Differences and Similarities among Sampling Methods in Top of Mind Research: a Comparative Study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Arantes, Elaine Cristina
Data de Publicação: 2007
Outros Autores: Silva, Wesley Vieira da, Kato, Heitor Takashi
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online)
Texto Completo: https://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/67
Resumo: Considering the major importance that a brand represents in the marketing  strategy of organizations, several firms try to use branding as a competitive differential, looking to be perceived and remembered by the consumer as a factor of influence at the moment of the purchase of the product. Business firms aim to have a brand in the top of mind position. This paper has the objective of comparing three top of mind researches done in Brazil between August of 2003 and March of 2004, aiming to investigate the existence of a pattern in the choice of the sampling methods of the researches in focus, since the sample reveals the characteristics of the public who remembers more the company’s or the competitor’s brand, information taken in consideration in the marketing strategy of the organizations that appeal to this type of research. The analyzed surveys have been carried through by the Datafolha Institute of Research, the Mapa Institute and the Federal University of the Paraná / Consultoria Jr. Results show that there is not a pattern in the choice of the sampling methods adopted by the researches analyzed in this study, which can be explained by the many variables involved in the choice of the sampling technique. Key-words: Top of mind. Research methods. Sampling.
id FECAP-3_92ebe4f2a838c9fc5581d6b91d53fcbc
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/67
network_acronym_str FECAP-3
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Differences and Similarities among Sampling Methods in Top of Mind Research: a Comparative StudyDiferencias y Similitudes en los Métodos de Muestreo de Investigaciones Top of Mind: un estudio comparativoDiferenças e Semelhanças nos Métodos de Amostragem de Pesquisas Top of Mind: um estudo comparativoTop of mind. Research methods. Sampling.Top of mind. Metodología de investigación. Muestreo.Top of mind. Metodologia de pesquisa. Amostragem.Considering the major importance that a brand represents in the marketing  strategy of organizations, several firms try to use branding as a competitive differential, looking to be perceived and remembered by the consumer as a factor of influence at the moment of the purchase of the product. Business firms aim to have a brand in the top of mind position. This paper has the objective of comparing three top of mind researches done in Brazil between August of 2003 and March of 2004, aiming to investigate the existence of a pattern in the choice of the sampling methods of the researches in focus, since the sample reveals the characteristics of the public who remembers more the company’s or the competitor’s brand, information taken in consideration in the marketing strategy of the organizations that appeal to this type of research. The analyzed surveys have been carried through by the Datafolha Institute of Research, the Mapa Institute and the Federal University of the Paraná / Consultoria Jr. Results show that there is not a pattern in the choice of the sampling methods adopted by the researches analyzed in this study, which can be explained by the many variables involved in the choice of the sampling technique. Key-words: Top of mind. Research methods. Sampling.Considerando la gran importancia que la marca representa en la estrategia de marketing de las organizaciones, muchas de ellas buscan utilizar la marca como un diferencial competitivo, para que el consumidor la perciba y recuerde y se torne un factor de influencia en el momento de la compra del producto. toda empresa desea ser una marca top of mind. En este contexto, el presente artículo se propone establecer una comparación entre tres investigaciones top of mind realizadas en Brasil entre agosto de 2003 y marzo de 2004, con el propósito de investigar la existencia de un estándar en la elección del método de muestreo en las investigaciones enfocadas, pues la muestra revela las características del público que mejor recuerda la marca de la empresa o del competidor, información que se tiene en cuenta en la estrategia de marketing de las organizaciones que utilizan este tipo de investigación. El análisis de los datos recolectados estuvo a cargo de: Datafolha Instituto de Pesquisas, Instituto Mapa y Universidad Federal de Paraná/Consultoría Jr. Los resultados muestran que no hay un estándar entre los métodos de muestreo adoptados por las investigaciones enfocadas, que puede explicarse por las diversas variables que intervienen en la elección de la técnica de muestreo.Palabras clave: Top of mind. Metodología de investigación. Muestreo.Considerando a grande importância que a marca representa na estratégia de marketing das organizações, muitas delas buscam utilizar a marca como um diferencial competitivo, para que sejam percebidas e lembradas pelo consumidor e se tornem um fator de influência no momento da compra do produto. Ser uma marca top of mind é uma posição desejada pelas empresas em geral. Neste contexto, o presente artigo tem como objetivo fazer um comparativo de três pesquisas top of mind realizadas no Brasil entre agosto de 2003 e março de 2004, visando a investigar a existência de um padrão na escolha do método de amostragem nas pesquisas em foco, uma vez que a amostra revela as características do público que mais se lembra da marca da empresa ou do concorrente, informação levada em consideração na estratégia de marketing das organizações que recorrem a este tipo de pesquisa. Os levantamentos analisados foram realizados pelo Datafolha Instituto de Pesquisas, pelo Instituto Mapa e pela Universidade Federal do Paraná/Consultoria Jr. Os resultados mostram que não há um padrão entre os métodos de amostragem adotados pelas pesquisas em foco, o que pode ser explicado em função das diversas variáveis que envolvem a escolha da técnica de amostragem. Palavras-chave: Top of mind. Metodologia de pesquisa. Amostragem.FECAP2007-07-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por paresapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/6710.7819/rbgn.v8i22.67Review of Business Management; Vol. 8 No. 22 (2006); 37-45RBGN Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios; Vol. 8 Núm. 22 (2006); 37-45RBGN - Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios; v. 8 n. 22 (2006); 37-451983-08071806-4892reponame:Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online)instname:Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado (FECAP)instacron:FECAPporenghttps://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/67/61https://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/67/248Copyright (c) 2014 Review of Business Managementinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessArantes, Elaine CristinaSilva, Wesley Vieira daKato, Heitor Takashi2008-12-10T15:11:45Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/67Revistahttp://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/indexhttps://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/oai||jmauricio@fecap.br1983-08071806-4892opendoar:2008-12-10T15:11:45Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online) - Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado (FECAP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Differences and Similarities among Sampling Methods in Top of Mind Research: a Comparative Study
Diferencias y Similitudes en los Métodos de Muestreo de Investigaciones Top of Mind: un estudio comparativo
Diferenças e Semelhanças nos Métodos de Amostragem de Pesquisas Top of Mind: um estudo comparativo
title Differences and Similarities among Sampling Methods in Top of Mind Research: a Comparative Study
spellingShingle Differences and Similarities among Sampling Methods in Top of Mind Research: a Comparative Study
Arantes, Elaine Cristina
Top of mind. Research methods. Sampling.
Top of mind. Metodología de investigación. Muestreo.
Top of mind. Metodologia de pesquisa. Amostragem.
title_short Differences and Similarities among Sampling Methods in Top of Mind Research: a Comparative Study
title_full Differences and Similarities among Sampling Methods in Top of Mind Research: a Comparative Study
title_fullStr Differences and Similarities among Sampling Methods in Top of Mind Research: a Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Differences and Similarities among Sampling Methods in Top of Mind Research: a Comparative Study
title_sort Differences and Similarities among Sampling Methods in Top of Mind Research: a Comparative Study
author Arantes, Elaine Cristina
author_facet Arantes, Elaine Cristina
Silva, Wesley Vieira da
Kato, Heitor Takashi
author_role author
author2 Silva, Wesley Vieira da
Kato, Heitor Takashi
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Arantes, Elaine Cristina
Silva, Wesley Vieira da
Kato, Heitor Takashi
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Top of mind. Research methods. Sampling.
Top of mind. Metodología de investigación. Muestreo.
Top of mind. Metodologia de pesquisa. Amostragem.
topic Top of mind. Research methods. Sampling.
Top of mind. Metodología de investigación. Muestreo.
Top of mind. Metodologia de pesquisa. Amostragem.
description Considering the major importance that a brand represents in the marketing  strategy of organizations, several firms try to use branding as a competitive differential, looking to be perceived and remembered by the consumer as a factor of influence at the moment of the purchase of the product. Business firms aim to have a brand in the top of mind position. This paper has the objective of comparing three top of mind researches done in Brazil between August of 2003 and March of 2004, aiming to investigate the existence of a pattern in the choice of the sampling methods of the researches in focus, since the sample reveals the characteristics of the public who remembers more the company’s or the competitor’s brand, information taken in consideration in the marketing strategy of the organizations that appeal to this type of research. The analyzed surveys have been carried through by the Datafolha Institute of Research, the Mapa Institute and the Federal University of the Paraná / Consultoria Jr. Results show that there is not a pattern in the choice of the sampling methods adopted by the researches analyzed in this study, which can be explained by the many variables involved in the choice of the sampling technique. Key-words: Top of mind. Research methods. Sampling.
publishDate 2007
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2007-07-23
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/67
10.7819/rbgn.v8i22.67
url https://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/67
identifier_str_mv 10.7819/rbgn.v8i22.67
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/67/61
https://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/67/248
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2014 Review of Business Management
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2014 Review of Business Management
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv FECAP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv FECAP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Review of Business Management; Vol. 8 No. 22 (2006); 37-45
RBGN Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios; Vol. 8 Núm. 22 (2006); 37-45
RBGN - Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios; v. 8 n. 22 (2006); 37-45
1983-0807
1806-4892
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online)
instname:Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado (FECAP)
instacron:FECAP
instname_str Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado (FECAP)
instacron_str FECAP
institution FECAP
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online) - Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado (FECAP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jmauricio@fecap.br
_version_ 1798942366609965056