Adequacy of the best practices manual of and of the standard operating procedures in food services in Ponta Grossa, State of Paraná

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Belphman, Cristiane
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Batistel Szczerepa, Sunáli
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
Texto Completo: https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1221
Resumo: Introduction: The Best Practices Manual (BPM) and the Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) are documents that are intended to portray the operations performed by establishments. Objective: In this context, the present work had as objective to emphasize the adequacy of these documents in food services. Method: Thus, the BPMs and SOPs of 15 food services were evaluated on the spot, divided into three categories, using a checklist elaborated based on the sanitary legislation in force. This list consisted of eight items on the BPM and eight on the SOPs and included aspects such as language, presence of mandatory items, storage location and update status of the documents. Results: The average adequacy of BPM andSOPs was 60.62% and 80.50%, respectively. However, differences were observed among the three categories of establishments, with a lower level of adequacy in the food and nutrition units. In addition, some documents did not portray the reality of the places and did not present signatures, fact that indicates lack of commitment of its implementation. The language used was not simple and understandable and many documents were outdated. Conclusions: This analysis allows to conclude that although food services present BPM and SOPs, many points in their elaboration and implementation need to be improved. 
id FIOCRUZ-9_fd61af1a783958a7e2bbd1dc93166487
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1221
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-9
network_name_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository_id_str
spelling Adequacy of the best practices manual of and of the standard operating procedures in food services in Ponta Grossa, State of ParanáAdequação do manual de boas práticas e dos procedimentos operacionais padronizados em serviços de alimentação de Ponta Grossa, ParanáLegislação SanitáriaHigiene dos AlimentosManipulação de AlimentosDocumentosHealth LegislationFood HygieneFood HandlingDocumentsIntroduction: The Best Practices Manual (BPM) and the Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) are documents that are intended to portray the operations performed by establishments. Objective: In this context, the present work had as objective to emphasize the adequacy of these documents in food services. Method: Thus, the BPMs and SOPs of 15 food services were evaluated on the spot, divided into three categories, using a checklist elaborated based on the sanitary legislation in force. This list consisted of eight items on the BPM and eight on the SOPs and included aspects such as language, presence of mandatory items, storage location and update status of the documents. Results: The average adequacy of BPM andSOPs was 60.62% and 80.50%, respectively. However, differences were observed among the three categories of establishments, with a lower level of adequacy in the food and nutrition units. In addition, some documents did not portray the reality of the places and did not present signatures, fact that indicates lack of commitment of its implementation. The language used was not simple and understandable and many documents were outdated. Conclusions: This analysis allows to conclude that although food services present BPM and SOPs, many points in their elaboration and implementation need to be improved.  Introdução: O Manual de Boas Práticas (MBP) e os Procedimentos Operacionais Padronizados (POP) são documentos que têm como finalidade retratar as operações executadas pelos estabelecimentos. Objetivo: Nesse contexto, o presente trabalho teve como objetivo analisar a adequação destes documentos em serviços de alimentação. Método: Assim, foram avaliados in loco os MBP e POP de 15 serviços de alimentação, divididos em três categorias, sendo utilizada uma lista de verificação elaborada com base nas legislações sanitárias vigentes. Esta lista era composta por oito itens sobre o MPB e oito sobre os POP e contemplava aspectos como linguagem, presença dos itens obrigatórios, local de armazenamento e estado de atualização dos documentos. Resultados: A média de adequação dos manuais e dos POP foi de 60,62% e 80,50%, respectivamente. Contudo, foram verificadas diferenças entre as três categorias de estabelecimentos, com menor nível de adequação nas unidades de alimentação e nutrição. Além disso, alguns documentos não retratavam a realidade dos locais e não apresentavam assinaturas, fato que aponta falta de compromisso em sua implementação. A linguagem utilizada não era simples e compreensível e muitos documentos estavam desatualizados. Conclusões: Com base nessa análise, conclui-se que embora os serviços de alimentação apresentem MBP e POP, muitos pontos na elaboração e implementação precisam ser melhorados.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2019-05-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/122110.22239/2317-269x.01221Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 7 No. 2 (2019): May; 69-74Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 7 Núm. 2 (2019): Puede; 69-74Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 7 n. 2 (2019): Maio; 69-742317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporenghttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1221/1014https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1221/1073Copyright (c) 2019 Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBelphman, CristianeBatistel Szczerepa, Sunáli2023-06-27T15:11:12Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1221Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-06-27T15:11:12Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Adequacy of the best practices manual of and of the standard operating procedures in food services in Ponta Grossa, State of Paraná
Adequação do manual de boas práticas e dos procedimentos operacionais padronizados em serviços de alimentação de Ponta Grossa, Paraná
title Adequacy of the best practices manual of and of the standard operating procedures in food services in Ponta Grossa, State of Paraná
spellingShingle Adequacy of the best practices manual of and of the standard operating procedures in food services in Ponta Grossa, State of Paraná
Belphman, Cristiane
Legislação Sanitária
Higiene dos Alimentos
Manipulação de Alimentos
Documentos
Health Legislation
Food Hygiene
Food Handling
Documents
title_short Adequacy of the best practices manual of and of the standard operating procedures in food services in Ponta Grossa, State of Paraná
title_full Adequacy of the best practices manual of and of the standard operating procedures in food services in Ponta Grossa, State of Paraná
title_fullStr Adequacy of the best practices manual of and of the standard operating procedures in food services in Ponta Grossa, State of Paraná
title_full_unstemmed Adequacy of the best practices manual of and of the standard operating procedures in food services in Ponta Grossa, State of Paraná
title_sort Adequacy of the best practices manual of and of the standard operating procedures in food services in Ponta Grossa, State of Paraná
author Belphman, Cristiane
author_facet Belphman, Cristiane
Batistel Szczerepa, Sunáli
author_role author
author2 Batistel Szczerepa, Sunáli
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Belphman, Cristiane
Batistel Szczerepa, Sunáli
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Legislação Sanitária
Higiene dos Alimentos
Manipulação de Alimentos
Documentos
Health Legislation
Food Hygiene
Food Handling
Documents
topic Legislação Sanitária
Higiene dos Alimentos
Manipulação de Alimentos
Documentos
Health Legislation
Food Hygiene
Food Handling
Documents
description Introduction: The Best Practices Manual (BPM) and the Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) are documents that are intended to portray the operations performed by establishments. Objective: In this context, the present work had as objective to emphasize the adequacy of these documents in food services. Method: Thus, the BPMs and SOPs of 15 food services were evaluated on the spot, divided into three categories, using a checklist elaborated based on the sanitary legislation in force. This list consisted of eight items on the BPM and eight on the SOPs and included aspects such as language, presence of mandatory items, storage location and update status of the documents. Results: The average adequacy of BPM andSOPs was 60.62% and 80.50%, respectively. However, differences were observed among the three categories of establishments, with a lower level of adequacy in the food and nutrition units. In addition, some documents did not portray the reality of the places and did not present signatures, fact that indicates lack of commitment of its implementation. The language used was not simple and understandable and many documents were outdated. Conclusions: This analysis allows to conclude that although food services present BPM and SOPs, many points in their elaboration and implementation need to be improved. 
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-05-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
"Peer-reviewed article"
"Artículo revisado por pares"
"Artigo avaliado pelos pares"
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1221
10.22239/2317-269x.01221
url https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1221
identifier_str_mv 10.22239/2317-269x.01221
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1221/1014
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1221/1073
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 7 No. 2 (2019): May; 69-74
Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 7 Núm. 2 (2019): Puede; 69-74
Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 7 n. 2 (2019): Maio; 69-74
2317-269X
reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
collection Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository.name.fl_str_mv Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br
_version_ 1797042045296050176