A Distinctive Analysis of Case Study, Action Research and Design Science Research
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/2069 |
Resumo: | Objective – This paper aims at analyzing the difference between research methods that are typical in operations management (case study and action research) with design science research. Design/methodology/approach – The paper adopts a theoretical-conceptual methodological approach, based on an extensive literature review. The literature review focused on studies that discuss the use of Case Study, Action Research and Design Science/Design Science Research. Theoretical framework – This paper reveals the foundations of Case Study and Action Research. Due to its recent use as a research method, Design Science Research is presented in greater depth. Findings – Firstly, we present design science and design science research as paradigms and as research methods, respectively, in the field of management. Secondly, we present the difference between Natural Sciences, Social Sciences and Design Science. Thirdly, we carry out comparative analysis of research methods Case Study, Action Research and Design Science Research. Finally, we offer a set of suggestions for future research regarding the use of research methods in management, in general, and in operations management, inparticular. Contributions – The main contributions of this paper focus on reflecting about research methods used in the management field. An important contribution is expanding the repertoire of research methods for understanding and using Design Science Research. The use of this method can contribute to reduce the distance between rigor and relevance, which has been described by several authors. |
id |
FECAP-3_b92d584dac12b0c60e83ddf19865a6a1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/2069 |
network_acronym_str |
FECAP-3 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
A Distinctive Analysis of Case Study, Action Research and Design Science ResearchUn Análisis Distintivo entre Estudio de Caso, Estudio-Acción y Design Science ResearchUma Análise Distintiva entre o Estudo de Caso, A Pesquisa-Ação e a Design Science Researchresearch approachesresearch methodscase studyaction researchdesign science research.abordagem de pesquisamétodos de pesquisaestudo de casopesquisa-açãodesign science researchPesquisa - MetodologiaObjective – This paper aims at analyzing the difference between research methods that are typical in operations management (case study and action research) with design science research. Design/methodology/approach – The paper adopts a theoretical-conceptual methodological approach, based on an extensive literature review. The literature review focused on studies that discuss the use of Case Study, Action Research and Design Science/Design Science Research. Theoretical framework – This paper reveals the foundations of Case Study and Action Research. Due to its recent use as a research method, Design Science Research is presented in greater depth. Findings – Firstly, we present design science and design science research as paradigms and as research methods, respectively, in the field of management. Secondly, we present the difference between Natural Sciences, Social Sciences and Design Science. Thirdly, we carry out comparative analysis of research methods Case Study, Action Research and Design Science Research. Finally, we offer a set of suggestions for future research regarding the use of research methods in management, in general, and in operations management, inparticular. Contributions – The main contributions of this paper focus on reflecting about research methods used in the management field. An important contribution is expanding the repertoire of research methods for understanding and using Design Science Research. The use of this method can contribute to reduce the distance between rigor and relevance, which has been described by several authors.Objetivo – Esse ensaio tem como objetivo analisar a distinção entre métodos de pesquisa típicos na gestão de operações (estudo de caso e pesquisa-ação) com a design science research.Método – O artigo adota uma abordagem metodológica teórico-conceitual, fundamentada em ampla revisão da literatura. A revisão da literatura se concentrou em trabalhos que discutem a utilização do Estudo de Caso, da Pesquisa-Ação e da Design Science/Design Science Research.Fundamentação teórica – Esse ensaio explicita as bases do Estudo de Caso e da Pesquisa-Ação. Em virtude de sua utilização recente como método de pesquisa, a Design Science Research é apresentada em maior profundidade.Resultados – Primeiro, é realizada uma apresentação da design science e da design science research como paradigma e método de pesquisa, respectivamente, no campo da gestão; segundo, a distinção entre as Ciências Naturais, Ciências Sociais e a Design Science; terceiro, uma análise comparativa entre os métodos de pesquisa Estudo de Caso, Pesquisa-Ação e Design Science Research; por fim, um conjunto de sugestões para pesquisas futuras no que tange à utilização de métodos de pesquisa na área de gestão, em geral, e de gestão de operações, em particular.Contribuições – As principais contribuições desse ensaio se concentram na reflexão sobre os métodos de pesquisa utilizados na área de gestão. Uma contribuição importante é a ampliação do repertório de métodos de pesquisa pela compreensão e utilização da design science research. A utilização desse método de pesquisa pode contribuir para a redução do distanciamento entre rigor e relevância que tem sido caracterizado por diversos autores.FECAP2015-11-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por paresapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/206910.7819/rbgn.v17i56.2069Review of Business Management; Vol. 17 No. 56 (2015); 1116-1133RBGN Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios; Vol. 17 Núm. 56 (2015); 1116-1133RBGN - Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios; v. 17 n. 56 (2015); 1116-11331983-08071806-4892reponame:Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online)instname:Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado (FECAP)instacron:FECAPengporhttps://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/2069/pdfhttps://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/2069/pdf_1Copyright (c) 2015 Review of Business Managementinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDresch, AlineLacerda, Daniel PachecoCauchick Miguel, Paulo Augusto2021-07-21T16:28:03Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/2069Revistahttp://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/indexhttps://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/oai||jmauricio@fecap.br1983-08071806-4892opendoar:2021-07-21T16:28:03Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online) - Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado (FECAP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A Distinctive Analysis of Case Study, Action Research and Design Science Research Un Análisis Distintivo entre Estudio de Caso, Estudio-Acción y Design Science Research Uma Análise Distintiva entre o Estudo de Caso, A Pesquisa-Ação e a Design Science Research |
title |
A Distinctive Analysis of Case Study, Action Research and Design Science Research |
spellingShingle |
A Distinctive Analysis of Case Study, Action Research and Design Science Research Dresch, Aline research approaches research methods case study action research design science research. abordagem de pesquisa métodos de pesquisa estudo de caso pesquisa-ação design science research Pesquisa - Metodologia |
title_short |
A Distinctive Analysis of Case Study, Action Research and Design Science Research |
title_full |
A Distinctive Analysis of Case Study, Action Research and Design Science Research |
title_fullStr |
A Distinctive Analysis of Case Study, Action Research and Design Science Research |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Distinctive Analysis of Case Study, Action Research and Design Science Research |
title_sort |
A Distinctive Analysis of Case Study, Action Research and Design Science Research |
author |
Dresch, Aline |
author_facet |
Dresch, Aline Lacerda, Daniel Pacheco Cauchick Miguel, Paulo Augusto |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lacerda, Daniel Pacheco Cauchick Miguel, Paulo Augusto |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Dresch, Aline Lacerda, Daniel Pacheco Cauchick Miguel, Paulo Augusto |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
research approaches research methods case study action research design science research. abordagem de pesquisa métodos de pesquisa estudo de caso pesquisa-ação design science research Pesquisa - Metodologia |
topic |
research approaches research methods case study action research design science research. abordagem de pesquisa métodos de pesquisa estudo de caso pesquisa-ação design science research Pesquisa - Metodologia |
description |
Objective – This paper aims at analyzing the difference between research methods that are typical in operations management (case study and action research) with design science research. Design/methodology/approach – The paper adopts a theoretical-conceptual methodological approach, based on an extensive literature review. The literature review focused on studies that discuss the use of Case Study, Action Research and Design Science/Design Science Research. Theoretical framework – This paper reveals the foundations of Case Study and Action Research. Due to its recent use as a research method, Design Science Research is presented in greater depth. Findings – Firstly, we present design science and design science research as paradigms and as research methods, respectively, in the field of management. Secondly, we present the difference between Natural Sciences, Social Sciences and Design Science. Thirdly, we carry out comparative analysis of research methods Case Study, Action Research and Design Science Research. Finally, we offer a set of suggestions for future research regarding the use of research methods in management, in general, and in operations management, inparticular. Contributions – The main contributions of this paper focus on reflecting about research methods used in the management field. An important contribution is expanding the repertoire of research methods for understanding and using Design Science Research. The use of this method can contribute to reduce the distance between rigor and relevance, which has been described by several authors. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-11-24 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado por pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/2069 10.7819/rbgn.v17i56.2069 |
url |
https://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/2069 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.7819/rbgn.v17i56.2069 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng por |
language |
eng por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/2069/pdf https://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/2069/pdf_1 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Review of Business Management info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Review of Business Management |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
FECAP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
FECAP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Review of Business Management; Vol. 17 No. 56 (2015); 1116-1133 RBGN Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios; Vol. 17 Núm. 56 (2015); 1116-1133 RBGN - Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios; v. 17 n. 56 (2015); 1116-1133 1983-0807 1806-4892 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online) instname:Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado (FECAP) instacron:FECAP |
instname_str |
Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado (FECAP) |
instacron_str |
FECAP |
institution |
FECAP |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online) - Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado (FECAP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||jmauricio@fecap.br |
_version_ |
1798942368890617856 |