Cartography of disputes in the public arena of electoral corruption in Brazil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/54831 |
Resumo: | This article explores the debate in the public arena of electoral corruption in Brazil, from a pragmatic sociology perspective, to map and unfold its main disputes. Through the approach of the Actor-Network Theory (LATOUR, 2007; 2012; 2014), we seek to grasp how the public arena of electoral corruption (re)sets over time and how this public issue is seen, interpreted, and which solutions multiple actors propose. Therefore, we provide a “ballistic” view, i.e. the nonlinear route of a public issue addressed over time (CHATEAURAYNAUD, 2011). This study is based on the methodological approach of the “cartography of disputes” (VENTURINI, 2010; 2012 and VENTURINI, RICCI, MAURI et al., 2015). In addition, we analyze the public arena in three fields: political (through newspaper articles published in Folha de São Paulo), scientific (by searching academic databases), and technical-legal (examining the most significant laws on the subject). The timeframe of the mapping was from 1988, the milestone of the Brazilian democratic opening, and goes until 2014. This allowed identifying the main actors-network, who are spokespersons for the public issue, their statements, the themes of disputes arising in the debate, and the worldviews built over time about the public issue. Thus, we illustrate the setting process (CEFAÏ, 1996) or, the translation process (LATOUR, 2012) that the public issue has gone through, which influences its definition and the ways in which it is interpreted and faced. |
id |
FGV-9_e513cfda6967bbe0d9dbe373e192ca1b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/54831 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-9 |
network_name_str |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Cartography of disputes in the public arena of electoral corruption in BrazilCartografía de las controversias en la arena pública de la corrupción electoral en BrasilCartografia das controvérsias na arena pública da corrupção eleitoral no BrasilPublic arenaCartography of disputesElectoral corruptionArena públicaCartografía de controvérsiasCorrupción electoralArena públicaCartografia das controvérsiasCorrupção eleitoralThis article explores the debate in the public arena of electoral corruption in Brazil, from a pragmatic sociology perspective, to map and unfold its main disputes. Through the approach of the Actor-Network Theory (LATOUR, 2007; 2012; 2014), we seek to grasp how the public arena of electoral corruption (re)sets over time and how this public issue is seen, interpreted, and which solutions multiple actors propose. Therefore, we provide a “ballistic” view, i.e. the nonlinear route of a public issue addressed over time (CHATEAURAYNAUD, 2011). This study is based on the methodological approach of the “cartography of disputes” (VENTURINI, 2010; 2012 and VENTURINI, RICCI, MAURI et al., 2015). In addition, we analyze the public arena in three fields: political (through newspaper articles published in Folha de São Paulo), scientific (by searching academic databases), and technical-legal (examining the most significant laws on the subject). The timeframe of the mapping was from 1988, the milestone of the Brazilian democratic opening, and goes until 2014. This allowed identifying the main actors-network, who are spokespersons for the public issue, their statements, the themes of disputes arising in the debate, and the worldviews built over time about the public issue. Thus, we illustrate the setting process (CEFAÏ, 1996) or, the translation process (LATOUR, 2012) that the public issue has gone through, which influences its definition and the ways in which it is interpreted and faced.Este artículo explora el debate en la arena pública de la corrupción electoral en Brasil, desde la perspectiva de la sociología pragmática, buscando identificar sus principales controversias. Utilizando los postulados de la Teoría del Actor-Red (LATOUR, 2007, 2012 y 2014), tratamos de entender cómo el problema público de la corrupción electoral se (re) configura con el tiempo, cómo es interpretado y cómo se proponen soluciones para ello. Se trata de comprender la trayectoria no lineal o la “balística” del problema público (CHATEAURAYNAUD, 2011). Para ello, utilizamos como enfoque metodológico la “cartografía de las controversias” (VENTURINI, 2007, 2009 y 2010), efectuando el análisis de la escena pública en tres campos: político (a través de la encuesta de noticias del diario Folha de São Paulo), científico (mediante la búsqueda en las bases de datos) y técnico-legal (con el examen de las leyes más importantes sobre la materia). El mapeo, que tuvo como punto de partida el año 1988 - marco de la apertura democrática en Brasil - se extendió hasta el año 2014 y permitió identificar los principales “actores-red”, voceros del problema público, sus declaraciones, los temas de controversia que surgen en el debate y las visiones de mundo sobre la cuestión de la corrupción electoral. Así, se ilustra el proceso de “configuración” (CEFAÏ, 1996) o incluso de “traducción” (LATOUR, 2012) del problema público, que influye en su definición y en las formas de interpretarlo y enfrentarlo.Este artigo explora o debate na arena pública da corrupção eleitoral no Brasil, sob o prisma da sociologia pragmática, buscando mapear e desdobrar suas principais controvérsias. Adotando os postulados da Teoria do Ator-Rede (LATOUR, 2007; 2012; 2014), buscamos compreender como a arena pública da corrupção eleitoral se (re) configura ao longo do tempo e como esse problema público é visto, interpretado e quais soluções são propostas. Trata-se, portanto, de visualizar a “balística”, ou seja, a trajetória não linear do problema público ao longo do tempo (CHATEAURAYNAUD, 2011). Para tanto, usamos como enfoque metodológico a “cartografia de controvérsias” (VENTURINI, 2010; 2012, VENTURINI, RICCI e MAURI et al., 2015), analisando a arena pública em três campos: político (por meio do levantamento de notícias do jornal Folha de São Paulo), científico (em pesquisa nas bases de dados) e técnico-legal (com o exame das leis mais importantes referentes à matéria). O mapeamento teve como ponto de partida o ano de 1988, marco da abertura democrática no Brasil, e foi feito até 2014, permitindo identificar os principais atores-rede porta-vozes do problema público, suas declarações, os temas das controvérsias que emergem no debate e as visões de mundo elaboradas ao longo do tempo sobre o problema público. Com isso, ilustramos o processo de configuração (CEFAÏ, 1996) ou, ainda, de translação (LATOUR, 2012) que vive o problema público e influencia sua definição, as formas de interpretá-lo e também de enfrentá-lo.Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas2017-12-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/54831Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 15 No. 4 (2017) - Epistemology and Sociology of the Science of Administration; 846-876Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 15 Núm. 4 (2017) - Epistemología y Sociología de la Ciencia de la Administración; 846-876Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 15 n. 4 (2017) - Epistemologia e Sociologia da Ciência da Administração; 846-8761679-3951reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BRinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/54831/70351Copyright (c) 2017 Cadernos EBAPE.BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMoraes, Rubens LimaAndion, CarolinaPinho, Josiani Lúcia2023-02-23T19:18:28Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/54831Revistahttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebapehttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/oaicadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br1679-39511679-3951opendoar:2024-05-13T09:59:58.450830Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Cartography of disputes in the public arena of electoral corruption in Brazil Cartografía de las controversias en la arena pública de la corrupción electoral en Brasil Cartografia das controvérsias na arena pública da corrupção eleitoral no Brasil |
title |
Cartography of disputes in the public arena of electoral corruption in Brazil |
spellingShingle |
Cartography of disputes in the public arena of electoral corruption in Brazil Moraes, Rubens Lima Public arena Cartography of disputes Electoral corruption Arena pública Cartografía de controvérsias Corrupción electoral Arena pública Cartografia das controvérsias Corrupção eleitoral |
title_short |
Cartography of disputes in the public arena of electoral corruption in Brazil |
title_full |
Cartography of disputes in the public arena of electoral corruption in Brazil |
title_fullStr |
Cartography of disputes in the public arena of electoral corruption in Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Cartography of disputes in the public arena of electoral corruption in Brazil |
title_sort |
Cartography of disputes in the public arena of electoral corruption in Brazil |
author |
Moraes, Rubens Lima |
author_facet |
Moraes, Rubens Lima Andion, Carolina Pinho, Josiani Lúcia |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Andion, Carolina Pinho, Josiani Lúcia |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Moraes, Rubens Lima Andion, Carolina Pinho, Josiani Lúcia |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Public arena Cartography of disputes Electoral corruption Arena pública Cartografía de controvérsias Corrupción electoral Arena pública Cartografia das controvérsias Corrupção eleitoral |
topic |
Public arena Cartography of disputes Electoral corruption Arena pública Cartografía de controvérsias Corrupción electoral Arena pública Cartografia das controvérsias Corrupção eleitoral |
description |
This article explores the debate in the public arena of electoral corruption in Brazil, from a pragmatic sociology perspective, to map and unfold its main disputes. Through the approach of the Actor-Network Theory (LATOUR, 2007; 2012; 2014), we seek to grasp how the public arena of electoral corruption (re)sets over time and how this public issue is seen, interpreted, and which solutions multiple actors propose. Therefore, we provide a “ballistic” view, i.e. the nonlinear route of a public issue addressed over time (CHATEAURAYNAUD, 2011). This study is based on the methodological approach of the “cartography of disputes” (VENTURINI, 2010; 2012 and VENTURINI, RICCI, MAURI et al., 2015). In addition, we analyze the public arena in three fields: political (through newspaper articles published in Folha de São Paulo), scientific (by searching academic databases), and technical-legal (examining the most significant laws on the subject). The timeframe of the mapping was from 1988, the milestone of the Brazilian democratic opening, and goes until 2014. This allowed identifying the main actors-network, who are spokespersons for the public issue, their statements, the themes of disputes arising in the debate, and the worldviews built over time about the public issue. Thus, we illustrate the setting process (CEFAÏ, 1996) or, the translation process (LATOUR, 2012) that the public issue has gone through, which influences its definition and the ways in which it is interpreted and faced. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-12-14 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/54831 |
url |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/54831 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/54831/70351 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Cadernos EBAPE.BR info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 15 No. 4 (2017) - Epistemology and Sociology of the Science of Administration; 846-876 Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 15 Núm. 4 (2017) - Epistemología y Sociología de la Ciencia de la Administración; 846-876 Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 15 n. 4 (2017) - Epistemologia e Sociologia da Ciência da Administração; 846-876 1679-3951 reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BR instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
collection |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1798943210847862784 |