Three-dimensional cell culture: nearing the gap between in vitro and in vivo models

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Costa, Marianna Cavalheiro da
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Barros, Ana Paula Dantas Nunes de, Louback, Rafaela de Assiz, Rossi, Maria Isabel Doria
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
Texto Completo: https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1047
Resumo: Introduction: Biotechnological advances in association with the pressure to substitute animal experimentation impelled the development of in vitro models that are more physiological and predictive of in vivo response. Objective: To discuss advantages and limitations of threedimensional (3D) cell culture models. Method: Review of the scientific literature at PubMed using the keywords “3D culture”, spheroid, organoid, “organotypic culture”, “alternative model”, microfluidic, organ-on-a-chip and biotechnology, individually and in different combinations. The search period was from 1971 to 2017. Results: Traditional monolayer cell culture assays, although extensively used, do not reproduce the cell-cell and cellextracellular matrix interactions that create physical and chemical gradients and that control cell functions, such as survival, proliferation, differentiation, migration, and protein and gene expression. 3D cell culture models are able to mimic more physiological microenvironment. The number of manuscripts published in this period reflects the scientific interest in the field. Conclusions: Although 3D models have unequivocally contributed to the bioengineering, morphogenesis, oncology, and toxicology fields, many challenges remain. The high cost of some of these models, to reproduce the mechanical spatiotemporal features of the tissues, as wells as the lack of standard protocols should be taken into account. Here we discuss the advantages and limitations of some 3D cell culture models.
id FIOCRUZ-9_62efb41638dbd4863429c503b03098d5
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1047
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-9
network_name_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository_id_str
spelling Three-dimensional cell culture: nearing the gap between in vitro and in vivo modelsModelos tridimensionais de cultura de células: aproximando o in vitro do in vivoCultura 3DModelo AlternativoEsferoide MulticelularCultura OrganotípicaOrganoide3D CultureAlternative ModelMulticellular SpheroidOrganotypic CultureOrganoidIntroduction: Biotechnological advances in association with the pressure to substitute animal experimentation impelled the development of in vitro models that are more physiological and predictive of in vivo response. Objective: To discuss advantages and limitations of threedimensional (3D) cell culture models. Method: Review of the scientific literature at PubMed using the keywords “3D culture”, spheroid, organoid, “organotypic culture”, “alternative model”, microfluidic, organ-on-a-chip and biotechnology, individually and in different combinations. The search period was from 1971 to 2017. Results: Traditional monolayer cell culture assays, although extensively used, do not reproduce the cell-cell and cellextracellular matrix interactions that create physical and chemical gradients and that control cell functions, such as survival, proliferation, differentiation, migration, and protein and gene expression. 3D cell culture models are able to mimic more physiological microenvironment. The number of manuscripts published in this period reflects the scientific interest in the field. Conclusions: Although 3D models have unequivocally contributed to the bioengineering, morphogenesis, oncology, and toxicology fields, many challenges remain. The high cost of some of these models, to reproduce the mechanical spatiotemporal features of the tissues, as wells as the lack of standard protocols should be taken into account. Here we discuss the advantages and limitations of some 3D cell culture models.Introdução: Os avanços biotecnológicos em associação com a pressão para substituir a experimentação animal impulsionam o desenvolvimento de modelos in vitro mais fisiológicos e preditivos da resposta in vivo. Objetivo: Discutir vantagens e limitações de modelos tridimensionais (3D) de cultura de células. Método: Revisão da literatura na base PubMed utilizando os termos “3D culture”, spheroid, organoid, “organotypic culture”, “alternative model”, microfluidic, organ-on-a-chip e biotechnology, individualmente e em diferentes combinações. A pesquisa abrangeu o período de 1971 a 2017. Resultados: Ensaios tradicionais de cultura em monocamada, embora sejam amplamente utilizados, não reproduzem as interações célula-célula e célula-matriz extracelular, que criam gradientes físicos e químicos e controlam funções celulares, como sobrevivência, proliferação, diferenciação, migração e expressão de genes e proteínas. Modelos 3D de cultura de células são capazes de mimetizar um microambiente mais fisiológico. O número de publicações no período estudado reflete o crescente interesse científico no tema. Conclusões: Embora os modelos 3D tenham inequivocamente contribuído para as áreas de bioengenharia, morfogênese, oncologia e toxicologia, muitos desafios permanecem. O custo elevado de alguns destes modelos, reproduzir as características mecânicas, espaciais e temporais dos tecidos, assim como a necessidade de desenvolver protocolos padronizados devem ser considerados.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2018-02-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/104710.22239/2317-269X.01047Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 6 No. 1 (2018): February - Tecnologias celulares avançadas: desafios biotecnológicos e regulatórios; 72-83Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 6 Núm. 1 (2018): Febrero - Tecnologias celulares avançadas: desafios biotecnológicos e regulatórios; 72-83Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 6 n. 1 (2018): Fevereiro - Tecnologias celulares avançadas: desafios biotecnológicos e regulatórios; 72-832317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporenghttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1047/431https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1047/564Copyright (c) 2018 Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCosta, Marianna Cavalheiro daBarros, Ana Paula Dantas Nunes deLouback, Rafaela de AssizRossi, Maria Isabel Doria2023-06-27T15:07:41Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1047Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-06-27T15:07:41Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Three-dimensional cell culture: nearing the gap between in vitro and in vivo models
Modelos tridimensionais de cultura de células: aproximando o in vitro do in vivo
title Three-dimensional cell culture: nearing the gap between in vitro and in vivo models
spellingShingle Three-dimensional cell culture: nearing the gap between in vitro and in vivo models
Costa, Marianna Cavalheiro da
Cultura 3D
Modelo Alternativo
Esferoide Multicelular
Cultura Organotípica
Organoide
3D Culture
Alternative Model
Multicellular Spheroid
Organotypic Culture
Organoid
title_short Three-dimensional cell culture: nearing the gap between in vitro and in vivo models
title_full Three-dimensional cell culture: nearing the gap between in vitro and in vivo models
title_fullStr Three-dimensional cell culture: nearing the gap between in vitro and in vivo models
title_full_unstemmed Three-dimensional cell culture: nearing the gap between in vitro and in vivo models
title_sort Three-dimensional cell culture: nearing the gap between in vitro and in vivo models
author Costa, Marianna Cavalheiro da
author_facet Costa, Marianna Cavalheiro da
Barros, Ana Paula Dantas Nunes de
Louback, Rafaela de Assiz
Rossi, Maria Isabel Doria
author_role author
author2 Barros, Ana Paula Dantas Nunes de
Louback, Rafaela de Assiz
Rossi, Maria Isabel Doria
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Costa, Marianna Cavalheiro da
Barros, Ana Paula Dantas Nunes de
Louback, Rafaela de Assiz
Rossi, Maria Isabel Doria
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cultura 3D
Modelo Alternativo
Esferoide Multicelular
Cultura Organotípica
Organoide
3D Culture
Alternative Model
Multicellular Spheroid
Organotypic Culture
Organoid
topic Cultura 3D
Modelo Alternativo
Esferoide Multicelular
Cultura Organotípica
Organoide
3D Culture
Alternative Model
Multicellular Spheroid
Organotypic Culture
Organoid
description Introduction: Biotechnological advances in association with the pressure to substitute animal experimentation impelled the development of in vitro models that are more physiological and predictive of in vivo response. Objective: To discuss advantages and limitations of threedimensional (3D) cell culture models. Method: Review of the scientific literature at PubMed using the keywords “3D culture”, spheroid, organoid, “organotypic culture”, “alternative model”, microfluidic, organ-on-a-chip and biotechnology, individually and in different combinations. The search period was from 1971 to 2017. Results: Traditional monolayer cell culture assays, although extensively used, do not reproduce the cell-cell and cellextracellular matrix interactions that create physical and chemical gradients and that control cell functions, such as survival, proliferation, differentiation, migration, and protein and gene expression. 3D cell culture models are able to mimic more physiological microenvironment. The number of manuscripts published in this period reflects the scientific interest in the field. Conclusions: Although 3D models have unequivocally contributed to the bioengineering, morphogenesis, oncology, and toxicology fields, many challenges remain. The high cost of some of these models, to reproduce the mechanical spatiotemporal features of the tissues, as wells as the lack of standard protocols should be taken into account. Here we discuss the advantages and limitations of some 3D cell culture models.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-02-28
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
"Peer-reviewed article"
"Artículo revisado por pares"
"Artigo avaliado pelos pares"
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1047
10.22239/2317-269X.01047
url https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1047
identifier_str_mv 10.22239/2317-269X.01047
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1047/431
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1047/564
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 6 No. 1 (2018): February - Tecnologias celulares avançadas: desafios biotecnológicos e regulatórios; 72-83
Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 6 Núm. 1 (2018): Febrero - Tecnologias celulares avançadas: desafios biotecnológicos e regulatórios; 72-83
Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 6 n. 1 (2018): Fevereiro - Tecnologias celulares avançadas: desafios biotecnológicos e regulatórios; 72-83
2317-269X
reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
collection Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository.name.fl_str_mv Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br
_version_ 1797042045185949696