Hermeneutics and Constitutional Mutation: Differences Between Constitutional Mutation (Verfassungswandlung) and Formal Amendment of the Constitutional (Verfassungsänderung)- Positioning of the Debate about Art. 52, X CF/98.
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Eletrônica da Faculdade de Direito de Franca |
Texto Completo: | http://www.revista.direitofranca.br/index.php/refdf/article/view/162 |
Resumo: | The neo-constitutionalist movement is born in a breeding ground of post-World War II to ensure the fundamental rights and limit the Governor’s powers. On these grounds, Brazil issued in 1988, a guarantor and compromised Federal Constitution. In order to have the constitutional "pre-commitments" guaranteed against the social clamor, the Constitution provides “self-restraint” mechanisms, among them, the system of checks and balances. In this constitutionally established system is contained the function of Senate to give efficacy "erga omnes" to the final decisions of the Supreme Court, in the seat of diffuse control of constitutionality. The object of this study is unfolded before this scenario, and starts off with the analysis and differentiation of the institutes of formal amendment of the Constitution and constitutional mutation. To obtain the result, the Heideggerian phenomenological-hermeneutic "method" was used. Thus, this research does not develop a result with absolute truths, but rather, just another view on the topic. With the results, the impossibility of an express constitutional mutation of the item X from article 52 of the Constitution, required in the votes of some ministers in the Constitutional Complaint 4335-5/AC is verified. Keywords: Constitutional Law, Hermeneutics, Constitutional mutation, Formal amendment of the Constitution |
id |
FDF-0_c5e8a90c4caf4387b1394cffa8631d20 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/162 |
network_acronym_str |
FDF-0 |
network_name_str |
Revista Eletrônica da Faculdade de Direito de Franca |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Hermeneutics and Constitutional Mutation: Differences Between Constitutional Mutation (Verfassungswandlung) and Formal Amendment of the Constitutional (Verfassungsänderung)- Positioning of the Debate about Art. 52, X CF/98.HERMENÊUTICA E MUTAÇÃO CONSTITUCIONAL: diferenças entre mutação constitucional (Verfassungswandlung) e alteração formal da Constituição (Verfassungsänderung) – posicionamento do debate acerca do art. 52, X da CF/98Direito Constitucional. Hermenêutica. Mutação Constitucional. Alteração Formal da ConstituiçãoThe neo-constitutionalist movement is born in a breeding ground of post-World War II to ensure the fundamental rights and limit the Governor’s powers. On these grounds, Brazil issued in 1988, a guarantor and compromised Federal Constitution. In order to have the constitutional "pre-commitments" guaranteed against the social clamor, the Constitution provides “self-restraint” mechanisms, among them, the system of checks and balances. In this constitutionally established system is contained the function of Senate to give efficacy "erga omnes" to the final decisions of the Supreme Court, in the seat of diffuse control of constitutionality. The object of this study is unfolded before this scenario, and starts off with the analysis and differentiation of the institutes of formal amendment of the Constitution and constitutional mutation. To obtain the result, the Heideggerian phenomenological-hermeneutic "method" was used. Thus, this research does not develop a result with absolute truths, but rather, just another view on the topic. With the results, the impossibility of an express constitutional mutation of the item X from article 52 of the Constitution, required in the votes of some ministers in the Constitutional Complaint 4335-5/AC is verified. Keywords: Constitutional Law, Hermeneutics, Constitutional mutation, Formal amendment of the ConstitutionO movimento neoconstitucionalista nasce em um terreno fértil do Pós-Segunda Guerra Mundial para garantir os direitos fundamentais e limitar os poderes dos governantes. Sobre esses fundamentos, o Brasil editou, em 1988, uma Constituição Federal garantidora e compromissória. Para que os “pré-compromissos” constitucionais fossem garantidos em face aos clamores sociais, a Constituição prevê mecanismos de “auto-restrição”, dentre eles, o sistema de freios e contrapesos (Check and Balance). Nesse sistema constitucionalmente estabelecido, está contida a função do Senado em dar eficácia “erga omnes” às decisões definitivas do Supremo Tribunal Federal, em sede de controle difuso de constitucionalidade. O objeto de estudo se descortina diante desse cenário, e parte para a análise e diferenciação dos institutos da alteração formal da Constituição e da mutação constitucional. Para a obtenção do resultado, utilizou-se o “método” fenomenológico-hermenêutico de cariz heideggeriano. Dessa forma, não se desenvolve nessa pesquisa, um resultado com verdades absolutas, e sim, apenas outro olhar sobre o tema. De posse dos resultados, verifica-se a impossibilidade de haver uma expressa mutação constitucional do art.52 X da Constituição Federal, pretendida nos votos de alguns ministros na Reclamação Constitucional 4335-5/AC.Faculdade de Direito de Franca2012-03-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionavaliado por paresapplication/pdfhttp://www.revista.direitofranca.br/index.php/refdf/article/view/16210.21207/1983.4225.162Revista Eletrônica da Faculdade de Direito de Franca; v. 5 n. 1 (2012)1983-4225reponame:Revista Eletrônica da Faculdade de Direito de Francainstname:Faculdade de Direito de Franca (FDF)instacron:FDFporhttp://www.revista.direitofranca.br/index.php/refdf/article/view/162/105Ferreira, Gabriela Vidottiinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-01-10T13:52:47Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/162Revistahttps://www.revista.direitofranca.br/index.php/refdfPUBhttp://www.revista.direitofranca.br/index.php/refdf/oai||drcildo@direitofranca.br1983-42251983-4225opendoar:2023-01-10T13:52:47Revista Eletrônica da Faculdade de Direito de Franca - Faculdade de Direito de Franca (FDF)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Hermeneutics and Constitutional Mutation: Differences Between Constitutional Mutation (Verfassungswandlung) and Formal Amendment of the Constitutional (Verfassungsänderung)- Positioning of the Debate about Art. 52, X CF/98. HERMENÊUTICA E MUTAÇÃO CONSTITUCIONAL: diferenças entre mutação constitucional (Verfassungswandlung) e alteração formal da Constituição (Verfassungsänderung) – posicionamento do debate acerca do art. 52, X da CF/98 |
title |
Hermeneutics and Constitutional Mutation: Differences Between Constitutional Mutation (Verfassungswandlung) and Formal Amendment of the Constitutional (Verfassungsänderung)- Positioning of the Debate about Art. 52, X CF/98. |
spellingShingle |
Hermeneutics and Constitutional Mutation: Differences Between Constitutional Mutation (Verfassungswandlung) and Formal Amendment of the Constitutional (Verfassungsänderung)- Positioning of the Debate about Art. 52, X CF/98. Ferreira, Gabriela Vidotti Direito Constitucional. Hermenêutica. Mutação Constitucional. Alteração Formal da Constituição |
title_short |
Hermeneutics and Constitutional Mutation: Differences Between Constitutional Mutation (Verfassungswandlung) and Formal Amendment of the Constitutional (Verfassungsänderung)- Positioning of the Debate about Art. 52, X CF/98. |
title_full |
Hermeneutics and Constitutional Mutation: Differences Between Constitutional Mutation (Verfassungswandlung) and Formal Amendment of the Constitutional (Verfassungsänderung)- Positioning of the Debate about Art. 52, X CF/98. |
title_fullStr |
Hermeneutics and Constitutional Mutation: Differences Between Constitutional Mutation (Verfassungswandlung) and Formal Amendment of the Constitutional (Verfassungsänderung)- Positioning of the Debate about Art. 52, X CF/98. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Hermeneutics and Constitutional Mutation: Differences Between Constitutional Mutation (Verfassungswandlung) and Formal Amendment of the Constitutional (Verfassungsänderung)- Positioning of the Debate about Art. 52, X CF/98. |
title_sort |
Hermeneutics and Constitutional Mutation: Differences Between Constitutional Mutation (Verfassungswandlung) and Formal Amendment of the Constitutional (Verfassungsänderung)- Positioning of the Debate about Art. 52, X CF/98. |
author |
Ferreira, Gabriela Vidotti |
author_facet |
Ferreira, Gabriela Vidotti |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ferreira, Gabriela Vidotti |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Direito Constitucional. Hermenêutica. Mutação Constitucional. Alteração Formal da Constituição |
topic |
Direito Constitucional. Hermenêutica. Mutação Constitucional. Alteração Formal da Constituição |
description |
The neo-constitutionalist movement is born in a breeding ground of post-World War II to ensure the fundamental rights and limit the Governor’s powers. On these grounds, Brazil issued in 1988, a guarantor and compromised Federal Constitution. In order to have the constitutional "pre-commitments" guaranteed against the social clamor, the Constitution provides “self-restraint” mechanisms, among them, the system of checks and balances. In this constitutionally established system is contained the function of Senate to give efficacy "erga omnes" to the final decisions of the Supreme Court, in the seat of diffuse control of constitutionality. The object of this study is unfolded before this scenario, and starts off with the analysis and differentiation of the institutes of formal amendment of the Constitution and constitutional mutation. To obtain the result, the Heideggerian phenomenological-hermeneutic "method" was used. Thus, this research does not develop a result with absolute truths, but rather, just another view on the topic. With the results, the impossibility of an express constitutional mutation of the item X from article 52 of the Constitution, required in the votes of some ministers in the Constitutional Complaint 4335-5/AC is verified. Keywords: Constitutional Law, Hermeneutics, Constitutional mutation, Formal amendment of the Constitution |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-03-11 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion avaliado por pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.revista.direitofranca.br/index.php/refdf/article/view/162 10.21207/1983.4225.162 |
url |
http://www.revista.direitofranca.br/index.php/refdf/article/view/162 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.21207/1983.4225.162 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.revista.direitofranca.br/index.php/refdf/article/view/162/105 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Direito de Franca |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Direito de Franca |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Eletrônica da Faculdade de Direito de Franca; v. 5 n. 1 (2012) 1983-4225 reponame:Revista Eletrônica da Faculdade de Direito de Franca instname:Faculdade de Direito de Franca (FDF) instacron:FDF |
instname_str |
Faculdade de Direito de Franca (FDF) |
instacron_str |
FDF |
institution |
FDF |
reponame_str |
Revista Eletrônica da Faculdade de Direito de Franca |
collection |
Revista Eletrônica da Faculdade de Direito de Franca |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Eletrônica da Faculdade de Direito de Franca - Faculdade de Direito de Franca (FDF) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||drcildo@direitofranca.br |
_version_ |
1754644628366163968 |