The Constitutionality of Parallel Civil Forfeiture Proceedings and Criminal Prosecutions under the Double Jeopardy Clause in the United States
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/338 |
Resumo: | In the Unites States the existence of statutes that allow to declare forfeiture of the property used in certain prohibited ways in civil proceedings without the general safeguards of criminal law is an extended legal practice. This parallel law enforcement system, however, has raised several constitutional discussions. One of these debates concerns the compatibility of the parallel system with the double jeopardy clause: does the double jeopardy clause bar the government from bringing a civil forfeiture proceeding against a defendant that has previously been convicted in a criminal court for the same offence? The aim of the present article is studying the evolution of the case law of the Supreme Court of the United States on the constitutionality of parallel civil forfeiture proceedings and criminal prosecutions under the double jeopardy clause, analysing the current state of the jurisprudence and its possible further developments. |
id |
IBRASPP-1_09de8fe695212fecc0c53551eaa62b1c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/338 |
network_acronym_str |
IBRASPP-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The Constitutionality of Parallel Civil Forfeiture Proceedings and Criminal Prosecutions under the Double Jeopardy Clause in the United StatesLa constitucionalidad de procedimientos de comiso civil y procesos penales paralelos bajo la cláusula double jeopardy en los Estados UnidosCivil forfeituredouble jeopardy clausene bis in idemprohibition of multiple punishmentsexcessive fines clause.Comiso civilcláusula double jeopardyne bis in idemprohibición de sanción múltipleprohibición de multas excesivas.In the Unites States the existence of statutes that allow to declare forfeiture of the property used in certain prohibited ways in civil proceedings without the general safeguards of criminal law is an extended legal practice. This parallel law enforcement system, however, has raised several constitutional discussions. One of these debates concerns the compatibility of the parallel system with the double jeopardy clause: does the double jeopardy clause bar the government from bringing a civil forfeiture proceeding against a defendant that has previously been convicted in a criminal court for the same offence? The aim of the present article is studying the evolution of the case law of the Supreme Court of the United States on the constitutionality of parallel civil forfeiture proceedings and criminal prosecutions under the double jeopardy clause, analysing the current state of the jurisprudence and its possible further developments. En los Estados Unidos la existencia de leyes que permiten declarar el comiso de la propiedad utilizada en determinadas maneras prohibidas en un procedimiento civil sin las garantías generales del derecho penal es una práctica legal extendida. Este sistema paralelo de cumplimiento del derecho ha suscitado diversas discusiones constitucionales. Una de estas discusiones dice relación con la compatibilidad de este sistema paralelo con la cláusula double jeopardy: ¿prohíbe la cláusula double jeopardy que el gobierno incoe un procedimiento de comiso civil en contra de una persona que haya sido previamente condenada en sede penal por los mismos hechos? El objetivo del presente artículo es estudiar la evolución de la jurisprudencia de la Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos sobre la constitucionalidad de la incoación paralela de procesos penales y procedimientos de comiso civil bajo la cláusula de doble riesgo, analizando el estado actual de la jurisprudencia y sus posibles repercusiones. Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2020-06-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/33810.22197/rbdpp.v6i2.338Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 6 No. 2 (2020); 701-733Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 6 Núm. 2 (2020); 701-733Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 6 N. 2 (2020); 701-733Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 6 n. 2 (2020); 701-7332525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v6i2reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPenghttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/338/221https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/338/250Copyright (c) 2020 Javier Escobar Veasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEscobar Veas, Javier2020-09-29T10:15:21Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/338Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2020-09-29T10:15:21Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The Constitutionality of Parallel Civil Forfeiture Proceedings and Criminal Prosecutions under the Double Jeopardy Clause in the United States La constitucionalidad de procedimientos de comiso civil y procesos penales paralelos bajo la cláusula double jeopardy en los Estados Unidos |
title |
The Constitutionality of Parallel Civil Forfeiture Proceedings and Criminal Prosecutions under the Double Jeopardy Clause in the United States |
spellingShingle |
The Constitutionality of Parallel Civil Forfeiture Proceedings and Criminal Prosecutions under the Double Jeopardy Clause in the United States Escobar Veas, Javier Civil forfeiture double jeopardy clause ne bis in idem prohibition of multiple punishments excessive fines clause. Comiso civil cláusula double jeopardy ne bis in idem prohibición de sanción múltiple prohibición de multas excesivas. |
title_short |
The Constitutionality of Parallel Civil Forfeiture Proceedings and Criminal Prosecutions under the Double Jeopardy Clause in the United States |
title_full |
The Constitutionality of Parallel Civil Forfeiture Proceedings and Criminal Prosecutions under the Double Jeopardy Clause in the United States |
title_fullStr |
The Constitutionality of Parallel Civil Forfeiture Proceedings and Criminal Prosecutions under the Double Jeopardy Clause in the United States |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Constitutionality of Parallel Civil Forfeiture Proceedings and Criminal Prosecutions under the Double Jeopardy Clause in the United States |
title_sort |
The Constitutionality of Parallel Civil Forfeiture Proceedings and Criminal Prosecutions under the Double Jeopardy Clause in the United States |
author |
Escobar Veas, Javier |
author_facet |
Escobar Veas, Javier |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Escobar Veas, Javier |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Civil forfeiture double jeopardy clause ne bis in idem prohibition of multiple punishments excessive fines clause. Comiso civil cláusula double jeopardy ne bis in idem prohibición de sanción múltiple prohibición de multas excesivas. |
topic |
Civil forfeiture double jeopardy clause ne bis in idem prohibition of multiple punishments excessive fines clause. Comiso civil cláusula double jeopardy ne bis in idem prohibición de sanción múltiple prohibición de multas excesivas. |
description |
In the Unites States the existence of statutes that allow to declare forfeiture of the property used in certain prohibited ways in civil proceedings without the general safeguards of criminal law is an extended legal practice. This parallel law enforcement system, however, has raised several constitutional discussions. One of these debates concerns the compatibility of the parallel system with the double jeopardy clause: does the double jeopardy clause bar the government from bringing a civil forfeiture proceeding against a defendant that has previously been convicted in a criminal court for the same offence? The aim of the present article is studying the evolution of the case law of the Supreme Court of the United States on the constitutionality of parallel civil forfeiture proceedings and criminal prosecutions under the double jeopardy clause, analysing the current state of the jurisprudence and its possible further developments. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-06-27 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/338 10.22197/rbdpp.v6i2.338 |
url |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/338 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22197/rbdpp.v6i2.338 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/338/221 https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/338/250 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Javier Escobar Veas info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Javier Escobar Veas |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/xml |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 6 No. 2 (2020); 701-733 Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 6 Núm. 2 (2020); 701-733 Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 6 N. 2 (2020); 701-733 Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 6 n. 2 (2020); 701-733 2525-510X 10.22197/rbdpp.v6i2 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) instacron:IBRASPP |
instname_str |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) |
instacron_str |
IBRASPP |
institution |
IBRASPP |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista@ibraspp.com.br |
_version_ |
1798329402338050048 |