Non-financial reports, anti-corruption performance and corporate reputation
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng spa |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/2687 |
Resumo: | Objective – This paper analyzes whether the anti-corruption reporting practices of the companies are a reflection of adequate anti-corruption systems put in place by companies, or whether the disclosure is merely a tool for companies to improve their reputation and thus maintain their legitimacy. Design/methodology/approach – We apply the PLS method to the collected data in a content analysis of the sustainability reports of 31 companies within the Ibex 35 in December 2008. Theoretical foundation – In the analysis, we use both the legitimacy theory and the stakeholder theory, because we consider them as complementary theories and consistent with our approach. Findings – The results show that regarding the corruption issue there is a negative relationship between disclosure and performance, that is, companies with poor performance disclose more. On the other hand, the results reflect the existence of a positive relationship between disclosure and reputation, i.e. report information to interested parties enhances the perception of stakeholders about the company. This finding could be justified by the above two theories. However, we can’t conclude that companies with good performance disclose information to key stakeholders in order to strengthen relations, as stated by the stakeholder theory.Practical implications – this study provides evidence of how companies use non-financial reporting-specifically anti-corruption data- to improve corporate reputation. It is also noted that reporting practices not necessarily have to be in accordance with the actual anti-corruption practices of firms. |
id |
FECAP-3_b58b14d52b6e2882199b8d805d2669a2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/2687 |
network_acronym_str |
FECAP-3 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Non-financial reports, anti-corruption performance and corporate reputationInformes no financieros, desempeño anticorrupción y reputación corporativaRelatórios financeiros, desempenho anticorrupção e reputação corporativaCorporate social responsibility (CSR)anti-corruptionreportingperformancereputation.Responsabilidad social corporativa (RSC)anticorrupcióndivulgacióndesempeñoreputación.Responsabilidad social corporativa (RSC)anticorrupcióndivulgacióndesempeñoreputación.Objective – This paper analyzes whether the anti-corruption reporting practices of the companies are a reflection of adequate anti-corruption systems put in place by companies, or whether the disclosure is merely a tool for companies to improve their reputation and thus maintain their legitimacy. Design/methodology/approach – We apply the PLS method to the collected data in a content analysis of the sustainability reports of 31 companies within the Ibex 35 in December 2008. Theoretical foundation – In the analysis, we use both the legitimacy theory and the stakeholder theory, because we consider them as complementary theories and consistent with our approach. Findings – The results show that regarding the corruption issue there is a negative relationship between disclosure and performance, that is, companies with poor performance disclose more. On the other hand, the results reflect the existence of a positive relationship between disclosure and reputation, i.e. report information to interested parties enhances the perception of stakeholders about the company. This finding could be justified by the above two theories. However, we can’t conclude that companies with good performance disclose information to key stakeholders in order to strengthen relations, as stated by the stakeholder theory.Practical implications – this study provides evidence of how companies use non-financial reporting-specifically anti-corruption data- to improve corporate reputation. It is also noted that reporting practices not necessarily have to be in accordance with the actual anti-corruption practices of firms.Objetivo – El presente trabajo analiza si la revelación de informaciónefectuada por las compañías con relación a sus prácticas anticorrupciónes el reflejo de la instauración dentro de las compañías de sistemasanticorrupción adecuados o si se trata de un mero instrumento paraque las empresas mejoren su reputación y mantengan así su legitimidad.Método – Hemos analizado las memorias de sostenibilidad de 31empresas pertenecientes al Ibex 35 en diciembre de 2008, aplicandosobre los datos obtenidos la técnica PLS.Fundamentación teórica – En nuestro análisis utilizamos tantola teoría de la legitimidad como la teoría de los stakeholders porconsiderarlas complementarias y acordes con nuestro planteamiento.Resultados – Los resultados reflejan que en el tema de la corrupciónexiste una relación negativa entre divulgación y desempeño, es decir,que las compañías con peor desempeño divulgan más información.Por otro lado, reflejan la existencia de una relación positiva entredivulgación y reputación, es decir, ofrecer información a los stakeholdersmejora la percepción de éstas sobre la compañía, aspecto que podríajustificarse con las dos teorías antes mencionadas. Sin embargo, nonos permiten concluir que aquellas empresas con buen desempeñodivulguen información a sus principales stakeholders con el objetivode estrechar relaciones, tal y como afirma la teoría de los stakeholders.Contribuciones – El presente trabajo aporta evidencia sobre lacapacidad que las compañías tienen en incidir sobre la reputacióncorporativa mediante la utilización de los informes no financieros, sinla necesidad de que lo publicado en tales informes esté acorde a lasprácticas reales de las firmas.Objetivo – El presente trabajo analiza si la revelación de informaciónefectuada por las compañías con relación a sus prácticas anticorrupciónes el reflejo de la instauración dentro de las compañías de sistemasanticorrupción adecuados o si se trata de un mero instrumento paraque las empresas mejoren su reputación y mantengan así su legitimidad.Método – Hemos analizado las memorias de sostenibilidad de 31empresas pertenecientes al Ibex 35 en diciembre de 2008, aplicandosobre los datos obtenidos la técnica PLS.Fundamentación teórica – En nuestro análisis utilizamos tantola teoría de la legitimidad como la teoría de los stakeholders porconsiderarlas complementarias y acordes con nuestro planteamiento.Resultados – Los resultados reflejan que en el tema de la corrupciónexiste una relación negativa entre divulgación y desempeño, es decir,que las compañías con peor desempeño divulgan más información.Por otro lado, reflejan la existencia de una relación positiva entredivulgación y reputación, es decir, ofrecer información a los stakeholdersmejora la percepción de éstas sobre la compañía, aspecto que podríajustificarse con las dos teorías antes mencionadas. Sin embargo, nonos permiten concluir que aquellas empresas con buen desempeñodivulguen información a sus principales stakeholders con el objetivode estrechar relaciones, tal y como afirma la teoría de los stakeholders.Contribuciones – El presente trabajo aporta evidencia sobre lacapacidad que las compañías tienen en incidir sobre la reputacióncorporativa mediante la utilización de los informes no financieros, sinla necesidad de que lo publicado en tales informes esté acorde a lasprácticas reales de las firmas.FECAP2015-12-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por paresapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/268710.7819/rbgn.v17i58.2687Review of Business Management; Vol. 17 No. 58 (2015); 1321-1340RBGN Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios; Vol. 17 Núm. 58 (2015); 1321-1340RBGN - Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios; v. 17 n. 58 (2015); 1321-13401983-08071806-4892reponame:Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online)instname:Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado (FECAP)instacron:FECAPengspahttps://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/2687/pdf_1https://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/2687/pdfCopyright (c) 2015 Review of Business Managementinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAldaz, MaiderAlvarez, IgorCalvo, José Antonio2021-07-21T16:27:20Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/2687Revistahttp://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/indexhttps://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/oai||jmauricio@fecap.br1983-08071806-4892opendoar:2021-07-21T16:27:20Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online) - Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado (FECAP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Non-financial reports, anti-corruption performance and corporate reputation Informes no financieros, desempeño anticorrupción y reputación corporativa Relatórios financeiros, desempenho anticorrupção e reputação corporativa |
title |
Non-financial reports, anti-corruption performance and corporate reputation |
spellingShingle |
Non-financial reports, anti-corruption performance and corporate reputation Aldaz, Maider Corporate social responsibility (CSR) anti-corruption reporting performance reputation. Responsabilidad social corporativa (RSC) anticorrupción divulgación desempeño reputación. Responsabilidad social corporativa (RSC) anticorrupción divulgación desempeño reputación. |
title_short |
Non-financial reports, anti-corruption performance and corporate reputation |
title_full |
Non-financial reports, anti-corruption performance and corporate reputation |
title_fullStr |
Non-financial reports, anti-corruption performance and corporate reputation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Non-financial reports, anti-corruption performance and corporate reputation |
title_sort |
Non-financial reports, anti-corruption performance and corporate reputation |
author |
Aldaz, Maider |
author_facet |
Aldaz, Maider Alvarez, Igor Calvo, José Antonio |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Alvarez, Igor Calvo, José Antonio |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Aldaz, Maider Alvarez, Igor Calvo, José Antonio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) anti-corruption reporting performance reputation. Responsabilidad social corporativa (RSC) anticorrupción divulgación desempeño reputación. Responsabilidad social corporativa (RSC) anticorrupción divulgación desempeño reputación. |
topic |
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) anti-corruption reporting performance reputation. Responsabilidad social corporativa (RSC) anticorrupción divulgación desempeño reputación. Responsabilidad social corporativa (RSC) anticorrupción divulgación desempeño reputación. |
description |
Objective – This paper analyzes whether the anti-corruption reporting practices of the companies are a reflection of adequate anti-corruption systems put in place by companies, or whether the disclosure is merely a tool for companies to improve their reputation and thus maintain their legitimacy. Design/methodology/approach – We apply the PLS method to the collected data in a content analysis of the sustainability reports of 31 companies within the Ibex 35 in December 2008. Theoretical foundation – In the analysis, we use both the legitimacy theory and the stakeholder theory, because we consider them as complementary theories and consistent with our approach. Findings – The results show that regarding the corruption issue there is a negative relationship between disclosure and performance, that is, companies with poor performance disclose more. On the other hand, the results reflect the existence of a positive relationship between disclosure and reputation, i.e. report information to interested parties enhances the perception of stakeholders about the company. This finding could be justified by the above two theories. However, we can’t conclude that companies with good performance disclose information to key stakeholders in order to strengthen relations, as stated by the stakeholder theory.Practical implications – this study provides evidence of how companies use non-financial reporting-specifically anti-corruption data- to improve corporate reputation. It is also noted that reporting practices not necessarily have to be in accordance with the actual anti-corruption practices of firms. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-12-21 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado por pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/2687 10.7819/rbgn.v17i58.2687 |
url |
https://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/2687 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.7819/rbgn.v17i58.2687 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng spa |
language |
eng spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/2687/pdf_1 https://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/2687/pdf |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Review of Business Management info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Review of Business Management |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
FECAP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
FECAP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Review of Business Management; Vol. 17 No. 58 (2015); 1321-1340 RBGN Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios; Vol. 17 Núm. 58 (2015); 1321-1340 RBGN - Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios; v. 17 n. 58 (2015); 1321-1340 1983-0807 1806-4892 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online) instname:Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado (FECAP) instacron:FECAP |
instname_str |
Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado (FECAP) |
instacron_str |
FECAP |
institution |
FECAP |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online) - Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado (FECAP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||jmauricio@fecap.br |
_version_ |
1798942368984989696 |