Epistemological principles of the social capital theory in the management field
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/25382 |
Resumo: | This article aims to present a paradigmatic classification of the predominant references on the social capital theory in management science from the identification of the underlying epistemological principles. Social scientists have offered a variety of definitions of social capital, in which each one expresses a significant particularity. Underlying this fact, scientists have used epistemological principles in their research, which reflect a worldview that is prior to the concepts they are trying to define. In this article, the epistemological analysis seeks to identify elements of empiricism, rationalism, utilitarianism, positivism, functionalism, systemism and dialectics. We analyse the contributions of Bourdieu, Coleman, Putnam, Fukuyama and Ghoshal on the social capital theory. The analyses are presented considering the area of expertise of the authors, being sociology, political science or management. In general, we conclude that the principles of systemism are prevalent in the concepts of social capital developed by the authors analysed. The approaches of Coleman, Putnam, Fukuyama and Ghoshal can be classified as developed in a functionalist paradigm, while Bourdieu’s approach can be positioned in a critical paradigm. |
id |
FGV-9_2f2d4c8b6f8046407c610a03b8eefe5c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/25382 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-9 |
network_name_str |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Epistemological principles of the social capital theory in the management fieldPrincipios epistemológicos de la teoría del capital social en el área de administraciónPrincípios epistemológicos da teoria do capital social na área da administração This article aims to present a paradigmatic classification of the predominant references on the social capital theory in management science from the identification of the underlying epistemological principles. Social scientists have offered a variety of definitions of social capital, in which each one expresses a significant particularity. Underlying this fact, scientists have used epistemological principles in their research, which reflect a worldview that is prior to the concepts they are trying to define. In this article, the epistemological analysis seeks to identify elements of empiricism, rationalism, utilitarianism, positivism, functionalism, systemism and dialectics. We analyse the contributions of Bourdieu, Coleman, Putnam, Fukuyama and Ghoshal on the social capital theory. The analyses are presented considering the area of expertise of the authors, being sociology, political science or management. In general, we conclude that the principles of systemism are prevalent in the concepts of social capital developed by the authors analysed. The approaches of Coleman, Putnam, Fukuyama and Ghoshal can be classified as developed in a functionalist paradigm, while Bourdieu’s approach can be positioned in a critical paradigm. Este artigo tem o objetivo de apresentar uma classificação paradigmática das referências predominantes sobre a teoria do capital social na ciência da administração a partir da identificação dos princípios epistemológicos subjacentes. Os cientistas sociais têm oferecido uma variedade de definições de capital social, nas quais cada uma expressa uma particularidade significante. Subjacente a esse fato estão os princípios epistemológicos que têm sido utilizados para guiar os investigadores em suas pesquisas, que refletem uma visão de mundo que é anterior aos conceitos que estão tentando definir. Neste artigo, a análise epistemológica é guiada buscando identificar elementos do empirismo, do racionalismo, do utilitarismo, do positivismo, do funcionalismo, do sistemismo e da dialética. São analisadas as contribuições de Bourdieu, Coleman, Putnam, Fukuyama e Ghoshal sobre a teoria do capital social. As análises são apresentadas considerando a área de especialização dos autores, seja a sociologia, a ciência política ou a administração. De maneira geral, pode-se concluir que os princípios do sistemismo são predominantes nas concepções de capital social elaboradas pelos autores analisados. As abordagens de Coleman, Putnam, Fukuyama e Ghoshal podem ser classificadas como desenvolvidas em um paradigma funcionalista, enquanto a abordagem de Bourdieu pode ser posicionada em um paradigma crítico.Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas2015-01-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/25382Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 13 No. 1 (2015); 136 a 164Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 13 Núm. 1 (2015); 136 a 164Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 13 n. 1 (2015); 136 a 1641679-3951reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BRinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/25382/41267Copyright (c) 2015 Cadernos EBAPE.BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde Melo, Paulo Thiago Nunes BezerraRegis, Helder Pontesvan Bellen, Hans Michael2016-10-10T17:38:23Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/25382Revistahttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebapehttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/oaicadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br1679-39511679-3951opendoar:2024-05-13T09:59:52.734476Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Epistemological principles of the social capital theory in the management field Principios epistemológicos de la teoría del capital social en el área de administración Princípios epistemológicos da teoria do capital social na área da administração |
title |
Epistemological principles of the social capital theory in the management field |
spellingShingle |
Epistemological principles of the social capital theory in the management field de Melo, Paulo Thiago Nunes Bezerra |
title_short |
Epistemological principles of the social capital theory in the management field |
title_full |
Epistemological principles of the social capital theory in the management field |
title_fullStr |
Epistemological principles of the social capital theory in the management field |
title_full_unstemmed |
Epistemological principles of the social capital theory in the management field |
title_sort |
Epistemological principles of the social capital theory in the management field |
author |
de Melo, Paulo Thiago Nunes Bezerra |
author_facet |
de Melo, Paulo Thiago Nunes Bezerra Regis, Helder Pontes van Bellen, Hans Michael |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Regis, Helder Pontes van Bellen, Hans Michael |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
de Melo, Paulo Thiago Nunes Bezerra Regis, Helder Pontes van Bellen, Hans Michael |
description |
This article aims to present a paradigmatic classification of the predominant references on the social capital theory in management science from the identification of the underlying epistemological principles. Social scientists have offered a variety of definitions of social capital, in which each one expresses a significant particularity. Underlying this fact, scientists have used epistemological principles in their research, which reflect a worldview that is prior to the concepts they are trying to define. In this article, the epistemological analysis seeks to identify elements of empiricism, rationalism, utilitarianism, positivism, functionalism, systemism and dialectics. We analyse the contributions of Bourdieu, Coleman, Putnam, Fukuyama and Ghoshal on the social capital theory. The analyses are presented considering the area of expertise of the authors, being sociology, political science or management. In general, we conclude that the principles of systemism are prevalent in the concepts of social capital developed by the authors analysed. The approaches of Coleman, Putnam, Fukuyama and Ghoshal can be classified as developed in a functionalist paradigm, while Bourdieu’s approach can be positioned in a critical paradigm. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-01-07 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/25382 |
url |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/25382 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/25382/41267 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Cadernos EBAPE.BR info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 13 No. 1 (2015); 136 a 164 Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 13 Núm. 1 (2015); 136 a 164 Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 13 n. 1 (2015); 136 a 164 1679-3951 reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BR instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
collection |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1798943210069819393 |