Non-financial reports, anti-corruption performance and corporate reputation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Aldaz, Maider
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Alvarez, Igor, Calvo, José Antonio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
spa
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online)
Texto Completo: https://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/2687
Resumo: Objective – This paper analyzes whether the anti-corruption reporting practices of the companies are a reflection of adequate anti-corruption systems put in place by companies, or whether the disclosure is merely a tool for companies to improve their reputation and thus maintain their legitimacy. Design/methodology/approach – We apply the PLS method to the collected data in a content analysis of the sustainability reports of 31 companies within the Ibex 35 in December 2008. Theoretical foundation – In the analysis, we use both the legitimacy theory and the stakeholder theory, because we consider them as complementary theories and consistent with our approach. Findings – The results show that regarding the corruption issue there is a negative relationship between disclosure and performance, that is, companies with poor performance disclose more. On the other hand, the results reflect the existence of a positive relationship between disclosure and reputation, i.e. report information to interested parties enhances the perception of stakeholders about the company. This finding could be justified by the above two theories. However, we can’t conclude that companies with good performance disclose information to key stakeholders in order to strengthen relations, as stated by the stakeholder theory.Practical implications – this study provides evidence of how companies use non-financial reporting-specifically anti-corruption data- to improve corporate reputation. It is also noted that reporting practices not necessarily have to be in accordance with the actual anti-corruption practices of firms.
id FECAP-3_b58b14d52b6e2882199b8d805d2669a2
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/2687
network_acronym_str FECAP-3
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Non-financial reports, anti-corruption performance and corporate reputationInformes no financieros, desempeño anticorrupción y reputación corporativaRelatórios financeiros, desempenho anticorrupção e reputação corporativaCorporate social responsibility (CSR)anti-corruptionreportingperformancereputation.Responsabilidad social corporativa (RSC)anticorrupcióndivulgacióndesempeñoreputación.Responsabilidad social corporativa (RSC)anticorrupcióndivulgacióndesempeñoreputación.Objective – This paper analyzes whether the anti-corruption reporting practices of the companies are a reflection of adequate anti-corruption systems put in place by companies, or whether the disclosure is merely a tool for companies to improve their reputation and thus maintain their legitimacy. Design/methodology/approach – We apply the PLS method to the collected data in a content analysis of the sustainability reports of 31 companies within the Ibex 35 in December 2008. Theoretical foundation – In the analysis, we use both the legitimacy theory and the stakeholder theory, because we consider them as complementary theories and consistent with our approach. Findings – The results show that regarding the corruption issue there is a negative relationship between disclosure and performance, that is, companies with poor performance disclose more. On the other hand, the results reflect the existence of a positive relationship between disclosure and reputation, i.e. report information to interested parties enhances the perception of stakeholders about the company. This finding could be justified by the above two theories. However, we can’t conclude that companies with good performance disclose information to key stakeholders in order to strengthen relations, as stated by the stakeholder theory.Practical implications – this study provides evidence of how companies use non-financial reporting-specifically anti-corruption data- to improve corporate reputation. It is also noted that reporting practices not necessarily have to be in accordance with the actual anti-corruption practices of firms.Objetivo – El presente trabajo analiza si la revelación de informaciónefectuada por las compañías con relación a sus prácticas anticorrupciónes el reflejo de la instauración dentro de las compañías de sistemasanticorrupción adecuados o si se trata de un mero instrumento paraque las empresas mejoren su reputación y mantengan así su legitimidad.Método – Hemos analizado las memorias de sostenibilidad de 31empresas pertenecientes al Ibex 35 en diciembre de 2008, aplicandosobre los datos obtenidos la técnica PLS.Fundamentación teórica – En nuestro análisis utilizamos tantola teoría de la legitimidad como la teoría de los stakeholders porconsiderarlas complementarias y acordes con nuestro planteamiento.Resultados – Los resultados reflejan que en el tema de la corrupciónexiste una relación negativa entre divulgación y desempeño, es decir,que las compañías con peor desempeño divulgan más información.Por otro lado, reflejan la existencia de una relación positiva entredivulgación y reputación, es decir, ofrecer información a los stakeholdersmejora la percepción de éstas sobre la compañía, aspecto que podríajustificarse con las dos teorías antes mencionadas. Sin embargo, nonos permiten concluir que aquellas empresas con buen desempeñodivulguen información a sus principales stakeholders con el objetivode estrechar relaciones, tal y como afirma la teoría de los stakeholders.Contribuciones – El presente trabajo aporta evidencia sobre lacapacidad que las compañías tienen en incidir sobre la reputacióncorporativa mediante la utilización de los informes no financieros, sinla necesidad de que lo publicado en tales informes esté acorde a lasprácticas reales de las firmas.Objetivo – El presente trabajo analiza si la revelación de informaciónefectuada por las compañías con relación a sus prácticas anticorrupciónes el reflejo de la instauración dentro de las compañías de sistemasanticorrupción adecuados o si se trata de un mero instrumento paraque las empresas mejoren su reputación y mantengan así su legitimidad.Método – Hemos analizado las memorias de sostenibilidad de 31empresas pertenecientes al Ibex 35 en diciembre de 2008, aplicandosobre los datos obtenidos la técnica PLS.Fundamentación teórica – En nuestro análisis utilizamos tantola teoría de la legitimidad como la teoría de los stakeholders porconsiderarlas complementarias y acordes con nuestro planteamiento.Resultados – Los resultados reflejan que en el tema de la corrupciónexiste una relación negativa entre divulgación y desempeño, es decir,que las compañías con peor desempeño divulgan más información.Por otro lado, reflejan la existencia de una relación positiva entredivulgación y reputación, es decir, ofrecer información a los stakeholdersmejora la percepción de éstas sobre la compañía, aspecto que podríajustificarse con las dos teorías antes mencionadas. Sin embargo, nonos permiten concluir que aquellas empresas con buen desempeñodivulguen información a sus principales stakeholders con el objetivode estrechar relaciones, tal y como afirma la teoría de los stakeholders.Contribuciones – El presente trabajo aporta evidencia sobre lacapacidad que las compañías tienen en incidir sobre la reputacióncorporativa mediante la utilización de los informes no financieros, sinla necesidad de que lo publicado en tales informes esté acorde a lasprácticas reales de las firmas.FECAP2015-12-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por paresapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/268710.7819/rbgn.v17i58.2687Review of Business Management; Vol. 17 No. 58 (2015); 1321-1340RBGN Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios; Vol. 17 Núm. 58 (2015); 1321-1340RBGN - Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios; v. 17 n. 58 (2015); 1321-13401983-08071806-4892reponame:Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online)instname:Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado (FECAP)instacron:FECAPengspahttps://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/2687/pdf_1https://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/2687/pdfCopyright (c) 2015 Review of Business Managementinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAldaz, MaiderAlvarez, IgorCalvo, José Antonio2021-07-21T16:27:20Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/2687Revistahttp://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/indexhttps://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/oai||jmauricio@fecap.br1983-08071806-4892opendoar:2021-07-21T16:27:20Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online) - Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado (FECAP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Non-financial reports, anti-corruption performance and corporate reputation
Informes no financieros, desempeño anticorrupción y reputación corporativa
Relatórios financeiros, desempenho anticorrupção e reputação corporativa
title Non-financial reports, anti-corruption performance and corporate reputation
spellingShingle Non-financial reports, anti-corruption performance and corporate reputation
Aldaz, Maider
Corporate social responsibility (CSR)
anti-corruption
reporting
performance
reputation.
Responsabilidad social corporativa (RSC)
anticorrupción
divulgación
desempeño
reputación.
Responsabilidad social corporativa (RSC)
anticorrupción
divulgación
desempeño
reputación.
title_short Non-financial reports, anti-corruption performance and corporate reputation
title_full Non-financial reports, anti-corruption performance and corporate reputation
title_fullStr Non-financial reports, anti-corruption performance and corporate reputation
title_full_unstemmed Non-financial reports, anti-corruption performance and corporate reputation
title_sort Non-financial reports, anti-corruption performance and corporate reputation
author Aldaz, Maider
author_facet Aldaz, Maider
Alvarez, Igor
Calvo, José Antonio
author_role author
author2 Alvarez, Igor
Calvo, José Antonio
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Aldaz, Maider
Alvarez, Igor
Calvo, José Antonio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Corporate social responsibility (CSR)
anti-corruption
reporting
performance
reputation.
Responsabilidad social corporativa (RSC)
anticorrupción
divulgación
desempeño
reputación.
Responsabilidad social corporativa (RSC)
anticorrupción
divulgación
desempeño
reputación.
topic Corporate social responsibility (CSR)
anti-corruption
reporting
performance
reputation.
Responsabilidad social corporativa (RSC)
anticorrupción
divulgación
desempeño
reputación.
Responsabilidad social corporativa (RSC)
anticorrupción
divulgación
desempeño
reputación.
description Objective – This paper analyzes whether the anti-corruption reporting practices of the companies are a reflection of adequate anti-corruption systems put in place by companies, or whether the disclosure is merely a tool for companies to improve their reputation and thus maintain their legitimacy. Design/methodology/approach – We apply the PLS method to the collected data in a content analysis of the sustainability reports of 31 companies within the Ibex 35 in December 2008. Theoretical foundation – In the analysis, we use both the legitimacy theory and the stakeholder theory, because we consider them as complementary theories and consistent with our approach. Findings – The results show that regarding the corruption issue there is a negative relationship between disclosure and performance, that is, companies with poor performance disclose more. On the other hand, the results reflect the existence of a positive relationship between disclosure and reputation, i.e. report information to interested parties enhances the perception of stakeholders about the company. This finding could be justified by the above two theories. However, we can’t conclude that companies with good performance disclose information to key stakeholders in order to strengthen relations, as stated by the stakeholder theory.Practical implications – this study provides evidence of how companies use non-financial reporting-specifically anti-corruption data- to improve corporate reputation. It is also noted that reporting practices not necessarily have to be in accordance with the actual anti-corruption practices of firms.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-12-21
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/2687
10.7819/rbgn.v17i58.2687
url https://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/2687
identifier_str_mv 10.7819/rbgn.v17i58.2687
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
spa
language eng
spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/2687/pdf_1
https://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/2687/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Review of Business Management
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Review of Business Management
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv FECAP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv FECAP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Review of Business Management; Vol. 17 No. 58 (2015); 1321-1340
RBGN Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios; Vol. 17 Núm. 58 (2015); 1321-1340
RBGN - Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios; v. 17 n. 58 (2015); 1321-1340
1983-0807
1806-4892
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online)
instname:Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado (FECAP)
instacron:FECAP
instname_str Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado (FECAP)
instacron_str FECAP
institution FECAP
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online) - Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado (FECAP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jmauricio@fecap.br
_version_ 1798942368984989696