Cartography of disputes in the public arena of electoral corruption in Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Moraes, Rubens Lima
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Andion, Carolina, Pinho, Josiani Lúcia
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Cadernos EBAPE.BR
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/54831
Resumo: This article explores the debate in the public arena of electoral corruption in Brazil, from a pragmatic sociology perspective, to map and unfold its main disputes. Through the approach of the Actor-Network Theory (LATOUR, 2007; 2012; 2014), we seek to grasp how the public arena of electoral corruption (re)sets over time and how this public issue is seen, interpreted, and which solutions multiple actors propose. Therefore, we provide a “ballistic” view, i.e. the nonlinear route of a public issue addressed over time (CHATEAURAYNAUD, 2011). This study is based on the methodological approach of the “cartography of disputes” (VENTURINI, 2010; 2012 and VENTURINI, RICCI, MAURI et al., 2015). In addition, we analyze the public arena in three fields: political (through newspaper articles published in Folha de São Paulo), scientific (by searching academic databases), and technical-legal (examining the most significant laws on the subject). The timeframe of the mapping was from 1988, the milestone of the Brazilian democratic opening, and goes until 2014. This allowed identifying the main actors-network, who are spokespersons for the public issue, their statements, the themes of disputes arising in the debate, and the worldviews built over time about the public issue. Thus, we illustrate the setting process (CEFAÏ, 1996) or, the translation process (LATOUR, 2012) that the public issue has gone through, which influences its definition and the ways in which it is interpreted and faced.
id FGV-9_e513cfda6967bbe0d9dbe373e192ca1b
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/54831
network_acronym_str FGV-9
network_name_str Cadernos EBAPE.BR
repository_id_str
spelling Cartography of disputes in the public arena of electoral corruption in BrazilCartografía de las controversias en la arena pública de la corrupción electoral en BrasilCartografia das controvérsias na arena pública da corrupção eleitoral no BrasilPublic arenaCartography of disputesElectoral corruptionArena públicaCartografía de controvérsiasCorrupción electoralArena públicaCartografia das controvérsiasCorrupção eleitoralThis article explores the debate in the public arena of electoral corruption in Brazil, from a pragmatic sociology perspective, to map and unfold its main disputes. Through the approach of the Actor-Network Theory (LATOUR, 2007; 2012; 2014), we seek to grasp how the public arena of electoral corruption (re)sets over time and how this public issue is seen, interpreted, and which solutions multiple actors propose. Therefore, we provide a “ballistic” view, i.e. the nonlinear route of a public issue addressed over time (CHATEAURAYNAUD, 2011). This study is based on the methodological approach of the “cartography of disputes” (VENTURINI, 2010; 2012 and VENTURINI, RICCI, MAURI et al., 2015). In addition, we analyze the public arena in three fields: political (through newspaper articles published in Folha de São Paulo), scientific (by searching academic databases), and technical-legal (examining the most significant laws on the subject). The timeframe of the mapping was from 1988, the milestone of the Brazilian democratic opening, and goes until 2014. This allowed identifying the main actors-network, who are spokespersons for the public issue, their statements, the themes of disputes arising in the debate, and the worldviews built over time about the public issue. Thus, we illustrate the setting process (CEFAÏ, 1996) or, the translation process (LATOUR, 2012) that the public issue has gone through, which influences its definition and the ways in which it is interpreted and faced.Este artículo explora el debate en la arena pública de la corrupción electoral en Brasil, desde la perspectiva de la sociología pragmática, bus­cando identificar sus principales controversias. Utilizando los postulados de la Teoría del Actor-Red (LATOUR, 2007, 2012 y 2014), tratamos de entender cómo el problema público de la corrupción electoral se (re) configura con el tiempo, cómo es interpretado y cómo se proponen soluciones para ello. Se trata de comprender la trayectoria no lineal o la “balística” del problema público (CHATEAURAYNAUD, 2011). Para ello, utilizamos como enfoque metodológico la “cartografía de las controversias” (VENTURINI, 2007, 2009 y 2010), efectuando el análisis de la escena pública en tres campos: político (a través de la encuesta de noticias del diario Folha de São Paulo), científico (mediante la búsqueda en las bases de datos) y técnico-legal (con el examen de las leyes más importantes sobre la materia). El mapeo, que tuvo como punto de partida el año 1988 - marco de la apertura democrática en Brasil - se extendió hasta el año 2014 y permitió identificar los principales “acto­res-red”, voceros del problema público, sus declaraciones, los temas de controversia que surgen en el debate y las visiones de mundo sobre la cuestión de la corrupción electoral. Así, se ilustra el proceso de “configuración” (CEFAÏ, 1996) o incluso de “traducción” (LATOUR, 2012) del problema público, que influye en su definición y en las formas de interpretarlo y enfrentarlo.Este artigo explora o debate na arena pública da corrupção eleitoral no Brasil, sob o prisma da sociologia pragmática, buscando mapear e desdobrar suas principais controvérsias. Adotando os postulados da Teoria do Ator-Rede (LATOUR, 2007; 2012; 2014), buscamos com­preender como a arena pública da corrupção eleitoral se (re) configura ao longo do tempo e como esse problema público é visto, interpre­tado e quais soluções são propostas. Trata-se, portanto, de visualizar a “balística”, ou seja, a trajetória não linear do problema público ao longo do tempo (CHATEAURAYNAUD, 2011). Para tanto, usamos como enfoque metodológico a “cartografia de controvérsias” (VENTURINI, 2010; 2012, VENTURINI, RICCI e MAURI et al., 2015), analisando a arena pública em três campos: político (por meio do levantamento de notícias do jornal Folha de São Paulo), científico (em pesquisa nas bases de dados) e técnico-legal (com o exame das leis mais importantes referentes à matéria). O mapeamento teve como ponto de partida o ano de 1988, marco da abertura democrática no Brasil, e foi feito até 2014, permitindo identificar os principais atores-rede porta-vozes do problema público, suas declarações, os temas das controvérsias que emergem no debate e as visões de mundo elaboradas ao longo do tempo sobre o problema público. Com isso, ilustramos o processo de configuração (CEFAÏ, 1996) ou, ainda, de translação (LATOUR, 2012) que vive o problema público e influencia sua definição, as formas de interpretá-lo e também de enfrentá-lo.Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas2017-12-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/54831Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 15 No. 4 (2017) - Epistemology and Sociology of the Science of Administration; 846-876Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 15 Núm. 4 (2017) - Epistemología y Sociología de la Ciencia de la Administración; 846-876Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 15 n. 4 (2017) - Epistemologia e Sociologia da Ciência da Administração; 846-8761679-3951reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BRinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/54831/70351Copyright (c) 2017 Cadernos EBAPE.BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMoraes, Rubens LimaAndion, CarolinaPinho, Josiani Lúcia2023-02-23T19:18:28Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/54831Revistahttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebapehttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/oaicadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br1679-39511679-3951opendoar:2024-05-13T09:59:58.450830Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Cartography of disputes in the public arena of electoral corruption in Brazil
Cartografía de las controversias en la arena pública de la corrupción electoral en Brasil
Cartografia das controvérsias na arena pública da corrupção eleitoral no Brasil
title Cartography of disputes in the public arena of electoral corruption in Brazil
spellingShingle Cartography of disputes in the public arena of electoral corruption in Brazil
Moraes, Rubens Lima
Public arena
Cartography of disputes
Electoral corruption
Arena pública
Cartografía de controvérsias
Corrupción electoral
Arena pública
Cartografia das controvérsias
Corrupção eleitoral
title_short Cartography of disputes in the public arena of electoral corruption in Brazil
title_full Cartography of disputes in the public arena of electoral corruption in Brazil
title_fullStr Cartography of disputes in the public arena of electoral corruption in Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Cartography of disputes in the public arena of electoral corruption in Brazil
title_sort Cartography of disputes in the public arena of electoral corruption in Brazil
author Moraes, Rubens Lima
author_facet Moraes, Rubens Lima
Andion, Carolina
Pinho, Josiani Lúcia
author_role author
author2 Andion, Carolina
Pinho, Josiani Lúcia
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Moraes, Rubens Lima
Andion, Carolina
Pinho, Josiani Lúcia
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Public arena
Cartography of disputes
Electoral corruption
Arena pública
Cartografía de controvérsias
Corrupción electoral
Arena pública
Cartografia das controvérsias
Corrupção eleitoral
topic Public arena
Cartography of disputes
Electoral corruption
Arena pública
Cartografía de controvérsias
Corrupción electoral
Arena pública
Cartografia das controvérsias
Corrupção eleitoral
description This article explores the debate in the public arena of electoral corruption in Brazil, from a pragmatic sociology perspective, to map and unfold its main disputes. Through the approach of the Actor-Network Theory (LATOUR, 2007; 2012; 2014), we seek to grasp how the public arena of electoral corruption (re)sets over time and how this public issue is seen, interpreted, and which solutions multiple actors propose. Therefore, we provide a “ballistic” view, i.e. the nonlinear route of a public issue addressed over time (CHATEAURAYNAUD, 2011). This study is based on the methodological approach of the “cartography of disputes” (VENTURINI, 2010; 2012 and VENTURINI, RICCI, MAURI et al., 2015). In addition, we analyze the public arena in three fields: political (through newspaper articles published in Folha de São Paulo), scientific (by searching academic databases), and technical-legal (examining the most significant laws on the subject). The timeframe of the mapping was from 1988, the milestone of the Brazilian democratic opening, and goes until 2014. This allowed identifying the main actors-network, who are spokespersons for the public issue, their statements, the themes of disputes arising in the debate, and the worldviews built over time about the public issue. Thus, we illustrate the setting process (CEFAÏ, 1996) or, the translation process (LATOUR, 2012) that the public issue has gone through, which influences its definition and the ways in which it is interpreted and faced.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-12-14
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/54831
url https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/54831
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/54831/70351
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Cadernos EBAPE.BR
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Cadernos EBAPE.BR
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 15 No. 4 (2017) - Epistemology and Sociology of the Science of Administration; 846-876
Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 15 Núm. 4 (2017) - Epistemología y Sociología de la Ciencia de la Administración; 846-876
Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 15 n. 4 (2017) - Epistemologia e Sociologia da Ciência da Administração; 846-876
1679-3951
reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BR
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Cadernos EBAPE.BR
collection Cadernos EBAPE.BR
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br
_version_ 1798943210847862784