Differences and Similarities among Sampling Methods in Top of Mind Research: a Comparative Study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2007 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/67 |
Resumo: | Considering the major importance that a brand represents in the marketing strategy of organizations, several firms try to use branding as a competitive differential, looking to be perceived and remembered by the consumer as a factor of influence at the moment of the purchase of the product. Business firms aim to have a brand in the top of mind position. This paper has the objective of comparing three top of mind researches done in Brazil between August of 2003 and March of 2004, aiming to investigate the existence of a pattern in the choice of the sampling methods of the researches in focus, since the sample reveals the characteristics of the public who remembers more the company’s or the competitor’s brand, information taken in consideration in the marketing strategy of the organizations that appeal to this type of research. The analyzed surveys have been carried through by the Datafolha Institute of Research, the Mapa Institute and the Federal University of the Paraná / Consultoria Jr. Results show that there is not a pattern in the choice of the sampling methods adopted by the researches analyzed in this study, which can be explained by the many variables involved in the choice of the sampling technique. Key-words: Top of mind. Research methods. Sampling. |
id |
FECAP-3_92ebe4f2a838c9fc5581d6b91d53fcbc |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/67 |
network_acronym_str |
FECAP-3 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Differences and Similarities among Sampling Methods in Top of Mind Research: a Comparative StudyDiferencias y Similitudes en los Métodos de Muestreo de Investigaciones Top of Mind: un estudio comparativoDiferenças e Semelhanças nos Métodos de Amostragem de Pesquisas Top of Mind: um estudo comparativoTop of mind. Research methods. Sampling.Top of mind. Metodología de investigación. Muestreo.Top of mind. Metodologia de pesquisa. Amostragem.Considering the major importance that a brand represents in the marketing strategy of organizations, several firms try to use branding as a competitive differential, looking to be perceived and remembered by the consumer as a factor of influence at the moment of the purchase of the product. Business firms aim to have a brand in the top of mind position. This paper has the objective of comparing three top of mind researches done in Brazil between August of 2003 and March of 2004, aiming to investigate the existence of a pattern in the choice of the sampling methods of the researches in focus, since the sample reveals the characteristics of the public who remembers more the company’s or the competitor’s brand, information taken in consideration in the marketing strategy of the organizations that appeal to this type of research. The analyzed surveys have been carried through by the Datafolha Institute of Research, the Mapa Institute and the Federal University of the Paraná / Consultoria Jr. Results show that there is not a pattern in the choice of the sampling methods adopted by the researches analyzed in this study, which can be explained by the many variables involved in the choice of the sampling technique. Key-words: Top of mind. Research methods. Sampling.Considerando la gran importancia que la marca representa en la estrategia de marketing de las organizaciones, muchas de ellas buscan utilizar la marca como un diferencial competitivo, para que el consumidor la perciba y recuerde y se torne un factor de influencia en el momento de la compra del producto. toda empresa desea ser una marca top of mind. En este contexto, el presente artículo se propone establecer una comparación entre tres investigaciones top of mind realizadas en Brasil entre agosto de 2003 y marzo de 2004, con el propósito de investigar la existencia de un estándar en la elección del método de muestreo en las investigaciones enfocadas, pues la muestra revela las características del público que mejor recuerda la marca de la empresa o del competidor, información que se tiene en cuenta en la estrategia de marketing de las organizaciones que utilizan este tipo de investigación. El análisis de los datos recolectados estuvo a cargo de: Datafolha Instituto de Pesquisas, Instituto Mapa y Universidad Federal de Paraná/Consultoría Jr. Los resultados muestran que no hay un estándar entre los métodos de muestreo adoptados por las investigaciones enfocadas, que puede explicarse por las diversas variables que intervienen en la elección de la técnica de muestreo.Palabras clave: Top of mind. Metodología de investigación. Muestreo.Considerando a grande importância que a marca representa na estratégia de marketing das organizações, muitas delas buscam utilizar a marca como um diferencial competitivo, para que sejam percebidas e lembradas pelo consumidor e se tornem um fator de influência no momento da compra do produto. Ser uma marca top of mind é uma posição desejada pelas empresas em geral. Neste contexto, o presente artigo tem como objetivo fazer um comparativo de três pesquisas top of mind realizadas no Brasil entre agosto de 2003 e março de 2004, visando a investigar a existência de um padrão na escolha do método de amostragem nas pesquisas em foco, uma vez que a amostra revela as características do público que mais se lembra da marca da empresa ou do concorrente, informação levada em consideração na estratégia de marketing das organizações que recorrem a este tipo de pesquisa. Os levantamentos analisados foram realizados pelo Datafolha Instituto de Pesquisas, pelo Instituto Mapa e pela Universidade Federal do Paraná/Consultoria Jr. Os resultados mostram que não há um padrão entre os métodos de amostragem adotados pelas pesquisas em foco, o que pode ser explicado em função das diversas variáveis que envolvem a escolha da técnica de amostragem. Palavras-chave: Top of mind. Metodologia de pesquisa. Amostragem.FECAP2007-07-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por paresapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/6710.7819/rbgn.v8i22.67Review of Business Management; Vol. 8 No. 22 (2006); 37-45RBGN Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios; Vol. 8 Núm. 22 (2006); 37-45RBGN - Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios; v. 8 n. 22 (2006); 37-451983-08071806-4892reponame:Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online)instname:Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado (FECAP)instacron:FECAPporenghttps://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/67/61https://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/67/248Copyright (c) 2014 Review of Business Managementinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessArantes, Elaine CristinaSilva, Wesley Vieira daKato, Heitor Takashi2008-12-10T15:11:45Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/67Revistahttp://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/indexhttps://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/oai||jmauricio@fecap.br1983-08071806-4892opendoar:2008-12-10T15:11:45Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online) - Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado (FECAP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Differences and Similarities among Sampling Methods in Top of Mind Research: a Comparative Study Diferencias y Similitudes en los Métodos de Muestreo de Investigaciones Top of Mind: un estudio comparativo Diferenças e Semelhanças nos Métodos de Amostragem de Pesquisas Top of Mind: um estudo comparativo |
title |
Differences and Similarities among Sampling Methods in Top of Mind Research: a Comparative Study |
spellingShingle |
Differences and Similarities among Sampling Methods in Top of Mind Research: a Comparative Study Arantes, Elaine Cristina Top of mind. Research methods. Sampling. Top of mind. Metodología de investigación. Muestreo. Top of mind. Metodologia de pesquisa. Amostragem. |
title_short |
Differences and Similarities among Sampling Methods in Top of Mind Research: a Comparative Study |
title_full |
Differences and Similarities among Sampling Methods in Top of Mind Research: a Comparative Study |
title_fullStr |
Differences and Similarities among Sampling Methods in Top of Mind Research: a Comparative Study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Differences and Similarities among Sampling Methods in Top of Mind Research: a Comparative Study |
title_sort |
Differences and Similarities among Sampling Methods in Top of Mind Research: a Comparative Study |
author |
Arantes, Elaine Cristina |
author_facet |
Arantes, Elaine Cristina Silva, Wesley Vieira da Kato, Heitor Takashi |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva, Wesley Vieira da Kato, Heitor Takashi |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Arantes, Elaine Cristina Silva, Wesley Vieira da Kato, Heitor Takashi |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Top of mind. Research methods. Sampling. Top of mind. Metodología de investigación. Muestreo. Top of mind. Metodologia de pesquisa. Amostragem. |
topic |
Top of mind. Research methods. Sampling. Top of mind. Metodología de investigación. Muestreo. Top of mind. Metodologia de pesquisa. Amostragem. |
description |
Considering the major importance that a brand represents in the marketing strategy of organizations, several firms try to use branding as a competitive differential, looking to be perceived and remembered by the consumer as a factor of influence at the moment of the purchase of the product. Business firms aim to have a brand in the top of mind position. This paper has the objective of comparing three top of mind researches done in Brazil between August of 2003 and March of 2004, aiming to investigate the existence of a pattern in the choice of the sampling methods of the researches in focus, since the sample reveals the characteristics of the public who remembers more the company’s or the competitor’s brand, information taken in consideration in the marketing strategy of the organizations that appeal to this type of research. The analyzed surveys have been carried through by the Datafolha Institute of Research, the Mapa Institute and the Federal University of the Paraná / Consultoria Jr. Results show that there is not a pattern in the choice of the sampling methods adopted by the researches analyzed in this study, which can be explained by the many variables involved in the choice of the sampling technique. Key-words: Top of mind. Research methods. Sampling. |
publishDate |
2007 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2007-07-23 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado por pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/67 10.7819/rbgn.v8i22.67 |
url |
https://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/67 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.7819/rbgn.v8i22.67 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/67/61 https://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/67/248 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2014 Review of Business Management info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2014 Review of Business Management |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
FECAP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
FECAP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Review of Business Management; Vol. 8 No. 22 (2006); 37-45 RBGN Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios; Vol. 8 Núm. 22 (2006); 37-45 RBGN - Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios; v. 8 n. 22 (2006); 37-45 1983-0807 1806-4892 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online) instname:Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado (FECAP) instacron:FECAP |
instname_str |
Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado (FECAP) |
instacron_str |
FECAP |
institution |
FECAP |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online) - Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado (FECAP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||jmauricio@fecap.br |
_version_ |
1798942366609965056 |