Epistemological principles of the social capital theory in the management field

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: de Melo, Paulo Thiago Nunes Bezerra
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Regis, Helder Pontes, van Bellen, Hans Michael
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Cadernos EBAPE.BR
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/25382
Resumo:  This article aims to present a paradigmatic classification of the predominant references on the social capital theory in management science from the identification of the underlying epistemological principles. Social scientists have offered a variety of definitions of social capital, in which each one expresses a significant particularity. Underlying this fact, scientists have used epistemological principles in their research, which reflect a worldview that is prior to the concepts they are trying to define. In this article, the epistemological analysis seeks to identify elements of empiricism, rationalism, utilitarianism, positivism, functionalism, systemism and dialectics. We analyse the contributions of Bourdieu, Coleman, Putnam, Fukuyama and Ghoshal on the social capital theory. The analyses are presented considering the area of expertise of the authors, being sociology, political science or management. In general, we conclude that the principles of systemism are prevalent in the concepts of social capital developed by the authors analysed. The approaches of Coleman, Putnam, Fukuyama and Ghoshal can be classified as developed in a functionalist paradigm, while Bourdieu’s approach can be positioned in a critical paradigm. 
id FGV-9_2f2d4c8b6f8046407c610a03b8eefe5c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/25382
network_acronym_str FGV-9
network_name_str Cadernos EBAPE.BR
repository_id_str
spelling Epistemological principles of the social capital theory in the management fieldPrincipios epistemológicos de la teoría del capital social en el área de administraciónPrincípios epistemológicos da teoria do capital social na área da administração This article aims to present a paradigmatic classification of the predominant references on the social capital theory in management science from the identification of the underlying epistemological principles. Social scientists have offered a variety of definitions of social capital, in which each one expresses a significant particularity. Underlying this fact, scientists have used epistemological principles in their research, which reflect a worldview that is prior to the concepts they are trying to define. In this article, the epistemological analysis seeks to identify elements of empiricism, rationalism, utilitarianism, positivism, functionalism, systemism and dialectics. We analyse the contributions of Bourdieu, Coleman, Putnam, Fukuyama and Ghoshal on the social capital theory. The analyses are presented considering the area of expertise of the authors, being sociology, political science or management. In general, we conclude that the principles of systemism are prevalent in the concepts of social capital developed by the authors analysed. The approaches of Coleman, Putnam, Fukuyama and Ghoshal can be classified as developed in a functionalist paradigm, while Bourdieu’s approach can be positioned in a critical paradigm. Este artigo tem o objetivo de apresentar uma classificação paradigmática das referências predominantes sobre a teoria do capital social na ciência da administração a partir da identificação dos princípios epistemológicos subjacentes. Os cientistas sociais têm oferecido uma variedade de definições de capital social, nas quais cada uma expressa uma particularidade significante. Subjacente a esse fato estão os princípios epistemológicos que têm sido utilizados para guiar os investigadores em suas pesquisas, que refletem uma visão de mundo que é anterior aos conceitos que estão tentando definir. Neste artigo, a análise epistemológica é guiada buscando identificar elementos do empirismo, do racionalismo, do utilitarismo, do positivismo, do funcionalismo, do sistemismo e da dialética. São analisadas as contribuições de Bourdieu, Coleman, Putnam, Fukuyama e Ghoshal sobre a teoria do capital social. As análises são apresentadas considerando a área de especialização dos autores, seja a sociologia, a ciência política ou a administração. De maneira geral, pode-se concluir que os princípios do sistemismo são predominantes nas concepções de capital social elaboradas pelos autores analisados. As abordagens de Coleman, Putnam, Fukuyama e Ghoshal podem ser classificadas como desenvolvidas em um paradigma funcionalista, enquanto a abordagem de Bourdieu pode ser posicionada em um paradigma crítico.Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas2015-01-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/25382Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 13 No. 1 (2015); 136 a 164Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 13 Núm. 1 (2015); 136 a 164Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 13 n. 1 (2015); 136 a 1641679-3951reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BRinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/25382/41267Copyright (c) 2015 Cadernos EBAPE.BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde Melo, Paulo Thiago Nunes BezerraRegis, Helder Pontesvan Bellen, Hans Michael2016-10-10T17:38:23Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/25382Revistahttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebapehttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/oaicadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br1679-39511679-3951opendoar:2024-05-13T09:59:52.734476Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Epistemological principles of the social capital theory in the management field
Principios epistemológicos de la teoría del capital social en el área de administración
Princípios epistemológicos da teoria do capital social na área da administração
title Epistemological principles of the social capital theory in the management field
spellingShingle Epistemological principles of the social capital theory in the management field
de Melo, Paulo Thiago Nunes Bezerra
title_short Epistemological principles of the social capital theory in the management field
title_full Epistemological principles of the social capital theory in the management field
title_fullStr Epistemological principles of the social capital theory in the management field
title_full_unstemmed Epistemological principles of the social capital theory in the management field
title_sort Epistemological principles of the social capital theory in the management field
author de Melo, Paulo Thiago Nunes Bezerra
author_facet de Melo, Paulo Thiago Nunes Bezerra
Regis, Helder Pontes
van Bellen, Hans Michael
author_role author
author2 Regis, Helder Pontes
van Bellen, Hans Michael
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv de Melo, Paulo Thiago Nunes Bezerra
Regis, Helder Pontes
van Bellen, Hans Michael
description  This article aims to present a paradigmatic classification of the predominant references on the social capital theory in management science from the identification of the underlying epistemological principles. Social scientists have offered a variety of definitions of social capital, in which each one expresses a significant particularity. Underlying this fact, scientists have used epistemological principles in their research, which reflect a worldview that is prior to the concepts they are trying to define. In this article, the epistemological analysis seeks to identify elements of empiricism, rationalism, utilitarianism, positivism, functionalism, systemism and dialectics. We analyse the contributions of Bourdieu, Coleman, Putnam, Fukuyama and Ghoshal on the social capital theory. The analyses are presented considering the area of expertise of the authors, being sociology, political science or management. In general, we conclude that the principles of systemism are prevalent in the concepts of social capital developed by the authors analysed. The approaches of Coleman, Putnam, Fukuyama and Ghoshal can be classified as developed in a functionalist paradigm, while Bourdieu’s approach can be positioned in a critical paradigm. 
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-01-07
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/25382
url https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/25382
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/25382/41267
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Cadernos EBAPE.BR
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Cadernos EBAPE.BR
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 13 No. 1 (2015); 136 a 164
Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 13 Núm. 1 (2015); 136 a 164
Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 13 n. 1 (2015); 136 a 164
1679-3951
reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BR
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Cadernos EBAPE.BR
collection Cadernos EBAPE.BR
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br
_version_ 1798943210069819393