituição
topic Direito Constitucional. Hermenêutica. Mutação Constitucional. Alteração Formal da Constituição
description The neo-constitutionalist movement is born in a breeding ground of post-World War II to ensure the fundamental rights and limit the Governor’s powers. On these grounds, Brazil issued in 1988, a guarantor and compromised Federal Constitution. In order to have the constitutional "pre-commitments" guaranteed against the social clamor, the Constitution provides “self-restraint” mechanisms, among them, the system of checks and balances. In this constitutionally established system is contained the function of Senate to give efficacy "erga omnes" to the final decisions of the Supreme Court, in the seat of diffuse control of constitutionality. The object of this study is unfolded before this scenario, and starts off with the analysis and differentiation of the institutes of formal amendment of the Constitution and constitutional mutation. To obtain the result, the Heideggerian phenomenological-hermeneutic "method" was used. Thus, this research does not develop a result with absolute truths, but rather, just another view on the topic. With the results, the impossibility of an express constitutional mutation of the item X from article 52 of the Constitution, required in the votes of some ministers in the Constitutional Complaint 4335-5/AC is verified. Keywords: Constitutional Law, Hermeneutics, Constitutional mutation, Formal amendment of the Constitution
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-03-11
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
avaliado por pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.revista.direitofranca.br/index.php/refdf/article/view/162
10.21207/1983.4225.162
url http://www.revista.direitofranca.br/index.php/refdf/article/view/162
identifier_str_mv 10.21207/1983.4225.162
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.revista.direitofranca.br/index.php/refdf/article/view/162/105
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Direito de Franca
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Direito de Franca
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Eletrônica da Faculdade de Direito de Franca; v. 5 n. 1 (2012)
1983-4225
reponame:Revista Eletrônica da Faculdade de Direito de Franca
instname:Faculdade de Direito de Franca (FDF)
instacron:FDF
instname_str Faculdade de Direito de Franca (FDF)
instacron_str FDF
institution FDF
reponame_str Revista Eletrônica da Faculdade de Direito de Franca
collection Revista Eletrônica da Faculdade de Direito de Franca
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Eletrônica da Faculdade de Direito de Franca - Faculdade de Direito de Franca (FDF)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||drcildo@direitofranca.br
_version_ 1754644628366163968

Registros relacionados